Bill to increase starting teacher pay applauded by local educators
Senate Bill 146, authored by state Sen. Linda Rogers, R-Granger, would increase minimum teacher salaries to $45,000 from $40,000. It would also require districts to spend at least 65% of their state tuition support on teacher compensation.
The bill unanimously passed the Senate Committee on Education and Career Development and has been referred to the Indiana House for further debate.
J.T. Morgan, a fourth-grade teacher at Alexandria Elementary School, said teacher salaries and difficulties in retaining teachers frequently go hand in hand.
'Any time you can increase the minimum salary, I think that is fantastic,' Morgan said. 'Obviously, in the last several years, public education has struggled with retaining teachers and we need to fix that. Salary, of course, is a part of it.'
Alexandria has around 100 certified teachers for the elementary and the high school combined, with a current starting salary of $48,700.
Brent Baker, the superintendent for Alexandria Community Schools, said increasing the minimum salary for teachers would help decrease some financial stress.
'Teachers need to be able to have a job where they can dedicate their time to their craft and to their classroom and to their students,' Baker said. 'They shouldn't have to worry about working a second job to pay the bills.'
Baker said that although Alexandria schools are not currently struggling to find teachers, 'any time we can increase teacher pay, we should look into it.'
While lauding the idea of increasing teachers' minimum salary, Morgan wondered what can be done for longer tenured educators.
'We want to bring up the minimum salary, which I think is great,' Morgan said, 'but I think we also have to remember the teachers who have given years of experience. What are we doing for those teachers to retain them and to make them feel the worth from a financial perspective as well?'
Morgan, who has worked as a teacher since 2003, also wondered, with inflation and the cost of living rising, how comparable his starting salary would be from 2003 to 2025.
Frankton-Lapel Community Schools has 173 certified staff members, with a starting pay of $43,250 for the 2024-25 school year.
Sterling Boles, the superintendent at FLCS, said the school corporation is currently fully staffed. He said the current legislation will help administrators create and maintain environments that would both attract new teachers and help the district hold on to well-performing ones.
'With its focus on increasing teacher pay, (SB 146) would have a positive impact on our school corporation by helping us remain competitive in attracting and retaining high-quality educators,' Boles said. 'Increased salaries would make our district more appealing to new teachers entering the profession and could also encourage experienced educators to stay, reducing turnover.'
South Madison Community Schools currently employs approximately 265 teachers, with a starting pay of $50,000.
Superintendent Mark Hall said that while South Madison is always on the lookout or teachers, administrators did not have trouble filling spots for the current school year. He said the district favors increased funding for teacher salaries, viewing the measure as an investment in the district's students as well.
'I think any time we can increase funding for our teachers, that is important,' Hall said. 'I think the 65%, spending that on teacher compensation, I think that just guarantees that school districts are putting their money where it should be, which is in their teaching staffs.'
Morgan said that the emotional side of teaching is what a lot of teachers enjoy the most about the profession.
'When you have been teaching as long as some of our veteran teachers have, you are doing this because of the love you have for your students and for their successes in the classroom as well as out of the classroom,' he said. 'I tell my students all the time, 'I am here because I love and care about you and want you to be well-rounded individuals when you step out of this building.'
'We are trying to prepare them for the real world and even though my students are just fourth graders, we are laying that groundwork for them now.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
7 hours ago
- Forbes
The 10 Biggest Risks That Companies And Organizations Are Facing Today
The 10 biggest risks facing companies today underscore an important reality about preparing for the next crisis—the nature of the risks that can trigger a crisis are always subject to change. The top threat that is now confronting companies is disinformation that is often driven by polarized political agendas, according to the latest quarterly Reputation Risk Index that was conducted by the Global Risk Advisory Council. Compare that risk to the Council's Index for the first quarter of the year, in which the misuse of AI was the top-ranked threat. The most surprising result of the new research is how quickly the biggest threat changed between th first and second quarters. The misuse of AI, which was the top-ranked risk in the three months of 2025, dropped out of the top ten, while disinformation, which was previously unranked, rose to the #1 spot. That's according to Cate Costa, a member of the Council and former vice president for corporate philanthropy and small business at JP Morgan Chase, who shared that perspective with me in an email message. In the second quarter of this year, 'disinformation has taken the spotlight, reflecting continued anxieties around how technology is shaping public discourse,' she observed. 'While these risks are intertwined—growing concern about disinformation is fueled, at least in part, by the rise of generative AI—this volatility proves that business leaders must look beyond today's headlines to be prepared for the threats of tomorrow. Relying solely on last quarter's data is insufficient. Success in this environment demands foresight to get ahead of what's next,' Costa warned. Corporate risks can vary depending on geography, politics, and other factors. 