logo
AI is changing our world. At what point will it change our reality?

AI is changing our world. At what point will it change our reality?

USA Today16 hours ago
We aren't hapless figures in a false simulation, despite efforts to make that our new reality.
A Pakistani crowd set fire to a Hindu temple. Chinese researchers experimented with a bat in a wet lab. An election worker donning a gay pride pin shredded election ballots. Palestinians are gratefully accepting U.S. aid in Gaza.
All these events were caught on video, yet none is real. These videos are a result of a Time magazine analysis of Google's new Veo 3 artificial intelligence video model, a powerful new AI tool making 8-second videos that are uncomfortably realistic.
AI videos have existed for years now, but this is on an entirely new plane, one that proves we've climbed out of the uncanny valley and summited a higher, scarier peak. While these videos are still clockable as AI, the technology will only get better, making it even more difficult to determine what's real and what's fake.
In an age where misinformation already runs rampant, the line separating fact from fiction has become a blur. Advancements in AI will only erase it further by proliferating false realities until we find ourselves in a post-truth society.
Post-truth refers to a situation where facts are no longer important in contemporary political and public debate. The concept is not so much used to suggest that the truth does not exist, but that facts have become secondary to our political point of view, according to ScienceDirect.
By the time our social media feeds are littered with AI videos of political candidates saying things they never said and fake news moments pushing agendas to sway public opinion, it will be far too late. By then, the truth, the facts and reality itself will become secondary, a problem we're already seeing in education.
Opinion: As a college professor, I see how AI is stripping away the humanity in education
A generation of critical nonthinkers
A New York article recently dug into AI's place in education and how many students are relying on AI to do all of their schoolwork. Capitalism has turned higher education into a means to an end, the latter being a high-paying job (hopefully). Students have no desire to pursue knowledge; they're fine with letting AI work and think for them.
A generation averse to critical thought is primed to fall for AI trickery. It's scary to think that higher education, a place once conducive to the development of critical thought, problem-solving skills and creativity, is being infiltrated by a singular mechanism that undoes its very foundation.
And what's to say of these students when they exit the four-year microcosm that is college after cheating their way through? Will pre-med students turn to ChatGPT to diagnose patients? Will future lawyers use AI to summarize cases and form arguments?
Opinion: Is it me or ChatGPT? As AI grows smarter, I have a down-to-earth worry ‒ my job.
AI not only invades political and educational spaces, but it chips away at our humanity in our most isolated, insular and vulnerable moments.
AI therapy gaslights
ChatGPT and other dedicated AI therapy chatbots have become a low-cost, accessible option for those seeking mental health assistance as our culture wrestles with loneliness and isolation. But computerized AI is not meant to offer meaningful support for the minutiae of human emotion. Behavior that rests on AI's unfounded ability to grasp our humanity leads to outcomes that range from futile to detrimental.
A 14-year-old boy died by suicide after becoming emotionally dependent on an AI chatbot. ChatGPT convinced a man with past mental health diagnoses that he had fallen in love with an AI entity named Juliet. When confronted with the truth, he became violent, resulting in his being killed by police. His father used ChatGPT to write his obituary.
Cases like these seem to be more common, paired with less deadly but equally unnerving impacts of AI use, like falling down rabbit holes of spiritual mania and unfounded clairvoyance.
Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store.
These scenarios all share similarities in that victims are gaslit to believe AI is a sentient being that understands them on a deeper level. They fall prey to confirmation bias and the spiritual psychosis that follows. The false reality spewed by AI becomes their all-encompassing truth.
The way AI is discussed makes it seem like this is a necessary outcome, that there is nothing anyone can do to stop people from falling down AI's deadly rabbit hole of misinformation. Technological determinism posits that advancements in technology, including advancements in AI, are an inevitable process independent of human or societal interference.
But who exactly benefits from leaving such a dangerous tool of misinformation unchecked? What is gained from blurring the line between fact and fiction? We aren't hapless figures in a false simulation, despite efforts to make that our new reality.
Kofi Mframa is a columnist and digital producer for USA Today and the USA TODAY Network.
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Did Trump strike a deal with China about TikTok? Here's what we know
Did Trump strike a deal with China about TikTok? Here's what we know

