logo
Will Mifepristone Prove a CATALYST for Change?

Will Mifepristone Prove a CATALYST for Change?

Medscape2 days ago
Expanding evidence for the impact of hypercortisolism in patients with difficult-to-control type 2 diabetes (T2D) and key insights from the CATALYST study were discussed during the final symposium at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 85th Scientific Sessions in Chicago, which I was fortunate to attend.
I must be honest, the role of hypercortisolism in T2D was not hitherto on my radar. Whilst the phrase is somewhat of a cliche these days, the CATALYST trial is practice-changing for me.
I'm sure we can all immediately recall patients with suboptimally managed T2D despite their positive lifestyle choices and adherence to multiple medications. We should consider whether underlying hypercortisolism is driving these patients' hyperglycemia. In the opening session of the ADA symposium, Ralph DeFronzo, MD, chief of the Diabetes Division at the University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio, Texas, reminded us that in T2D — which is a heterogeneous disorder — hypercortisolism plays an important role and contributes to refractory disease.
In fact, DeFronzo suggested that his 'ominous octet' of core pathophysiological defects in T2D should be expanded to the 'noxious nine' to include hypercortisolism.
DeFronzo made an analogy with resistant hypertension and hyperaldosteronism. Hyperaldosteronism is an etiological factor in 10%-30% of patients with resistant hypertension, and around one-third of these patients have a solitary adrenal adenoma. Yet we do not routinely screen for hyperaldosteronism in resistant hypertension. But we do commonly prescribe mineralocorticoid (primarily aldosterone) receptor antagonists such as spironolactone for these patients. This approach has proven to be an effective strategy for resistant hypertension, as demonstrated in trials such PATHWAY-2.
DeFronzo also reminded us that many patients with hypercortisolism do not present with the classic phenotypic features of Cushing syndrome (ie, moon face, buffalo hump, etc). Instead, most patients with hypercortisolism present with the following 'big 4':
Difficult-to-control T2D
Difficult-to-control hypertension
Visceral or centripetal obesity
Osteoporosis or fractures.
Again, I am sure we can all recall such patients.
So, how does hypercortisolism cause hyperglycemia? Hypercortisolism reduces insulin secretion, increases glucagon secretion, and, interestingly, increases GLP-1 resistance, which generally results in severe insulin resistance. Hypercortisolism is a recognized contributor to T2D, metabolic syndrome, and cardiometabolic risk.
The CATALYST trial sought to explore the prevalence of hypercortisolism in difficult-to-control T2D and whether treatment with mifepristone (a competitive glucocorticoid receptor antagonist) improved glycemia in patients with difficult-to-control T2D. The FDA has already approved mifepristone for the treatment of hyperglycemia secondary to hypercortisolism in adults with endogenous Cushing syndrome who have T2D or glucose intolerance.
The CATALYST trial's prevalence phase recruited 1057 patients with difficult-to-control T2D (mean HbA1c, 8.8%). Eligible participants were taking multiple glucose-lowering therapies or antihypertensive therapies or had microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes. Nearly a quarter of participants had hypercortisolism by overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test with a cortisol cutoff of 50 nmol/L. Around one-third of individuals had an adrenal imaging abnormality.
Notably, about 27% of CATALYST participants were taking three or more antihypertensive agents, and the prevalence of hypercortisolism among these patients was about 38%. Moreover, patients with hypercortisolism had more cardiovascular disease (eg, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure) and higher overall medication burden.
