
Trump says he wants to deport ‘the worst of the worst.' Government data tell another story
But government data around ongoing detentions tell a different story.
There has been an increase of arrests by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement since Trump began his second term, with reports of raids across the country. Yet the majority of people currently detained by ICE have no criminal convictions. Of those who do, relatively few have been convicted of high-level crimes — a stark contrast to the chilling nightmare Trump describes to support his border security agenda.
'There's a deep disconnect between the rhetoric and the reality,' said Ahilan Arulanantham, co-faculty director of the UCLA Law School's Center for Immigration Law and Policy. 'This administration, and also in the prior Trump administration, they consistently claim to be going after the worst of the worst and just talk about immigration enforcement as though it is all about going after violent, dangerous people with extensive criminal histories. And yet overwhelmingly, it's people they're targeting for arrest who have no criminal history of any kind.'
The latest ICE statistics show that as of June 29, there were 57,861 people detained by ICE, 41,495 — 71.7% — of whom had no criminal convictions. That includes 14,318 people with pending criminal charges and 27,177 who are subject to immigration enforcement but have no known criminal convictions or pending criminal charges.
Each detainee is assigned a threat level by ICE on a scale of 1 to 3, with one being the highest. Those without a criminal record are classified as having 'no ICE threat level.' As of June 23, the latest data available, 84% of people detained at 201 facilities nationwide were not given a threat level. Another 7% had been graded as a level 1 threat, 4% were level 2 and 5% were level 3.
'President Trump has justified this immigration agenda in part by making false claims that migrants are driving violent crime in the United States, and that's just simply not true,' said Lauren-Brooke Eisen, senior director of the justice program at the Brennan Center for Justice. 'There's no research and evidence that supports his claims.'
Tricia McLaughlin, an assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, called the assessment that ICE isn't targeting immigrants with a criminal record 'false' and said that DHS Secretary Kristi Noem has directed ICE 'to target the worst of the worst—including gang members, murderers, and rapists.' She counted detainees with convictions, as well as those with pending charges, as 'criminal illegal aliens.'
Nonpublic data obtained by the Cato Institute show that as of June 14, 65% of the more than 204,000 people processed into the system by ICE since the start of fiscal year 2025, which began Oct. 1, 2024, had no criminal convictions. Of those with convictions, only 6.9% had committed a violent crime, while 53% had committed nonviolent crimes that fell into three main categories — immigration, traffic, or vice crimes.
Total ICE arrests shot up at the end of May after White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller gave the agency a quota of 3,000 arrests a day, up from 650 a day in the first five months of Trump's second term. ICE arrested nearly 30% more people in May than in April, according to the Transactional Records Clearinghouse. That number rose again in June, by another 28%.
The Cato Institute found that between Feb. 8 and May 17, the daily average of 'noncriminals' processed into the system ranged from 421 to 454. In the following two weeks at the end of May, that number rose to 678 and then rose to 927 in the period from June 1 through June 14.
'What you're seeing is this huge increase in funding to detain people, remove people, enforce immigration laws,' Eisen said. 'And what we're seeing is that … these are not people who are dangerous.'
Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, said the administration is intensely focused on rooting out unvetted criminals who are in the country illegally.
'Just this week, the Administration conducted a successful operation rescuing children from labor exploitation at a marijuana facility in California, and continued arresting the worst of the worst — including murderers, pedophiles, gang members, and rapists,' she wrote in a recent email. 'Any suggestion that the Administration is not laser focused on these dangerous criminals is flat out wrong.'
During his campaign, Trump highlighted several cases where immigrants in the country illegally were arrested for horrific crimes. Among them: the killing of 22-year-old Laken Riley, a Georgia nursing student who was slain last year by a Venezuelan man in the U.S. illegally. Jose Ibarra was found guilty of murder and other crimes in Riley's February 2024 killing and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Ibarra is seeking a new trial.
Trump in January signed into law the Laken Riley Act, which requires the detention of unauthorized immigrants accused of theft and violent crimes.
