
The Wedding That Wasn't: Inside Gen Z's Playful Reimagining Of Tradition
Last week in Dubai, a friend hosted me for lunch at The Arts Club. As we discussed the evolving landscape of society and culture, she shared a video-cum-advertisement that left quite an impression. It was a video with eye-popping colours, choreography, and an unmistakable shaadi dazzle. Young people in exquisite ethnic ensembles twirling to Bollywood beats, grinning through varmala ceremonies, throwing petals with perfect cinematic timing. It looked like a wedding. It felt like a wedding. Except, there was no bride or groom. No priest. No sacred fire. Just a curated performance of what a wedding is supposed to feel like.
Welcome to the world of fake weddings.
A rapidly growing trend among Gen Z across India's metros—and now increasingly across global campuses and expat communities—these shaadi-style parties have all the makings of a big fat Indian wedding minus the actual marriage. There's a mehendi counter. There's a sangeet. There may even be a baraat, a mock phera, and a buffet that rivals real wedding spreads. But what binds it together isn't commitment—it's content.
At first, I wasn't sure what to make of it. As someone who has spent a lifetime celebrating and chronicling Indian culture—from classical forms to crafts, from cuisine to couture—I carry a deep reverence for the Indian wedding. In our country, a wedding is not just a private promise; it is a public sacrament. A convergence of tradition and modernity, of generations and values, of ritual and joy. So when I saw these ceremonies unmoored from meaning, I felt a curious discomfort.
But the more I read, watched, and listened, a layered story began to emerge. One that is less about parody and more about performance. Less about derision and perhaps more about desire.
Less rebellion, more participation
Let's begin with the facts. These events are not one-offs. They are a flourishing genre. Event companies in Delhi now regularly host fake weddings, with entry passes ranging from Rs 500 to Rs 3,000. Guests dress in ethnic finery, sip cocktails, play shaadi games, and create content for social media. Some of these are on college campuses; others are in rooftop bars or curated lounges. The catch? No real couple, no commitment, and absolutely no family drama.
It's not just India. At Cornell University in the US, a two-day fake wedding drew scores of students. In Dubai, South Asian millennials recently attended a full-blown 'farzi sangeet", complete with gajras and DJ sets. Luxury hotel chains have taken note too—when the Shangri-La Group launched Bandhan, its wedding service vertical, the press event itself was a mock wedding, starring models in Tarun Tahiliani couture and live Sufi musicians.
So, why now? Why fake weddings, and why this generation?
Part of it is simple enough: the Indian wedding, with all its rituals and excesses, is irresistible. The clothes, the food, the music, the emotion—it's a high-voltage celebration of life. For many Gen Zers—especially young professionals far from home, NRIs, or foreigners who've grown up hearing about Indian weddings but never been invited—the idea of a fake wedding is less rebellion, more participation. It's a way to access the magic, without the pressure.
But there's something deeper, too.
Not a mockery—but a mirror
Today's young adults are navigating a landscape of shifting values. They have grown up watching the sanctity of marriage challenged by increasing divorce rates, gender conflicts, and intergenerational disillusionment. For many, the idea of getting married feels loaded, even fraught. But the performance of a wedding? That still retains allure. It's theatre. It's fantasy. It's the one Indian party where everyone knows the choreography.
Perhaps the fake wedding, then, is not a mockery—but a mirror. A mirror reflecting the tensions of a generation that yearns for connection but fears permanence. That craves celebration, but shrinks from commitment. That seeks the symbols of tradition, while rewriting its substance.
There is, of course, an entire ecosystem that makes this possible. Event companies promise curated experiences with flowers, food, mehendi artists, and classic shaadi games. Some venues even offer free cocktails if you show up in ethnic wear. And for Instagram-native attendees, it's a dream—what better occasion to wear that lehenga you've kept for your cousin's wedding, or those kundan earrings you've only worn once?
I spoke recently to someone who attended a 'shaadi rave" in Noida. 'It was the most fun I've had in ages," she said. 'There were dhol players, a fake bride and groom, a haldi station with marigolds, and even a choreographed sangeet. No relatives asking about your job or love life, no melodrama. Just fun." Her joy was sincere. And even contagious.
