Trump appoints Sean Duffy as NASA administrator after epic Musk snub
Duffy, a former Congressman from Wisconsin, will now oversee the $25 billion space agency, which has been headed by Janet Petro - a former leader of the Kennedy Space Center - since Trump's term began.
'Sean is doing a TREMENDOUS job in handling our Country´s Transportation Affairs, including creating a state-of-the-art Air Traffic Control systems, while at the same time rebuilding our roads and bridges, making them efficient, and beautiful, again,' the president wrote on his Truth Social page Wednesday night.
'He will be a fantastic leader of the ever more important Space Agency, even if only for a short amount of time. Congratulations, and thank you, Sean!'
Duffy graciously accepted the nomination, writing on X that he is 'honored to accept this mission.
'Time to take over space. Let's launch,' he posted.
The announcement came just weeks after Trump suddenly withdrew the nomination of Musk-backed entrepreneur and billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, citing his 'prior associations.'
The decision angered Musk, whose SpaceX business does contract work for the space agency.
Trump touted Duffy's work heading the Department of Transportation in his announcement on his Truth Social page
In explaining his decision to renege on Isaacman's nomination, the president claimed that the billionaire was recommended to him by Musk 'and while I thought his friend was very good, I was surprised to learn that he was a blue blooded Democrat who had never contributed to a Republican before.'
Federal Election Commission filings obtained by CBS News show Isaacman has donated to Democratic congressional candidates and groups - but has also given some money to the GOP.
The New York Times has also revealed that Trump reportedly knew about Isaacman's donations from the moment he chose to nominate him to run NASA - fueling speculation that Isaacman's ouster was more about the president's growing feud with Musk.
Trump has even since admitted that he 'thought it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the Space Business, run NASA, when NASA is such a big part of Elon's corporate life.'
Isaacman has been a close collaborator with Musk ever since buying his first chartered flight on Musk's SpaceX company in 2021.
He was selected to head NASA during the height of Trump's bromance with Musk, and when Trump selected Isaacman at his nominee, the president touted the billionaire as 'an accomplished business leader, philanthropist, pilot and astronaut.'
Isaacman was then approved by a Senate committee and was headed to a confirmation vote when Trump suddenly pulled his nomination amid Musk's ouster from the White House.
Isaacman then took to X on Monday to 'clarify' some of the things that Trump has said about him, while noting that the 'president is entitled to assemble the leadership team he believes will best serve his administration.'
The billionaire rocketman described himself in the lengthy post as 'relatively apolitical' and a 'right-leaning moderate,' and claimed he disclosed his 'political donations across both parties (though 10x more to Republicans)' before his nomination.
Isaacman went on to assert that he only knows Elon 'professionally' and does not own any equity in SpaceX, though he has a 'firsthand appreciation for what he and his companies have accomplished' after flying to space twice on SpaceX rockets.
'Like all nominees, I signed an ethics letter and would have honored it,' he wrote.
He added that his desire to lead NASA 'was never about political ambition, personal gain or enriching others.
'I love my country and I care deeply about America's competitiveness and leadership in space.'
Following Trump's appointment of Duffy on Wednesday, Isaacman called the appointment a 'great move' and wished the transportation secretary well.
