UN says almost 800 people killed near Gaza aid hubs in in six weeks
An officially private effort, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operations on May 26 after Israel halted supplies into the Gaza Strip for more than two months, sparking warnings of imminent famine.
Since those operations began through to July 7, UN rights office spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani said the agency had recorded "615 killings in the vicinity of the GHF sites".
Another 183 people had been killed "presumably on the routes of aid convoys" carried out by UN and other aid organisations, she told reporters in Geneva.
"This is nearly 800 people who have been killed while trying to access aid," she said, adding that "most of the injuries are gunshot injuries".
GHF operations, which effectively sidelined a vast UN aid delivery network in Gaza, have been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli forces firing on people waiting to collect rations.
The GHF, which said Thursday it had distributed more than 69 million meals to date, has denied that fatal shootings have occurred in the immediate vicinity of its aid points.
The Israeli army has accused Hamas of being responsible for firing at civilians in the vicinity of aid centres.
The army said Friday it had issued instructions to Israel's forces in the field "following lessons learned" after reports of deadly incidents at distribution facilities.
It explained that it "allows the American civilian organisation (GHF) to distribute aid to Gaza residents independently, and operates in proximity to the new distribution zones to enable the distribution alongside the continuation of IDF operational activities in the Gaza Strip".
"As part of this effort, IDF forces have recently worked to reorganise the area through the installation of fences, signage placement, the opening of additional routes, and other measures," it said.
The army stressed that "following incidents in which harm to civilians who arrived at distribution facilities was reported, thorough examinations were conducted," adding those incidents were "under review by the competent authorities in the IDF".
Ms Shamdasani highlighted that the UN rights office had repeatedly raised "serious concerns about respect for international humanitarian law principles" in the war in Gaza, which erupted following Hamas's deadly October 7, 2023 attack inside Israel.
"Where people are lining up for essential supplies such as food and medicine, and where they are being attacked, where… they have a choice between being shot or being fed, this is unacceptable," she said.
AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Iran says cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog will take 'new form'
Iran said Saturday its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency "will take on a new form", expressing a desire for a diplomatic solution to resolve concerns over its nuclear programme. Iran's 12-day war with Israel last month, sparked by an Israeli bombing campaign that hit military and nuclear sites as well as residential areas, rattled its already shaky relationship with the UN nuclear watchdog. The attacks began days before a planned meeting between Tehran and Washington aimed at reviving nuclear negotiations, which have since stalled. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Saturday that Iran's cooperation with the IAEA "has not stopped, but will take on a new form", after the Islamic republic formally ended cooperation with the UN watchdog in early July. Iran has blamed the IAEA in part for the June attacks on its nuclear facilities, which Israel says it launched to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon -- an ambition Tehran has repeatedly denied. The United States, which had been in talks with Iran since April 12, joined Israel in carrying out its own strikes on June 22, targeting Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz. Araghchi said requests to monitor nuclear sites "will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis... taking into account safety and security issues", and be managed by Iran's Supreme National Security Council. - 'Assurances'- In early July, a team of IAEA inspectors left Iran to return to the organisation's headquarters in Vienna after Tehran suspended cooperation. The talks were aimed at regulating Iran's nuclear activites in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Before agreeing to any new meeting, "we are examining its timing, its location, its form, its ingredients, the assurances it requires", said Araghchi, who also serves as Iran's lead negotiator. He said that any talks would focus only on Iran's nuclear activities, not its military capabilities. "If negotiations are held... the subject of the negotiations will be only nuclear and creating confidence in Iran's nuclear programme in return for the lifting of sanctions," he told diplomats in Tehran. "No other issues will be subject to negotiation." Araghchi also warned that reimposing UN sanctions could eliminate Europe's role in the process. - Enrichment - "Such measures would signify the end of Europe's role in the Iranian nuclear dossier," Araghchi said. A clause in the 2015 nuclear agreement, which US President Donald Trump withdrew from during his first term, allows for UN sanctions to be reimposed if Iran is found to be in breach of the deal. Araghchi stressed that any new nuclear deal must uphold Iran's right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. "I would like to emphasise that in any negotiated solution, the rights of the Iranian people on the nuclear issue, including the right to enrichment, must be respected," he said. "We will not have any agreement in which enrichment is not included." Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said at the BRICS summit in Rio on Monday that Moscow would remain a committed ally of Iran and support its nuclear programme.