The CATALYST trial's treatment phase investigated 136 patients with difficult-to-control T2D and hypercortisolism. Ninety-one participants were randomly assigned to receive mifepristone, and 45 participants were randomly assigned to receive placebo. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes in glucose-lowering medications, changes in hypercortisolism-related comorbidities, and improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors such as waist circumference, blood pressure, and lipid profile.
Mifepristone was associated with a 1.47% reduction in HbA1c, compared with a 0.15% reduction with placebo, at 24 weeks. Differences in HbA1c were observed even after 12 weeks. Importantly, there was no difference in effect in patients with or without adrenal abnormalities.
Glycemic improvements were accompanied by clinically meaningful reductions in glucose-lowering medications, weight (mean reduction, 4.4 kg), BMI (mean reduction, 1.47), and waist circumference (mean reduction, 5.2 cm). Mean blood pressure in participants taking mifepristone remained at or near the recommended target (< 130/80 mm Hg), but a mean increase of 8 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure was observed in the mifepristone group. The placebo group, however, had a reduction of 2 mm Hg. Reassuringly, in patients on mifepristone with baseline systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mm Hg, no increases in blood pressure were observed. There were only small numerical changes in lipid profile with mifepristone.
With regard to mifepristone's safety profile, 42 patients (46%) discontinued the treatment, compared with eight patients (18%) receiving placebo. Adverse events with mifepristone were mostly mild to moderate and consistent with the drug's known safety profile; no new safety signals were identified. Adverse events included hypokalemia and fatigue, nausea, vomiting, headache, and dizziness consistent with glucocorticoid withdrawal. Three participants on mifepristone experienced euglycemic ketoacidosis, and all three were receiving SGLT2 inhibitors.
In conclusion, the CATALYST trial is the next evolution in personalized diabetes care. We should consider screening for hypercortisolism in patients with difficult-to-control T2D.
The overnight dexamethasone suppression test can be conducted in primary care, but I am mindful of the considerable pressures we currently face in the community. Patients should take 1 mg of dexamethasone around 11 pm or midnight and have their serum cortisol levels checked at around 8 or 9 am. A morning cortisol level of < 50 nmol/L excludes hypercortisolism. We should be aware of common causes of false positive results, including use of the combined oral contraceptive pill; use of exogenous steroids; severe psychiatric, medical, or surgical illness; night shift work; excess alcohol intake; severe untreated sleep apnea; and hemodialysis or end-stage renal disease.
CT scans should also be performed to establish whether the disease could be surgically remediable. Access to CT is challenging, given the current climate in primary care, but improvements in HbA1c were seen irrespective of adrenal abnormalities.
Treatment with mifepristone must be individualized to maintain the drug's risk-benefit ratio; the compelling benefits in HbA1c and overall cardiometabolic risk reduction must be balanced against the side effects of hypokalemia and glucocorticoid withdrawal. Counseling about sick day guidance remains pivotal for patients on SGLT2 inhibitors, and blood pressure will also need to be monitored regularly.
To paraphrase Paracelsus (1493-1541), the Swiss physician and founder of toxicology, 'No drug is without poison; the dosage makes it a poison or a remedy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Little Beasts: Art, Wonder, and the Natural World' Review: A Scientist's Eye, an Artist's Hand
‘Little Beasts: Art, Wonder, and the Natural World' Review: A Scientist's Eye, an Artist's Hand

