Europeans angry with Musk still aren't buying his cars as Tesla sales drop for fifth month in a row
NEW YORK (AP) — Europeans still aren't buying Teslas with figures out Wednesday showing sales plunged for a fifth month in a row in May, a blow to investors who had hoped anger toward Elon Musk would have faded by now.
Tesla sales fell 28% last month in 30 European countries even as the overall market for electric vehicles expanded sharply, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association. The poor showing comes after Tesla's billionaire CEO had promised a 'major rebound' was coming last month, adding to a recent buying frenzy among investors.
They were selling on Wednesday, pushing the prices down more than 4% in early afternoon trading.
Musk had said Tesla was sure to get a boost once the company was done retooling its factories to produce a new version of its biggest seller, the Model Y. But that was finished months ago, and the new models are widely available. Investors are now hoping that a cheaper Tesla expected to be out later year will help reverse the sales decline.
Overall, battery electric vehicle sales rose 25% in Europe compared to a year earlier. The market for EVs was particularly strong in Germany, where Musk has angered potential buyers by publicly supporting the far-right, anti-immigrant Alternative for Germany party in elections. Overall EV sales there leapt 45%.
China's SAIC Motor was the big winner for the month with its European sales of EVs and other kinds of cars jumping 38%. That has allowed the company to leapfrog Tesla, which a year ago was selling more cars in the region.
SAIC sold 18,716 vehicles last month versus Tesla's 8,729.
The sales drop for Tesla comes at a crucial time for the company as it launches a test run of its driverless 'robotaxis' service in Austin, Texas. Musk says that if goes well, he expects to introduce the service in several other cities in quick succession and have as many as a million of the automated cabs on roads by the end of the year.
Reviews so far have been mostly good, but the service is limited to a dozen or so cars and some passengers have circulated videos of problems during their rides, including one showing a robotaxi heading down a lane for opposing traffic.
Federal traffic safety regulators said Tuesday they were looking into the videos.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Goldman Sachs Isn't Sold on Tesla's (TSLA) Robotaxi Just Yet
Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:) is one of the . On June 25, Goldman Sachs analyst Mark Delaney maintained a 'Neutral' rating on Tesla and reiterated a 12-month price target of $285. The firm has raised concerns about the near-term prospects of the company's newly launched robotaxi service, suggesting that investors may have gotten ahead of themselves. Tesla launched robotaxi operations on Sunday, June 22, making its service available for a group of early-access individuals in Austin, Texas. In response, investors drove the stock price more than 8% the following day. Delaney has cautioned against this optimism, stating that even though the commercial launch paves the way for success in the autonomous vehicle market, near-term scaling may take longer than anticipated. 'The use of an Austin-specific tech stack, a Tesla employee being present in the vehicle (albeit on the passenger side), and the navigation/lane issue reported in the first day of use suggests scaling will be slow in the near-term in our view. We also believe this suggests that it will be some time before consumers can use [Full Self-Driving] on their personal vehicles in a wide operating area.' The analyst also mentioned how 'some degree of [autonomous vehicles] related profit was already in the stock.' Tesla's valuation also boosted in Monday's rally against rival Waymo, which the firm believes is already ahead of Tesla in terms of robotaxi operations. 'With the move higher on 6/23/25, Tesla added > $90 bn to its market cap or roughly double Waymo's reported valuation of > $45 bn as of October 2024 per Bloomberg.' While we acknowledge the potential of TSLA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 AI Stocks in the Spotlight and . Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
CNBC
23 minutes ago
- CNBC
How China could shut down auto factories around the world
China's dominance of the global supply chain is starting to hurt automakers. On April 4, the country cut off exports of a class of minerals called "heavy rare earth elements," and it sent the global auto industry into a panic. Rare earths are a class of 17 elements that have become indispensable in all kinds of applications — everything from fighter jets and submarines, to smartphones and appliances. You can even find them in sports equipment, like tennis rackets and baseball bats. They are also, of course, essential to the modern automobile. Gas burning cars use them to filter pollution through the vehicle's catalytic converter. Electric vehicles use them in motors and batteries. "Rare earths are really critical, and not just for electric vehicles," said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "They are in your seat belt, your steering wheels, various parts of your electrical components. You are not going to manufacture a car without rare earths." Rare earths are split into further categories, based on their atomic weight. Light rare earths are easier to source. It's the medium and heavy ones that China has totally monopolized. China controls about 70% of the world's rare earth mines. But where it really dominates is in processing. The name "rare earth elements" is a bit misleading — the elements themselves are not that rare in nature. What makes them "rare" is the complex and difficult process of separating them from the rock they are embedded in, and from each other. China controls about 90% of the world's rare earth processing, and has a total monopoly on the processing of heavy rare earths. Since at least 2023, China has been tightening its grip on several of the key critical minerals it provides for the world, Baskaran said. Still, the April 4 export restrictions shocked the automotive world. "It came out of nowhere," said Dan Hearsch, managing director at AlixPartners. "Nobody had any time to react to it. I mean, within a matter of weeks, all of the material in the pipeline was out." European automakers shut down factories. Ford had to idle production of its popular Explorer SUV. This month, China started permitting some access to companies that supply parts to some automakers. And this week the Trump administration said it had reached a deal to expedite rare earth and magnet shipments to the U.S. Still it is unclear how durable these deals will be. "We're not out of the woods yet," Baskaran said. "There is a lot of volatility in the U.S.