
Syrian sanctions: Caesar act to remain in effect to protect minorities, report
In another display of bipartisanship, two centrist Democrats — Reps. Brad Sherman of California and Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey — helped Republicans advance the Lawler plan. Trump-friendly Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., joined all other Democrats in voting 'no.'
'The objective here is very straightforward, which is to actually allow for this government to start to take hold and be successful — and in order to do that, you need to have, obviously, economic cooperation, and you need the sanctions to begin to be eased,' Lawler told Semafor.
Still, he added, 'I believe it is foolish to immediately remove all sanctions without a truly stable situation on the ground,' pointing to a possible 'coup or a collapse of this fledgling government.'
Lawler said he's 'been in touch with members of the administration' about his legislation. A White House spokesperson declined to comment.
'I get what Mike's trying to do, but in my view, let's not get ahead of the White House,' Donalds told Semafor. 'A lot of things have changed on the ground; let's give the president a wide berth.'
Under current law, Trump can waive the remaining US sanctions on Syria, imposed under a law known as the Caesar Act, every 180 days. Lawler's legislation would give the new administration two years to certify the new Syrian government had met its set of conditions before lifting the sanctions for good.
Among the lawmakers advocating for full repeal, rather than Lawler's solution: Conservative
Rep. Joe Wilson
, R-S.C., who urged the committee to
'reconsider' the measure
, and the Financial Services Committee's top Democrat, Rep. Maxine Waters of California. Wilson said he supported the failed amendment Waters offered to Lawler's bill on Tuesday.
AD
'Well, hey, she's correct,' Wilson said of Waters. 'I'm very grateful that indeed, the president has indicated that he wants to give Syria a chance — and the way to do that is to fully repeal the sanctions, so that businesses know that they can invest.'
Some Democrats were torn ahead of the vote. Rep. Greg Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, told Semafor that 'it's a touchy situation.'
'You remove all the sanctions at one time — you know, what does that mean?' Meeks said on his way into the committee room. 'At the same time, you want to make sure that there is progress going down the road.'
'Maybe by the time I get outside, I can tell you exactly what I believe,' Meeks added. He wound up voting against the bill.
KNOW MORE
The president cannot permanently lift sanctions imposed by the Caesar Act unless Congress repeals that law (or allows it to lapse in 2029).
While the Trump administration issued a new six-month waiver of the sanctions in May, lawmakers on both sides of the debate say the short-term relief makes it difficult to facilitate long-term economic growth in Syria because investors lack certainty needed to make long-term decisions.
'What Lawler is attempting to do [is say] 'We want sanctions relief. We want money to flow back into the country,'' said Financial Services Chair French Hill, R-Ark.
'But how do we do that in the right way? Lawler's not adding burden, in my judgment, in his proposal.'
'The president has these freedoms, but in this bill, he's granted statutory relief that he doesn't have,' Hill added. 'The bill is a balanced bill.'
Lawler acknowledged that 'the administration's position is going to be vital' when it comes to building sufficient support in the full House and Senate.
Sherman raised concerns over lifting sanctions after sectarian violence in Syria led to the death of a US citizen last week. He voted yes after Lawler agreed to adopt his amendment that would add a new condition for lifting sanctions: 'reasonable steps … to protect religious and ethnic minorities.'
As the Trump administration seeks to bring Syria into the Abraham Accords, Lawler expressed optimism that his proposal could be a helpful tool. The president in May
promised Syria's new president sanctions relief
if Damascus agreed to pursue normalized relations with Israel.
'This, in implementation, can be used as a vehicle by which to help actually normalize economic ties with Israelis,' Lawler said.
Lawler said the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which also has jurisdiction over Syria sanctions, will also need to mark up the legislation. Meeks said that committee was his preferred venue for further discussion about the proposal.
ROOM FOR DISAGREEMENT
Those advocating to repeal the Caesar Act make two main arguments. Republicans say it would provide Trump with the most flexibility possible; Democrats say it would be the best bet for protecting Syrians.
'Sanctions are not effective in what the goal here is,' Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., said. 'On the ground, it is the Syrian people that are hurting because of these sanctions.'
The Syrian Emergency Task Force said in a press release Tuesday that the bill 'goes against President Trump's agenda of 'giving Syria a chance' and allowing long-term investment.'
ELEANOR'S VIEW
A lot of the uncertainty surrounding Lawler's bill can be attributed to its relatively short runway. He only introduced the proposal last week, which hasn't left much time for members to decide how they want to proceed.
Either way, the Trump administration's approach is critical. If it endorses the legislation, Lawler's proposal is on a glide path to enactment.
If the administration tries to pump the brakes, it seems inevitable that the bill's momentum slows.
Semator

