Bombshell report suggests 'Chinese spies' infiltrating prestigious US university: 'Widespread campaign'
The report, published by the Stanford Review, tells the story of a Stanford student working on sensitive research at the school – and given the name "Anna" to protect her identity – receiving unexpected messages from a man with the alias Charles Chen asking about seemingly harmless topics like networking opportunities.
Those messages soon took a "strange turn," according to the outlet when Chen's questions became more personal, asking Anna if she spoke Mandarin, encouraging her to visit Beijing on a trip he would pay for, and referencing details she had never disclosed to him.
Charles advised Anna on how to enter China briefly enough to avoid visa scrutiny from authorities, told her to only communicate through the CCP-monitored WeChat and told her to delete screenshots.
Blue State Governor Touts Meeting With Ccp Official Cozying Up To Dems: 'Grateful For The Opportunity'
"Under the guidance of experts familiar with espionage tactics, Anna contacted authorities," the article explains.
Read On The Fox News App
"Their investigation revealed that Charles Chen had no affiliation with Stanford. Instead, he had posed as a Stanford student for years, slightly altering his name and persona online, targeting multiple students, nearly all of them women researching China-related topics. According to the experts on China who assisted Anna, Charles Chen was likely an agent of the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS), tasked with identifying sympathetic Stanford students and gathering intelligence."
Fox News Digital spoke to students involved in the article who explained that there are three major takeaways from the findings of the report.
"Number one, what we saw was a full apparatus for extracting information so they would hit the students they wanted, then two, they would administer loyalty tests and three they would demand the information be sent back," one of the students said.
In some cases, if the students refuse to provide information to the CCP, their parents are threatened back home and sometimes interrogated by police, according to the students who spoke to some Chinese international students.
New Report Warns Of Growing National Security Threat To U.s. As China Builds Ai: 'Significant And Concerning'
'To be very clear, what they said is that every Chinese international student at any time can be asked by the CCP to disclose their research information," Fox News Digital was told.
"So what that looks like is, potentially weekly calls with the Chinese ambassador back in China, where they will explain what research they're doing and if it is particularly sensitive technologies like AI and robotics. This is where the majority of the CCP targeting is happening. They'll ask them to send back not just public information, they'll also send back internal lab reports, future directions of the research, recorded conversations with the professor, the methodologies, the other participants in the research, particularly if they're Chinese international students so they can look for other ones."
The Stanford Review story points out that the House Select Committee on China sent a letter to Stanford last year warning of the risks that China poses to STEM research.
The article also explained how concerns about a Chinese spy presence in China have "quietly persisted" for "years" and claimed that several people who were contacted were too afraid to speak publicly.
"One student who experienced espionage firsthand was too fearful to recount their story, even via encrypted messaging," the article states.
"'The risk is too high,' they explained. "Transnational repression, $64 million in Chinese funding, and allegations of racial profiling have contributed to a pervasive culture of silence at Stanford and beyond."
The authors of the article, after interviewing dozens of people in and around the university, summed up their findings by saying, "The CCP is orchestrating a widespread intelligence-gathering campaign at Stanford."
"In short, 'there are Chinese spies at Stanford.'"
Newsom's Ties To Ccp Under Microscope In New Book Exposing Alleged Corruption: 'Fleeced American Citizens'
Fox News Digital spoke to former California GOP Congressman Michelle Steel about the report, and she explained that hundreds of millions of dollars are pouring in from China to prestigious universities. She called the situation "very dangerous."
"President Trump is totally right," Steel said. "China is the biggest threat to all other industries, but especially universities."
Hudson Institute senior fellow Michael Sobolik, who recently published an article urging the U.S. to "stop giving Beijing an advantage through TikTok," told Fox News Digital that "sunlight is the best disinfectant" in this situation.
"If Stanford is worried about foreign espionage and coercion on its campus – and it should be – then its leadership will need to call it out publicly," Sobolik said.
"Thus far, woke politics have deterred Stanford from speaking out. That's insane, and it rebounds to Beijing's benefit. The CCP is one of the most racist political organizations in the world, and it hides behind the Chinese people as a shield," he continued. "If Americans are afraid to call the party out, we implicitly advance the CCP's narrative that there's no difference between the Chinese people and the CCP."