Research has consistently found, however, that immigrants are not driving violent crime in the U.S. and that they actually commit fewer crimes than native-born Americans. A 2023 working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research, for example, reported that immigrants for 150 years have had lower incarceration rates than those born in the U.S. The rates have declined since 1960, according to the paper, and immigrants in fact were 60% less likely to be incarcerated.
Experts say the false rhetoric coming out of the Trump administration creates real harm.
'It makes people in immigrant communities feel targeted and marginalized,' Arulanantham said. 'It creates more political and social space for hate in all its forms, including hate crime against immigrant communities.'
Eisen noted that the impact extends to other communities as well.
'All Americans should want safe and thriving communities and this idea that the president of the United States is making misleading statements about the truth and distorting reality is not the way to deliver public safety,' she said.
Goldin writes for the Associated Press.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Hitting Trump With Major $6.8 Billion Lawsuit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nearly half of the country's states and the District of Columbia (DC) sued the Trump administration on Monday for $6.8 billion over education funding being withheld. The coalition of 24 states and DC launched the suit against President Donald Trump, Linda McMahon in her capacity as secretary of education, the Education Department, Russ Vought as the director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the OMB. The suit alleges that the Trump administration has "unlawfully frozen over $6 billion in education funding for K-12 schools and adult education." The states say the freeze is unlawful because the funds were appropriated by Congress to be given to the states on July 1 and are currently being withheld by the president for a "review." The Education Department and OMB have been contacted via email for comment. Why It Matters The states suing the Trump administration allege these funds are vital for several key educational programs and needs, including those for people learning English, technology in the classroom lessons, and extracurricular programs. The plaintiffs have said that withholding these funds "will irreparably harm the Plaintiff States, their schools, and the students and families they serve." This is one of several suits faced by the White House over withholding congressionally approved funds. What To Know Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Senate Appropriations hearing, Tuesday, June 3, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Senate Appropriations hearing, Tuesday, June 3, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Julia Demaree Nikhinson, File/AP Photo The suit alleges that the Trump administration is withholding these funds "without any statutory or constitutional authority," as Congress has already earmarked this money and the White House has no legal right to prevent congressional funds from being used. The plaintiffs said they are eligible for the funding due to compliance with the conditions set out by the Education Department, and have submitted state plans which were approved by the Education Department. They have been receiving these funds for decades without incident until this year. According to the plaintiffs, they received the following letter from the Education Department on June 30, the day before they were set to receive their funds: "Given the change in Administrations, the Department is reviewing the FY 2025 funding for the [Title I-C, II-A, III-A, IV-A, IV-B] grant program(s), and decisions have not yet been made concerning submissions and awards for this upcoming academic year. Accordingly, the Department will not be issuing Grant Award Notifications obligating funds for these programs on July 1 prior to completing that review. The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities." This suit was launched by attorneys general from 22 states with the governors of Pennsylvania and Kentucky, all Democrats. It comes as the Supreme Court ruled Trump can lay off nearly 1,400 workers from the Education Department, overruling a previous judge's ruling to reinstate the workers. Discussing that suit, Secretary McMahon said: "The U.S. Department of Education will now deliver on its mandate to restore excellence in American education. We will carry out the reduction in force to promote efficiency and accountability and to ensure resources are directed where they matter most—to students, parents, and teachers." The Department of Education has not released a statement yet on this lawsuit. What People Are Saying Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell in a press release: "The President does not have the authority to decline spending funds appropriated by Congress, and as long as this Administration continues to violate our laws, I will continue to hold him accountable." Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul in a press release: "With the start of the school year only a month away for many Illinois students, the Trump administration's illegal funding freeze is wreaking havoc on school budgets, suspending programs and causing stress and anxiety for families who depend on them." Education Secretary Linda McMahon on the Supreme Court's ruling in a press release: "Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies." What Happens Next The states are suing for injunctive relief, meaning they want the freeze to end and the funds allocated to them away of the upcoming academic year. This case, like many others against the Trump administration, will likely find itself in court.

Business Insider
34 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I moved to the US, but got fed up with fighting the immigration system. I've taken a salary hit in Canada, but I feel like I belong.
