Far-right Israelis storm Al-Aqsa, UNRWA compounds amid Jerusalem Day march
Some Israelis chanted, 'Death to Arabs' and 'May your village burn,' as they marched through the alleyways of Jerusalem's Old City on Monday, going through the Muslim quarter to mark 'Jerusalem Day', which commemorates the Israeli occupation and annexation of East Jerusalem after the 1967 war.
Thousands of heavily armed police and border police were dispatched in advance because settlers regularly assault, attack and harass Palestinians and shops in the Muslim quarter. The settlers live in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem in settlements and outposts, which are illegal under international law.
Groups of young people, some carrying Israeli flags, were seen on Monday confronting Palestinian shopkeepers, passers-by and schoolchildren as well as Israeli rights activists and police, at times spitting on people, lobbing insults and trying to force their way into houses.
Police detained at least two youths, according to AFP journalists at the scene.
A small group of those rallying, including an Israeli member of parliament, stormed a compound in East Jerusalem belonging to the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, known as UNRWA.
Israel has banned the agency from working in occupied Palestinian territory and in Israel, impacting the life-saving work that it has been carrying out for more than 70 years in areas that include the besieged and bombarded Gaza Strip.
UNRWA West Bank coordinator Roland Friedrich said about a dozen Israeli protesters, including Yulia Malinovsky, one of the legislators behind an Israeli law that banned UNRWA, entered the compound, climbing its main gate in view of Israeli police.
Last year's procession, held during the first year of Israel's assault on Gaza, saw ultranationalist Israelis attack a Palestinian journalist in the Old City and call for violence against Palestinians. And four years ago, the march contributed to the outbreak of an 11-day war in Gaza.Earlier on Monday, Israel's far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, and other politicians were among more than 2,000 Israelis who stormed the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound and surrounding areas.
Ben-Gvir released a video on his X account from the site – Islam's third holiest – saying he 'prayed for victory in the war, for the return of all our hostages, and for the success of the newly-appointed head of the Shin Bet – Major General David Zini'.
Negev and Galilee Minister Yitzhak Vaserlauf and Knesset member Yitzhak Kreuzer were among those accompanying the ultranationalist minister.
Backed by armed police, Ben-Gvir has carried out similar provocative moves in the compound before, often at sensitive junctures in Israel's war on Gaza, to advocate for increased military pressure and to block all humanitarian aid entering Gaza.
The Jerusalem Waqf – the Islamic authority that oversees the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, known to Muslims as al-Haram al-Sharif (the Noble Sanctuary) – decried the storming of the compound by Ben-Gvir and other members of the Israeli Knesset and called for a halt to all 'provocative activities' in the area.
Under the management of the Jordan-appointed Waqf, only Muslims are allowed to pray at the compound.
Al Jazeera's Nida Ibrahim said the march is aimed at asserting Israeli dominance over the city.
'Videos show Israeli citizens inside the Old City of Jerusalem attacking Palestinian shops and throwing objects at them,' Ibrahim said, reporting from Doha, Qatar as Al Jazeera has been banned from reporting in Israel and occupied East Jerusalem.
'This is again a reminder that no one has immunity.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
43 minutes ago
- USA Today
The far left says AOC didn't go far enough against Israel. That's concerning.
The far left is so far gone that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is somehow seen as not anti-Israel enough. On July 18, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, introduced a defense appropriations amendment that would strip Israel of funding for its Iron Dome missile defense system. The amendment garnered just six votes in support. One of the surprising votes against the amendment came from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, who is not an ally of Israel. Ocasio-Cortez has accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza and voted against all other funding for Israel's offensive capabilities. So voting against stripping Israel of Iron Dome funding might seem like a switch for her. It's not. She ultimately voted against the larger legislation to help Israel. Still, her vote on the failed amendment was met with backlash from the far left because she wasn't aggressive enough in her denunciation of Israel. That criticism of AOC makes it clear that even just opposing Israel's offensive in Gaza is not enough for the anti-Israel left, who demand that you also support stripping Israel of its defenses. They are not interested in peace; they are interested in more dead Jewish far left and far right have something in common there. AOC's position on Israel isn't enough for the far left 'Marjorie Taylor Greene's amendment does nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza,' said Ocasio-Cortez on X. 'What it does do is cut off defensive Iron Dome capacities while allowing the actual bombs killing Palestinians to continue.' While I disagree with Ocasio-Cortez's characterization of Israel's campaign in Gaza, her position makes sense from her perspective that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Opinion: What does antisemitism look like in America? A grandmother killed in the street. AOC eventually voted against the final defense spending bill itself, which authorized an additional $600 million in aid to Israel. However, that wasn't enough for the far left. The Democratic Socialists of America, by whom AOC was once endorsed, demanded she go further against Israel. They are upset that AOC didn't also support the amendment. 'An arms embargo means keeping all arms out of the hands of a genocidal military, no exceptions,' wrote the Democratic Socialists of America in a statement. 