What makes reinvention meaningful is intention
But I cannot help but wonder what's lost when we detach ritual from meaning. There was a time when a wedding was not just a private milestone but a communal memory. A grandmother's lullaby during the mehendi. A father's quiet tears at the vidaai. A cousin teaching you the steps to a garba. A wedding was a story handed down, not a script improvised for a reel.
What happens when we commodify that emotion? When commitment becomes cosplay?
There is also the question of sustainability. The fake wedding economy may generate business for bartenders and DJs, but will it sustain traditional artisans, mehfil singers, or the handloom weavers of Chanderi and Banarasi? Will a party that lives and dies on Instagram support the quiet dignity of those who bring poetry to the phera?
That said, I don't wish to play the moralist. Culture is not static. It flows. It morphs. It reinvents. And Indian culture—vast, inclusive, irrepressibly alive—has always accommodated reinvention. From hybrid cuisines to destination weddings, from eco-friendly rituals to gender-neutral pheras, we have never been afraid to play with form.
But what makes reinvention meaningful is intention. When we perform a ritual, we owe it at least some sincerity. Otherwise, what anchors our joy? What deepens our celebration?
Am I against fake weddings? I am against shallow mimicry. If these events become occasions for real connection, cultural appreciation, or even joyful experimentation, they have value. But if they reduce centuries of emotion into hashtags and headpieces, then perhaps we must pause and ask: what are we celebrating? And why? Or is this spectacle simply a reflection of our collective state of mind?
A columnist and author, Sundeep Bhutoria is passionate about the environment, education, and wildlife conservation. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
culture marriage wedding
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 01, 2025, 05:03 IST
News opinion Opinion | The Wedding That Wasn't: Inside Gen Z's Playful Reimagining Of Tradition
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
Tamannaah denies rape of Avantika in Baahubali: It's finding herself through a man
Actor Tamannaah Bhatia, in an exclusive interview with The Lallantop, opened up about her perspective regarding the controversial scene featuring her and Prabhas in director SS Rajamouli's 'Baahubali: The Beginning'. In the scene, Prabhas' Shivudu starts stripping Tamannaah's Avantika and applying some natural make-up on her to remind her of the femininity that she had forgotten. This particular scene gave way to a discourse about how problematic it is and sparked a debate about a candid conversation addressing an article titled 'The Rape of Avantika', the actor defended the creative vision behind the controversial sequence while addressing broader issues of societal repression. Bhatia began by addressing what she sees as a fundamental issue. "This is my take. Jab log aapko control nahi kar sakte. woh ek technique istemaal karte aur woh hai shame and guilt. Kyunki woh hamesha aapko aisa mehsoos karate hai ki aap jo bhi kare uske baare mein aapko sharmanaak hona chahiye. jab woh aapko mehsoon kara sakte woh aap pe control paa sakte hain. (When people can't control you, they use a technique and that is shame and guilt. Because they always make you feel that whatever you do, you should feel ashamed about it. When they can make you feel that, they can gain control over you.). This is one aspect of the conversation."The actor also highlighted what she views as a deeply rooted hypocrisy in Indian society regarding natural human processes. She pointed out the contradiction in how society treats the very process that brings life into existence, noting that despite its fundamental importance, it remains heavily stigmatised. "In our country, people look down upon the idea of the process by which you and I are here today. If our parents didn't come together, I don't think you'd be here. Neither would I nor would anybody else be. And we look down upon it so much, we are so repressed," Bhatia on this societal contradiction, she said: "Jo itni pure cheez hai, usi ko ham sabse gandi nazar se dekthe hai. Woh nazariya jo hai, wo ham sabko aise mehsoos karate hain that we have we have to