This as-told-to essay is based on a transcribed conversation with Sindhu Mahadevan, who moved from the US to Canada in 2021. The following has been edited for length and clarity. I moved to the US from India in 2012 to study a master's degree in biology. I graduated and entered the workforce in the States, but slowly began to grow disillusioned with the US immigration system. In 2021, I decided to stop fighting the system and move to Canada. Although I've left behind the high salaries available in the US, I've traded it for a sense of belonging as a permanent resident in Canada. I entered the American workforce, but felt vulnerable as an immigrant I grew up in a city in western India. I had family who lived in the US. I moved there on an F-1 visa for international students and graduated in 2014. My visa status made me eligible for two types of work authorization — optional practical training (OPT) and curricular practical training (CPT), both of which I used. I knew that after my student work authorization expired, I'd require a visa sponsorship. Some companies I applied to told me they wouldn't offer sponsorships or ghosted me after they realized I'd eventually need one. I started a career in the medical device industry and was employed under my work authorization until 2018. I was very conscious of my immigration status at work. I struggled to have difficult conversations about aligning everyone on compliance issues because I was worried about my job security. Sometimes, I felt this affected how well I could do my job. The path to a green card didn't feel possible I got married in 2015, and my husband, who was also on a visa, and I wanted to try to build a life in the US. I felt I needed permanent residency to do this. I wanted the freedom to visit India and the flexibility to change jobs, which became complicated on an F-1 visa. In 2016 and 2017, my company tried twice to get me an H-1B visa, which can be a step toward permanent residency in the US. Petitions are chosen for processing through a lottery selection system, but I wasn't picked either time. Around that time, I started to find out more information about the green card backlog for Indian nationals. There's a cap per country at 7% of all the green cards allocated that year. India has a large population with a lot of applicants, so there is a very long waitlist to have your applications processed. I felt I was thrashing against the system just to be able to stay in the country and contribute. In a moment of clarity, I realized I wasn't willing to keep fighting. In 2018, I no longer had work authorization and had to stop working. I didn't like not making an income at all, and it felt like a hard-won career had been yanked away from me. I moved to Canada as a permanent resident and have found a sense of belonging As a temporary solution, I tried changing my status from an F-1 to an F-2 visa, which would make me a dependent of my husband's F-1. I was allowed to remain in the US while my application was pending. Around the same time I filed the application to change my status, I began looking at backup plans. Moving to Canada was on the cards through the "Express Entry" system. It's a points-based system that scores applicants on things like their education, work experience, and language proficiencies. The highest-scoring applicants receive an invitation to apply for permanent residence. My work experience was American-centric. Canada was a better fit than Europe or Asia. I applied just before the pandemic hit in 2020, when I still hadn't heard back with a final decision about changing my status to F-2. I received PR in October 2021, and my husband and I went to Canada straight away. As a permanent resident, I can work and buy property, but I can't vote in elections or stay outside Canada for longer than 730 days in a five-year window. In the US, I was a passenger along for the ride. In Canada, with PR status, I'm back in the driver's seat. I feel comfortable and in a solid legal position. As a permanent resident, I can take chances with my career I haven't had issues getting employment without Canadian experience, a problem some expats face, perhaps because my US experience is seen as valuable in my industry. I had a job lined up before the move. I've taken a salary hit, but with my PR status I have the freedom to take a chance working for a startup, something I wouldn't have dreamed of while in the US, where if the startup went under and I lost my job, it could mean the end of the road. Though more politely presented here than in the US, anti-immigrant sentiment in Canada concerns me, even though I haven't personally experienced negativity. People are expressing concerns around strained healthcare and housing, and Canada is experiencing immigration contraction. I'm fine with Canada's smaller economy Living in America shaped me in many ways. I admire Americans for their zeal to fight for what they believe in and to speak up. I don't regret moving there. If you're looking for the best universities or economy, the rational choice is the US. I moved to the US for my education, but the constraints of the immigration system slowly overshadowed the economic opportunities. I'm fine being in a smaller economy where I have more security. In a statement to BI, a spokesperson from the Department of Homeland Security said it was "committed to restoring integrity to the visa program" and ensuring people cannot illegally remain in the US.


