logo
Toddler dies after ‘after being forgotten' inside car in Spain during 35C afternoon

Toddler dies after ‘after being forgotten' inside car in Spain during 35C afternoon

The Sun20 hours ago
A TODDLER has died after being 'forgotten' inside a car in Spain -amid a horror heatwave which has seen temperatures surpass 35 degrees.
The boy, believed to be aged around two, was left inside his dad's car on an industrial estate in the Costa Dorada town of Valls near the east coast city of Tarragona.
3
3
3
The alarm was raised around 3pm on Tuesday afternoon before firefighters rushed to the vehicle.
When they arrived, they found the youngster's dad beside the child with the car door already open.
They tried to revive him with help from emergency medical responders who arrived soon after.
The responders practised CPR on the toddler before discovering he had gone into cardiac arrest.
Efforts to save his life were unsuccessful - and he was tragically pronounced dead at the scene.
A police probe into the horror accident has been launched.
It is unclear if any arrests have been made yet, but police questioned the parent shortly after the ordeal.
Police sources said the toddler's dad had arrived for work at around 9am and allegedly forgot the child in his seat in the back of his car, the Daily Mail reported.
A horrified colleague is believed to have alerted the dad around six hours later - after passing by the car on the industrial estate and spotting the child inside.
Detectives are now reportedly working on the theory that the child died from heat exhaustion and dehydration after being left in the vehicle in 35 degree heat.
Psychologists have also been brought in to provide the toddler's family with counselling.
More than 100 deaths since Saturday have been linked to Spain's first summer heatwave.
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Southend-on-Sea man Michael Shirley died in fire lit by cigarette
Southend-on-Sea man Michael Shirley died in fire lit by cigarette

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Southend-on-Sea man Michael Shirley died in fire lit by cigarette

A man living in sheltered accommodation burned to death while sitting in his armchair, a coroner sparked by a discarded cigarette broke out at Michael Shirley's flat in Baxter Avenue, Southend-on-Sea, on 11 68-year-old died from breathing in smoke and a "severe burn injury", Essex Coroner's Court was tribute to her father, Laura Shirley said: "He loved a good laugh and had a grand sense of humour." Two fire crews found Mr Shirley's first-floor flat was ablaze and "heavily smoke-logged" after being called at 11:42 entered the property using breathing apparatus and extinguished the flames, but said the occupant died at the coroner Michelle Brown said the circumstances in which Mr Shirley died were not suspicious."The severely burnt body of this 68-year-old gentleman was found sitting in an armchair in the flat," she said, opening an inquest into his death. The blaze was recorded as accidental by firefighters, who said it was caused by a lit to the inquest, Ms Shirley told the BBC her father was a keen dog lover who inspired her passion for art and drawing."I have great memories of him driving me and my mother up to Alton Towers and we all had such a lovely time there," the 26-year-old station manager Rick Williams said his thoughts went out to the family."We would encourage anyone who smokes to make sure cigarettes are properly stubbed out and you avoid smoking while tired, if you've been taking strong medication or you've had a drink," he said at the time of the full inquest was adjourned until a later date. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Mother who lost her arm and leg when she fell down gap on Tube platform and was hit by two trains 'contributed' to her own life-changing injuries, claims TfL in £25m lawsuit
Mother who lost her arm and leg when she fell down gap on Tube platform and was hit by two trains 'contributed' to her own life-changing injuries, claims TfL in £25m lawsuit

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Mother who lost her arm and leg when she fell down gap on Tube platform and was hit by two trains 'contributed' to her own life-changing injuries, claims TfL in £25m lawsuit

