
What I'm hearing on Mets trade deadline: How others expect New York to fill pitching needs
It is deep in terms of sought-after pitchers and up-the-middle position players.
What the industry is eager to learn: How much are the Mets willing to subtract from it in order to address major-league needs?
Advertisement
Beyond their farm system, the Mets are willing to deal from their major-league infield depth, league sources said. They have four young infielders in Mark Vientos, Brett Baty, Ronny Mauricio and Luisangel Acuña all vying for playing time at third base and second base when Jeff McNeil plays center field. With limited opportunities — obviously stars Francisco Lindor and Pete Alonso are locked into shortstop and first base, respectively — it would only make sense for the Mets to have conversations with other clubs about their younger infielders if it means helping them elsewhere.
The Mets' main priority is supplementing their bullpen. They need multiple relievers. Their preference is to find help through trades.
If New York somehow does not find a deal to its liking that meaningfully improves its bullpen, the Mets are open to using top starting pitcher prospects Nolan McLean, Brandon Sproat and Blade Tidwell in shorter roles in the majors, people briefed on their plans said. The Mets don't appear to be committing to such a decision, but it is among the possibilities.
Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns used a similar strategy in the past. While with the Milwaukee Brewers, he broke in future top starters Brandon Woodruff, Corbin Burnes and Freddy Peralta as relievers for teams in playoff hunts. However, there is more risk in going such a route compared to acquiring a proven reliever.
Industry sources expect the bullpen market to feature many options. The level of quality at the top remains unclear. Pittsburgh Pirates closer David Bednar, who isn't a free agent until after the 2026 season, is available. It is still up in the air as to whether other closers under club control such as the Cleveland Guardians' Emmanuel Clase, the Athletics' Mason Miller, the Minnesota Twins' Jhoan Duran and the Baltimore Orioles' Félix Bautista join Bednar on the market. Such impactful relievers are also relatively affordable, meaning the cost for teams interested in acquiring them is high.
Teams with such closers are looking to land a top prospect in return. Buyers know they are going to pay a premium at this time of year. For teams like the Mets, the challenge is parting with something good but not too good; no team wants to surrender a future All-Star for a reliever.
In previous years, Stearns has not acquired such a reliever at the trade deadline. While with Milwaukee, he largely didn't have to — the Brewers were typically strong in the backend of bullpens — and worked under a much tighter financial budget. Last year, his first with the Mets, he acquired relievers who were either undervalued because of performance or salary (Ryne Stanek, Phil Maton) and/or represented upside with club control (Huascar Brazoban).
Advertisement
But unlike Stearns' Brewers teams, the Mets do not feature multiple elite backend relievers. The Mets have just one: Edwin Díaz. Thus, the need is greater than in the past, which, in theory, means there should be more openness.
At this juncture, it is unlikely that the Mets add to their starting rotation solely for depth purposes, people briefed on their plans said. In other words, even if an injury pops up, it is unlikely that the Mets would jump into the market for a back-of-the-rotation starter. Sproat and McLean are among the reasons why the Mets feel good about their depth.
It is tough for the Mets to acquire a mid-rotation starter given their current alignment of Sean Manaea, Kodai Senga, David Peterson, Clay Holmes and Frankie Montas. None of them has pitched poorly enough to warrant a demotion to the bullpen.
If the Mets end up trading for a starter, it would have to be someone who represents a major upgrade — an ace-level pitcher all but guaranteed to start a playoff game. Such a player may not exist on the market.
The upside of the Mets' rotation relies on Senga and Manaea staying healthy. With both pitchers, the ability to remain healthy is a valid concern. At least six innings have been completed by a Mets starting pitcher just five times over their last 35 games, and Peterson is responsible for all five occurrences. Senga and Manaea returned recently from respective stints on the injured list. Neither is built up yet to provide consistent length. The Mets expect that to change.
(Photo of Mets reliever Ryne Stanek: Ishika Samant / Getty Images)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. After bleeding close to $600 billion in market value in January amidst the DeepSeek selloff, Wall Street's AI chip darling, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is once again the most valuable company in the world. The firm has benefited from growing investor bullishness about the long-term prospects of AI. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares closed the week 1% higher after big tech's continued persistence to spend billions of dollars to buy AI chips. Cramer discussed the impact and the CEO's relationship with President Trump: 'All CapEx go up, it's all NVIDIA. . .it's really good for NVIDIA. But of course, NVIDIA, the President talking about breaking them up, we'll get to that later. It was an out of body comment. Previously, the CNBC TV host commented on NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares and parabolic moves: 'What is the solution to this? Look, in my forthcoming book, How to Make Money in Any Market, I have banished my antiparabola bias. I have a method I reveal of picking five stocks to go alongside an index fund with some money added each month. I state point blank that if you are in your 30s or older, you should own one speculative situation like an Oklo, okay, or a Joby. Just one. It could fail you after going parabolic. Moreover, if you're under 30, you can pick two speculative names out of five because you've got enough time to make back any potential losses. Photo by Javier Esteban on Unsplash Now, you may think I'm reckless for endorsing any of these even with caveats, but it's time to admit that for many years now, speculative stocks with great growth, they've worked. Oh, and let's not forget, they don't have to stay speculative. NVIDIA stock has had many parabolic moves, including the one that started in April. To keep yourself out of these runs because of a principle that stopped working ages ago, that's to be blind to change, and I don't like it. I don't want to be that way.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Xander Bogaerts starts the 7th with a homer (7)
Xander Bogaerts gives the Padres an 8-2 lead with a solo home run in the top of the 7th inning