Peru reinstates full protection of Nazca Lines reserve after controversial cutback
The country's culture ministry on Sunday nullified last week's resolution that had reinstated the boundary map set in 2004. The switch followed severe backlash after the government approved a 42% reduction in the zone — about 2,400 square kilometers (926 square miles) — and to allow miners to seek formal permits in previously restricted areas.
The original protected zone — spanning 5,600 square kilometers (2,162 square miles) — will remain in effect. The ministry also ordered an update of the site's management plan within 10 days and the formation of a technical panel, which will include government representatives, academics, UNESCO, and civil society figures to define future use and conservation strategies.
The area in question forms part of a UNESCO-recognized World Heritage Site, home to the Nazca Lines — massive geoglyphs etched into the desert over 1,500 years ago — and one of Peru's most fragile desert ecosystems.
'Thanks to the strong rejection by national and international public opinion, the government revoked the reduction of the area of the Nazca Archaeological Reserve,' Mariano Castro, Peru's former vice minister of the environment, told The Associated Press.
Castro said the government justified its decision by saying it had not previously discussed its decision publicly.
'In other words, it (the government) does not go so far as to admit the measure was wrong, despite evidence of the presence of illegal mining, which seriously endangers and threatens the integrity of the Nazca Lines and petroglyphs,' he said.
The ministry said a new government entity will be created to oversee the site's management, and technical studies will be published to ensure transparency and accountability.
Peruvian environmental lawyer, César Ipenza, who follows the issue closely, welcomes the technical panel, which will include local authorities, but he still has concerns.
'The truth is that the local authority is actually the one that has been calling for the reduction of the boundaries of the Nazca Lines,' Ipenza told the AP. 'There will also be strong pressure from miners for this to go ahead."
Ipenza is concerned that informal mining has been steadily expanding in the area, even though all mining activity is officially banned.
'The government hasn't taken action to remove these miners and as a result, there has been pressure to officially open the area to allow informal and illegal miners to become formalized,' he said.
The AP contacted UNESCO for comment. The organization said it would aim to provide information on Tuesday, as Monday was a public holiday in France, where it is headquartered.
—-
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
US steps up efforts to help Bolsonaro avoid jail over alleged coup plot
The United States has intensified its campaign to help Jair Bolsonaro avoid punishment for allegedly masterminding a failed coup, with the state department denouncing the decision to place Brazil's former president under house arrest. 'Let Bolsonaro speak!' the department's bureau of western hemisphere affairs tweeted on Monday night after the far-right populist was confined to his mansion in the capital, Brasília, and had his mobile phone seized by police. Alexandre de Moraes, the supreme court judge overseeing the trial, said he had taken the decision as a result of what he called Bolsonaro's deliberate violation of a court order forbidding him from using social media or communicating with foreign diplomats. 'Justice is blind but it isn't stupid,' Moraes wrote in Monday's order. The Trump administration has thrown its weight behind efforts to help Bolsonaro avoid a lengthy jail sentence for allegedly plotting to seize power after he lost the 2022 election to his leftwing rival, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Federal police claim the conspiracy included plans to assassinate Lula, his vice-president, Geraldo Alckmin, and Moraes. The plot allegedly culminated on 8 January 2023, a week after Lula took power, when thousands of Bolsonaro supporters stormed congress, the supreme court and the presidential palace in what police claim was an unsuccessful attempt to trigger a military intervention. But Trump has claimed his ally – who is currently being tried by the supreme court – is the victim of a politically motivated 'witch-hunt' and last week slapped Magnitsky sanctions on Moraes. The US president has also announced 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports, which are set to come into force on Wednesday. 'This Trial should not be taking place!' Trump wrote in a letter to Lula earlier this month calling Bolsonaro's treatment 'an international disgrace'. After Bolsonaro's house arrest on Monday, the state department hinted that other members of Brazil's 11-seat supreme court could soon face Magnitsky sanctions, which are normally used to punish the perpetrators of major human rights violations. 'The United States condemns Moraes' order imposing house arrest on Bolsonaro and will hold accountable all those aiding and abetting sanctioned conduct,' it said. Trump's attempt to interfere in Brazil's justice system has outraged progressive Brazilians who decry what they see as a flagrant violation of their country's sovereignty. But the US president's actions have exhilarated Bolsonaro's sizeable support base, with Bolsonaristas hoping Trump's intervention will help pressure congress into approving an amnesty that will ensure their leader avoids prosecution. Bolsonaro, who is 70, is widely expected to be found guilty when the coup trial concludes in the coming weeks and faces spending the rest of his life in jail. Bolsonaro has repeatedly denied the charges but has admitted seeking 'alternative' forms of remaining in power after losing the election. On Monday night, hundreds of followers flocked to the gates of Bolsonaro's upmarket condominium to vent their anger, some carrying US flags. 