be ashamed about that aspect of our lives - to hide and not discuss, or we can't be open about that conversation). The thing that is so pure, we look at it from the dirtiest perspective. That perspective makes us all feel that we have to be ashamed of that aspect of our lives - to hide and not discuss or we can't be open about that conversation)."advertisementThe conversation took a more specific turn when Bhatia addressed criticism of certain film sequences, particularly defending the artistic vision of directors. "Log hamesha aapko mehsoos karane chahte hai ki aapne kuch galat kar diya. But, yeh sabse basic cheez hai life ki. Isiliye aaj hum hai. Ye mujhe aaj tak baath samajh mein nahi aayi ki log kyun - jab aap ek film dekhte hain - wo ek director ka vision hota hai (People always want to make you feel like you've done something wrong. But, this is the most basic thing in life. That's why we are here today)," she said, expressing confusion about why people judge films without understanding the director's intent. Bhatia recalled a conversation with renowned director SS Rajamouli, who explained his vision for the stripping sequence in 'Baahubali 1': "I remember when Rajamouli sir was explaining that entire sequence to me, he was like, 'she is that divine feminine, who is wounded. She is beautiful. She is feminine. She wants to be loved. But, she has gone through so much hardship in her life that she feels like she needs to push everybody away. She can't let anybody inside because they will always take advantage of her. So, she holds boundaries. But, here, there is a young man who is merely trying to woo her to make her see how beautiful she is.'"advertisementDescribing the visual storytelling approach, Bhatia explained: "Agar aapko yeh visually darshana pade, toh there was an entire sequence about, kuch baali shift ho jahte hai, bindi lag jahte hai - jab apne aap ko dekhte apna khud ka chehra dekhti hai - wo dekhti arrey mujhe hameesha se lagtha tha ki mujhe apna aap ko itna strong kar diya tha ki apni jo namrata hai wo kahi na kahi gum ho gayi thi. (If you had to show it visually, then there was an entire sequence about some bangles being worn, bindi appearing on her forehead - when she sees herself, sees her own face - she sees 'oh, I always thought I had to be my warrior.' She had made herself so strong that her essence, her innocence, had gotten lost somewhere. And this is Shiva's character who helps her reconnect with herself)."The actress emphasised how individual perspectives shape the interpretation of artistic content. "Yeh tha nazariya. Ab yeh unka nazariya hai. yeh har cheez ko vaise hi dekhthe hai. Kyunki everyone perceives. Aapna kuch bhi dikha liya vo sabse purest cheez dikha lijiye. Agar kiso lagta hai sex is a bad thing or your body is a bad thing, usko vohi dikhayi dega kyunki woh uska nazariya hai, uski soch hai. Ek filmmaker aapko kuch bahut hi beautiful dikhana chahta hai lekin aapko kuch aur dikhta hai. (This is how everyone sees everything. Because everyone perceives. Whatever you show them, even if you show the purest thing. If someone thinks sex is a bad thing and your body is a bad thing, that's what they'll see. Because that's their perspective. A filmmaker wants to show you something very beautiful, but you see something else. That's their thinking)," she conclusion, Bhatia firmly rejected negative interpretations of the artistic work, stating: "I don't think I take the burden of that and, as creative people, I don't think it was the rape of Avantika. It was Avantika finding herself through a young man who was wooing her."The actress's comments reflect ongoing debates in Indian cinema about artistic freedom, societal norms, and the interpretation of intimate or romantic scenes in films. Her stance emphasises the importance of understanding creative vision rather than imposing predetermined judgments on artistic expression.- EndsMust Watch


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Son of Sardaar 2 X Reviews: Ajay Devgn-Mrunal Thakur get mixed reactions, from paisa vasool to worse than Housefull 5