A mother-of-two who lost her arm and leg when she slipped on a wet platform and was hit by two Tube trains 'contributed' to her life-changing injuries through her own negligence, according to Transport for London. City worker Sarah de Lagarde, 46, slipped on a wet platform at High Barnet station in north London in September 2022 and fell down the gap between the platform and the train. Ms De Lagarde, global head of corporate affairs at investment firm Janus Henderson, was returning home from work at 10pm on September 30, 2022. She fell asleep and was woken up by another passenger at the end of the Northern Line at High Barnet station. After getting off the train, she noticed it was returning back the same way and stepped backwards to get back on. But she fell through the gap on to the tracks. Nobody heard her desperate cries for help and she was run over and crushed by two trains. By the time she was rescued and taken to hospital, she had to have her limbs amputated. The PR executive, who now uses two prosthetic limbs including a bionic arm, has launched a legal battle against London Underground Ltd (LUL), part of Transport for London (TfL), and is seeking £25million in compensation. However, in defence documents submitted to the High Court, TfL denies liability, arguing Ms De Lagarde's injuries were the result of her own negligence. The public transport network says she, 'placed herself in a position of danger' because she was 'negligent' in how she got off the train. Ms de Lagarde was on the tracks for 15 minutes before the alarm was raised. Speaking previously, she said: 'Twenty-two tonnes of steel crushed my limbs, and, if that wasn't bad enough, I remained on the tracks undetected until the second train came into the station, crushing me for a second time.' TfL defence lists six grounds of Ms de Lagarde's alleged contributory negligence Failed to manage her exit from the train so that she was on stable footing when she was on the platform. Failed to walk safely along the platform so that she stepped sideways and backwards on the platform after alighting the train and fell backwards into the gap. Failed reasonably to maintain her balance. Failed to have sufficient regard for her own safety and placed herself in a position of danger. Failed to heed warnings of the existence of the gap, including announcements given on the network of the existence of a gap between trains and platforms. Failed to guard against the obvious risk of danger of falling off the platform if positioned close to its edge. In defence documents submitted to the High Court by TfL 's legal team and seen by MailOnline, TfL suggest 'the incident was caused or contributed to by the claimant's negligence'. According to the TfL defence: 'The claimant took a few steps forward on to the platform and then took a few steps backwards, before the rear of her body struck the rear side of the door of the train she had exited from. 'The claimant continued to move backwards and, approximately seven seconds after exiting the train, she fell into the gap between carriages five and six of the train.' Around five minutes later, the train driver walked back through the train to get to the driver's cab to start his return journey southbound. He noticed Ms de Lagarde's brown leather bag wedged between the train and the platform, which he later handed to lost property. But he didn't investigate further. TfL's defence said the driver 'did not see or hear the claimant at that point and did not look into the gap, having no reason to do so'. She called out for help, but no one came and the train left the platform, bringing her right arm with it. She managed to reach her phone but her face was so badly injured the face ID didn't work and it was too wet from the rain for the touchscreen to function, so she again tried to shout for help. But again, no one came. And then a second train arrived, running over her right leg. On Wednesday June 25, Ms de Lagarde attended the first High Court hearing in her case against London Underground Limited, which is part of Transport for London before Judge Master Roger Eastman. The judge indicated that an eight-day trial would be listed at the High Court for early 2027. Standing outside the Royal Courts of Justice in central London, she said: 'I was run over and crushed by not one, but two London underground trains on the Northern Line. 'Miraculously, I survived, but it cost me dearly: the first train took my arm, and the second train took my leg. That night I also lost my mobility, my independence, my dignity and above all my ability to hug my two young children with both arms. 'Today, I stand before you not just as a survivor, but as a voice for change.' TfL say the driver of the second train did not see Ms de Lagarde lying on the track, despite the train's headlights being on. However, TfL said their purpose was 'not to illuminate the tracks or the platform' but to make the train visible to workers on the track. Ms de Lagarde was on the tracks for 15 minutes before the alarm was raised and London Fire Brigade and London's Air Ambulance medics were alerted. Three air ambulance medics helped save her life, with Dr Benjamin Marriage and paramedics Chris Doyle and Kevin Cuddon receiving a national bravery award. Mr Cuddon said: 'Sarah was trapped in a very awkward position so I crawled under the train to help the London Fire Brigade get her out. 'Together we had to carry her about 30m under the train and put her on a device to lift her up to the platform. 'She was really quiet, pale and had lost some blood.' Ms de Lagarde had stepped on to an 'accessibility hump', a slope of a ramp that is designed to make it easier for wheelchair users to board trains. An investigation by TfL found that the ramp was 'in principle compliant' with TfL's standards and that 'passengers stepping on to the base of the platform ramp is considered a sub-optimal arrangement' but was nevertheless Ms de Lagarde says 'remained conscious and continued to cry out for help'. Her claim states: 'She was left lying partially across the first rail of the track, closest to the station platform. 'The claimant attempted to manoeuvre her right foot and leg across the first rail in order to retrieve her mobile telephone. She cried out for help, but nobody came to her assistance.' She was unable to move into a recess space in the platform wall as it was blocked by a steel frame and 'excess ballast', it is claimed. It is disputed by TfL that there are different safety procedures for trains departing from a terminus station, as opposed to a station elsewhere on the line. 'The same checks are required on dispatching a train from a terminus station and a non-terminus station,' TfL said. Ms de Lagarde was airlifted to the Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel where she underwent surgery before being transferred to the Amputee Rehabilitation Unit in Lambeth on October 20. She was discharged home on December 1, 2022. Ms de Lagarde receives ongoing care at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital in Stanmore. Representing Ms de Lagarde, Leigh Day partner Thomas Jervis said: 'Like millions of other Londoners, Sarah de Lagarde was just trying to get home from work when she was hit by two tube trains at High Barnet station. 'Transport for London is refusing to accept liability and positively blames Sarah for what happened. 'This case is incredibly important and may have a profound impact on how London's transport network is operated in the future.' A TfL spokesperson said: 'We are responding to a legal claim brought by Sarah de Lagarde. 'It is not appropriate to discuss details of our defence while this case is ongoing. 'Our thoughts continue to be with Sarah and her family following this terrible incident, and we will continue to make every possible effort to learn from any incident on the Tube network.