In a statement, Stanford University said it "takes its commitment to national security with the utmost seriousness, and we are acutely aware of the threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party to all research universities."
"Stanford has rigorous policies and processes in place to ensure that research by its faculty and students is conducted in a manner that safeguards America's interests. Stanford does not conduct classified or secret research," the statement continued. "Stanford has a university-wide process for reporting threats to research security, and carefully assesses all reports. Stanford consults with federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to ensure our policies and procedures are rigorous and protect national security."
The university added that it is "looking into" the Stanford Review report and has reached out to federal law enforcement, adding that it is "very important to distinguish between threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party, and Chinese and Chinese-American faculty and students who are at Stanford to learn and contribute to the generation of knowledge, and are valued members of our community."
Steel and the Stanford students told Fox News Digital that while it is important not to generalize and make assumptions about all Chinese students, it is the students from China who are ultimately the victims in this situation as they are coerced and sometimes punished by the CCP.
"We really have to protect these innocent students, innocent Chinese Americans, but at the same time we really have to vet those students coming in or anybody, even diplomats, they're coming in, we really have to vet them," Steel said.
Fox News Digital reached out to the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., for comment on the report and received a statement denying the allegations.
"The above reports are full of false information, delusional speculation, political lies and ideological prejudice," spokesperson Liu Pengyu said. "China is strongly dissatisfied with and firmly opposes this."
"China-US educational cooperation has not only expanded the channels for students of the two countries and enhanced the understanding between the two peoples, but also promoted the economic prosperity and scientific and technological innovation of the United States, which is in the interests of both sides," the statement continued.
"We urge the US to stop generalizing national security, stop slandering Chinese students, and stop stigmatizing, politicizing and instrumentalizing normal educational exchanges. Effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese students studying abroad, and do not take discriminatory and restrictive measures against Chinese students."Original article source: Bombshell report suggests 'Chinese spies' infiltrating prestigious US university: 'Widespread campaign'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China's Stealthy Solar Exports Stay One Step Ahead of US Tariffs
The hum of solar panel factories in this steamy island city doesn't sound like much. But to American trade officials, it's the muffled noise of rules being bent — or broken. In recent months, Batam, a duty-free Indonesian enclave a short ferry ride from Singapore, has become a key waypoint in a convoluted global shuffle. Chinese solar manufacturers, facing stiff US tariffs, are quietly assembling their equipment in Indonesia and slipping their products into the American market, tariff-free.


CNBC
41 minutes ago
- CNBC
India expects 'preferential' tariffs in a trade deal with U.S., says India's commerce minister
India expects to secure "preferential" tariffs from the United States that are better than those achieved by its economic rivals, according to India's commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal. Goyal, who led the negotiations on the U.K.-India trade agreement, signaled a confident approach from New Delhi in ongoing trade talks with Washington. "India will get a preferential tariff compared to our peers and our competitors, because we were amongst the first to get into negotiations and our discussions, our engagement is truly very, very significant," Goyal told CNBC on Thursday. His comments were in response to a question about whether India could hope for better terms than the tariffs currently faced by Japan and Vietnam on some of their U.S. imports. Their exports face 15% and 20% duties, respectively. The minister said the negotiations were "progressing extremely well" towards a deal aimed at achieving the $500 billion bilateral trade target by 2030 , a goal previously set by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. "I have excellent relations with my good friend, [U.S.] Commerce Secretary, Mr Howard Lutnick," Goyal said. "The United States and India share a very special relationship, and I'm very confident we'll do a robust and good deal where both countries benefit and where businesses on both sides are happy." Lutnick is leading the U.S. trade negotiating team. The optimism was echoed by business leaders, who predicted that while a deal would be reached, India would negotiate from a position of strength. Keshav Murugesh, chairman of the Confederation of Indian Industry UK Business Forum, told CNBC that Indian negotiators would handle talks "strictly on merits" and "India will not be a pushover." Murugesh, also the chief executive of business services firm WNS , suggested that both sides are sufficiently motivated, noting that President Trump "and his people want a good deal with India because, let's face it, India is the future." India's Goyal also said the push for a U.S. deal is part of a deliberate policy to partner with "developed nations who complement the India story," a move away from past agreements with countries seen as direct competitors. He cited India's decision to withdraw from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) as an example of this, describing the pact as something that "would have otherwise been like a China-India FTA." His comments came on the day India and the United Kingdom finalized their free trade agreement. The bilateral deal, first announced in May , will see the U.K. benefit from lower tariffs on key exports such as whisky and cars, which will kick in over several years. Meanwhile, India will gain tariff-free access on 99% of imports from day one of the agreement. While expressing confidence in the U.S. talks, Goyal acknowledged sensitive issues remain. When asked if agriculture was a sticking point , he declined to comment specifically on the trade discussions but added that the sector was sensitive to India. "We are always very sensitive to the interests of our farmers, the interests of our MSMEs, and will ensure that our areas of concern are well protected," Goyal added. The issue is critical for Modi's government, as the vast agricultural sector employs a huge portion of India's population and represents a powerful political constituency. Protecting farmers from foreign competition is a long-standing government priority. Goyal added that the U.S. side understood India's position, saying, "the Trump administration, and my counterparts are equally cognizant and sensitive about our concerns." — CNBC's George Bextor contributed reporting.