'NASA needs political leadership from someone the President trusts and has confidence in,' he wrote on X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Indiana Fever president deletes social media account after being slammed by fans for bizarre Caitlin Clark comment
Indiana Fever president Kelly Krauskopf has reportedly deleted her X account and is laying low after fans took exception to a bizarre comment she made about Caitlin Clark. The Fever are in a rough patch of form and some fans have been looking for any excuse to throw shade at the front office. In a recent press conference, Krauskopf gave her detractors some perfect material, when she claimed she wanted to make the Fever 'as big as Apple', with some believing she put star player Clark down in the process. Speaking to the media, the president of basketball and business operations in Indiana said: 'We want to sustain the growth and the interest level in the franchise. I mean this is about the Indiana Fever. 'Yes, we have a foundational players in Caitlin Clark... and Aliyah Boston, and we're going to add to that. But I want this team to be a leader in the country, and an enduring brand... like Apple or something. We have a real opportunity here.' Fans immediately jumped on the comment, with one claiming: 'Enduring brands lean into their visionary. Apple became a global icon by making Steve Jobs both its visionary and its star.' Fans have claimed she is 'fumbling' Indiana's opportunity of having the biggest name in the W Another added: '95% of your brand is Caitlin Clark,' and a third said: 'They are fumbling this opportunity so hard. I think CC goes overseas and becomes the global superstar she could be if things don't shift by the end of her contract.' A fourth summed up fans' feelings by posting: 'Kelly... I'd say 75% of Fever fans go where Caitlin goes. Get mad at me, but the moment CC leaves Indy is the moment I quit buying Fever tickets. This is so stupid, she has no idea how to capitalize on the moment properly. You build around CC. She is the brand right now.' Seemingly in a bid to get away from the blowback to her comments, by Friday night Krauskopf had deleted her X account altogether, with an error message in its place. As of Friday night, the Fever president had deleted her account on the social media site X A win against the Atlanta Dream took the Fever's record back to .500 for the season, with 10 wins and 10 losses - but it has been far from plain sailing. Clark has, at times, been injured, and in recent days has struggled for form on the court, with her teammates stepping up instead. Kelsey Mitchell had 25 points and three assists on Friday, while Aliyah Boston had 19 points and Sophie Cunningham contributed 16 off the bench.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
We're becoming inured to Trump's outbursts – but when he goes quiet, we need to be worried
In the global attention economy, one titan looms over all others. Donald Trump can command the gaze of the world at a click of those famously short fingers. When he stages a spectacular made-for-TV moment – say, that Oval Office showdown with Volodymyr Zelenskyy – the entire planet sits up and takes notice. But that dominance has a curious side-effect. When Trump does something awful and eye-catching, nations tremble and markets move. But when he does something awful but unflashy, it scarcely registers. So long as there's no jaw-dropping video, no expletive-ridden soundbite, no gimmick or stunt, it can slip by as if it hadn't happened. Especially now that our senses are dulled through over-stimulation. These days it requires ever more shocking behaviour by the US president to prompt a reaction; we are becoming inured to him. Yet the danger he poses is as sharp as ever. Consider the events of just the last week or so, few of them stark enough to lead global news bulletins, yet each one another step towards the erosion of democracy in and by the world's most powerful country. On Wednesday, Trump threatened to impose 50% tariffs – yes, he's climbed back on that dead horse – on Brazil, if the judicial authorities there do not drop the prosecution of the country's Trump-like former president Jair Bolsonaro, charged with seeking to overturn his 2022 election defeat and leading a coup against the man who beat him, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. As concisely as he could manage, Lula explained, via social media, that Brazil is a sovereign country and that an independent judiciary cannot 'accept interference or instruction from anyone … No one is above the law.' This is becoming a habit of Trump's. He made the same move in defence of Benjamin Netanyahu last month, hinting that Israel could lose billions in US military aid if the prime minister continues to stand trial on corruption charges. In both cases, Trump was explicit in making the connection between the accused men and himself, decrying as a 'witch-hunt' the efforts to hold them to account. 'This is nothing more, or less, than an attack on a Political Opponent,' he posted, of Bolsonaro's legal woes. 