'We want Trump to help us,' said one protester, Ricardo, who wore a red Maga cap and declined to give his second name. 'Our solution can no longer come from within [Brazil]. It has to come from abroad. The sanctions are working. More people need to be hit with Magnitsky,' Ricardo added, as he stood outside Bolsonaro's compound holding up a star-spangled banner. Close allies of the former president were also present and vowed to launch a wave of demonstrations to protest their leader's plight. 'What they are doing to President Bolsonaro is an outrage,' the ex-president's brother-in-law, Eduardo Torres, said. He described his relative as 'a hostage'. 'We will occupy [the streets] and we will bring Brazil to a standstill if that's what we need to do to defend our freedom,' added Torres. Lenildo Mendes dos Santos Sertão, a brawny Amazonian congressman who goes by the nickname Delegado Caveira ('Police chief Skull'), said he still believed Bolsonaro's political future could still be salvaged. 'I spoke with him yesterday. He's very shaken. Very downcast. But he's a soldier and he is in the trenches and at the right time he will come out and we really believe that he will be our candidate in the presidential election,' Caveira said, as he marched towards the entrance to the compound Bolsonaro can no longer leave. Another pro-Bolsonaro lawmaker, Maurício Souza, called on truck drivers, entrepreneurs and members of the agribusiness community to stage a nationwide strike against the supreme court's 'tyranny'. 'Brazil is going to grind to a halt,' Souza told reporters.
Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
Bolsonaro under house arrest after social media post during coup trial
Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil's former president, has been placed under house arrest for posting on social media during his trial for plotting a coup. The 70-year-old is banned from social media for the duration of the proceedings, and third parties are not allowed to share his public remarks. But on Sunday, his allies defied the order by sharing footage online of a call between the former army captain and his eldest son Flavio at a solidarity rally in Rio de Janeiro. Mr Bolsonaro is currently on trial at the Supreme Court accused of leading an attempt to stage a coup to overturn the 2022 election, in which he was defeated by Left-wing president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes reacted furiously, declaring that the judiciary would not allow a defendant to 'treat it like a fool' because of his 'political and economic power'. Criticising Bolsonaro's 'repeated failure' to comply with the court's restrictions on him during the trial, he placed him under house arrest at his home in the capital Brasilia. He also barred the country's former leader from receiving visitors, apart from his lawyers, and from using mobile phones, and warned that any new transgression would lead to him being detained. Several mobile phones were seized at his home on Monday, the police said. US president Donald Trump has sought to punish Brazil, a long-time US ally, for what he sees as a politically motivated 'witch hunt' targeting Mr Bolsonaro by imposing eye-watering tariffs on Latin America's biggest economy and sanctioning the judge in the trial. Washington condemned the new restrictions on Monday night, with the State Department's Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs issuing a statement on X. 'Minister Alexandre de Moraes, already sanctioned by the United States for human rights violations, continues to use Brazilian institutions to silence the opposition and threaten democracy,' the bureau posted. 'Let Bolsonaro speak!' US officials added that they would 'hold accountable all those who collaborate with or facilitate sanctioned conduct.' The US post was re-shared by Bolsonaro's politician son Eduardo Bolsonaro, who had successfully lobbied Washington to take punitive action against Brazil over the case. In a separate post, he wrote: 'Brazil is no longer a democracy.' He called Mr Moraes, who is presiding over Mr Bolsonaro's trial and has styled himself a defender of Brazilian democracy in the face of the far right, an 'out-of-control psychopath.' Last month, Mr Moraes ordered Mr Bolsonaro to wear an ankle bracelet and instituted the social media ban. Trump responded in unprecedented fashion by banning Mr Moraes from the United States and freezing his assets in US banks. Mr Trump's pressure campaign has angered many Brazilians but endeared him to Mr Bolsonaro's conservative base. At rallies in Rio, Brasilia and Sao Paulo on Sunday, some demonstrators waved US flags or held signs reading: 'Thank you Trump.' Mr Bolsonaro himself did not attend the rallies, having been ordered by the Supreme Court to stay home at night and at weekends throughout the trial. Prosecutors say he and seven co-accused tried to overturn his 2022 election defeat in a plot that only failed because the military did not get on board. He faces a 40-year sentence if convicted at the trial, which is expected to wrap up in the coming weeks. Mr Bolsonaro's supporters stormed Brazil's congress in January 2023, after Mr Lula was inaugurated, ransacking the chambers and attacking police, in scenes reminiscent of an attack by Trump supporters on the US Capitol two years before. Despite being barred from running, Mr Bolsonaro hopes to mount a Trump-style comeback in Brazil's 2026 presidential election. Lula, 79, has said he may seek a fourth term, health permitting. Last year, he was hospitalised for a brain haemorrhage caused by a bathroom fall.
