
Boss sparks outrage over shocking texts to employee's maternity leave request: 'Is this a joke?'
UK Career Expert Ben Askins regularly shares social media videos calling out questionable workplace behaviour.
But a recent video the author and expert posted recounting an 'ugly' response to a pregnant woman's 'reasonable' maternity leave request saw him branding her employer as among 'the top three of the worst bosses I've come across'.
Ben shared the text exchange to his TikTok account in a video that's since been viewed almost 590,000 times.
The messages started with the pregnant employee confirming that her manager had received her 'email about maternity leave requests for February'.
The boss replied: 'I saw it, and I wanted to talk to you about it. Is there any way you'd consider reducing how long you want to take? If you are sure you are going to go ahead with it, would you be open to discussing it all. I am just a bit worried about the costs from our side.'
The female employee - clearly stunned by her boss's reaction - then tried to justify her reason for taking her legally-entitled maternity leave. She even offered to be as helpful as possible to the person who would be temporarily replacing her.
She replied: 'Oh ok, um I was kind of hoping to take as much time as possible. This is my first child and wanted to get as used to being as parent as possible, especially as my family lives quite far away.'
A boss has been slammed online for his guilt-laden response to a female employee's reasonable request for maternity leave
'I will ensure all my responsibilities are handed over seamlessly and help interview for mat cover but I really do want to take the full amount,' she continued.
However, the uncompromising boss continued to badger his pregnant employee over the 'burden' she was allegedly causing by taking maternity leave.
'The challenge is that this is a small company, and it's quite a burden to have to pay both your mat leave and your mat cover. I am just not sure how we can cope,' he replied.
By this point, the pregnant woman continued to politely advocate for her 'rights' – even making generous offers to assist her employer while she's away on leave.
She wrote: 'I appreciate that but this isn't fair to put on me, I am happy to support but I am well within my rights to do this.'
'I will try and support however I can, make sure everything is in place for a smooth handover and can also be on call for emergencies if that helps?'
The worried employee ended the message: 'Is my pregnancy going to be a problem for my role in the company?'
Most likely aware that he was wading into precarious employment law territory, the boss at this stage tried to downplay the discussion.
'Not at all! Your pregnancy is absolutely fine by me, we are a family company,' he replied.
Nevertheless, he continued to guilt his employee about the maternity leave request.
He continued: '[J]ust not ideal timing for me that is all. But if you are not going to help out and reduce the time then nothing really further for us to talk about I guess.'
Employment expert Ben, who is reading aloud the text messages in the social media video, is unable to bite his tongue at various points during the re-telling.
One of his interjections dissected the 'disgusting' behaviour of the manager.
Ben was adamant that the boss in this scenario was 'fully aware of what he's doing'.
'He's trying to use guilt to basically get her to kind of waive her rights [to take the full length of maternity leave]… because you can then sort of go, 'Oh no, she agreed with it'.
The workplace commentator added that the woman's request was entirely 'reasonable' and noted that she went above and beyond with offers of additional assistance as far as recruitment for her replacement and handover.
Ultimately, Ben said it was not the woman's 'problem' that the business may struggle financially with her leave entitlement - and that it's her right as a company employee to take maternity leave.
'That is not her f***ing problem, that is your problem,' he said. 'If she's not an equity holder, she's not a director in the business, it's not her company, that is a YOUR problem.'
The video has attracted nearly a thousand comments – many of them outraged by the employer's unconscionable behaviour.
'This is the kind of boss that makes you start looking for another job while you're on leave,' read one reply.
'She should not even have to justify anything,' added another.
'The gaslighting and guilt is beyond diabolical,' chimed in a third.
Many of the comments were also aggrieved by the manipulative language used by the manager in his text messages.
One commenter wrote: '"Not ideal timing for me." Yea, I mean sheesh, couldn't think of your boss while conceiving your baby?'
Another boldly questioned: 'Did they just suggest she get an abortion for the sake of the company's bottom line?!?'
