The Retirement Gap: Why Saving For The Future Is Harder For Black Americans
Despite rising incomes, many Black Americans continue to face major hurdles when it comes to saving for retirement, according to the 2025 Retirement Confidence Survey by the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
The survey, which included an oversample of Black workers and retirees, revealed that the racial wealth gap persists across income levels. Among households earning $75,000 or more, just 33% of Black respondents reported having at least $250,000 in savings and investments, compared to 63% of non-Black respondents. Debt is a key factor: 63% of higher-income Black households said debt was a problem, versus 45% of non-Black households at similar income levels. Nearly half of those Black respondents said debt directly impacted their ability to save or retire comfortably.
Debt remains a major barrier to wealth building for Black people. For example, Black student loan borrowers are disproportionately burdened by debt, with undergraduate Black borrowers paying an average of $386 per month, according to a 2024 report by the Education Data Initiative.
Housing costs further compound this disparity. A 2022 report from Housing Matters found that, on average, Black homeowners pay an additional $13,464 over the life of a mortgage. This extra cost translates to approximately $67,320 in lost retirement savings for Black households, further widening the racial wealth gap.
While many Black Americans feel confident managing daily expenses, fewer feel equipped to invest or plan for the long term. Among higher earners, only 77% of Black respondents reported saving for retirement, compared to 87% of non-Black counterparts. Retirement itself looks different, too. Around 44% of Black retirees said they left the workforce earlier than planned due to health issues or disability, compared to 32% of non-Black retirees. Many also returned to work for financial reasons and were more likely to say their retirement lifestyle fell short of expectations.
Access to professional financial advice remains limited among the Black community. The study found that only 31% of Black respondents currently work with a financial advisor, although nearly half said they plan to in the future. Those who do seek help often prioritize managing debt, creating wills or estate plans, and securing life insurance over traditional retirement planning.
While the data is alarming, researchers behind the eye-opening study said there are ways that the financial system can help Black individuals boost their retirement savings. These include providing greater assistance in managing competing financial priorities, such as reducing debt, supporting family members, and building long-term financial security.
But Black folks don't have to wait on banks or institutions to take the first step. There are countless resources available to begin the journey toward generational wealth. It starts with prioritizing financial education, learning the fundamentals of budgeting, saving, and investing, while also exploring deeper topics like credit management, compound interest, and asset allocation.
Black people can tap into a wide range of tools, including online courses, books, podcasts, and community workshops tailored to financial literacy. Connecting with financial professionals and attending local seminars can also offer practical guidance. By creating a culture of financial learning at home, Black individuals and families can not only strengthen their financial knowledge but also equip the next generation with the tools to start investing early and develop healthy money habits that last a lifetime.
SEE MORE:
Catalyzing Wealth-Building In The Black Community
The Racial Wealth Gap And Solutions To Address It
SEE ALSO
The Retirement Gap: Why Saving For The Future Is Harder For Black Americans was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
42 minutes ago
- Business Wire
's America's Greatest Workplaces in Health Care 2025
ONTARIO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Prime Healthcare has been recognized as one of America's Greatest Workplaces 2025 by Newsweek and Plant-A Insights Group. This recognition reflects Prime's continued commitment to supporting employees and fostering a workplace culture grounded in compassion, accountability and service to others. The ranking is based on more than 400,000 employee interviews and over 4.9 million company reviews nationwide. Prime Healthcare has been named one of America's Greatest Workplaces 2025 by Newsweek, recognizing its commitment to employee well-being, inclusion, and a workplace culture built on compassion, accountability, and service to others. Share Newsweek 's annual ranking commends companies that demonstrate a clear commitment to employee engagement and satisfaction. 'In the healthcare industry especially, organizations that invest in employee well-being are better positioned to meet the needs of their communities,' Jennifer H. Cunningham, Editor-in-Chief of Newsweek said. 'This year's honorees represent workplaces where employees feel supported, heard and valued.' Prime Healthcare operates 51 hospitals and more than 360 outpatient locations across 14 states, serving more than 2.5 million patients annually. As one of the nation's leading health systems, Prime is recognized for its focus on clinical quality, patient safety, health equity and community-based care, reflecting its mission to save and improve hospitals through measurable results. In addition to its national and healthcare recognitions, Prime Healthcare was also honored by Newsweek in several key categories in 2025, including: Inclusion & Diversity Women Mental Wellbeing Black Americans Parents & Families These distinctions highlight Prime's efforts to create an inclusive environment where individuals from all backgrounds feel valued and supported. 'At Prime, we believe great healthcare begins at the local level, and that the strength of our workforce plays a direct role in delivering quality, compassionate care,' said Sunny Bhatia, MD, President and Chief Medical Officer of Prime Healthcare. 