logo
Bipartisan bill promises more resources at ports to fight fentanyl smuggling, speed up wait times

Bipartisan bill promises more resources at ports to fight fentanyl smuggling, speed up wait times

Fox News26-02-2025
As drug smuggling attempts persist at ports of entry along the southern border, a bipartisan duo in the House of Representatives is proposing legislation to make it easier for U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents to do their jobs.
H.R. 1924, the Border Enforcement, Security, and Trade (BEST) Facilitation Act, would make sure image technicians and supervisors are hired at the ports to more closely examine cargo scans, a policy that proponents believe would speed up wait times and make it easier to catch drugs like fentanyl from heading into the U.S.
The goal is to create a specific role for scanning to make it easier on already strained agents.
"The majority of the fentanyl that is intercepted is at the ports of entry because of the technology that we have," Rep. Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz., who drafted H.R. 1924, told Fox News Digital. "Also because of the way that fentanyl looks and the way it gets transported, which are small pills and they can fit pretty much anywhere."
"Cars are taken apart and rebuilt around the fentanyl there. So when you've got these kinds of training positions, that enhances the security at the port of entry," the Arizona Republican continued, adding that the legislation comes from an idea floated by authorities on the ground.
Much of the known drug trafficking done across the border is through the ports. The majority of convictions in recent years for smuggling fentanyl specifically have been American citizens, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission.
"Through this kind of scanning process where goods are flowing back and forth, we can prevent the crossing of illegal drugs and also speed up the process of the legal goods coming in," Ciscomani said. He also noted that the legislation could make certain ports optimal for increasing trade and reduce wait times, which could be hours.
The influx of migrants during the Biden administration put a strain on resources at the ports, which even led to longer lines as authorities were also trying to handle the wave of people crossing into the nation illegally. Despite the obstacles, CBP still seized over 21,000 pounds of fentanyl and over 158,000 pounds of meth along the southern border in fiscal year 2024 alone, according to the agency's data.
"When I think about Eastern North Carolina and so many families being devastated in particular by the fentanyl crisis, we have to do something. We have to take urgent steps. We have to, you know, put aside the partisan politics because this is hitting home literally. So when I went to the border, taking three trips to the border, and in particular the Tucson sector," Rep. Don Davis, D-N.C., who's co-sponsoring the legislation, told Fox News Digital.
"They're gonna be able to do more inspections, and I believe that this is a pathway of actually saving lives," Davis added.
H.R. 1294 has been referred to the House Homeland Security Committee, and it comes at a time when the Trump administration is undertaking a full-scale crackdown on the border crisis, which has led to praise from Republicans and backlash from Democrats. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced that only 200 people were encountered by CBP trying to illegally cross on Saturday, the lowest daily figure in 15 years.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids are ongoing across the country, with some even being held at Guantanamo Bay, and troops were sent down to the southern border shortly after President Donald Trump took office last month.
Meanwhile, the overall conversation remains heated on Capitol Hill. Democratic Rep. Janelle Bynum slammed another bill by Ciscomani, the Agent Raul Gonzalez Safety Act, as akin to the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 for ramping up penalties for those "intentionally fleeing" law enforcement near the border. Yet, the bill ended up passing with some bipartisan support.
There have been some bright spots of compromise despite broader disputes on the issue across the nation as well. Arizona Republican lawmakers and Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes are supporting a state bill that would give permission to local authorities to shoot down drones suspected of being operated by the cartels, which would likely hinder one tool the organizations use to smuggle illicit drugs.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ghislaine Maxwell's immunity request denied by House Oversight Committee
Ghislaine Maxwell's immunity request denied by House Oversight Committee

Fox News

time13 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Ghislaine Maxwell's immunity request denied by House Oversight Committee