Last Friday was a pretty eventful one with so many exciting Bollywood releases lined up for movie-buffs. While Akshay Kumar's Housefull 5 arrived on OTT after its theatrical run, Son of Sardaar 2 and Dhadak 2 released on the silver screen. Starring Ajay Devgn, Mrunal Thakur, Ravi Kishan, Neeru Bajwa and Deepak Dobriyal, Son of Sardaar 2 is a standalone sequel to the 2012 film Son of Sardaar. Did the sequel manage to tickle audiences' funny bone like the original had? Well, the verdict is here and the internet is divided. Mrunal Thakur and Ajay Devgn in Son of Sardaar 2 Some fans were blown away by the 'clean comedy' that Ajay Devgn's film presented, with many calling Son of Sardaar 2 a 'paisa vasool' watch. One such netizen tweeted, 'Mind Blowing movie 🔥🔥💓💓 Full of Roller coaster, Entertaing start to end what a comeback of @ajaydevgn in Comedy Genre. Its absolute Banger 🎊🎊@ravikishann man he is on another level 🔥🔥Galat Negativity log faila rahe h, ye Paisa Wasool h 4/5*😃 #SonOfSardaar2 #AjayDevgn,' whereas another review read, 'Just came out of watching #SonOfSardaar2 and I'm still smiling! 😄 What a fun-filled, clean, family entertainer. @ajaydevgn and @mrunal0801 have amazing chemistry, they light up the screen together! 🔥❤️ @RaviKishan and @Deepak Sir have done a good job. Overall the movie is good.' But there were also quite a lot of netizens who compared Son of Sardaar 2 to Housefull 5, calling the Ajay-starrer worse. For instance, a tweet read, '#SonOfSardaar2 Review: PAKISTAN ZINDAABAAD! RATING - ⭐⭐ 2/5* Respect for #Housefull5🫡 At least, it wasn't Pro-Pakistani. #SOS2 misfires big time despite some hilarious segment and cheerful parodies. One of the weakest and out of the context sequels in Bollywood. #AjayDevgn.' Another post stated, '#SonOfSardaar2 Literally a colossal flop. Not one good scene. All the jokes and comedy are pure gags and vulgar. Worse than #Housefull5 0 story and screenplay is 🗑️. #AjayDevgn is horrible and expressionless. #MrunalThakur is just eye candy. Songs are bad too. TRASH! 0.5/5.' After reading these lukewarm reviews of Son of Sardaar 2, are you planning to watch the comedy this week?


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Tamannaah Bhatia says moms tell her their toddlers only eat while watching Aaj Ki Raat: ‘Kaunse lyrics samajh aayenge'
Actor Tamannaah Bhatia talked about her choice of films and songs, adding that they need to have an impact on or influence her audience's lives. In an interview with The Lallantop, Tamannaah said that her projects can't be something that she only does for a living. She said, "so be it", if a child has to watch her song while eating their food. Tamannaah Bhatia in a still from her famous song Aaj Ki Raat from Stree 2. Tamannaah talks about toddlers watching Aaj Ki Raat When the host asked which song she was talking about, Tamannaah replied that it was Aaj Ki Raat, her dance number from Stree 2. She said, "I can't tell you the number of mothers that have called me up and said, 'My child will eat food only if he hears Aaj Ki Raat'. Because bacche apne diaper mein aise aise hil rahe hote hai (moves side to side)." Tamannaah says babies don't remember lyrics When the host said that, this raised concern about the mothers, Tamannaah added, "Mummyo ka concern hai ki bacche khana kha rahe hai ya nahi? Priorities hote hai. Ek aadh saal mein unko kaunse lyrics samajh mein aayenge (Mothers' concerns are whether their kids are eating properly or not. There are priorities. What lyrics will they understand at the age of one)? There is music. We forget films, we remember the songs. It's the fact." About Aaj Ki Raat The song Stree 2 was a sensual dance number featuring Tamannaah. The song, a seductive medley, talks about a woman urging her lover to only watch her from afar and not touch her. The song and music video, featuring Tamannaah, were both popular. Stree 2 is a comedy horror film directed by Amar Kaushik. The film stars Shraddha Kapoor, Rajkummar Rao, Pankaj Tripathi, Abhishek Banerjee and Aparshakti Khurana. It earned ₹900 crore, and was among the biggest hits of 2024. About Tamannaah's upcoming film Tamannaah is gearing up for her upcoming film VVAN: Force of the Forest. Directed by Deepak Mishra and Arunabh Kumar, the film will also star Sidharth Malhotra. Set in the dense, mythical heartlands of Central India, VVAN is rooted in Indian folklore and promises a gripping cinematic experience filled with ancient legends, hidden temples, and secrets buried deep within nature. The film is set to release on May 15, next year.