
Video of Trump condemning Israeli strikes on Gaza uses fabricated audio
"Trump finally spoke up about Israel," reads the English and Tagalog-language caption of a Facebook reel shared on June 21, 2025.
It features the US president purportedly saying: "Israel, listen carefully. You are responsible for over 55,000 people getting wiped out in Gaza and now you are talking about peace? You must be joking".
The post has amassed at least two million views and has been reposted by other Facebook users.
Image
Screenshot of the false Facebook post taken on June 24, 2025 with a red X mark added by AFP
Trump said on June 24 that a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was holding, minutes after he criticised both countries for violating the truce he had announced (archived link).
Israeli attacks on Iran killed at least 610 civilians during the 12-day war between the arch-foes, Iran's health ministry said, while 28 people were killed in Israel in strikes across the country (archived link).
Even as attention has shifted to the war with Iran since June 13,
Comments on the video suggest the users were misled.
"He is changing sides now," one user commented.
"I thought you were attacking Iran. You're on Israel's side," another user said.
But the circulating clip's audio had been doctored.
US election debate
Google reverse image searches led to a longer video of the third presidential debate in 2016 between Trump and his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton that US broadcaster NBC News streamed on October 20, 2016 (archived link).
Visual elements from the YouTube video -- such as the blue background, Trump's black suit and red tie -- matched the circulating false posts.
In the original clip, Clinton asked Trump whether he was willing to "admit and condemn" the alleged Russian involvement in the US elections, to which he called her out for "a great pivot of the fact that she wants open borders".
Trump also said Russian President Vladimir Putin "has no respect" for Clinton.
The continuation of his answer at the 27:47 mark was used in the false posts, where he can be seen making the same hand gesture.
Image
Screenshot comparison of the false Facebook post with a red X mark added by AFP (L) and the NBC News video
Trump did not criticise Israel during the debate (archived link).
An analysis using the voice cloning detection tool Hiya in The Verification Plugin, also known as InVID-WeVerify, shows the video's audio was "very likely AI-generated".
Image
Screenshot of the audio analysis from Hiya in The Verification Plugin, also known as InVID-WeVerify, taken on June 24, 2025
AFP has debunked a slew of online misinformation about the Iran-Israel war.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Russia launches biggest aerial strikes on Ukraine yet
Russia has launched its biggest aerial attack against Ukraine overnight, with a total of 537 aerial weapons fired, including 477 drones and decoys and 60 missiles, Ukraine's air force reported. Of these, 249 were shot down and 226 were lost, likely having been electronically jammed. Apart from the drones, the air force listed four Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missiles, seven Iskander-M/KN-23 ballistic missiles, one of which was shot down; 41 Kh-101/Iskander-K cruise missiles of which 33 were shot down and one disappeared from radar; five Kalibr cruise missiles (four shot down) and three S-300 anti-aircraft missiles. Yuriy Ihnat, head of communications for Ukraine's air force, told the Associated Press that the overnight onslaught was 'the most massive air strike' on the country, taking into account both drones and various types of missiles. The attack targeted regions across Ukraine, including western Ukraine, far from the frontline. In a statement on social media, the Ukrainian air force had earlier announced that an F-16 fighter jet has been lost, the third one so far in this war: "Sadly, we have suffered another painful loss. Last night, while repelling a large-scale enemy air attack, First Class pilot Lieutenant Colonel Maksym Ustymenko, 32, was killed while flying an F-16 aircraft. The pilot used the full range of onboard weapons and shot down seven aerial targets. While engaging the final target, his aircraft was damaged and began to lose altitude. Maksym Ustymenko did everything he could to steer the aircraft away from a populated area but did not manage to eject in time." EU warplanes scrambled to protect airspace Poland and allied countries scrambled aircraft to ensure the safety of Polish airspace, the Polish air force said on Sunday. As for the casualties, Kherson regional Governor Oleksandr Prokudin said one person died in a drone strike. Six people were wounded in Cherkasy, including a child, according to regional Governor Ihor Taburets. The fresh attacks follow a statement by Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday that Moscow is ready for a fresh round of direct peace talks in Istanbul. However, US-led international peace efforts have so far produced no breakthrough. Two recent round of talks between the Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul were brief and led to further exchanges of prisoners of war but yielded no progress on reaching a settlement.