-China relationship in between tariffs and mineral restrictions. We've seen China ramp up restrictions over two years. Rare earths are just the newest one." There are longer-term solutions if China cuts off access again: recycling, developing other sources and innovation, for example. This crisis may even spur the industry to take action that reduces dependence on China. But this rare earths crisis is just the latest in a series of supply disruptions over the last several years. Hearsch said it will likely get worse. "Today it's rare earths," Hearsch said. "But tomorrow it can and will be something else that maybe we're not thinking about, that maybe isn't even all that valuable and suddenly will be." Watch the video to learn more
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AGG Is a Great Choice for Most, but I Like This Vanguard ETF Better
Rising levels of public debt could lead to the tightening of the yield premium of investment-grade corporate bonds over U.S. Treasuries. Corporations will arguably manage debt more responsibly than successive U.S. administrations have proven to be. The Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF has outperformed the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF offering in recent years, and risk is rising with the latter. 10 stocks we like better than iShares Trust - iShares Core U.s. Aggregate Bond ETF › The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NYSEMKT: AGG) is a suitable option for investors seeking bond exposure in their portfolios. That said, the Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF (NASDAQ: VTC) is a better option for long-term investors on a risk/reward basis. Here's why. The stated aim of this ETF is to "track the investment results of an index composed of the total U.S. investment-grade bond market." As such, it holds high-quality debt deemed to have a relatively low default risk. Based on S&P Global's ratings, the ETF currently holds just 12.07% of its funds in BBB-rated bonds (the lowest investment-grade debt rating), with 75.5% in bonds rated AA- or above. As you might expect, and indeed hope for, the majority of this bond ETF's assets are invested in U.S. Treasuries and government-backed mortgages. In short, it's a relatively safe bond ETF with a very low expense ratio of 0.03% and a 30-day SEC yield of 4.45%. It's exactly the sort of bond fund that risk-averse investors might want to include in their portfolio to help balance the rising levels of risk faced by their equity holdings. The Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF owns investment-grade corporate debt, but a similar mix of corporate debt to that held by the iShares ETF. Investors buy bonds and often gauge their yields based on a perception of risk. Traditionally, U.S. Treasuries have been considered among the lowest-risk bonds available. After all, the world economy would likely be in very serious trouble if the U.S. defaulted on its debt. That's why other bonds, including the corporate bonds held in the Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF, tend to trade at higher yields. Those higher yields reflect their greater default risk. This is why the Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF has a 5.24% 30-day SEC yield while iShares ETF has a 30-day SEC yield of only 4.45%. The chart below, which displays their 12-month trailing yields, also illustrates this point. But here's the thing. Given the seemingly ever-rising levels of public debt in the U.S. -- an issue that has been criticized by Elon Musk among others -- and the costs of servicing that debt, investors are entitled to ask who they trust more to demonstrate financial discipline in response to potentially rising interest rates: corporations or the U.S. government? Interest rates on public debt could rise simply due to the ongoing need for more of it to be issued to support rising debt servicing levels and more spending. Meanwhile, increasing public debt may encourage investors to shy away from holding dollar-denominated assets or reduce the weighting of their assets held in dollars. That could be a negative for the value of the U.S. dollar. To be clear, rising U.S. interest rates (Treasury yields) are not good news for corporate America, as they will push corporate bond yields up (and send corporate bond prices down). However, there are a couple of things to bear in mind: Many U.S. corporations are global in scope and earn money internationally, too, so all things being equal, a weakening of the dollar will improve their ability to cover interest payments on dollar-denominated debt. The argument here is about a relative shift in risk; if government debt becomes relatively riskier, all things being equal, corporate debt should become more attractive. To put it succinctly, the spread between the yields on investment-grade corporate debt and public debt will get smaller, and so will the spread between these two ETFs. Indeed, this spread tightening is one reason why the Vanguard ETF has outperformed the iShares ETF in recent years. If you share the view that U.S. public debt is likely to keep rising, then it makes sense to expect the market to price that risk in. If you also share the view that this will lead to investment-grade corporate bonds outperforming, then the Vanguard ETF is a better option. Before you buy stock in iShares Trust - iShares Core U.s. Aggregate Bond ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and iShares Trust - iShares Core U.s. Aggregate Bond ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. AGG Is a Great Choice for Most, but I Like This Vanguard ETF Better was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