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
The conviction of Colombia's ex-president is a sign of hope amid autocracy's rise
On 25 October 1997, paramilitary groups descended upon the remote 300-person farming town of El Aro, in the Colombian state of Antioquia. Over the next five days, the drug-running paramilitaries slaughtered 17 people, raped multiple women and burned the town down, forcing the remaining townspeople to flee. The attorney Jesús María Valle had been pleading with the state governor, Álvaro Uribe, for over a year to stop the paramilitaries' brutal takeover of the countryside and collusion with the military. Instead, Uribe labeled Valle an 'enemy of the armed forces'. In a statement to prosecutors after the El Aro massacre, Valle asked for a full investigation into what he described as an 'alliance' in Antioquia among paramilitaries, the military and Uribe to kill civilians and seize their land, in the name of fighting the country's leftwing Farc guerrillas. Within days, two men in suits strode into Valle's law office in downtown Medellín and shot him dead. On 1 August, Uribe, who went on to become Colombia's president in 2002, was sentenced to 12 years of house arrest after a Colombian court convicted him of bribing a witness who had linked him to the paramilitaries. The conviction could still be overturned on appeal, but the fact that it has happened at all is a striking development that would have seemed almost inconceivable a decade or so ago. In a time of rising autocracy and abuse, including in the US, it also offers reasons for hope. For decades, Uribe seemed almost untouchable. As president, he gained domestic and international acclaim – including the US Presidential Medal of Freedom from George W Bush – because of his successes, with billions of dollars in US military aid, in beating back the abusive Farc. When I met him in 2004, he strode about his conference room, lecturing me and my then colleagues on how nobody had done more than he had to bring safety to the country. Glowing portrayals of Uribe's record at the time routinely glossed over his efforts to pass laws favoring the paramilitaries and to undermine investigations of their links to those in power. During his presidency, the Colombian supreme court conducted what became known as the 'parapolitics' investigations into about one-third of members of Congress for collusion – including in many cases electoral fraud – with the paramilitaries. Uribe engaged in a furious smear campaign against the justices and his intelligence service engaged in illegal surveillance of the justices and independent journalists. Yet over the years, senior paramilitary leaders have testified to the involvement of the army and Uribe's chief of staff in Antioquia, Pedro Juan Moreno, in the El Aro massacre. Multiple investigations have documented widespread collusion between paramilitaries and important sectors of the military and political establishment at the time. There is also evidence – including statements that I obtained in a prison interview with a paramilitary leader – that Uribe's office, when he was governor, had close ties to paramilitaries, and that Moreno approved Valle's murder. Uribe has repeatedly denied it all. The conviction this week emerged in the context of a supreme court investigation into allegations that Uribe started a paramilitary group in the 1990s. Uribe claimed early on that the allegations were manufactured by a member of congress, but the court found there was no basis to his claims. Instead, the supreme court ordered a new investigation into possible witness tampering by people working for Uribe (then a senator), including alleged payments to paramilitaries to change their testimony. Uribe quit his senate seat, forcing the case to be moved from the supreme court to a lower court, and – with prosecutors seemingly unwilling to move it forward – it looked for years like the case might just die out like many other previous investigations. However, with a new chief prosecutor in place, the case picked up steam again, finally resulting in this week's conviction. Not surprisingly, Donald Trump's US administration has been trying to discredit Colombia's courts, with Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, decrying the 'weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch'. But this is all now part of a tired playbook. It's the same rhetoric Trump and his allies have been using to discredit US courts – even Trump appointees – that have ruled against them. It's how Trump has talked about the case against his buddy Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, and about the investigations conducted by the international criminal court. And it's how Uribe himself smeared activists like Jesús María Valle in the 1990s and sought to undermine the Colombian supreme court in the early 2000s. But, to me, this week's ruling stands for something else: that no matter how much power leaders may amass, they are not ultimately above the law. And no matter how desperate the situation, with courage and commitment, there is much we can do to create a path toward accountability. Maria McFarland Sánchez-Moreno is CEO of RepresentUs and the author of the award-winning book There Are No Dead Here: A Story of Murder and Denial in Colombia. She spearheaded Human Rights Watch's work on Colombia during most of Uribe's presidency
