Strict behaviour policy blamed for 'exodus of 500 pupils' from Ark Alexandra Academy in Hastings
An ITV News Meridian investigation has discovered that 472 children have left Ark Alexandra Academy in Hastings over the past three school years before the scheduled end of their secondary education.
The data, obtained via a Freedom of Information Request, shows that 28% of the children leaving the school prematurely were recorded as having Special Educational Needs or Disabilities (SEND).
The Ark Schools Trust told us they have 'high aspirations for students' and 'work hard to support those with additional education needs'.
Labour MP Helena Dollimore, who has raised her concerns about the school in Parliament, described the numbers leaving as an 'exodus' and urged Ark to 'acknowledge the scale of the problem' and 'work with the community rather than against it'.
The Hastings & Rye MP told ITV News Meridian: 'Everybody agrees we need strict discipline in our schools but the way this is being implemented is causing a lot of issues and ultimately leading to children falling out of the education system.'
Laura Wallis removed her son from the school less than a fortnight after he started Year 7 in September 2024. She claims he was discriminated against because of his ADHD and autism – and was effectively forced to leave.
'Within two weeks of being there he'd racked up nearly four hours worth of detentions. He wasn't walking close enough to the corridor wall – that was a detention. Spatial awareness is one of the things he really struggles with.
'There was no support for both his physical needs and his special educational needs. Their no-nonsense policy pushes children out of the education system.'
The figures show that 39% of the children removed from Ark Alexandra are initially home schooled, rather than transferred directly to another school.
Laura Wallis's son lost 120 days of classroom education before being accepted into another school, where she says he is 'thriving'.
Staff whistleblowers have told ITV News Meridian that the school has a target that each staff member should issue 25 detentions per week.
One teacher said while student behaviour had improved since the new policy was introduced, staff and student wellbeing has been impacted as a result.
Helena Dollimore, Labour MP for Hastings & Rye, says she's extremely concerned
Nigel Woodcock said he removed his daughter from the school in recent months, after almost three years at Ark Alexandra, because of the 'immense affect on her mental wellbeing".
'I wouldn't even explain it as being a prison. The kids aren't allowed to laugh in the hallways, they're not even allowed to sit with their friends at lunchtime except on a Friday", he added.
Ark Schools declined our repeated requests for an interview. Instead the trust issued a statement, in which a spokesperson said:
'Ark Alexandra has improved rapidly over the past 18 months: suspensions have fallen significantly, attendance has improved, and students are making good progress in all year groups.
'We have high aspirations for our students and work hard to support those with additional education needs. Everything we do is focused on providing a great education for our children and seeing them thrive.'
Justin Wynne, District Secretary at the National Education Union, does not support detention targets
In response to the criticism of the detention targets, the Ark Schools spokesperson added: 'We monitor behaviour points to ensure the school's behaviour policy is implemented fairly and consistently.
'Staff are encouraged to award four times more rewards for positive behaviour – with the focus on catching students behaving well, rather than catching them out. This has helped us to create a culture of warmth and high standards.'
Academies are state schools not controlled by the local authority but by an academy trust, funded directly by the Department for Education.
The government is currently making a series of changes to the rules that academy trusts have to follow, to standardise curriculum, staff pay, conditions and recruitment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
No 10 quashes Rayner's demand for tourism tax
Downing Street has backed Rachel Reeves and rejected Angela Rayner's proposal for a tourist tax. After her dispute with the Chancellor over councils charging visitors to use hotel rooms, the Deputy Prime Minister has been lobbying the Treasury to allow councils and regional mayors to be given new powers to charge 'Barcelona-style' taxes. She has teamed up with Labour mayors, including Sir Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham, in calling for more 'fiscal devolution' and called it 'deeply disrespectful' to councils that Westminster dictates their budgets. But Ms Reeves is opposed to the idea and has refused to grant any further tax-raising powers, The Telegraph reported on Monday. She strongly objected to the idea of local authorities raising their own money beyond the council tax already charged on properties. Labour sources said the difference in opinion was at the heart of their rift on tax policy, and that Ms Rayner had long called for more devolution from Westminster. Downing Street has now said that there are 'no plans' to introduce tourist taxes, in an apparent rebuke of Ms Rayner's position. 'Places can already choose to introduce a levy on overnight stays through working with their local tourism sector, using the accommodation business improvement district model,' Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesman said on Tuesday. 'Tourism obviously plays an important role in the UK's economy.' 'Transformative' impact Pressed on whether Ms Rayner had been lobbying in favour of the policy, and why her department had discussed it with some local authorities, the spokesman added: 'There are no plans to introduce it. 'Obviously, the Government regularly consults on a wide range of issues.' The issue is the latest in a series of disputes between Ms Rayner and Ms Reeves on tax policy. Earlier this year, The Telegraph revealed a leaked memo written by Ms Rayner suggesting a range of tax hikes to the Treasury. The ideas were rejected by Ms Reeves, who let it be known she is solely responsible for tax policy. Councils and mayoralties have been pushing for tourist levies for some time, believing that they could have a 'transformative' impact on their areas at a relatively low cost to visitors. Manchester and Liverpool have both introduced a flat rate charge of £2 per night on hotel stays within their 'business improvement districts', but are barred from making the tax city-wide by Westminster. Many European cities, including Barcelona, Lisbon and Amsterdam, charge a flat rate or percentage-based tax on hotel stays. The hospitality industry is opposed to a similar system being introduced in the UK, arguing that Britain's 'tourism competitiveness' has been eroded by higher rates of VAT than in many European countries. Ms Reeves is understood to agree with the sector that further taxes on their profits should be kept to a minimum after the hike in employer National Insurance rates in last year's Budget and new workers' rights rules that would be costly to implement. One hotelier in Dorset said a tourism levy would cost them £600,000 a year, and that travellers would go elsewhere to avoid it. But Sir Sadiq told a podcast last month that tourists 'don't mind' paying a 'small levy' in European cities. He said: 'We could spend more money improving the public realm, which would encourage more tourists to come but also improve the quality of life for residents in London.'
