
Classified report to reveal full scale of Iranian threat to UK
A study by Parliament's Intelligence and Security Committee will also show the damage caused by Tehran through cyber attacks aimed at UK companies.
The Telegraph understands the findings will conclude that Iran remains one of the biggest state-based threats to the UK, in the same bracket as China and Russia.
Continued attempts by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which has been crippled by Israeli assassinations in recent months, to meddle with the UK will also be laid bare.
The report is more than 100 pages long and the result of two years of work. It has been compiled with interviews with Iranian experts at British intelligence services and access to classified documents.
Starmer signed off the study
Those familiar with the report's contents expect it to be a wake-up call for ministers about the persistent threat of Iran and its ability to act within the UK.
Sir Keir Starmer has personally signed off the report. Unlike other parliamentary committees, the group's work is so sensitive the Prime Minister gets prior sight of conclusions.
It comes at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East following military action between Iran and Israel, and the US bombing of three Iranian nuclear facilities.
Tehran had issued veiled threats that UK military bases in the Middle East could be targeted if there was British support for the Israeli air strikes that preceded the US bombing.
The Prime Minister ended up not fully endorsing Donald Trump's military strike, refusing to admit whether it was legal or the right course of action.
In January 2024, the UK Government imposed sanctions on Iranian officials it said were involved in threats to kill journalists.
Last year Ken McCallum, the director-general of MI5, also used a rare public speech to reveal the scale of potential attacks being thwarted by the security services.
Mr McCallum said over the last two years Iran had been behind 'plot after plot' in the UK, organised with 'an unprecedented pace and scale'.
He added: 'Since January 2022, with police partners, we have responded to 20 Iran-backed plots presenting potentially lethal threats to British citizens and UK residents.
'As events unfold in the Middle East, we will give our fullest attention to the risk of an increase in – or a broadening of – Iranian state aggression in the UK.
'Like the Russian services, Iranian state actors make extensive use of criminals as proxies – from international drug traffickers to low-level crooks.'
The Intelligence and Security Committee is expected to conclude in its report that Iran is continuing to make plots against people living in the UK.
Dissidents of the regime on British soil will be singled out as being at risk. Threats of reprisal attacks on the European continent will also be flagged.
The reports will also detail the IRGC's reach in Britain.
The IRGC was founded as an ideological custodian of Iran's 1979 revolution but has since morphed into a major military, political and economic force in the country.
There has been a long public debate about whether the IRGC should be formally declared a terrorist group and banned under a proscription process.
Critics of the move, including those inside the Government, argue that it would limit the UK's ability to talk to and therefore influence senior Iranian political and military figures.
The Intelligence and Security Committee is unlike other parliamentary committees in that all nine members are cleared to read confidential intelligence to help scrutinise the agencies.
Its hearings are held in private. Reports with findings and recommendations are pulled together over a much longer timescale than other committees, with direct involvement from intelligence figures.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar 'must cut ties' to Tony Blair Institute amid Gaza plan row
The Financial Times has revealed that the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), a non-profit organisation founded in 2016, is involved in a project led by Israeli businessmen which used financial models developed inside the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) to envision Gaza as a trading hub. Plans outlined in a slide deck, titled the 'Great Trust', were shared with US president Donald Trump and included a proposal to pay half a million Palestinians to leave the area and replace them with private investors to develop Gaza. According to the newspaper, the TBI did not author or endorse the final slide deck, but two members of its staff were involved in message groups and calls as the project developed. READ MORE: Wes Streeting calls John Swinney an 'analogue politician' amid NHS row This has led to backlash, with the SNP saying the Scottish Labour leader and the Prime Minister have 'real and urgent questions to answer'. SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said it was 'common knowledge' that Starmer's Downing Street political operation and Scottish Labour are 'inextricably linked and influenced' by the Tony Blair Institute. We previously reported on how Scottish Labour are reportedly consulting with TBI, which has previously called for more private involvement in the NHS, on its health policies ahead of the Holyrood 2026 election. (Image: PA) 'The Tony Blair Institute has been involved with a group who were developing a plan which amounts to ethnic cleansing in the Gaza strip. It is one more awful stain on Tony Blair's shameful legacy in the Middle East,' Flynn (above) said. 'Given their close co-operation and ties to the Tony Blair Institute, real and urgent questions now need to be answered by both Keir Starmer and Anas Sarwar. It is common knowledge that their senior teams are inextricably linked and influenced by this Institute which, we now know, was present when a plan to steal Palestinian land and livelihoods was being developed.' The SNP MP added: 'Both Starmer and Sarwar have at least three urgent questions to answer - will they come out and publicly condemn the former Labour Party Leader, Tony Blair, whose Institute has been part of this sickening plan? Will they fully reveal their own dealings with this Institute and their team's involvement with the staff who were aware of this sickening plan? And will they now commit to cut all ties and all funding to the Tony Blair Institute? "If the Labour Party fails to immediately cut ties to the Tony Blair Institute, it will also severely undermine their credibility in achieving a two state-solution in the region. 