Man (25) with brain injury after steel jack dislodged at road works fell on him settles action for €4.75m
Man (25) with brain injury after steel jack dislodged at road works fell on him settles action for €4.75m

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Man (25) with brain injury after steel jack dislodged at road works fell on him settles action for €4.75m

A 25-year-old man who suffered a traumatic brain injury when, it was claimed, he was struck by a steel jack which was dislodged when a car drove by road works has settled a High Court action for €4.75 million. Karam Ali, his counsel Edward Walsh SC instructed by Connellan Solicitors, told the High Court was a general operative and was working laying ducts on Shantalla Road, Galway city, when the accident happened five years ago. Advertisement Counsel said a car struck a steel jack which then collided with Mr Ali. Liability, counsel said, was conceded last year and the case was before the court for assessment of damages only. The settlement was reached after mediation. He said Mr Ali suffered an acquired brain injury and now has difficulty with concentration and excess fatigue, and other issues. He had been in this country for eight months when the accident happened. Karam Ali (25)with an address in Bradford, England, had sued car driver Mohamed El Helali of Barnacranny, Bushy Park, Galway, as a result of the accident on May 1st, 2020. Advertisement It was claimed that the car suddenly and without warning struck a steel jack, which in turn hit Mr Ali, and he suffered catastrophic injuries. Mr Ali was wearing a safety helmet, which it was claimed was knocked off in the accident. It was claimed there was a failure to appreciate the presence of Mr Ali on the roadway and a failure to appreciate that works were ongoing. It was further claimed that the driver allegedly neglected to look where he was driving and allegedly failed to drive with due care and attention and to proceed cautiously past the works where Mr Ali was working. There was also, it was contended, a failure to take account of the roadworks and traffic conditions pertaining at the time and to take heed of Mr Ali on the public road. Advertisement Mr Ali, who sustained a head injury including fractures to the skull, was taken to hospital in Galway and later transferred to Dublin, where he had to have an operation to remove part of his skull to manage brain swelling due to severe traumatic brain injury. His family travelled to Ireland to be at his bedside, and he was later transferred to a UK hospital. Approving the settlement, Mr Justice Paul Coffey said it was fair and reasonable.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store