New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Epstein Saga
After years spent spreading spidery conspiracy theories for his own political gain, President Trump has found himself wrapped up in the stickiest one of them of all. For more than a week, the political movement he created has convulsed with righteous fury over Jeffrey Epstein and the things the administration has said and done — or rather not done — about his death. Trump's supporters simply cannot swallow the anticlimactic conclusion that the Justice Department reached eight days ago when it said: There's nothing to see here, folks. No secret client list, no ties to foreign governments, no clique of Washington protectors who shielded the financier and his friends from justice for preying on girls. Over the weekend, a rabble of conspiracists who've been hand-fed for years by Trump broke into open revolt. The fallout is testing the power that the president holds over his most loyal followers, the ones who've trusted him all along and who believed they would learn a whole lot more about the Epstein saga if they returned Trump to office. The unconvinced Maybe the revolt will sputter out, but it has been stunning to behold. It is a Möbius strip of paranoia and distrust: A political movement that began with a conspiracy theory — lies about Barack Obama's birthplace were central to Trump's rise — is cannibalizing itself over another conspiracy theory. And in a novel twist, Trump's usual playbook for getting himself out of trouble didn't work. In a social media post on Saturday, he blamed Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden for unresolved Epstein mysteries. But the base wasn't buying it. 'People are really upset at the outright dismissal of it,' said Natalie Winters, a 24-year-old protégé of Stephen Bannon. As Mike Cernovich, the prolific pro-Trump social media commentator, wrote online, 'Trump's persuasive power over his base, especially during his first term, was almost magical. … The reaction on Epstein should thus be startling to him.' One person close to Trump conceded that the president didn't grasp how deep and wide the discontent was because he doesn't spend all that much time on the internet, where Epstein conspiracies breed. The 79-year-old president's media diet consists primarily of cable news and print newspapers. But by Monday, news networks like CNN were devoting much more airtime to the uproar. A test of loyalty This is not the first time Trump's base has bristled at him. The faithful grumbled when he encouraged Americans to take Covid vaccines or dropped bombs on Iranian nuclear facilities. But the conjecture around Epstein's crimes and death is a many-layered mania that can't really be compared to anything else. The shadowy concepts that undergird the whole thing go to the 'very foundation of MAGA,' as Winters put it, because 'it gets to the heart of who is in control of the country.' She lamented that Trump and the people who work for him now had campaigned against the deep state and failed to deliver. 'Finally, you have the power to expose it, and either you're not, because there's nothing there, in which case it makes you a liar — and I don't believe that — or you're ineffective, or you're compromised.' The fallout is fundamentally about whether Trump can corral the conspiracy-driven forces that he weaponized. He sprang to power at a time of deep mistrust in this country after two wars and a financial crisis, selling himself as the only one who would tell the truth about a corrupt uniparty cabal that sold out the United States. But now that he is the one in control of the government, he is telling his supporters to move on from all of that. It has left many of them mystified. When the Department of Government Efficiency started slashing government jobs, its goal was to streamline America's bureaucracy. Until that happens, though, many federal workers are on an emotional roller coaster. They've been fired and rehired; their health insurance has stopped; their questions have gone unanswered. Eileen Sullivan spoke with workers left in the lurch. For instance: Erin Czajkowski was axed from her job at the Department of Housing and Urban Development in February, rehired in March, then fired again in May. She spent weeks trying to understand court orders and legal challenges to her firing. 'Honestly, I need this to be over,' she told The Times. Martin Basch was terminated in February from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. He started applying for unemployment benefits but was confused when paychecks began arriving again in his bank account. He later learned that a court case had led to his reinstatement. Sarah Garman was fired from the Internal Revenue Service in February and then reinstated in March because of a court order. But when she got back on the government's payroll, her health coverage was suspended — even as premiums were still being deducted from her paychecks. Read the full story here. Flash Floods Slow-moving storms have dumped several inches of rain across the Mid-Atlantic, causing long flight delays in New York and inundating roads in New Jersey. The National Weather Service said two cities in Virginia risked 'catastrophic' damage from flash floods and urged people there to move to