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
AstraZeneca to invest $50B in US as tariff threat looms
AstraZeneca plans to plough billions of pounds into US manufacturing as the drugs giant faces the threat of looming tariffs. There are also reports the FTSE 100 pharmaceuticals giant plans to abandon London as its home. AstraZeneca on Tuesday said it would invest $50 billion (£37.1 billion) in the US by 2030, creating 'tens of thousands' of highly skilled 'direct and indirect' jobs, while 'powering growth and delivering next generation medicines'. Boss Pascal Soriot told investors in April the drugmaker is 'firmly committed to investing and growing in the US' as the White House continues to threaten the sector with looming tariffs on US imports. President Donald Trump last week outlined a plan to introduce levies that would steadily climb higher over time with the potential to hit 200 per cent after a 'year, year and a half'. Trump said: 'We're going to start off with a low tariff and then give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build and then we're going to make it a very high tariff. 'There's two ways you do it. You make money and/or you have them move here so they don't have to pay the tariff.' Howard Lutnick, US Secretary of Commerce, said on Thursday: 'For decades Americans have been reliant on foreign supply of key pharmaceutical products. President Trump and our nation's new tariff policies are focused on ending this structural weakness.' It also comes amid reports Soriot is weighing moving AstraZeneca's headquarters away from the UK as well as its main stock market listing. Soriot, 66, has lambasted the UK and the rest of Europe for falling behind other countries such as the US and China in developing medicines. AstraZeneca is planning its 'largest single manufacturing investment in the world' in the state of Virginia, with the site earmarked to produce drug substances for its weight management and metabolic portfolio. 'The facility will leverage AI, automation, and data analytics to optimise production,' AstraZeneca said. The rest of the investment will boost AstraZeneca's existing R&D and manufacturing facilities among other plans. AstraZeneca said the investments will help deliver its target of reaching $80 billion in total revenue by 2030, of which it expects 50 per cent would be generated in the US. Soriot said: 'Today's announcement underpins our belief in America's innovation in biopharmaceuticals and our commitment to the millions of patients who need our medicines in America and globally.' UK government 'will be kicking itself' AstraZeneca's decision will come as a blow to the Labour government as it struggles to encourage firm's to invest in the UK. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said the government 'will be kicking itself', with the country set to miss out on associated economic benefits of the investment. He added: 'That money, if invested in the UK, would have created a large number of jobs and help shine a light on the country for scientific excellence. 'AstraZeneca pulling out of a £450 million vaccine plant expansion in Liverpool earlier this year was the big clue that it was losing patience with the UK government. 'At the time, it hinted that without a certain level of support, it wasn't financially viable to invest that money. The previous government had pledged £90 million in grants and other aid, but the support was cut when Labour came to power. 'The more business it does in...[the US], the greater the likelihood that investors might push for AstraZeneca to switch its main stock listing to the US. That would be bad for the UK stock market as it is one of the biggest names in the FTSE 100.'
BBC News
2 minutes ago
- BBC News
Dumfries town board boss steps down with immediate effect
The man leading a board set up to help spend £20m to regenerate a Scottish town centre is stepping down with immediate Nicoll took up the role in Dumfries last year after it emerged as one of seven "overlooked" towns around the country in line for the said it had not been an easy decision to step down but, due to "upcoming changes" to his professional priorities, he could not give the time to the position he Nicoll said that as a "born and bred Doonhamer" it had been "one of the most meaningful and rewarding roles" he had ever had. The funding was announced in 2023 by the then prime minister Rishi Sunak to be put "in the hands of local people" to revitalise their high - along with Greenock, Irvine, Kilmarnock, Coatbridge, Clydebank and Elgin - was on the support was subsequently confirmed by the new Labour government and Mr Nicoll had been leading efforts to invest the funds - to be delivered over a 10-year he said he was no longer in a position to lead the town board set up as part of the investment process. 'Extremely proud' He said he was "incredibly proud" of what the board had achieved in terms of a regeneration strategy and "meaningful engagement" with others."We've begun building something truly unique and this is something that I am extremely proud of - a model unlike any other town board in the country," he said."One that is independent, community-led, and free from political interference."It's a model rooted firmly in the voice and will of the people of Dumfries."He highlighted Dumfries Shine - a community clean-up initiative - as one example that "meaningful, local-led change" was possible."My personal ethos has always been that you are either fully in or respectfully out," he added."With upcoming changes in my professional priorities, I do not want to reach a point where I'm missing meetings or limiting my contribution."The people of Dumfries deserve full commitment; nothing less."He said he would support his replacement and urged whoever it was to reflect the needs of local people not the agenda of any political organisation.