'This recognition affirms our focus on cultivating a supportive environment for all employees, including our nurses, physicians and frontline staff.' Prime's commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion is part of a broader effort to improve the well-being of employees and the communities it serves. The organization's approach to addressing social determinants of health has been recognized by The Joint Commission and the National Quality Forum for advancing health outcomes through systemwide collaboration. In 2025, Prime Healthcare hospitals earned more than 150 clinical quality awards from Healthgrades, including more Patient Safety Excellence Awards than any other health system for the eighth consecutive year. Prime hospitals have also been named among Premier's '100 Top Hospitals' 72 times and recognized by the Lown Institute for achievements in health equity, patient outcomes and value of care. About Prime Healthcare and Prime Healthcare Foundation Prime Healthcare is an award-winning health system operating 51 hospitals and more than 360 outpatient locations in 14 states, providing over 2.5 million patient visits annually. It is one of the nation's leading health systems, with nearly 57,000 employees and physicians. Eighteen of the Prime Healthcare hospitals are members of the Prime Healthcare Foundation, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit public charity. Based in Ontario, California, Prime Healthcare is nationally recognized for award-winning quality care and has been named a 10 Top and 15 Top Health System by Truven Health Analytics. Its hospitals have been named among the nation's '100 Top Hospitals' 72 times and it is one of Healthgrades' most awarded health systems in the nation for patient safety. To learn more, please visit
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Apple inks $500 million raw materials deal to boost US supply chain
Apple AAPL.O has signed a $500-million deal with Pentagon-backed MP Materials MP.N for a supply of rare earth magnets, becoming one of the first tech companies to ink a U.S. supply agreement after China curbed exports earlier this year. The move reflects strong backing for Las Vegas-backed MP by one of the world's most valuable companies, coming just days after the U.S. government said it would become MP's largest shareholder. Both mark an amazing about-face for MP after it contemplated merging with an Australian rival last year just to survive. MP shares jumped 21% in Tuesday trading to a record high, while Apple's stock gained under 1%. The deal, announced on Tuesday, guarantees Apple a steady flow of rare earths and magnets free from China - the world's largest producer. For Apple, the cost to support U.S. magnet production paled in comparison to the long-term risk that it could lose access entirely to the critical components, analysts said. MP last week agreed to a multibillion-dollar deal with the U.S. Department of Defense that will see the Pentagon become MP's largest shareholder and financial backstop. "Any time you have government ownership, that's a huge vote of confidence,"said Gracelin Baskaran, director of the critical minerals security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "We're in an era where executives are willing to pay a significant premium for a reliable supply chain. They don't want stoppage." Neither the precise length of the deal nor the specific volumes of magnets to be supplied was provided, although the agreement does call for magnets produced from recycled material, in keeping with Apple's long-standing goal of ending its reliance on the mining industry. Rare earths are a group of 17 metals used to make magnets that turn power into motion, including the devices that make cell phones vibrate. They are also used to make weapons, electric vehicles, and many other electronics. China halted exports in March following a trade spat with U.S. President Donald Trump that showed some signs of easing late last month, even as broader tensions underscored demand for non-Chinese supply. In case you missed it: Apple's $95 million Siri settlement deadline nears: How to get your cash As part of the agreement, Apple will prepay MP Materials $200 million for a supply of magnets slated to begin in 2027. The magnets will be produced at MP's Fort Worth, Texas, facility using magnets recycled at MP's Mountain Pass, California, mining complex, the companies said. "Rare earth materials are essential for making advanced technology, and this partnership will help strengthen the supply of these vital materials here in the United States," Apple CEO Tim Cook said in a statement. Bob O'Donnell, president at market research firm TECHnalysis Research, said Tuesday's move "makes complete sense" given that Apple requires significant amounts of rare earth magnets for its devices. "Plus, by focusing on a U.S.-based supplier, it does help position Apple more positively in Washington," he said. Apple, which said the deal is part of its $500 billion four-year investment commitment to the U.S., has faced threats from Trump over iPhones not made in the U.S. But many analysts have said making the iPhone in the U.S. is not possible, given labor costs and the existing smartphone supply chain. Apple, which sold about 232 million iPhones last year, according to data from IDC, did not disclose which devices in which it will use the magnets. MP said the deal will supply magnets for hundreds of millions of devices, which would constitute a significant share of any of Apple's product lines, which also include wearable devices such as watches and earbuds. MP already produces mined and processed rare earths and has said it expects to start commercial magnet production in its Texas facility by the end of this year. The company already has a magnet supply deal with General Motors GM.N and Germany's Vacuumschmelze. Last week's deal between MP and the U.S. government includes a price floor for rare earths designed to spur investment in domestic mines and processing plants, which has been lagging partly due to low prices set in China. Reporting by Ernest Scheyder in Houston; additional reporting by Zaheer Kachwala in Bengaluru, Eric Onstad in London and Stephen Nellis in San Francisco; Editing by Bernadette Baum, Shinjini Ganguli, Rod Nickel and Marguerita Choy
2 hours ago
Churches, now allowed to endorse candidates, could transform campaign finances