Wall Street Journal

time34 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

‘Little Beasts: Art, Wonder, and the Natural World' Review: A Scientist's Eye, an Artist's Hand

Washington Except when they are annoying, insects often go unnoticed. But not by a Dutch artist named Joris Hoefnagel (1542-1600). Hoefnagel observed bugs, along with birds, fish and other creatures, then drew or painted them in intricate detail. To achieve a precise appearance, he embellished some with metallic elements and even captured the irregular cells and veins on the translucent wings of dragonflies by pasting them onto his works.

Sliding vaccine rates hang over vote on CDC director nominee as US measles cases hit dangerous milestone
Sliding vaccine rates hang over vote on CDC director nominee as US measles cases hit dangerous milestone

CNN

time38 minutes ago

  • CNN

Sliding vaccine rates hang over vote on CDC director nominee as US measles cases hit dangerous milestone

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Wednesday tallied the highest number of US measles cases since the disease was declared eliminated a quarter-century ago, just as a key Senate committee split the vote to advance President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the public health agency. There have been more measles cases in the US this year than any other since the disease was declared eliminated a quarter-century ago, according to CDC data, with at least 1,288 confirmed cases. Just halfway through the year, the case tally has already surpassed the previous record from 2019, when there were a total of 1,274 cases. And it's well above the average of about 180 measles cases that have been reported each year since the disease was declared eliminated in the US in 2000. CNN reported this new milestone on Saturday using data from the Johns Hopkins University Center for Outbreak Response Innovation, which updates its numbers more frequently than the CDC. HHS has not responded to CNN's request for comment about the measles milestone. Childhood vaccine coverage has been declining in the US, and the vast majority of measles cases this year – more than 90% – have been in people who were unvaccinated or whose vaccination status was unknown, according to the CDC. When the measles case count reached its previous record in 2019 – during the first Trump administration – both the CDC director and the secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services at the time released statements emphasizing the safety and effectiveness of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and encouraging Americans to get vaccinated. However, almost six months into Trump's second term, the CDC still does not have a director and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has a long and complicated history with measles vaccines. Concerns about vaccine skepticism were front and center Wednesday as members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee voted to advance President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the CDC, Dr. Susan Monarez, for a vote by the full Senate. Committee members voted 12-11 to move Monarez's nomination. All of the committee's Republicans backed the longtime immunologist and government scientist, who spoke in her confirmation hearing about restoring trust in the CDC and defended Kennedy's decision to replace the members of a federal panel of vaccine advisers. The vote puts Monarez one step closer to taking the helm at the public health agency, and she will now progress to a full Senate vote. HELP Chairman Sen. Bill Cassidy, a Louisiana Republican and a doctor, voted to advance Monarez's nomination but nodded to falling vaccine coverage and the ongoing measles outbreak. 'Dr. Monarez will work to modernize our data health systems, to improve public health coordination and response while protecting American sensitive health information,' Cassidy said. 'This is especially crucial as the nation combats reemerging public health threats like measles, which has taken three lives in the United States this year.' He continued: 'One that's not included but is tragic: A Canadian woman who was pregnant got exposed to measles and lost her child. [The ongoing outbreak has] hospitalized many more due to misinformation regarding the measles vaccine.' Cassidy publicly pressed Kennedy last month to delay a meeting of the health agency's new vaccine advisers — several of whom have expressed skepticism and safety concerns about long-approved immunizations — amid concerns about their biases. During Wednesday's meeting, Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat, called on the committee to hold a hearing about the ongoing measles outbreak and Kennedy's shakeup of vaccine oversight. 'I am concerned because this committee, it feels like, has all but abandoned its serious oversight of this crisis,' she said. 'We haven't had a hearing on the record-breaking number of measles outbreaks or a hearing on how the CDC vaccine panel is now stacked with people who are actually not vetted, and all the previous board members, every single one of them, was removed with no credible explanation.' There needs to be congressional oversight of these actions, Murray said after casting a vote against Monarez. 'I really do hope that Dr. Monarez will defy my expectations. I hope she will stand up for science and put public health first. But again, I hope I have hoped that for others, and here we are today,' she said. Some health experts have emphasized the importance of vaccination rates and their trepidation about precedents being set under Kennedy's leadership of HHS. 'It is no surprise that the most widespread measles outbreak affecting the United States in a generation has occurred under Secretary Kennedy's watch,' Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the CDC, said in a statement Wednesday. 'His decades-long campaign to discredit vaccines at every turn, which has continued unabated during his time as health secretary, directly contributes to the alarming decline in routine childhood vaccination rates in our country that is resulting in more frequent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases,' he said. 'In addition, the dramatic funding cuts to public health will mean that small outbreaks will grow and spread.' Three people have died of measles in the US this year – two children in Texas and one adult in New Mexico, all of whom were unvaccinated – matching the total number of US measles deaths from the previous two and a half decades. 'I worry that even more children will be forced to pay with their lives or health because of Secretary Kennedy's malfeasance,' Besser said. 'As a pediatrician, I strongly encourage all parents to talk to their healthcare providers, listen to their local public health officials, and learn the facts about measles vaccines, which are incredibly effective and safe.' The MMR vaccine is highly effective. One dose offers 93% protection against measles, and two doses are 97% effective, according to the CDC. 'Vaccines work—full stop. They are one of the most powerful tools we have to protect patients, families and entire communities. We can prevent diseases through vaccines, but too many diseases that we once had under control are starting to reappear because people are choosing to delay or skip immunization,' Dr. Jennifer Brull, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, said in a statement. 'There's a lot of confusion around vaccinations, but patients don't have to navigate this alone. Family physicians, pediatricians, pharmacists and other public health workers can help patients wade through all the information and cut through the noise,' she said. 'The bottom line is vaccines are safe, effective and save lives. It's critical that we continue to protect not just individual families, but the health of our entire nation.'