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Did Trump strike a deal with China about TikTok? Here's what we know

U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to discuss a potential TikTok deal with China this week, and the United States "pretty much" has a deal on the sale of the TikTok short-video app. "I think we're gonna start Monday or to China, perhaps President Xi or one of his representatives, but we would, we pretty much have a deal," Trump told reporters on Air Force One en route to Trump National Golf Club Bedminster, New Jersey on Independence Day. A deal to spin off TikTok's U.S. operations into a new U.S.-based firm, majority-owned and operated by U.S. investors, was in the works earlier this year, but it was put on hold after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcement of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. When asked how confident he was that China would agree to a deal, he said, "I'm not confident, but I think so. President Xi and I have a great relationship, and I think it's good for them. I think the deal is good for China and it's good for us." Here's the latest on what we know regarding a potential TikTok ban in the U.S. and a possible sale of the app. Will TikTok be banned?: Trump says there's 'a group of very wealthy people' lined up to buy it Will TikTok be banned in the U.S.? Trump last month extended the deadline for a TikTok ban to take effect, allowing the Chinese-owned social media platform to continue operating for 90 days. Trump signed the executive order on June 19, marking the third time the president has authorized a delay. The extension gives ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, until Sept. 17 to secure a deal that satisfies a legal requirement. Who is buying TikTok? In a June interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo," Trump confirmed that his administration had identified a group of buyers for TikTok and would announce their names soon. "We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way," Trump said. "I think I'll need probably China's approval. I think President Xi will probably do it." He said the buyer is "a group of very wealthy people" without providing additional details. Contributing: Sarah D. Wire & Francesca Chambers, USA TODAY; Reuters Gabe Hauari is a national trending news reporter at USA TODAY. You can follow him on X @GabeHauari or email him at Gdhauari@

Veteran fund manager who predicted Musk America Party expects ‘nervous breakdown'
Veteran fund manager who predicted Musk America Party expects ‘nervous breakdown'

Miami Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Veteran fund manager who predicted Musk America Party expects ‘nervous breakdown'