higher ground. More heavy rainfall is expected throughout today. Education The Supreme Court decision allowing Trump to fire Education Department workers represents an expansion of presidential power: It lets Trump gut a government department created by Congress without legislators' input. Trump had already started to diminish the Education Department before the court's decision. It is now about half the size that it was when Trump took office in January. Twenty-four states sued the Trump administration over nearly $7 billion in education funding that it has withheld a few weeks before the start of the school year. War in Ukraine Trump said he would help Europe send more weapons to Ukraine and threatened 'very severe tariffs' on Russia's trading partners unless it reaches a peace deal within 50 days. The Pentagon said details of the arms sales weren't finished, and some experts doubt the credibility of the tariff threat. Trump also criticized Vladimir Putin for Russia's heavy air assaults on Ukraine, saying, 'My conversations with him are very pleasant, and then the missiles go off at night.' In Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelensky announced a plan to replace the prime minister with a loyalist. Critics called it a consolidation of power. Middle East Israel's defense ministry suggested relocating much of Gaza's population into a small zone along the Egyptian border. The proposal, which some legal experts likened to ethnic cleansing, could derail efforts to reach a truce with Hamas. Sectarian violence raged for a second day in Syria. More than 50 people have been killed. During their 12-day war, both Israel and Iran used social media and A.I. to spread disinformation. Trade The chipmaker Nvidia said the U.S. had lifted restrictions on selling an A.I. chip to China. China's economy grew steadily in the spring, despite Trump's tariffs. Exports to Europe and Africa jumped. E.U. officials have a plan to retaliate against U.S. tariffs. It's not clear they'll use it. Trump Administration A federal appeals court blocked the Trump administration's move to end deportation protections for thousands of Afghans. The Senate approved the first federal judge of Trump's second term. Senators confirmed judges faster in his first term. Other Big Stories Tech giants built water-guzzling data centers in Georgia to power the A.I. race. Then the neighbors' faucets and toilets stopped working. Officials in Kerr County, Texas, where flash floods killed dozens of people earlier this month, said they had received death threats over their response to the tragedy. A fire engulfed an assisted living residence in southern Massachusetts, killing nine people, officials said. Trapped people smashed windows and screamed for help. Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people, writes Omer Bartov, an expert on genocides and former Israeli soldier. Here are columns by Michelle Goldberg on Trump's base and Epstein and Thomas Edsall on eroding democracy in America. 'Happy growing up': The tooth fairy is real. She's a dentist in Seattle. Ask Well: Experts believe it's time to say goodbye to older antihistamines like Benadryl. Here's why. Your pick: The most clicked article in The Morning yesterday was about how climate change is remaking Europe's summers. Trending: Filming on the 'Harry Potter' HBO series has begun. The production released an image of the 11-year-old actor Dominic McLaughlin in costume as Harry, the BBC reports. See it here. Lives Lived: John MacArthur was a firebrand pastor in Southern California who influenced generations of evangelical preachers and became a culture warrior in his later years. He died at 86. M.L.B.: The Seattle Mariners catcher Cal Raleigh won the Home Run Derby, knocking 54 homers out of the park. M.L.B.: The sale of the Tampa Bay Rays from the current owner Stu Sternberg to a group led by the Jacksonville developer Patrick Zalupski for about $1.7 billion has been agreed to in principle and is expected to be completed as soon as September, according to The Athletic. You may have seen this viral video online: An Indonesian boy on the precarious front of a boat dances while men behind him row furiously. It's a study in contrasts, their effort and his ease. And he has inspired people around the world to find a similar level of Zen through 'aura farming.' In short, they do something that looks cool over and over to develop a better aura. Read more about the trend. More on culture Could you have landed a job at Vogue in the 1990s? Take a quiz. Woody Guthrie's estate is releasing 13 previously unheard songs that he recorded on tape at home. The recent couture shows in Paris were full of over-the-top, opulent and otherworldly fashion. See some of the looks. Burst tomatoes in this orzotto. Eat like a 2025 Wimbledon champion: Add strawberries and yogurt to pasta. (The crowd audibly gasped when Iga Świątek said she loved it.) Get into romantasy, the hottest genre in literature, with help from this guide. Sharpen your knives correctly. Make cold-brew coffee at home. Here is today's Spelling Bee. Yesterday's pangram was brought. And here are today's Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections, Sports Connections and Strands. Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@