A third added: '"If you're not going to help out" is an insane thing to say especially after she already stated she's more than happy to arrange cover and everything else before she leaves.'
It was unclear from the messages what jurisdiction the worker was in, but many commenters noted that maternity leave was a legal employment right in several countries – including Australia – and that she may have grounds to take legal action against her employer.
'Wow….. save this, go to an employer lawyer. Get settlement, enjoy!' read one reply.
Another wrote: 'This is a slam dunk mat discrimination case. Employers need to understand that claim awards are potentially unlimited.'
Unfortunately, it also appeared that this exchange was not an isolated incident with many commenters piping up to share their own horror story responses to previous maternity leave requests.
'I had a line manager refuse to discuss it with me because "your baby could still die right up until the end"', read one jaw-dropping comment.
'My old manager tried to convince me to have an abortion… they wondered why I didn't want to go back after having my baby,' read another wild reply.
Worryingly, comments on the TikTok video saw other female workers recount their own stories about the reaction to their requests for maternity leave (Image: stock photo)
Another person wrote: 'My old boss tried to tell me I only got half maternity time with my second child cos I'd already done the full maternity bonding time with my first.'
While many comments were outraged by the boss's responses, there were a small chorus claiming to understand where the employer was coming from.
'Whilst he's being improper, you can't avoid the fact that small companies will avoid employing women of childbearing age to reduce costs,' read one reply.
'For small businesses, maternity leave - even if protected by law - can have a massive impact on the company, especially if it's not performing well financially,' read part of another comment.
Another contributed: '[S]o many companies like this don't like hiring young women because the potential for taking maternity leave is high.'
A disheartened female worker responded to the viral video with a defeated comment that attracted over 1,600 likes.
The woman wrote: 'We're judged by society if we don't want kids and then punished by work when we do. We're judged for working 9-5 and having a career with kids but then also judged if we stay home full time with kids. Women can't win.'
In Australia, the Paid Parental Leave scheme is managed by Services Australia and provides financial support to eligible working parents to take time off work to care for a newborn or recently adopted child.
Some employees will receive parental leave payments from the Australian Government Parental Leave Pay, while others will receive e mployer funded parental leave payments. In some instances, a person may receive both.
According to the Fair Work Act, all employees in Australia are eligible for up to 12 months unpaid parental leave if they have completed at least 12 months of continuous service with their employer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
14 minutes ago
- Finextra
Sainsbury's sells travel money business to Fexco
UK supermarket group Sainsbury's is offloading its travel money business to Ireland's Fexco. Financial terms were not disclosed. 0 Fexco will take over all operations of Sainsbury's Travel Money, including digital platforms and more than 220 bureaux within the supermarket's stores. Services will continue to operate under the Sainsbury's brand with the company receiving an ongoing share of revenue and rental income. The deal increases Fexco's UK retail footprint to more than 460 locations, making it a top five player in the sector. Bláthnaid Bergin, CFO, Sainsbury's, says: With specialist expertise and a strong track record in foreign exchange, Fexco Group is a strong fit for our business. I'm also pleased to confirm that there will be no immediate changes, and customers can expect the same high level of service they know and trust.' Sainsburys has been withdrawing from financial services in the last two years, selling its retail banking operations to NatWest, offloading is mortgage book to Co-operative Bank, and handing over its ATM business to NoteMachine.


