Trump will make Iran war decision ‘within next two weeks'
US President Donald Trump said in a statement that he wanted to give negotiations a chance. PHOTO: NYTIMES
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on June 19 said he will decide whether to attack Iran within a fortnight, as Israel and its regional rival continued to trade fire for a seventh day.
'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Mr Trump said, in a statement read out by his press secretary, Ms Karoline Leavitt. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
43 minutes ago
- CNA
Iran could again enrich uranium 'in matter of months': UN nuclear watchdog chief
WASHINGTON: UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi says Iran likely will be able to begin to produce enriched uranium"in a matter of months", despite damage to several nuclear facilities from US and Israeli attacks, CBS News said on Saturday (Jun 28). Israel launched a bombing campaign on Iranian nuclear and military sites on Jun 13, saying it was aimed at keeping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon - an ambition the Islamic republic has consistently denied. The United States subsequently bombed three key facilities used for Tehran's atomic programme. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says the extent of the damage to the nuclear sites is "serious", but the details are unknown. US President Donald Trump insisted Iran's nuclear programme had been set back "decades". But Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said "some is still standing". "They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that," Grossi said Friday, according to a transcript of the interview released Saturday. Another key question is whether Iran was able to relocate some or all of its estimated 408.6kg stockpile of highly enriched uranium before the attacks. The uranium in question is enriched to 60 per cent - above levels for civilian usage but still below weapons grade. That material, if further refined, would theoretically be sufficient to produce more than nine nuclear bombs. Grossi admitted to CBS: "We don't know where this material could be". "So some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. So there has to be at some point a clarification," he said in the interview. For now, Iranian lawmakers voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA and Tehran rejected Grossi's request for a visit to the damaged sites, especially Fordo, the main uranium enrichment facility. "We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened," Grossi said. In a separate interview with Fox News's "Sunday Morning Futures" programme, Trump said he did not think the stockpile had been moved. "It's a very hard thing to do plus we didn't give much notice," he said, according to excerpts of the interview. "They didn't move anything". US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday underscored Washington's support for "the IAEA's critical verification and monitoring efforts in Iran", commending Grossi and his agency for their "dedication and professionalism".
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Trump says 'not going to stand' for Netanyahu's continued prosecution
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said on Saturday (Jun 28) the United States was "not going to stand" for the continued prosecution of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on corruption charges. "The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. An Israeli court on Friday rejected Netanyahu's request to postpone giving testimony in his corruption trial, ruling that he had not provided adequate justification for his request. In one case, Netanyahu and his wife Sara are accused of accepting more than US$260,000 worth of luxury goods such as cigars, jewellery and champagne from billionaires in exchange for political favours. In two other cases, Netanyahu is accused of attempting to negotiate more favourable coverage from two Israeli media outlets. Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing and has thanked Trump for his support in Israel's war with Iran, which saw a ceasefire agreement earlier this week. His lawyer had asked the court to excuse the leader from hearings over the next two weeks, saying he needs to concentrate on "security issues". Trump on Wednesday sprung to Netanyahu's defence, describing the case against him as a "witch hunt". On Saturday, he described Netanyahu as a "War Hero" and said the case would distract the prime minister from negotiations with Iran and with Hamas, the Gaza-based Palestinian armed group that Israel is at war with. "This travesty of 'Justice' will interfere with both Iran and Hamas negotiations," said Trump, although it was unclear what negotiations he was referring to with regards to Iran. Hamas took 251 hostages during its Oct 7, 2023, attack on Israel, with 49 still believed to be held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Negotiations are ongoing for the return of the remaining hostages and the bodies of those killed, while Israel's punishing war on Gaza continues unabated. The US leader also likened Netanyahu's legal troubles to his own before he took office for his second term. "It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure," said Trump. The Republican was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records in May 2024 in a case related to hush money payments to a porn star.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Musk wades back into politics, slamming Trump's domestic policy bill
Mr Elon Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, had been relatively quiet since his blowup with the president in June. PHOTO: REUTERS Mr Elon Musk waded back into the political fray on June 28, slamming a major domestic policy bill that Senate Republicans are scrambling to pass, just weeks after he ended a feud with President Donald Trump over the legislation. In the wee hours of the morning on June 28, GOP leaders released a new 940-page version of the legislation to carry out the President's agenda. Like the House version, the bill would slash taxes, scale back Medicaid, cut nutritional assistance and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. But the Senate also included some new measures intended to mollify holdouts in the Republican ranks, including a fund to help rural hospitals that depend on Medicaid. Leaders in the Republican majority are hoping to push the bill through the Senate and win final approval in the House before Mr Trump's deadline of July 4. Mr Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, had been relatively quiet since his blowup with the president in June, but as the Senate convened to discuss the package on the afternoon of June 28, he reentered the debate, calling the bill 'utterly insane and destructive' in a post on his social platform X. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' he wrote. The bill lies at the center of his earlier feud with the President. Mr Musk had said he believed that the package would significantly add to the national debt and would undermine the savings he claims were found by the Department of Government Efficiency, a federal government cost-cutting project he led. He called the bill a 'disgusting abomination' that would make the country bankrupt. The spat quickly became personal as both men unleashed a torrent of attacks at each other. Mr Musk suggested that Mr Trump was named in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein, the financier and convicted sex offender who killed himself in jail while awaiting trial. Mr Trump said that Mr Musk's 'crazy' behavior was linked to drug use. The war of words came as Mr Musk was taking a step back from his role in the Trump administration to focus on his companies, which had been struggling. Though Mr Trump said he had no interest in repairing their relationship, Mr Musk said a week after their dispute that he regretted some of his posts and felt that he 'went too far', signaling a possible truce. It is unclear how much influence Mr Musk wields over the Senate and what, if any, impact his views will have on the passage of the legislation. But his recent comments criticising what Mr Trump calls his 'Big Beautiful Bill' certainly do not bode well for his relationship with the President. NY TIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