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Seperate arms smuggling attempts, foiled along the Lebanese-Syrian border.
BEIRUT — The fight against arms trafficking continues on both sides of the particularly porous border between Syria and Lebanon. France has recently reiterated its willingness to "support cooperation between Beirut and Damascus in controlling their shared border," several operations have been carried out — both on Syrian and Lebanese territory — against arms smuggling. On Saturday night, the Syrian News Channel al-Ekhbaria reported, citing a Syrian security source, that internal security forces in the Nabek area of rural Damascus seized a shipment of weapons that was intended to be smuggled into Lebanon. Meanwhile, Lebanon's State Security announced on Sunday that it arrested a person wanted for trafficking in military weapons. "In implementation of plans aimed at curbing arms trafficking, (...) a patrol (...) arrested a Lebanese national [M. T.] who is wanted under several judicial warrants for trafficking in military weapons, shooting, throwing hand grenades, and theft", the State Security statement reads. "A search of his home yielded military equipment, wireless devices, a large quantity of hashish, and counterfeit U.S. $100 bills", the statement adds. The Lebanese Army has been heavily deployed at the border between the two countries after the fall of the regime, in an attempt to address issues related to the border's porosity, in the fight against smuggling and trafficking on Lebanon's northern and eastern borders. With the fall of Assad regime, Hezbollah lost one of its arms importation routes from Iran, which used to pass through Syria. Army units, supported by patrols from the Intelligence Directorate, raided the homes of wanted individuals in the towns of Khodr (Baalbek) and Sheikh Ayash (Akkar), arresting citizens (A.H.) and ( for multiple crimes including kidnapping, arms trafficking, and shooting. A quantity of weapons, ammunition, and military gear was seized in their possession. In a separate operation in Hay El Sellom, Beirut's southern suburbs, an Intelligence Directorate patrol arrested Syrian national (M.J.) and Lebanese citizens (H.H.) and (N.H.) for drug use, drug dealing, and shooting. Weapons and ammunition were also found in their possession. The confiscated items were handed over, and investigations are underway under the supervision of the competent judiciary.


L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Joumblatt: Hezbollah must understand its missiles are now useless
BEIRUT — The Druze leader and former president of the Progressive Socialist Party (PSP), Walid Joumblatt, spoke in favor of withdrawing heavy weapons from Hezbollah's arsenal on Saturday in an interview with the Saudi channel al-Arabiya. "Hezbollah officials must understand that keeping heavy weapons and missiles serves no purpose. It's no longer useful, on the contrary, it will cause us problems and Lebanon will not stabilize. (...) It will cause us, and them [Hezbollah,] complete destruction," said the Druze leader, when asked about his position on the Shiite party's arsenal. Hezbollah disarmament has been at the center of Lebanese and international political negotiations since the cease-fire that ended two months of all-out war with Israel took effect on Nov. 27, 2024. No weapons outside those of the state "I return to the idea of resistance," he added. "That does not detract from my historical condemnation of Western and Zionist Israeli occupation of Palestine but, at the very least, that's my position for Lebanon. Of course, this must come with the implementation of international decisions, among them the withdrawal of the Israeli army from occupied territories in Lebanon," he said, before reaffirming his support for the idea of a monopoly on weapons held by the state, as the PSP officially handed over its weapons at the end of June, hoping Hezbollah and Palestinian factions in Lebanon would do the same. "We have reached an agreement with President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam to implement all international decisions: there should not be a single weapon outside those of the state. This work has started in South Lebanon, but at the same time, Israeli bombings and killings have not stopped," he emphasized. Asked about the "support war," whose front Hezbollah opened on Oct. 8, 2023 in solidarity with the Gaza Strip and the Hamas movement, Joumblatt again revisited his earlier stance in favor of an "equilibrium of terror" that Hezbollah's arsenal imposed on Israel, according to him and the pro-Iranian party's supporters. "At that time, I thought the [Hezbollah] military arsenal and missiles could hinder and deter Israel, but perhaps that was a mistake. Things have changed since the 2006 war," he conceded. No disarmament by force The Druze leader finally said that this process should not, however, be carried out "by force," at risk of causing internal security disturbances. "Deep down, I do not believe in the outcome of Lebanese political arrangements, but it is not possible to disarm Hezbollah by force. I have said it: these heavy missiles are no longer of any use, but there must be international support for the Lebanese army. Up until now, we have seen a bit of support, but it is timid," he concluded. Once an objective ally of Hezbollah, Joumblatt has since the end of the last war become one of its internal opponents. He has notably held rare one-on-one discussions with the leader of the Lebanese Forces (LF) Christian party, Samir Geagea, who is strongly hostile towards Hezbollah. These statements come as the United States, through its special envoy for Lebanon and Syria, Tom Barrack, is calling for the development of a clear roadmap for Hezbollah's disarmament, including a timeline and enforcement mechanisms. "The credibility of the Lebanese government rests on its ability to put these principles into practice," the American diplomat said Saturday on X. "As its leaders have repeatedly said, it is crucial that the state has a monopoly on weapons. As long as Hezbollah retains its weapons, words will not be enough. The government and Hezbollah must fully commit and act now in order not to consign the Lebanese people to a precarious status quo." The pro-Iranian party has hinted it would reject any new agreement on its arsenal, insisting that Israel must first comply with existing agreements. Hezbollah notably demands that the Israeli army withdraw from the five positions it still occupies in South Lebanon and stop its daily strikes in the border area, which have killed at least 285 people since the truce, according to a count by the U.N. and L'Orient Today.


L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Damascus, Aleppo, Latakia: Which civilian airports could be rehabilitated in Syria?
This week in Damascus, the first Syrian-Saudi investment forum is being held to secure investment and partnership agreements for the reconstruction of infrastructure in Syria, which was ravaged by 13 years of war and is now ruled by President Ahmad al-Sharaa, after the fall of the Assad regime last December. On the sidelines of this forum, the president of Syria's General Civil Aviation Authority, Omar al-Houssary, announced Thursday that the country will launch a project to build a new international airport in Damascus that could handle up to 30 million passengers a year. He also announced his intention to upgrade the current Damascus airport to increase its capacity to five million passengers per year, and to rehabilitate the Aleppo airport to accommodate two million total, Syria has 55 airfields, most of which are...