'The Labour Party were shamefully slow in calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and the UK Labour Government is still authorising the sale of arms to an Israeli Government that is engaged in the collective punishment of the Palestinian people. These revelations are another part of that shameful story for the Labour Party and their neglect for the plight of the Palestinian people.' Scottish Labour and Labour have been approached for comment.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Nigel Farage says he ‘can't apologise' for lack of MP vetting in general election
Nigel Farage has told Reform UK councillors 'how we behave matters' and says he 'can't apologise' for the 2024 election vetting process because he was not involved in it. On Monday morning, Mr Farage arrived to overcast drizzle at Kent County Council (KCC) in Maidstone, to be greeted by expectant councillors from the Reform-led authority. The visit comes after news that Reform MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock James McMurdock has resigned the party whip amid allegations that he took out government loans during the Covid pandemic for businesses with no employees. Mr Farage was keen to distance himself from the absence of Reform candidate vetting processes for the 2024 general election, and said he 'can't apologise' for it. He said: 'I came in, I inherited this situation where hundreds of candidates who stood in the last general election had not gone through a vetting process. 'I said on July 5, the day after the election last year, that we would now professionalise. 'We put 1,630 candidates into the field on May 1, more than any other party with very, very few rows or arguments – so the vetting process worked for this year, I can't apologise for what happened before.' The Reform leader did not answer when asked whether the allegations faced by Mr McMurdock were an embarrassment for his party. 'Let's find out the truth, I know as much about this right now as you do.' said Mr Farage. He added that he would be heading to Westminster later on Monday to find out more about the situation. Addressing KCC Reform councillors on the steps inside County Hall, he outlined his expectations for them. Mr Farage said: 'Behaving with integrity is a responsibility upon all of you, although that doesn't mean you all have to become stuffed shirts or anything like that. 'You are holders of public office you are responsible and how we behave matters.' Later, he told the PA news agency: 'Yes I think, I think that when you become elected at any level you have a responsibility, 'I'm not asking for stuffed shirts, I'm not asking for boring people. I'm just saying think, think to all of these people here who were basically in 'civvy street' in political terms before May 1, just think before you act.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trial date set for Palestine protest organisers accused of public order offences
A trial date has been set for two pro-Palestinian protest organisers charged with committing public order offences at a demonstration. Benjamin Jamal, 61, of Kingston upon Thames, and Christopher Nineham, 63, of Bow, are both accused over the protest held in central London on January 18, which saw 77 people arrested in total. The Metropolitan Police alleged that some protesters tried to breach conditions imposed on the protest by marching out of Whitehall. Jamal, who is the director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), is facing offences including inciting people to fail to comply with protest conditions. Nineham is vice chair of the Stop the War Coalition. Both defendants appeared in the dock and spoke only to confirm their names and dates of birth during a hearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Monday. District Judge Minhas granted the defendants unconditional bail and fixed a trial date of February 23 next year at the same court, with a time estimate of six days. The judge said Jamal and Nineham would be allowed to give evidence during the trial. Ten other people were charged by police for offences relating to the same demonstration, which also saw former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and MP John McDonnell voluntarily interviewed by the force. Owen Greenhall, defending Jamal, told the court that Jamal and Nineham's trial had been identified as 'the lead trial' of all the related cases, with the others pushed back as a result. The judge said: 'Each case will be determined on a case-by-case basis.' A group of pro-Palestinian supporters gathered outside the court chanting and waving flags ahead of the hearing. Several counter-protesters also appeared carrying Israeli flags and holding signs that read 'Defend protest for all', and were subsequently blocked off from the larger crowd by police officers. Speaking on stage outside the court before the hearing, Nineham said the defendants were 'very, very confident that in the end, we will get justice.' He said: 'The proscriptions, the arrests, the mounting campaign against the movement are clearly designed to intimidate us and to divide us, and they have, of course, attacked our marches and our protests from the very start of this campaign. 'Once again, we are here to say that we stand united and we stand defiant, and I think it's important to recognise that the attempts to shut the movement down are backfiring.' In a statement shared ahead of the hearing, the PSC said the charges should never have been brought against Jamal and Nineham and were 'a political attack designed to suppress solidarity with the Palestinian people'. 'It is outrageous that Chris and Ben, their families and friends will be left with this threat of criminal charges hanging over them, possibly for many more months,' the statement added.