'European risks primarily center around concerns about corporate behavior, perceptions of anti-competitive actions, and CEO actions top the Index. Even as the [Trump]The 10 Greatest Risks The 10 greatest risks to companies, according to the Council's new Index, are ranked and defined as follows: 1. Disinformation. The deliberate spread of false or misleading information which can harm credibility or reputation. 2. Data privacy violations. Violations of a person's right rto control how their personal data is collected, used, or shared. 3. Corruption. Dishonest or unethical behavior by an organization or its leaders, including government-related bribery or abuse of power for personal gain. 4. Organizational ethics failures. When a company violates ethical standards leading to reputational or legal consequences. 5. Major operational disruptions. Events including natural disasters (e,g. wildfires, pandemics) or human-caused crises (e.g, shootings, explosions). 6. Controversies involving CEOs, Scrutiny or public criticism of a CEO's behavior, decisions, or potential departure that could undermine investor or public confidence. 7. Ties to China. Real or perceived connections to the Chinese government, companies, or foreign nationals, often raising concerns about influence or security. 8. Climate change/environmental harms. Actions or impacts that harm the environment or contribute to climate change, such as pollution, emissions, or deforestation. 9. Anticompetitiveness/antitrust. Business or government actions that restrict competition, leading to higher prices, lower quality, reduced service levels, or less innovation. Includes unfair market practices, monopolistic behavior, and legislation aimed at preventing or regulating trusts and monopolies to ensure fair competition. 10. Intellectual property/copyright/trademark infringement. Claims of copying creative works, inventions, or ownership, including unauthorized use, reproduction, or pawned or trademarked material. The research was commissioned by public relations firm Global Situation Room. For the latest quarterly Index, online news articles were analyzed from February 16 to May 15, 2025. From that analysis, the Global Risk Advisory Council surveyed its members between June 9 and June 29, 2025. The Council includes more than 100 former heads of state, C-suite executives, and public affairs leaders from around the world, the organization said in a statement I received via email. Other Risks And Threats The threats that are facing companies can also depend on other variables, as noted in my informal survey of CEOs and other business observers. 'One of the biggest risks I see right now—both from my time as a CEO and in my coaching work—is misalignment at the leadership level. When founders or senior teams aren't crystal clear on vision, priorities, or roles, that confusion ripples through the company. It kills morale, slows execution, and leads to quiet quitting or high turnover—especially in small to midsize companies trying to scale,' Pete Srodoski a business coach said in an email interview. 'The other major risk? Burnout. Especially among owners and top performers. When a company lacks an operating rhythm, everything feels urgent, nothing gets traction, and even the best leaders end up buried in reactive work,' he explained. 'The biggest risk I see right now? Actually, not competitive threats or tech disruption, but misalignment between brand and business strategy. Companies are making big bets [on technology and new markts] but their positioning doesn't keep pace. That disconnect kills deals, erodes trust, and confuses internal teams making them look muddy at best and a total mess at worst,' Lauryn Warnick, CEO at Villain Branding. 'The biggest risk facing my company today is tariffs and increased duties,'Amrita Bhasin co-founder and CEO of Sotira, which helps retailers and brands to offload and monetize unsold inventory. 'One seemingly tiny change in procurement, production timeline, freight costs, cargo delay or duty fee increase has a domino effect on the rest of the supply chain and leads to waste, delays and inefficiencies. Supply chain and logistics depend on each other and there are a lot of moving parts involved in getting products manufactured abroad and in the hands of Americans in a timely manner. Tariffs have resulted in our company having to alter shipping paths or accept higher container costs or import/export fees,' according to Bhasin. The biggest risk to most companies today is the denial by corporate leaders about basic realities, Patrice Williams-Lindo, CEO of Career Nomad, told me in an email interview. She said that includes 'denial your 'retained' talent is already emotionally checked out. Denial that your brand is invisible in a market where noise now outpaces that AI isn't a magic bullet—without human trust and upskilling, it's a loaded gun pointed at your own culture.' The changing nature of risks and threats to companies and organizations reinforces the need for business leaders to review and update their crisis management plans and scenarios on a regular basis. Otherwise, their plans to respond to a new type of crisis could be be outdated and useless.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Seeking growth AND dividends? 3 investment trusts to consider in August
UK share investors have a vast selection of investment trusts to choose from today. Whether someone is seeking growth or passive income — or a combination of both — there are plenty of options to suit every individual's investment style. With this in mind, here are two top, balanced trusts worth serious consideration right now. Global dividend trust Through a combination of share price gains and dividend income, the Bankers Investment Trust (LSE:BNKR) has delivered an average annual return of 11% over the last 10 years. To put that into context, the FTSE 100's delivered a 7% return on the same basis. The FTSE 250 index of mid-cap growth shares produced a 5% average return. Bankers could be an especially great trust to consider for investors leaning more closely towards dividends. It targets payout growth 'greater than inflation, as measured by the UK Consumer Prices Index', and has raised cash rewards for 58 consecutive years. The trust's portfolio comprises roughly 100 global shares, and has significant holdings in technology shares such as Microsoft, Amazon, Apple