It's his party and he'll cry if he wants to. Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk may be hearing the strains of Lesly Gore's 1963 hit "It's My Party" as he contends all manner of misery. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter The electric vehicle maker's stock was down 7.2% at last check on July 7, days after Musk announced the creation of the "American Party" to compete against the Republican and Democratic parties, declaring on X, the social media site he owns, that "today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." Musk's political power move comes after the world's richest man's relationship with President Donald Trump blew up like a SpaceX rocket - which also belongs to Musk - over the administration's tax and spending plans. The billionaire had pumped at least $270 million to help Trump win the White House and went on to work as a special government employee for the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The controversial agency ripped through the federal workforce like a chainsaw, which Musk proudly wielded at one point, as well as government agencies that were responsible for overseeing his companies.. But now Musk has no reason to smile as Trump blasted him on Truth Social, his own social media site."I'm saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks," Trump said in his post. "The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of complete and total disruption and chaos." Meanwhile, Tesla is facing trouble in China, according to The Wall Street Journal, which reported that the company's market share has shriveled while other Chinese automakers have become more popular. More Tesla: Tesla robotaxi launch hits major speed bumpTesla claims rival startup is built on stolen trade secrets10,000 people join Tesla class action lawsuit over key issue Chinese consumers said the vehicles feel increasingly tired and out of touch with local tastes, the Journal noted, noting that the top China-designed EVs come with features not normally found in Teslas. In addition, Musk's reputation as a partner for Beijing in Washington took a hit after his relationship with Trump soured. Tesla shares are down 28% this year, while the stock is up 16% from this time in 2024. William Blair downgraded Tesla to market perform from outperform without a price target, according to The Fly. While the removal of the $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit from the "Big, Beautiful Bill's" budget reconciliation was expected, the elimination of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) fines "requires a reset in expectations," the firm said in a research note. The standards, enacted after the 1973 to 1974 oil embargo, were intended to reduce fuel consumption by increasing the average fuel economy of cars and light trucks William Blair said that it believes the combination of a demand headwind from the tax credit removal and Tesla's over $2 billion in profit from regulatory credits being at risk "may be too much for investors to bear." The firm said that it expects the company's reduction in regulatory credit revenue to result in a "direct hit to profitability, prompting yet another across-the-board reset to Street models." HSBC recently said that Tesla's reported second quarter volumes "imply an exceptional June" and finds it "difficult to explain this sales bump." Tesla reported around 384,000 vehicle deliveries in the second quarter, down 14% from a year ago and marking the second straight quarterly decline. The third quarter may see some pulled forward demand ahead of the new tax bill, but the firm said that it thinks the June result "looks like an aberration" and doesn't expect the 170,000 to 180,000 vehicle June run-rate to "be the new normal." HSBC maintained a reduce rating and $120 price target on Tesla shares. Related: Veteran Tesla analyst drops 4-word call None of Musk's troubles come as a surprise to Doug Kass. The longtime hedge fund manager and TheStreet Pro contributor, reminded readers that "The Musk/Trump romance was short lived - as I predicted in my '15 Surprises for 2025'." Kass, who described the Musk-Trump relationship as "a limited production novella," had forecast that the "romance between Trump/Musk, doesn't make it past Spring 2025." He also invoked another '60s hit, Neil Sedaka's "Breaking up is Hard to Do" to describe the Musk-Trump tribulations "Reading the room (and increasingly uncomfortable with Musk's notoriety), President Trump begins to be openly critical of Musk and finally abandons him entirely," Kass had observed in the December 23, 2024 post. "Musk lashes out and retaliates by forming his own party and has a nervous breakdown." Kass also predicted that "Tesla makes little progress in 'full self driving.'" "The U.S. government takes away the $7,500 tax credit, competition from China intensifies, unit sales drop by double digits and Tesla's profits collapse," the post continued. "In addition, an 'accounting issue' (related to warranties) is uncovered by a short-oriented research boutique. All these factors cause the shares of (TSLA) to drop to $100/share." Kass also predicted that "Elon Musk's non-Tesla investments suffer from reduced U.S. government support." "Musk grows ever more unhinged throughout 2025 - his mother attempts a family intervention," the months-old post concluded. Stay tuned... Related: Fund-management veteran skips emotion in investment strategy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Anthropic proposes transparency framework for frontier AI models
Anthropic proposes transparency framework for frontier AI models

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Anthropic proposes transparency framework for frontier AI models

The artificial intelligence (AI) startup Anthropic laid out a 'targeted' framework on Monday, proposing a series of transparency rules for the development of frontier AI models. The framework seeks to establish 'clear disclosure requirements for safety practices' while remaining 'lightweight and flexible,' the company underscored in a news release. 'AI is advancing rapidly,' it wrote. 'While industry, governments, academia, and others work to develop agreed-upon safety standards and comprehensive evaluation methods—a process that could take months to years—we need interim steps to ensure that very powerful AI is developed securely, responsibly, and transparently.' Anthropic's proposed rules would apply only to the largest developers of frontier models or the most advanced AI models. They would require developers to develop and publicly release a secure development framework, detailing how they assess and mitigate unreasonable risks. Developers would also be obligated to publish a system card, summarizing testing and evaluation procedures. 'Transparency requirements for Secure Development Frameworks and system cards could help give policymakers the evidence they need to determine if further regulation is warranted, as well as provide the public with important information about this powerful new technology,' the company added. The AI firm's proposed framework comes on the heels of the defeat last week of a provision in President Trump's tax and spending bill that initially sought to ban state AI regulation for 10 years. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei came out against the measure last month, calling it 'far too blunt an instrument' to mitigate the risks of the rapidly evolving technology. The AI moratorium was ultimately stripped out of the reconciliation bill before it passed the Senate. The company's framework earned praise from AI advocacy group Americans for Responsible Innovation (ARI), which touted Anthropic for 'moving the debate from whether we should have AI regulations to what those regulations should be.' 'We've heard many CEOs say they want regulations, then shoot down anything specific that gets proposed — so it's nice to see a concrete plan coming from industry,' Eric Gastfriend, executive director at ARI, said in a statement. 'Anthropic's framework advances some of the basic transparency requirements we need, like releasing plans for mitigating risks and holding developers accountable to those plans,' he continued. 'Hopefully this brings other labs to the table in the conversation over what AI regulations should look like.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store