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Hillary Clinton sounded alarm on Biden's political viability 'by 2024,' Klain told House investigators
Ex-President Joe Biden's former chief of staff Ron Klain told House investigators that Hillary Clinton approached him with concerns about the octogenarian leader's political viability "by 2024," Fox News Digital has learned. Klain spoke with staff on the House Oversight Committee for over five hours on Thursday, as Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., continues to probe whether top Biden aides concealed signs of mental decline in the ex-president. A source familiar with his voluntary interview told Fox News Digital that Klain believed Biden was mentally sharp enough to serve as president, and was not too old to run. But the ex-secretary of state and former Biden national security adviser Jake Sullivan both "approached Ron Klain stating they believed Joe Biden was not politically viable" months before he dropped his re-election bid in July 2024, the source said. Sullivan told Klain that Biden "was less effective in 2024 compared to 2022," the source said. It's not immediately clear if Biden's mental acuity was the reasoning for their doubts, nor if they made the case to Klain together or separately. But it's a significant indictment coming from top national Democrats of Biden in general, long before concerns about his fitness for office within the party were made public knowledge. Sullivan had been a top aide to both Biden and Clinton, having served as the latter's senior policy advisor during her 2016 campaign. Klain, who served as White House chief of staff for the first half of Biden's term, conceded that the then-president was less energetic and more forgetful, though he defended his "acuity to govern," the source said. "Mr. Klain stated that President Biden often confused names and proper nouns, and it got worse over time," the source said. Fox News Digital was told that Klain also said there was no reason to doubt President Donald Trump's own mental fitness. Klain said nothing to reporters when going in or out of the committee room Thursday. He's the sixth former Biden administration aide to appear for Comer's probe. And despite the interview being largely staff-led, Comer did make an appearance for the early half of the sit-down, and Reps. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., were both briefly there as well. Both Biggs and Khanna called Klain "credible" from what they saw inside the room. "I think he is telling what he knows accurately," Biggs told Fox News Digital. On the other side of the aisle, Khanna told reporters, "He answered every single question. He was fully cooperative." Three other former Biden White House aides who previously appeared – Annie Tomasini, Anthony Bernal, and ex-White House doctor Kevin O'Connor – all appeared under subpoena and pleaded the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions. Longtime Biden aide Ashley Williams and ex-staff secretary Neera Tanden, like Klain, came for voluntary transcribed interviews. Jeff Zients, who served as Biden's chief of staff for the final two years, was also asked to sit for a transcribed interview, a committee aide previously told Fox News Digital. A source familiar with the Biden team's thinking previously called Republicans' probe "dangerous" and "an attempt to smear and embarrass." "And their hope is for just one tiny inconsistency between witnesses to appear so that Trump's DOJ prosecute his political opponents and continue his campaign of revenge," that source said. When reached for comment, Adrienne Watson, a representative for Sullivan, told Fox News Digital, "Jake did not have a conversation with Ron about Joe Biden running for president before the debate." Fox News Digital also reached out to Klain's attorney as well as a contact for comment for Clinton but did not hear back by press time.