Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay US$243 million in fatal Autopilot crash
The verdict is a rare win for victims of accidents involving Autopilot. Musk has been pushing to rapidly expand Tesla's recently launched robotaxi business based on an advanced version of its driver assistance software.
Tesla shares fell 1.8 per cent on Friday, and are down 25 per cent this year.
Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon, as well as her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo, US$129 million in compensatory damages plus US$200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet.
Tesla was held liable for 33 per cent of the compensatory damages, or US$42.6 million.
Jurors found the driver George McGee liable for 67 per cent, but he was not a defendant and will not have to pay his share.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,' Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said.
'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries,' he added.
Tesla said it will appeal.
'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' the company said.
The plaintiffs had sought US$345 million of damages. Their lawyers said that the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot.
Impact on future cases
Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial.
In June, a judge rejected Tesla's bid to dismiss the Florida case. Experts said on Friday's verdict may spur more lawsuits, and could make future settlements more costly.
'It's a big deal,' said Alex Lemann, a law professor at Marquette University. 'This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its Autopilot technology.'
The verdict could also impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year.
As Tesla's electric vehicle sales fall, much of its nearly US$1 trillion market value hinges on Musk's ability to pivot the company into robotics and artificial intelligence.
Driver's role
The trial concerned an Apr 25, 2019, incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 100 kph through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder.
McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV.
Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 23 metres to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries.
'We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash,' said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology.
'The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software,' he added. 'That's a big deal.'
Tesla, in its statement, said McGee was entirely at fault.
'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash,' the company said. 'This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs' lawyers blaming the car when the driver, from day one, admitted and accepted responsibility.' REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
International Business Times
2 hours ago
- International Business Times
Tesla Ordered to Pay $200 Million Over Fatal Florida Crash Linked to Autopilot
Tesla has been ordered by a Miami federal jury to pay over $200 million in damages for a 2019 crash that killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and seriously injured Dillon Angulo in Florida. The jury found Tesla's Autopilot system partly responsible for the collision. The court awarded $200 million in punitive damages and $43 million out of $129 million in compensatory damages. Tesla is now liable for nearly two-thirds of the total payout. The case marks a significant legal blow to Tesla's driver-assist technology. The crash occurred when driver George McGee ran a stop sign, flashing lights, and a T-intersection at 62 mph, slamming into a parked Chevrolet Tahoe. McGee admitted fault during the trial, stating he trusted the car to alert him and brake. "I trusted the technology too much," he testified. Tesla pushed back strongly, calling the ruling "wrong" and claiming it could slow progress in automotive safety. A spokesperson said the driver was distracted and speeding, which violated Tesla's safety instructions. The company also emphasized that drivers are told to stay alert and keep their hands on the wheel. Plaintiffs' attorney Brett Schreiber argued Tesla's branding, especially the use of the word "Autopilot," misled users. He said the company allowed the system to work on roads it wasn't designed for, and failed to disable it when drivers were distracted. Schreiber also accused Tesla of losing or hiding critical crash data. Tesla's defense insisted that McGee was solely at fault for dropping his phone and ignoring safety guidelines. They noted that he had driven through the intersection 30–40 times before without incident. Financial analyst Dan Ives commented that the ruling is a serious setback for Tesla and could impact the wider industry. Legal experts say the case could inspire more lawsuits against Tesla, as similar cases have often been settled or dismissed before trial. This ruling could lead to increased scrutiny of how Tesla markets its driver-assist features and raise pressure on the company as it moves forward with plans for fully autonomous vehicles.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
The AI race has big tech spending US$344 billion this year
[LONDON] If there's any lesson to take from the spending plans issued by the world's largest technology companies over the past two weeks, it's to never underestimate the fear of missing out. Microsoft, which set a US$24.2 billion capital spending record last quarter, plans to drop upwards of US$30 billion in the current period. similarly spent US$31.4 billion last quarter, almost double what it dropped a year ago, and is maintaining that level of investment. Google owner Alphabet raised its capital expenditures guidance this year to US$85 billion. Then there's Meta Platforms: The social networking giant lifted the low end of its forecast for 2025 capital expenditures and projected that costs will continue to grow at an even faster pace next year. Altogether, the four companies are expected to spend more than US$344 billion for the year, with much of it going to the data centres necessary to run artificial intelligence (AI) models. 'We have basically tripled capex investment in cloud due to AI,' Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Mandeep Singh said. The emphasis from virtually every company executive during this earnings season was on investing as quickly as possible to get ahead. 'We need the teams to execute at their very best to get the capacity in place as quickly and effectively as they can,' Microsoft chief financial officer Amy Hood told analysts in a call on Wednesday. Susan Li, Meta's CFO, said the goal of its own spend is to secure the advantage 'in developing the best AI models'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Wall Street's response has been mixed. Meta was rewarded – in large part because the company posted a strong second-quarter sales beat and issued a rosy revenue forecast, signalling that the billions it's spending on AI are paying off. 