'Something I know much about!' It's easy to make light of the transparent effort by Trump to forge an international trade union of populist would-be autocrats, but he's not solely moved by fraternal solidarity. He also wants to dismantle a norm that has long applied across the democratic world, which insists that even those at the top are subject to the law. That norm is an impediment to him, a check on his power. If he can discredit it, so that a new convention arises – one that agrees that leaders can act with impunity – that helps his animating project in the US: the amassing of ever more power to himself and the weakening or elimination of any rival source of authority that might act as a restraint. He is being quietly assisted in that goal by those US institutions that should regard themselves as co-equal branches of government – Congress and the supreme court – and whose constitutional duty is to stand up to an overmighty executive. Republicans in Congress have now approved a mega bill that they know will leave future generations of Americans drowning in debt and deprive millions of basic healthcare cover. Even so, they put aside their own judgment and bowed to the man who would be king. Less discussed was the bill's extraordinary expansion of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or Ice. Its budget has been increased by a reported 308%, with an extra $45bn to spend on detention and $29.9bn for 'enforcement and deportation'. It will soon have the capacity to detain nearly 120,000 people at any one time. And, remember, latest figures show that about half of all those detained by Ice have no criminal record at all. No wonder even conservative critics are sounding the alarm. The anti-Trump Republicans of the Bulwark warn that within months, the 'national brute squad' that is Ice will have twice as many agents as the FBI and its own vast prison system, emerging as 'the primary instrument of internal state power'. In this view, Trump has realised that corrupting the FBI is a tall order – though still worth trying – so he is supplanting it with a shadow force shaped in his own image. As the Bulwark puts it: 'The American police state is here.' Those most directly threatened might share clips of masked Ice agents snatching suspected migrants off the streets and manhandling them violently, just as reports circulate of appalling conditions in Ice premises, with people held in 'dungeon-like facilities', more than 100 crammed into a small room, denied showers or a chance to change clothes, and sometimes given only one meal a day and forced to sleep on concrete benches or the floor. But it is hardly a matter of national focus. Because it is not accompanied by a neon-lit Trump performance, it is happening just out of view. The same could be said of a series of recent decisions by the supreme court. They may lack the instant, blockbuster impact of past rulings, but they accelerate the same Trump trend away from democracy and towards autocracy. On Tuesday, the judges gave Trump the green light to fire federal workers en masse and to dismantle entire government agencies without the approval of Congress. Earlier, the supreme court had ruled that Trump was allowed to remove Democrats from the leadership of government bodies that are meant to be under politically balanced supervision. More usefully still for Trump, last month the judges limited the power of the lower courts to block the executive branch, thereby lending a helping hand to one of the president's most egregious executive orders: his ending of the principle that anyone born in the US is automatically a citizen of the US, a right so fundamental it is enshrined in the constitution. In ruling after ruling, the supreme court is removing restraints on Trump and handing him even more power. Small wonder that when one of the dissenting minority on the court, Ketanji Brown Jackson, was asked on Thursday what kept her up at night, she answered: 'The state of our democracy.' Meanwhile, Trump is succeeding in his goal of cowing the press, extracting serious cash from major news organisations in return for dropping (usually flimsy) lawsuits against them, a move that is having the desired, chilling effect. It all adds up to the steady erosion of US democracy and of democratic norms whose reach once extended far beyond US shores. Even if it is happening quietly, by Trump's standards, without the familiar sound and fury, it is still happening. The work of opposing it begins with noticing it. Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Boeing settles with Canadian man whose family died in 737 MAX crash
July 11 (Reuters) - Boeing (BA.N), opens new tab reached a settlement with a Canadian man whose family died in the March 2019 crash of an Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 737 MAX, the man's lawyer said on Friday. The terms of the settlement with Paul Njoroge of Toronto were not released. The 41-year-old man's wife Carolyne and three young children - Ryan, 6, Kellie, 4, and nine-month-old Rubi - died in the crash. His mother-in-law was traveling with them and also died in the crash. The trial was scheduled to start on Monday in U.S. District Court in Chicago and would have been the first against the U.S. planemaker stemming from two fatal 737 MAX crashes in 2018 and 2019 that together killed 346 people. Boeing also averted a trial in April, when it settled with the families of two other victims in the Ethiopian Airlines crash. The planemaker declined to comment on the latest settlement. The two accidents led to a 20-month grounding of the company's best-selling jet and cost Boeing more than $20 billion. In another trial that is scheduled to begin on November 3, Njoroge's attorney Robert Clifford will be representing the families of six more victims. Boeing has settled more than 90% of the civil lawsuits related to the two accidents, paying out billions of dollars in compensation through lawsuits, a deferred prosecution agreement and other payments, according to the company. Boeing and the U.S. Justice Department asked a judge earlier this month to approve an agreement that allows the company to avoid prosecution, over objections from relatives of some of the victims of the two crashes. The agreement would enable Boeing to avoid being branded a convicted felon and to escape oversight from an independent monitor for three years. It was part of a plea deal struck in 2024 to a criminal fraud charge that it misled U.S. regulators about a crucial flight 737 MAX control system which contributed to the crashes.
