Opposition To Gold Mining More Than At Risk Frogs
Watchdog and other groups will continue to oppose gold mining given the fact that gold is plentiful above ground and easily reusable. The real resources of infinite value are clean water and the treasured species that are now being called a threat.
Coromandel Watchdog of Hauraki say the amendments to the Wildlife Act this week and Shane Jones comments that Oceana Gold mining issue is just about vibration affecting 'mating frogs' are frivolous, wrong, and uninformed.
'The labelling of at-risk species like kiwi, some frogs, native bats and more as 'threats to development' could be a world first in terms of the deliberate promotion of extinction. The changes to the Wildlife Act this week, which were motivated to limit the courts from ruling in favour of protecting at risk species , are a bizarre leap backwards into deliberate disregard for the environment.
'Shane Jones is also wrong that our opposition to the Wharekirauponga gold mine project in the forest behind Whangamata is only about risks to Archeys frogs. We have consistently stated that creating more mountains of toxic waste from this proposed gold mine, dewatering the forest and risking acid mine leachate affecting underground water, are all reasons why we oppose this mine. Blasting under the habitat of the 200 million year old at risk frog is also a terrible idea. Thanks to the Fast Track law we have no right to participate in hearings so that these issues can be publicly scrutinised. Now the changes to the Wildlife Act presumably mean that even the expert panels cannot give due weight to protecting wildlife,' said Catherine Delahunty Chairperson of Watchdog.
Oceana Gold's Waihi North Project application to the Fast Track process was accepted this week and includes a new open pit in Waihi plus more underground mining there as well as the large underground mine at Wharekirauponga forests.
'When the Government becomes the enemy of at risk species so that multinationals companies can dig up gold for their profit, we all lose the hard work over many years to value and protect what is unique in these lands. It is a reputational risk but also an attack on our values and relationships with the rest of natural world. Shame on this Government.'
Watchdog and other groups will continue to oppose gold mining given the fact that gold is plentiful above ground and easily reusable. The real resources of infinite value are clean water and the treasured species that are now being called 'a threat'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
23 minutes ago
- Scoop
Watchdog Invited To Submit To Panel On Mine – Not The Same As Our Day In Court
Coromandel Watchdog of Hauraki has been invited to speak to the Fast Track Panel on the Waihi North Project application by Ocean Gold. This application is the first mining proposal to be considered under the new law. ' We appreciate the panel recognising the 45 year history we have with the mining issue in our region, but 20 working days is all the time we have to write a submission of a huge complex application prepared by a wealthy company and their hired guns . The Fast Track process excludes so many voices and dictates narrow terms even if you are selected to be heard. It's not fair on so many communities and groups who have deep concerns and questions about the Wharekirauponga and Waihi town mining projects.' Says Catherine Delahunty Chairperson of Watchdog. ' The Panel itself has acknowledged the complexity of the application and the difficulties in accessing experts to inform them on the many aspects of the application. Oceana Gold have combined an extension of mining in Waihi town ( more open cast and underground mining) with a totally different project, the first underground mining in conservation forest in the Hauraki region. Whether you are the Fast Track Panel appointed to look at this application, or the iwi and community groups trying to raise issues about risks and consequences of gold mining in Wharekirauponga or Waihi, it's hard to find the right experts and evidence in the short time given. It is clear that the Panel will not be hearing from experts on all the issues of concern. ' The majority of relevant experts in ecology, toxic impacts, hydrology, economics, and social impacts, who are specialist consultants in this country, are already employed, associated or relying on contracts with the mining industry. We spent two years searching for these local experts to help us prepare for a court hearing which the Fast Track law eliminated. People were afraid to be associated with us in case it jeopardised future industry opportunities. What is even more worrying is that the Panel must assess a highly technical application when independent scientific baseline data on issues like water hydrology in the area does not exist . Despite our best efforts only overseas experts have shown a willingness to work with us and there is barely time for them to read this enormous application if in fact they are available to help us immediately, We will do our best to represent our community to the Panel, but everyone needs to understand that this is a David versus Goliath struggle with Oceana Gold. They have the resources and a government determined to facilitate their interests, we have community support and a very limited resources. At least the Court processes allowed everyone to participate and not just the chosen few. In the past everyone could argue their case and cross examine company witnesses, The Fast Track is essentially unfair, elitist and unbalanced, we don't even know if Panel recommendations can succeed in stopping the Minister saying ' yes' to anyone in a hard hat who wants to drill holes in the country for the benefit of foreign corporates.' Ms Delahunty said.
Otago Daily Times
41 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Oil and gas exploration ban repeal passes final reading
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts. Photo: RNZ The government's repeal of the 2018 oil and gas exploration ban has passed its final reading in Parliament. The legislation had been set down for Tuesday night, but was delayed after a last-minute amendment to change the rules around liability for the clean-up of decommissioned oil and gas fields. Climate Change Minister Simon Watts stood in for Resources Minister Shane Jones, saying the ban has pushed power prices up. "The ban sent a chilling message to the investment community, halting the very exploration that underpins our energy security, and leading directly to the supply constraints and price volatility that we see today." Labour's Megan Woods said the repeal of the ban was a "very potent symbol of the shambles that this government is when it comes to energy policy," and that Prime Minister Christopher Luxon "is leading a government that is so far out of touch with ordinary New Zealanders and more intent at doing the bidding of multinational oil and gas companies". The bill passed 68 votes to 54, with all coalition parties in support and the opposition parties opposed.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Petroleum law passes, with a last minute twist
File photo. Photo: 123RF The exploration and extraction of petroleum in New Zealand will be more accessible from this week with the government's Crown Minerals Amendment Bill having received a third and final reading in Parliament this afternoon. The Bill (soon to be an Act pending Royal Assent), is the brainchild of Minister for Resources Shane Jones. It removes the 2018 law passed by the Ardern government which limited new petroleum exploration permits to onshore Taranaki. On Tuesday, the Clerk announced the commencement of the third reading of the Crown Minerals Amendment Bill, but rather than beginning that final debate, a last-minute motion from Jones meant the Bill was sent back to the committee stage in what is called a recommittal. Recommittals, although not unprecedented, don't happen all that often, and if they do occur, it's usually when a member's bill is being considered. (Member's Bills without the significant drafting resource possessed by a government are more likely to have oddities that need tidying up.) The process of returning a bill to an earlier stage enables the bill to receive further refinement. This may be necessary for several reasons - perhaps a fault or loophole has been discovered, or the government has had a last-minute change of mind regarding a specific provision. In any case, to make these changes, the bill is sent back to the Committee of the whole House stage, where amendments can be put forward. After reportedly spotting a loophole, Jones had tabled a significant amendment at 5pm on Monday which was then debated less than 24 hours later in Tuesday's recommittal. The change itself related to who pays the cost of decommissioning and cleaning up oil wells once production has ceased. The amendment paper, which was successfully included in the bill, places the power for determining who pays for decommissioning costs in the hands of the Minister for Resources and the Minister of Finance (currently Shane Jones), replacing the model of trailing liability. This is the third policy iteration within the current amendment bill. The Opposition spent most of Tuesday evening drilling into the last-minute switch, trying their best to extract answers from the Minister about why it was decided and who he had consulted with about it. To listen to some of those exchanges, click the link to the audio version of this story at the top of the page. *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