'On advertising, the strong performance this quarter is largely thanks to AI unlocking greater efficiency and gains across our ad system,' chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg said on an analyst call. Zuckerberg has plans to build several massive data centres and has been luring top AI researchers with compensation packages valued at hundreds of millions of US dollars. The company recently restructured its internal AI division, now referred to as Meta Superintelligence Labs, in an effort to build human-level AI capabilities and apply that technology across its products. Shares of the company have gained more than 8 per cent since it reported earnings on Wednesday. Amazon, on the other hand, failed to convince investors that its lavish spending has been worth it. The stock was down as much as 8.1 per cent on Friday after the company reported tepid sales from its cloud division. The results were 'especially disappointing' given the strong performance from Google's and Microsoft's own cloud services, according to Bloomberg Intelligence (BI). And the ongoing capital costs will not help. The operating margin for Amazon's cloud unit will continue to face pressure 'through 2026 as capital spending ramps up', BI analysts Poonam Goyal and Anurag Rana said. Alphabet's shares are essentially unchanged from last week when it reported earnings and issued guidance. The company raised its capital expenditures outlook by US$10 billion and expects to ramp up spending even more in 2026. chief executive officer Sundar Pichai explained that the investments are necessary to keep up with customer demand. 'Obviously, we are seeing strong momentum across our portfolio, and especially in cloud,' Pichai told analysts in a call on Jul 23. 'It's a tight supply environment, and we are investing more to expand.' Nikhil Lai, an analyst at Forrester, put it another way: If Google wants to keep up with rivals, he said, it has little choice but to follow suit: 'Google's hand is forced by OpenAI to spend tremendously on AI's infrastructure and applications.' Microsoft tied its AI investments directly to a 39 per cent jump in sales for its Azure cloud-computing division, which came in ahead of analysts' estimates. 'We continue to lead the AI infrastructure wave and took share every quarter this year,' chief executive officer Satya Nadella said in a call with analysts on Jul 30. 'In Microsoft's case, the returns are good,' Gil Luria, an analyst with DA Davidson, said. The only question now is whether Microsoft's customers are in turn seeing a decent return on investment, he said. 'That's where the test will be,' he said. 'If they don't, they are not going to increase that spend next year.' Apple's capital plans pale in comparison to its big tech peers. But the iPhone maker did raise its spending estimates, tying much of the increase to AI efforts. Apple's property, plant and equipment investments totalled US$9.47 billion in the nine months ended Jun 28, up nearly 45 per cent from a year ago. 'You are going to continue to see our capex grow,' chief financial officer Kevan Parekh told analysts on Thursday. 'It's not going to be exponential growth, but it is going to grow, substantially. And a lot of that's a function of the investments we are making in AI.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Wall Street banks lose ground in Europe as tariffs spook clients
AS US President Donald Trump has ratcheted up his rhetoric against trading partners in Europe, corporates across the continent are taking notice. Some companies have begun to diversify their banking relationships away from the giants of Wall Street, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That has been a boon for Europe's leading banks, which have been actively vying to win the extra business. 'Some players are saying that it's better to go to European or French investment banks for advice on financing or mergers and acquisitions,' said Arnaud Petit, managing director of Edmond de Rothschild's corporate finance business. Deutsche Bank chief executive officer Christian Sewing said he sees similar in potential clients' requests for proposals. 'It is happening every day with client wins and RFPs and new business that we put on.' So far this year, roughly half of the euro bond deals from non-US companies did not involve any of the five biggest US banks, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That is up five percentage points from a year earlier. For sterling bonds, the gap has widened even further. Wall Street banks were shut out of just 47 per cent of deals throughout all of last year. So far this year, though, they have been excluded from 64 per cent of them. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The emergence of the ability of a few European banks 'to be able to offer competitive services and advice to clients' has created a desire among clients to switch, according to UBS chief executive Sergio Ermotti. 'We believe we are well-placed to continue to benefit from that diversification.' 'Specific skills' Even before Trump's trade war kicked off in earnest, the biggest of the US banks warned that it was starting to see an impact. By April, JPMorgan Chase had already lost 'a couple' of bond deals tied to the tariff uncertainty, with companies opting for local banks instead, chief executive officer Jamie Dimon said in an interview with Fox Business at the time. He warned that the tumult was 'causing cumulative damage, including huge anger at the United States'. The latest example of a win for non-US banks came this week, when Zurich-based insurer Chubb issued an offshore yuan bond. It opted for Standard Chartered to help take on the deal. The bank was told: 'We want to bank with the regional champions, rather than just with global banks in general,' Standard Chartered chief financial officer Diego de Giorgi said. 'Because we think that you guys bring specific skills in a world that is fragmenting.' Chubb is not an exception. The effect is most pronounced in Asia, where economies are expected to be hard hit by the changing trade regimes and the re-routing of supply chains, said Ruchirangad Agarwal, head of corporate banking for Asia and the Middle East at research firm Coalition Greenwich. 'The willingness of companies in Asia to change their transaction bank is currently at a high: a third of them plan to issue a new (request for proposal) within the next 12 months,' Agarwal said. Already, US lenders' market share in financing trade for Chinese companies has dropped in recent years, from 12 per cent in 2017 to about 7 per cent share now, he added. Martin Smith, head of markets analysis at East & Partners, said: 'We expect to see heightened uncertainty and customer churn at US banks as large corporates take an active risk management stance on FX, interest rates, counterparty risk, geopolitical tensions and supply chain disruptions.' BNP Paribas, meanwhile, has gained more share than any other player in Asia, he added. 'There are clearly strategic opportunities in the tectonic shifts that the world has been seeing in recent months,' Societe Generale chief executive officer Slawomir Krupa said of companies looking to shift toward European banking partners. 'The logic behind this form of risk diversification has become more apparent for companies.' BLOOMBERG