Biden's physician refuses to answer questions from Republicans in House probe of former president's mental fitness
Biden's physician refuses to answer questions from Republicans in House probe of former president's mental fitness

CNN

time39 minutes ago

  • CNN

Biden's physician refuses to answer questions from Republicans in House probe of former president's mental fitness

Joe Biden's White House physician on Wednesday declined to answer questions during a closed-door deposition with the House Oversight Committee, invoking his Fifth Amendment right as the Republican-led panel pushes forward in its probe of the former president's mental fitness and decline. While Dr. Kevin O'Connor appeared on Capitol Hill Wednesday, his attorneys said he 'respectfully declined to answer any questions' from the panel, which had refused to limit the scope of the interview – imperiling, they said, his physician-patient privilege. 'Revealing confidential patient information would violate the most fundamental ethical duty of a physician, could result in revocation of Dr. O'Connor's medical license, and would subject Dr. O'Connor to potential civil liability. Dr. O'Connor will not violate his oath of confidentiality to any of his patients, including President Biden,' O'Connor's attorneys said in a statement on his behalf. The investigation is the latest front in the GOP push to expose alleged cover-ups by Biden and his inner circle that had fallen dormant in the last Congress. Republicans say the interviews are critical to supporting claims of the former president's cognitive decline in the final days of his administration. Democrats, meanwhile, have dismissed the probe in its entirety as a political stunt. The panel subpoenaed O'Connor in June after first seeking a voluntary interview, and has requested interviews with nearly a dozen former White House aides in recent months. But the interviews, which began as voluntary appearances, have grown increasingly contentious after President Donald Trump waived executive privilege for the physician and others. O'Connor's team on Wednesday argued the panel should pause its probe until the Department of Justice concludes its separate criminal investigation into his predecessor's actions and use of the autopen, which Trump had ordered in a memorandum. 'We believe that the Committee should hold its investigation in abeyance until any criminal investigation has concluded,' O'Connor's team said. A committee aide pushed back on the notion that O'Connor pleaded the Fifth Amendment because of doctor-patient privilege, arguing the physician did not answer any questions beyond his name. Invoking the Fifth Amendment is typically done to avoid answering specific questions. Though it can be perceived by the public as a way of avoiding accountability, the US Supreme Court has long regarded the right against self-incrimination as a venerable part of the Constitution and, in legal proceedings, tried to ensure that a witness' silence not be viewed as evidence of guilt. Following O'Connor's departure, House Oversight Chair James Comer accused the doctor of wanting to 'conceal the truth.' 'The American people demand transparency, but Dr. O'Connor would rather conceal the truth. Dr. O'Connor took the Fifth when asked if he was told to lie about President Biden's health and whether he was fit to be President of the United States,' the Kentucky Republican said in a statement. The committee still has multiple interviews scheduled throughout the summer. Unable to invoke executive privilege to avoid answering questions, some witnesses have already sought to stave them off. Former Biden aide Anthony Bernal withdrew from a voluntary interview last month after the White House counsel's office made clear that privilege would be waived. Comer then subpoenaed Bernal for his testimony. At least one interview has already led to a dispute over testimony. Comer claimed that Neera Tanden, Biden's director of the Domestic Policy Council, told the committee during her voluntary closed-door interview last month that she had 'no visibility' into how the approval for Biden's autopen signatures worked – a point that Republicans have latched onto. A Democratic committee official, however, swiftly pushed back on that characterization, saying that Tanden 'repeatedly and explicitly confirmed that she received President Biden's written sign-off on every executive action she presented him with.' 'Any other characterization is a distortion of the testimony,' the official told CNN at the time. Interview transcripts from Tanden's appearance have not yet been released. The top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Robert Garcia of California, criticized the Republican effort, saying the GOP is more concerned with the former president's health than their constituents' access to health care. 'The only person's health that Republicans care about is Joe Biden's – even as 17 million Americans lose access to affordable health care thanks to their big budget betrayal,' Garcia said in a statement. One Biden ally accused Republicans of playing politics with the congressional inquiry. 'It's an attempt to smear and embarrass. And their hope is for just one tiny inconsistency between witnesses to appear so that Trump's DOJ can prosecute his political opponents and continue his campaign of revenge,' the person told CNN.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store