The House Oversight Committee, led by GOP Chairman James Comer, said it "will not consider" a request from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys asking for immunity in exchange for her testimony to Congress. The former accomplice and girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein was hit with a subpoena last week to testify before Congress – from prison – amid a probe from lawmakers seeking to uncover more information about the disgraced financier's sex crimes. The subpoenaed deposition was scheduled for August 11. On Tuesday, Maxwell's attorneys sent a letter to Chairman Comer indicating she would invoke her Fifth Amendment rights and stay silent in front of Congress, unless the immunity request was agreed upon. In Maxwell's immunity request, her attorney's offer clemency as a possible solution as well, indicating Maxwell "would be willing—and eager—to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress" if it were granted to her. "The Oversight Committee will respond to Ms. Maxwell's attorney soon, but it will not consider granting congressional immunity for her testimony," a spokesperson told Fox News Digital after receiving the letter. In their letter to Comer, Maxwell's attorneys said their client's testimony could pose both legal and security risks for their client. Maxwell's legal team also requested questions their client would be asked in advance of her testimony in front of Congress, but the Oversight spokesperson did not directly speak to that request. Another request from Maxwell's attorneys was that the deposition date be delayed until after the Supreme Court rules on Maxwell's latest bid for an appeal. On Monday, Maxwell's attorneys asked the High Court to hear their client's appeal in her 2021 sex trafficking conviction, arguing the federal government "has an obligation to honor" a 2007 non-prosecution agreement that they believe should shield her from criminal charges. "Ms. Maxwell should never have been charged in the first place. In 2008, the United States government promised, in writing, that she would not be prosecuted," Maxwell's attorneys wrote in their correspondence to Comer, adding she did not receive a fair trial when convicted in the Southern District of New York for sex trafficking in 2021. "[The government] broke that promise only after Mr. Epstein died in 2019—at which point Ms. Maxwell became a convenient scapegoat." According to the attorneys, during Maxwell's case in the Southern District of New York prosecutors "wrongfully convinced the trial judge to unfairly limit Ms. Maxwell from presenting her defense, and at least one juror lied about a material fact during voir dire in order to serve on the jury." Fox News Digital reached out to Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, for comment, but did not immediately receive a response.

New York Democrats unveil their own mid-decade redistricting scheme, targeting future elections
New York Democrats unveil their own mid-decade redistricting scheme, targeting future elections

NBC News

time13 minutes ago

  • NBC News

New York Democrats unveil their own mid-decade redistricting scheme, targeting future elections

As Texas Republicans slowly move forward with plans to redraw congressional maps mid-decade, Democrats in New York on Tuesday plowed ahead with their own scheme intended to counter any GOP redistricting efforts. But the effort faces a long, arduous path forward and wouldn't be scheduled to come into effect for years, illustrating the limited options at Democrats' disposal as they hunt for ways to counter the GOP redistricting play in Texas. Legislative Democrats in the blue stronghold unveiled a bill that would allow state lawmakers in Albany to conduct mid-decade redistricting — but only if another state were to do it first. The proposal would, if enacted, effectively set up the prospect of a national redistricting tit-for-tat between Republicans and Democrats, with control of the House of Representatives in Washington potentially on the line. However, there are key differences between what's happening in New York and what's happening in Texas, including the timing of any actual map changes. Texas Republicans are looking to immediately enact new district boundaries for the 2026 elections. The bill in New York, which is technically a legislatively referred constitutional amendment, would allow the state legislature to redraw congressional districts in the event that another state engages in mid-decade redistricting. It would have to pass the legislature in two consecutive sessions — and then still must be approved by voters in a ballot measure after. In theory, that means that whatever new maps that would be created wouldn't be in place until the 2028 elections. 'New York will not sit idly by as other states work to disenfranchise voters,' New York state Senate Deputy Majority Leader Michael Gianaris, who introduced the bill in his chamber, said in a statement. 'States must play by the same rules for a legitimate democracy to exist, and if red states are intent on corrupting the redistricting process, New York will respond.' Democrats in the state Assembly introduced an identical measure in their chamber. The redistricting process in states typically occurs at the start of each new decade, when new census data is available. In New York, that process has since 2014 been controlled by the state's Independent Redistricting Commission — a bipartisan body charged with creating fair maps for the legislature to approve. The commission was created when New York voters passed a constitutional amendment changing the redistricting process. Previously, the legislature controlled the entire process for legislative and congressional maps. Gianaris' office said the effort is a direct response to the ongoing attempt by Texas Republicans to redraw their own congressional maps ahead of schedule — a scheme that could help pad the GOP's narrow majority during next year's midterms. A fight with national implications but different state-by-state rules At the urging of President Donald Trump, Texas Gov. Gregg Abbott convened a special legislative session that kicked off last week that includes on lawmakers' formal to-do list congressional redistricting. The session, which runs 30 days, is ongoing. Texas lawmakers haven't yet publicly unveiled their preferred choices for the redrawn maps. The unscheduled effort has triggered a ripple effect, with governors across the country floating the possibility of following suit to either add to or counter the plan — depending on their party affiliation. That could include potential actions benefitting congressional Republicans in Florida and Ohio. In the case of New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul said last week — in a precursor to the introduction of Gianaris' bill on Tuesday — that 'all's fair in love and war' and that she'd 'closely' consider any proposed actions. In response to questions about whether Hochul supported the proposal, spokesperson Emma Wallner referred NBC News to comments last week on 'The Jim Acosta Show.' 'It's something we're looking at very closely,' Hochul said on that podcast. 'We're watching what's happening there. And I do not like a scenario where we are disadvantaged when we're following the rules. More to say on that later.' Another big blue state where Democrats have signaled they could move forward with early redistricting is California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom, a potential 2028 presidential contender, has raised the idea. As is the case currently in New York, an independent commission empowered by the state constitution controls the redistricting process in California. Undoing that process would be similarly complicated, much more so than in states where redistricting is just a matter of passing a new state law, though Democrats are talking up the idea anyway. Before congressional lawmakers left Washington for a five-week summer recess, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries privately huddled with members of the California delegation. The meeting included a discussion about whether Democrats in California should redraw its congressional lines in response to Texas, said a source in the room, who added that Jeffries' message was that every option should be considered. In recent interviews with NBC News, California members of Congress indicated they'd support such a plan. 'If Texas is going to rig the system, then I think we can't just sit back and watch it and do nothing and say we're going to have our hands tied,' said Rep. Nanette Barragan, D-Calif., a member of Jeffries' leadership team and the former chair of the Hispanic Caucus. 'We'll have to keep our eyes on Texas, but I think we need to look at all options.' Another California Democrat, Rep. Ami Bera, a member of the leadership team for House Democrats' campaign arm, agreed Democrats shouldn't sit by and do nothing. 'I'm a fan of independent redistricting commissions, but the fact that Republicans are playing by a different set of rules, I think it doesn't make any sense that we're disarming ourselves,' Bera said. 'If they're going to play by a set of rules and put politics above everything, we've got to play hardball too.' Bera said he'd be fine giving up some Democratic portions of his district to give an edge to Democrats facing tougher races. 'I'm willing to give up some voters to get the majority again," he said. Rep. Mark Takano, D-Calif., said that it 'can't be the case that only Republican controlled states can maximize the mid-decade redistricting.' But many officials in California, and elsewhere — and not just Republicans — strongly oppose any and all efforts to circumvent the commission, which was created by voters via a ballot measure. 'You can't fight gerrymandering with more gerrymandering. It is a short sighted plan,' Patricia Sinay, a member of the California Citizen Redistricting Commission, said on a call with reporters Tuesday. 'Handing the power to incumbent legislators, lobbyists and special interests will bring back the political gamesmanship that brought us to independent redistricting in the first place.' Other opponents of efforts in California to redraw maps early said that doing so would likely strip black and brown voters of adequate representation. 'Redistricting is not as cut and dry as some are purporting it to be,' said Russia Chavis Cardenas, the deputy director of the California branch of government watchdog group Common Cause. 'We know that gerrymandering hurts Black, brown and poor communities the most — so for our communities of color, this is not a partisan issue, this really is a representation issue.' 'We cannot let the Trump administration bait us into abandoning our communities of color in the name of political gamesmanship,' she added. 'By responding to fire — the efforts in Texas — with fire, Democrats risk permanently damaging their relationship with Black and brown voters and ultimately diluting the voting power of Black and brown voters.'

Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's not running for governor
Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's not running for governor

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Marjorie Taylor Greene says she's not running for governor

Marjorie Taylor Greene says she is not going to run for governor. The Georgia Congresswoman took to social media on Tuesday, saying she was 'always dismayed by constant rumors about me and people who claim I am doing things.' 'If I was running for governor, the entire world would know it because I would be all over the state of Georgia campaigning, I would have ads running, I would be raising scary amounts of money, and I would literally clear the field,' Greene said. Greene said she has many concerns for Georgia, but said 'the good 'ole boy system' and the 'established 'Men Only' Republican firm' have left her uninterested in pursuing a run for governor at this time. 'One day, I might just run without the blessing from the good 'ole boys club or the out-of-state consulting leeches or even without the blessing of my favorite President. One day, I might just run purely out of the blessing of the wonderful people of Georgia, my family and friends, but it won't be in 2026,' Greene said. 'In the meantime, you'll find me in the beautiful hills of Northwest Georgia and fighting with all my might in the House of Representatives for the people who elected me.' TRENDING STORIES: 'The only place I've ever called home': Walton County family sues after home sold using forged deed Father killed in DeKalb was trying to stop thieves from stealing lawn work equipment Geo-fencing technology leads to arrest in 71-year-old grandmother's cold case murder Greene had already ruled out a run for Senate as well. Currently, there are five candidates who have thrown their hats into the governor's race in 2026. On the Republican side are current Lt. Gov. Burt Jones and current Attorney General Chris Carr. On the Democratic side, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms, current state Sen. Jason Esteves, and the Rev. Olu Brown have announced they are running.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store