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Musk-Trump fallout means stronger EU Tech enforcement, experts say
ADVERTISEMENT The fallout between US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, along with the expansion of the Digital Services Act (DSA) on July 1st, could make the law easier for the European Commission to enforce. Experts told Euronews Next that while Musk worked as a special employee at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it is possible that he was perceived as an official voice of the administration. Musk's former position could have made it harder for the Commission to put penalties on Musk's social media network X because they were worried about a larger 'spillover effect' with the Trump administration, said Oreste Pollicino, professor of digital constitutionalism and artificial intelligence at Bocconi University in Italy. 'Musk was seen not only as the owner of X but as a part of the US administration; this will not be the case anymore,' he said, adding that 'the political cost of targeting Musk could decrease'. 'They worry about the fallout' The DSA is a piece of legislation that regulates the spread of illegal and harmful online activities on platforms such as marketplaces, social media sites and app stores. On July 1st, a voluntary code of practice on disinformation will be folded into the DSA, which means platforms will have to abide by it going forward. (Twitter had signed the code in 2018 under previous leadership but withdrew in 2023 after Elon Musk bought the platform and renamed it X.) There's no proof that the Commission is avoiding taking action against X due to Musk's ties with Trump at the time because that would make it look 'very bad, ' said Jan Penfrat, senior policy advisor with European Digital Rights. However, he said that one of the major indicators that the Commission was worried about the Trump-Musk relationship is the fact that there is not yet a decision in its initial investigation into X, which was launched over 500 days ago. Last July, preliminary findings from the Commission found that X was in violation of the DSA in areas of 'dark patterns, advertising transparency, and data access for researchers'. 'There's tonnes of evidence. The Commission said so themselves. So why are we still waiting on [a] binding decision against X?' Penfrat told Euronews Next. 'One good explanation would be that yes, they are hesitant because they worry about the fallout … so if Trump and Musk aren't getting along anymore, [it could] lead to stronger and more decisions [under the legislation]'. How could the Commission prevent future enforcement issues? In the wake of the Trump-Musk fallout, Pollicino said there could be additional appetite from EU lawmakers to introduce complementary 'instruments' to close certain enforcement gaps. One of the things these instruments could focus on is refining a 'more precise criteria' for what might constitute a 'systemic risk' for harmful content, he added. The DSA currently evaluates four categories of systemic risks: the dissemination of illegal content, negative effects for the exercise of fundamental rights, negative effects on civic discourse, and negative effects on the protection of minors, gender-based violence and public health. 'If X is no longer perceived as an ideological instrument for a powerful United States political actor, it might recalibrate how systemic risks are assessed vis-a-vis … platforms like Meta, TikTok, [and] YouTube,' Pollicino said. The instrument could potentially address platform capture risk, Pollicino added, when a service becomes 'functionally aligned with a political actor or agenda [to] undermine democratic discourse.' Penfrat said that while the DSA is a 'solid' piece of legislation, more investment needs to be made into how to enforce it at the national level. What's next for the DSA investigation into X? The most recent update of the X investigation is that the Commission asked for more information about the algorithms the platform uses to push some content over others. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to see if there have been any additional steps taken on the DSA investigation but did not receive an immediate reply. Pollicino said he believes the scope of the investigation that the European Commission already launched under the DSA into X should be expanded to include any harmful commentary or content that Musk would've perpetrated on the platform during his time as DOGE special government employee. 'For sure, there was a bigger impact when there was this alliance between Musk and Trump,' Pollicino said. Musk could eventually be charged with up to six per cent of X's profits in Europe under the DSA, but Penfrat argued that the penalty should be applied to Musk's entire net worth instead. 'If you limit it to X, then there's not much to fine,' he said. 'X doesn't have a huge revenue compared to how rich Elon Musk is … you'll end up with a fine that's, you know, less than pocket money [for him],' he said. Euronews Next reached out to X but didn't get an immediate reply.


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
UK considers envoy for Britons held abroad
High-profile cases like jailed Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abdel Fattah and imprisoned Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai have spotlighted the plight of Britons held in jails overseas. The UK foreign ministry insists it continues to press such cases with governments, but relatives of detainees and human rights organisations complain of a lack of urgency and transparency. "The government is committed to strengthening support for British nationals, including through the appointment of a new envoy," a Foreign Office spokesperson told AFP. Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer has said an "Envoy for Complex Consular Detentions" is expected to be appointed "before the summer". The government has not specified the terms of the role but it could be similar to America's Special Presidential Envoy for Hostage Affairs, a position created in 2015. Unlike the United States though, Britain does not take part in prisoner exchanges. Professor Carla Ferstman, an expert on arbitrary detentions at the Human Rights Centre at Essex Law School, said appointing someone would be the "clearest thing that the UK can do that it hasn't done yet". "When you have someone at the highest level they command a certain level of respect," she told AFP. Abdel Fattah was arrested in September 2019 and sentenced to five years in prison on charges of "spreading false news" after sharing a Facebook post about police brutality. He is still imprisoned despite a hunger strike by his mother and Britain's foreign ministry saying it is pushing for his release "at the highest levels of the Egyptian government". His sister Sanaa Seif said an envoy would mean "a proper continued focus on" freeing detainees. - 'Clear strategy' - "It's also important to have a focal point that can help coordinate between different government bodies so that they all work in synchronisation," she told AFP. Seif believes the government should consider revising travel advice to Egypt too, a call also made by lawmakers who have suggested the government should sanction Egyptian officials as well. "Is it not clear that words are no longer sufficient?" Conservative peer Guy Black asked in parliament's House of Lords recently. Ferstman said tightening travel guidance can be a powerful tool. "It's a big deal because all of a sudden tourists can't get insurance and it's harder for business travel to happen. There's all kinds of implications," she explained. Amnesty International recently called for the government to develop a "clear strategy" to support arbitrarily detained Britons, including by demanding that UK officials attend trials. The Labour government pledged in its general election-winning manifesto last year that it would introduce "a new right to consular assistance in cases of human rights violations". Amnesty also wants the government to call for a person's "immediate release", including publicly when it is requested by the family. It said London took three years to publicly call for Lai to be freed, something his son Sebastian said "sends the wrong message" to "autocratic states". "The quicker we have the government speak out post-arrest, that's the window of opportunity to have people released," Eilidh Macpherson, Amnesty's campaigns manager for individuals at risk told AFP. UK officials say the government can be wary of accusations it is interfering in another country's judicial system. "Sometimes it may need to be quiet about what it's doing, but this shouldn't come at the expense of transparency," said Ferstman. Jagtar Singh Johal, a Sikh blogger from Scotland, was arrested in India in November 2017 while there for his wedding on accusations of being part of a terror plot against right-wing Hindu leaders. He has not been convicted of a crime and in March was cleared in one of the nine charges against him. The foreign ministry spokesperson said Foreign Secretary David Lammy "continues to raise concerns" about the detention with India's government "at every appropriate opportunity". But his brother, Gurpreet Singh Johal complains of being kept in the dark. "We don't know what's actually being said," he told AFP. Gurpreet said an envoy would be a "good thing" but until the position is in place, "We won't know exactly what it means." © 2025 AFP