President Donald Trump is praising an Internal Revenue Service's court filing, which effectively clears the way for churches to endorse political candidates -- a reversal of decades of legal precedent. Yet half a dozen religious leaders told ABC News they didn't foresee a large increase in political endorsements from their peers, despite last week's IRS court filing. The filing said it would not revoke nonprofit status from two Texas churches, Sand Springs Church and First Baptist Church Waskom, for doing so. The filing formalizes for the first time a lack of enforcement of the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which prohibits nonprofits from endorsing or opposing political candidates if they want to remain tax exempt. Both political parties have tested the line in trying to harness the power of the pulpit, with many Republicans wooing evangelical leaders while Democrats often try to curry favor with Black churches. "God is once again welcomed back into our public square," Trump said of the filing during a White House Faith Office summit on Monday. The president has opposed the Johnson Amendment since his first term. He said he asked religious leaders for their endorsements while running in 2015, but came up against the barrier of the Johnson amendment. "I said, 'you have more power than anybody, but you're not allowed to use your power.' I said, 'we're going to get rid of that because people want to hear what you have to say more than anybody else,'" Trump said Monday. "You were even afraid to talk about it. But they're not afraid any longer, and I think they appreciate it." Tax experts predict the filing could transform how money flows around elections, making houses of worship a way to avoid both taxes and transparency for campaign finances. Ellen Aprill, a professor emerita of tax law at Loyola Marymount University Law School, said the filing could open the door to political campaigns channeling money through churches to take advantage of their tax-exempt status and lower application and reporting requirements. Unlike other 501c3 organizations, churches are not required to file 990 forms disclosing financial information, leadership and activities. They also qualify automatically for tax exemption -- while other nonprofits have to apply. "One of my concerns, and others of us in this area, is this will encourage the creation of fraudulent churches who want to be able to get tax deductible money to engage in opposing or supporting candidates … so they don't have to disclose any other campaign intervention activities," Aprill said. Many evangelical Christians viewed the filing as a win for free-speech rights. Robert Jeffress, senior pastor of the 14,000-member First Baptist Church in Dallas, praised the filing and said he "personally thanked President Trump" for the outcome. "This would have never happened without the strong leadership of our great President Donald Trump!" Jeffress wrote in an X post. "Government has NO BUSINESS regulating what is said in pulpits!" Jeffress was on Trump's Evangelical Executive Advisory Board during his first campaign and had expressed support for the president in the leadup to the 2024 election, which he said led the IRS to investigate his church. Jeffress' church is distinct from First Baptist Church Waskom, the plaintiff in the case against the IRS. Cary Gordon, senior pastor and president at Cornerstone Church in Sioux City, Iowa, said he thought "anyone with half a brain" could see that "the Johnson Amendment was unconstitutional." A longtime opponent of the amendment, Gordon has said since 2010 that he hopes the IRS would sue him for his political speech so that he could fight the agency in court. That year, Gordon led an effort organizing religious leaders across Iowa to oppose retention for three Iowa Supreme Court Justices who supported same-sex marriage. The IRS has not sued Gordon. Gordon said although he thinks "hardly any pastors in the country will ever" endorse a candidate, the filing could allow religious leaders to address politics more directly. "The issue is not, 'oh no, they're going to endorse someone.' It's really about free speech and being able to communicate on any issue someone might perceive as political in a sermon, which must be done because all of our problems are moral, all of our problems are theological," he said. Brad Sherman, a former Iowa state representative who founded Solid Rock Christian Church in Coralville, Iowa, and is now running for governor, said he thought the filing was "long overdue," but he didn't anticipate a surge in endorsements. "There are other reasons why pastors and Christian leaders do not endorse candidates," Sherman said, adding that some leaders may be wary of pushback from their congregations. Regarding whether the filing would lead him to consider seeking endorsements from religious leaders during his own campaign, he said, "I haven't really thought much about it yet, but yes, it may influence that to some degree." Reactions from leaders of Black churches were more mixed. Rev. Thomas Bowen, who served in the Biden White House as a faith liaison and preaches in Black churches both in Ohio and D.C., said he was concerned the filing could risk turning churches into "campaign surrogates." "For me, the new ruling opens the doors to money that's just not transparent, money that can be used for political influence," Bowen said. "The fear that our sacred spaces will be at risk of becoming these stages for unchecked influence causes me to tell folk to tread carefully … Moral authority is sacred and it must never be sold for access." Unlike Bowen, Pastor Jamal Bryant said he approved of the filing. Bryant heads a congregation with more than 10,000 members at New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in Stonecrest, Georgia, which hosted Democratic nominee Kamala Harris when she visited the state during the 2024 presidential elections. Bryant said he would "absolutely" consider explicitly endorsing political candidates from the pulpit, including in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. "There's a whole lot on the line," he said. "All of America is going to be leaning in with intentionality for the midterm election on who best will speak for the masses."