and Alphabet. This provides significant growth potential as the digital economy rapidly grows. In total, around 32% of the fund is tied up in tech stocks. But remember that this high weighting could cause Bankers to underperform during economic slowdowns. High yield growth trust The JP Morgan Global Growth & Income (LSE:JGGI) trust has performed even more strongly over the last decade. Since summer 2015, it's provided an average annual return of 17.1%. As a consequence, it's comfortably achieved its goal of providing better returns than the MSCI All Country World Index. The total return here sits way back at 10.5%. This JP Morgan investment trust doesn't have the stunning dividend growth record of Bankers. Cash rewards fell sharply in 2016 after it reset its payout policy, reflecting plans to deliver dividends totalling 4% of its net asset value (NAV). But dividends have grown strongly since then, and the revised policy means the trust beats most UK shares on yield. Like Bankers, it holds a high proportion of US tech shares. This leaves it vulnerable to a slowing global economy, as well as a prolonged market shift from Wall Street equities to non-US stocks. UK dividend trust City of London Investment Trust (LSE:CTY) has also raised dividends consistently for more than half a century. They've grown every year since 1966, to be exact. Combined with share price gains, this means over the last decade the trust's delivered an average annual of 10.6%. I strongly believe returns could substantially improve over the next 10 years as broader demand for UK shares continues to pick up. You see, City of London is focused on blue-chip companies from Britain's stock market. These make up around 93% of the entire portfolio, in fact, with major holdings including HSBC, BAE Systems, Shell and Lloyds. This geographic allocation creates more regional risk than those other global trusts I've described. But it also provides the potential for greater returns if the recent shift from US equities to UK stocks continues. The post Seeking growth AND dividends? 3 investment trusts to consider in August appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool HSBC Holdings is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Royston Wild has positions in HSBC Holdings. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, BAE Systems, HSBC Holdings, Lloyds Banking Group Plc, and Microsoft. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump to blame for high cost of living, Americans say in new poll
Americans are struggling financially, grappling with debt and the rising cost of living, and are blaming the Trump administration and corporate interests for worsening economic outlooks for working families, according to a new poll. Six out of 10 Americans place blame on the Trump administration for driving up their cost of living, according to a poll conducted by Morning Consult for the Century Foundation, which asked 2,007 Americans how they are managing the high cost of living in the US economy, who they think is to blame and what are the solutions. Sixty three per cent said Trump had had a negative impact on grocery prices, and 61% said he had had a negative impact on the cost of living. Nearly half, 49%, said the Trump administration had had a negative impact on their finances. Nearly eight out of 10 Americans, including 70% of Republicans, fear that Trump's tariffs will increase the price of everyday goods. 'Donald Trump has simultaneously raised prices on everyday goods through a reckless approach to tariffs, a decimation of programs that help Americans afford healthcare, education, food and childcare, and then kneecapping federal regulators who keep banks and other big businesses from swindling consumers,' said Julie Margetta Morgan, president of the Century Foundation. 'This has created an alarming set of market conditions. Americans are left on their own to face high prices and low earnings, are building their own safety nets from a web of financial products, credit cards, buy now, pay later loans, payday loans and student debt, and companies have been given the green light to manipulate these products to boost their own profits without having to worry about following the law.' According to the poll, more than six out of 10 Americans said it had become more difficult to find a good paying job, buy a home and afford childcare. More than four out of five Americans, 83%, said they were concerned about the cost of groceries, with 46% saying they were very concerned. Some 47% said they were worried about being able to pay their rent or mortgage, 64% said they were worried about affording an unexpected medical expense. About 48% said they believed they would have trouble affording an unexpected $500 bill without borrowing. One in four said it would be 'very difficult'. A quarter of those surveyed said they spent at least three hours a day worrying about their finances and ability to afford basic necessities. Another 25% of respondents said they or someone in their household had skipped meals in the past year in order to make ends meet, and 26% said they had fallen behind on their monthly bills over the past year. Americans also fear things are getting worse economically, with 76% of those polled saying they fear a looming economic recession. Corporations and billionaires were seen as a big factor behind this financial anxiety, with 51% saying they believe corporations have had an active role in making life more difficult for average people over the past 25 years, and 52% saying billionaires have made life tougher. Half of those polled also believe congressional Republicans have made life more difficult, with 41% believing Democrats have made life more difficult. 'Millions of Americans, across parties, across backgrounds, are deeply anxious, and they're struggling to afford basics like housing and health care. Donald Trump is making these struggles worse,' said Rachel West, senior fellow at the Century Foundation. 'Americans believe the outsized influence of corporations and the wealthy has made their lives harder, and the risks they're taking to cope with high costs like taking on debt and tapping into their savings should sound an alarm for policymakers.'