'This is why we oppose Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's vote against an amendment that would have blocked $500 million in funding for the Israeli military's Iron Dome program.' The Iron Dome is Israel's only defense against rocket attacks from any of its hostile neighbors. About 30,000 projectiles have been fired into Israel since the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attacks, which started the latest war between Israel and the Hamas terrorist organization that controls the Gaza Strip. Democrats remain divided on Gaza Those who are against funding for the Iron Dome aren't trying to limit Israel's ability to continue its military campaign in Gaza. They are trying to strip Israel of its defensive capabilities, leading to its destruction. The very same can be said about the Republicans who voted in favor of Greene's amendment. Opinion: America's mental health field is overrun with antisemitism. It's dangerous. In 2024, the issue of Gaza isn't why the Democrats lost, but it certainly did not help. People have theorized that it contributed to why Vice President Kamala Harris chose Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz over Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro as her running mate in her presidential campaign, and it probably contributed to Harris losing the swing state of Michigan. The anti-Israel left is not the dominant wing of the Democratic Party, but they certainly have influence. AOC is learning this now, and it's something she needs to navigate if she has aspirations to higher office as a Democrat. The far left demands complete agreement on their slate of issues, and that makes them a difficult group to navigate for Democrats, even for someone like AOC. They must figure out how to win without these voters, or how to weave them back into the fold if they want electoral success. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
China Reacts to Trump's UNESCO Decision
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China accused the U.S. of negating its responsibilities as a major global power in response to President Donald Trump's decision to withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Trump is pulling the U.S. from UNESCO after his administration's review raised concerns about perceived pro-Palestinian and pro-Chinese bias, and an emphasis on "woke" diversity, equity, and inclusion policies that Washington opposes. "It's the third time the U.S. has withdrawn from UNESCO. The country hasn't paid arrears for a long time. This is not what a major country should do," Guo Jiakun, spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, said at a press briefing on Wednesday, July 23. He added: "China firmly supports UNESCO's work." Jiakun noted the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations, and said China calls on all countries "to reaffirm their commitment to multilateralism and take concrete action to support the UN-centered international system". The Trump Administration has sought to withdraw the U.S. from multilateral organizations and agreements that it sees as running against American interests. He had withdrawn from UNESCO during his first term, only for his successor President Joe Biden to re-enter in an effort to counter growing Chinese influence over the agency and its priorities. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Border Czar Blasts Hunter Biden: 'Former First Drug Addict'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's border czar, Tom Homan, dismissed Hunter Biden's criticism of the administration's immigration policy, saying he did not care what the "former first drug addict" thought. Hunter Biden, the son of former President Joe Biden, made the comments in an interview with independent journalist Andrew Callaghan that touched on a broad range of issues, including immigration. The younger Biden was convicted of three felony charges for federal gun violations in June 2024 and pardoned by his father in December. Hunter Biden has spoken publicly of his drug use. In his 2021 memoir, Beautiful Things, he wrote, "I was a crack addict and that was that." Then-President Joe Biden, left, and his son Hunter Biden in Nantucket, Massachusetts, on November 29, 2024. Then-President Joe Biden, left, and his son Hunter Biden in Nantucket, Massachusetts, on November 29, 2024. MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images Why It Matters Trump campaigned forcefully on the promise of mass deportations and beefed-up borders. The administration's actions, which include a marked increase in ICE raids, have underscored this focus. While immigration remains a cornerstone of Trump's second term and a defining issue of his administration, a poll this week by CNN showed that he hit a record low approval rating on the issue. What To Know In his interview on Callaghan's Channel 5, Hunter Biden dismissed "people that are really upset about illegal immigration," adding: "How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned? How do you think you've got food on your f****** table? Who do you think washes your dishes?" In an interview on Fox News' The Ingraham Angle, Homan derided Hunter Biden and defended the administration's immigration policy. "I don't really care what the former first drug addict thinks. I just thank God every morning I wake up we've got President Trump in the Oval Office," Homan said. He continued: "Because of President Trump, in seven weeks we've got the most secure border in the nation's history, and now we're arresting public safety threats and national security threats every day across this country. We've already arrested three times the number of criminals that Biden did during the same time frame." Homan added that Trump had recently committed to prioritizing immigration action in "sanctuary cities," which have laws and policies that limit or prevent their law enforcement officials from assisting federal officers with civil immigration arrests. In a Sunday poll from CNN conducted by SSRS, the president had a 42 percent approval rating on immigration and a 58 percent disapproval rating. The survey was taken between July 10 and 13 among 1,057 U.S. adults. It had a margin of error of 3.5 percent. In a survey taken from April 17 to 24, the president had a 45 percent approval rating and a 54 percent disapproval rating on immigration. In March, Trump had a 51 percent approval rating on the issue in a poll by CNN and SSRS, with a 48 percent disapproval rating. The survey also showed that 55 percent of U.S. adults believed the president had gone too far in deporting immigrants living in the country illegally. This is an uptick from an April poll showing that 52 percent believed so and a February poll showing 45 percent. What People Are Saying Tom Homan, the border czar, told Fox News in reference to sanctuary cities: "We're going to flood the zone. We're going to send hundreds of additional ICE agents to these cities. If they don't want to help us and get the bad guy in the county jail, then we're going to flood the neighborhoods until we find that guy. We're going to flood worksites until we find that guy because we're going to make this country safe again." Political analyst Craig Agranoff told Newsweek via text message on Monday: "This shift likely stems from increasing public discomfort with the administration's aggressive deportation policies and proposals for massive new detention centers, which polls show a majority of Americans oppose as going too far." What Happens Next Immigration will likely remain a divisive issue, shaping the domestic political landscape and the broader debate on the U.S.'s identity and values.