The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ofwat chief executive David Black to stand down
The chief executive of Ofwat is to step down as the embattled water regulator prepares to be abolished. David Black will leave the role at the end of August and an interim chief executive will be appointed in due course. The Government last month announced the regulator would be axed in a regulatory shake-up that comes as part of its response to public outrage over rising bills, sewage pollution and large bonuses for bosses. Ofwat may not be formally axed until at least 2027, with the process to overhaul the current system likely to be complex. The regulator said Mr Black, who took over as chief executive in 2021 and had worked in various roles at Ofwat since 2012, had decided the time is right for him to pursue new opportunities. In a statement on Tuesday, he said: 'I have been privileged to be able to lead Ofwat over the last four years, during which time we have achieved a huge amount together as a team for customers and the environment. 'I wish the team every success as they continue their important work.' The four bodies responsible for regulating the sector have faced intense criticism for overseeing companies during the years where they paid out to shareholders and accrued large debts – while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. Currently, Ofwat oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, the Drinking Water Inspectorate ensures that public water supplies are safe, while the Environment Agency and Natural England have regulatory functions to monitor the industry's impact on nature. Under Government plans, measures will be rolled out to merge their regulatory responsibilities into a 'single, powerful' regulator – one for England and another for Wales. The move was recommended by an independent review into the sector, which was commissioned by ministers to answer public fury over the ailing state of the water sector. Led by former Bank of England governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, the review advised far-reaching changes to the way the water system is regulated as one of 88 measures to tackle problems in industry. As part of its own response to the crisis, Ofwat said it would allow firms to raise average bills from 2025 to 2030 to help finance a £104 billion upgrade for the sector as part of its so-called price review, published in December. In his statement on Tuesday, Mr Black said: 'The 2024 price review backed an investment programme of £104 billion, along with a further £50 billion investment in major new water resources, which will improve service, environmental outcomes and resilience in the years to come.' Consumer groups at the time warned that the increases were 'more than what many people can afford', with companies able to raise average bills by £157 in total over the next five years to £597 to help finance the £104 billion. Ofwat chairman Iain Coucher said: 'David has worked, tirelessly, to bring about transformational change in the water sector. 'He has sought new regulatory powers and resources to hold companies to account, taken major enforcement action and provided funding and incentive packages that drive continual improvements for customers. 'On behalf of the board and everyone at Ofwat, I would like to thank David for his leadership and his service over the last 13 years and to wish him every success in the future.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Embattled Ofwat boss resigns amid sewage crisis
David Black has resigned as chief executive of Ofwat, just weeks after the Government called for the beleaguered water regulator to be scrapped. The watchdog confirmed on Tuesday that Mr Black will step down from his position at the end of August, with an interim successor to be announced in due course. It brings an end to Mr Black's tumultuous stint in charge of Ofwat, which has been subject to increasing criticism over its failure to tackle sewage spills. He has been the chief executive of Ofwat since April 2022, having initially joined the regulator in 2012. His planned departure comes after a review published last month by Sir Jon Cunliffe, which called for the water regulator to be abolished. In a damning assessment of Ofwat, the former deputy governor of the Bank of England criticised the 'deep-rooted, systemic' problems in the water sector, which have led to worsening pollution. It added that Ofwat had failed to prevent businesses in the water industry from 'making imprudent financial decisions'. This culminated in the crisis at Thames Water, which is facing the threat of nationalisation after failing to tackle a £17bn debt pile. Prior to the Cunliffe review, Steve Reed, the Environment Secretary, said Ofwat was 'clearly failing' as it had created a regulatory system that allowed the industry to 'get away with it'. He went further last month by scrapping Ofwat altogether, as he said that a new regulatory body will be introduced to mark the 'biggest overhaul of water regulation in a generation'. He added that a new regulator for the water industry would be given legal powers to intervene if customers are overcharged. The date of Ofwat's abolition has not yet been announced. After announcing his departure, Mr Black said: 'I have been privileged to be able to lead Ofwat, over the last four years, during which time we have achieved a huge amount together as a team for customers and the environment. 'The 2024 price review backed an investment programme of £104bn, along with a further £50bn investment in major new water resources, which will improve service, environmental outcomes and resilience in the years to come. I wish the team every success as they continue their important work.' Iain Coucher, the Ofwat chairman, added: 'David has worked, tirelessly, to bring about transformational change in the water sector. He has sought new regulatory powers and resources to hold companies to account, taken major enforcement action and provided funding and incentive packages that drive continual improvements for customers.'