The Age
23 minutes ago
- The Age
Bigger defence budgets are more often a prelude to war, not peace
It was Trump's own former defence secretary, General James Mattis, who warned if there were cuts to diplomacy and aid, 'then I need to buy more ammunition'. That's because real security requires more than just military power – it requires stability, trust, and reliable partnerships. I have just returned from the Thai Burma border visiting countless refugees from the junta's merciless aerial bombing of their own civilians using Russian and Belarusian bombs. The military led a coup on February 1, 2021 after Aung San Suu Kyi won a massive re-election in 2020 for her National League for Democracy government. Hundreds of thousands resigned from their government positions to join the resistance and many fled. I visited amputees and other wounded in Thailand's border hospitals. They are the lucky ones due to being carried across the border to receive medical treatment in Thailand. I met with the indigenous Chin leaders who spoke of more than 60 churches bombed. They are Baptists and as poor farmers their beautiful churches are their only communal source of pride; they are experiencing psychological terror as well as physical terror. I met with Karen leaders in Thailand whose churches have also been obliterated by bombs. One of the largest ethnic groups in Myanmar, there are now 1.2 million Karen internally displaced. There are no active international NGOs and UN agencies able to function in ethnic areas – it is only the churches and Buddhist monasteries delivering basic food and limited health work. International aid groups must be approved by the junta, so the only help is in junta-controlled areas. Civil society organisations have been blacklisted with many of their leaders imprisoned. Today there are now 3.5 million internally displaced people and 22 million Burmese in the country in dire need of humanitarian aid as the health and social systems have collapsed. With the cessation of USAID, even the limited health support that was reaching vulnerable communities – including vaccines, and treatment for TB, malaria, and HIV – has dried up. And it was USAID feeding the Karen refugees in the nine camps on the Thai border. As of July 31, 2025 the nine refugee camps are to be closed with 108,000 refugees unable to feed themselves and no right to work in Thailand. The Thai Border Consortium, headed by an Australian, has failed to fill the USAid gap because EU and British donors have also cut aid. It is a complete humanitarian disaster. Loading Defence spending decisions in donor nations are wreaking humanitarian havoc now. But Australia has skin in the game – with Julie Bishop serving as the UN Special Envoy for Myanmar – while both the UN Security Council and ASEAN have called on the junta to halt its bombing campaign and allow humanitarian aid to flow. I am proud that our government was one of the few nations that did not cut aid in its last Budget, and I call on the opposition to make aid a bipartisan commitment.
Sydney Morning Herald
23 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Bigger defence budgets are more often a prelude to war, not peace
It was Trump's own former defence secretary, General James Mattis, who warned if there were cuts to diplomacy and aid, 'then I need to buy more ammunition'. That's because real security requires more than just military power – it requires stability, trust, and reliable partnerships. I have just returned from the Thai Burma border visiting countless refugees from the junta's merciless aerial bombing of their own civilians using Russian and Belarusian bombs. The military led a coup on February 1, 2021 after Aung San Suu Kyi won a massive re-election in 2020 for her National League for Democracy government. Hundreds of thousands resigned from their government positions to join the resistance and many fled. I visited amputees and other wounded in Thailand's border hospitals. They are the lucky ones due to being carried across the border to receive medical treatment in Thailand. I met with the indigenous Chin leaders who spoke of more than 60 churches bombed. They are Baptists and as poor farmers their beautiful churches are their only communal source of pride; they are experiencing psychological terror as well as physical terror. I met with Karen leaders in Thailand whose churches have also been obliterated by bombs. One of the largest ethnic groups in Myanmar, there are now 1.2 million Karen internally displaced. There are no active international NGOs and UN agencies able to function in ethnic areas – it is only the churches and Buddhist monasteries delivering basic food and limited health work. International aid groups must be approved by the junta, so the only help is in junta-controlled areas. Civil society organisations have been blacklisted with many of their leaders imprisoned. Today there are now 3.5 million internally displaced people and 22 million Burmese in the country in dire need of humanitarian aid as the health and social systems have collapsed. With the cessation of USAID, even the limited health support that was reaching vulnerable communities – including vaccines, and treatment for TB, malaria, and HIV – has dried up. And it was USAID feeding the Karen refugees in the nine camps on the Thai border. As of July 31, 2025 the nine refugee camps are to be closed with 108,000 refugees unable to feed themselves and no right to work in Thailand. The Thai Border Consortium, headed by an Australian, has failed to fill the USAid gap because EU and British donors have also cut aid. It is a complete humanitarian disaster. Loading Defence spending decisions in donor nations are wreaking humanitarian havoc now. But Australia has skin in the game – with Julie Bishop serving as the UN Special Envoy for Myanmar – while both the UN Security Council and ASEAN have called on the junta to halt its bombing campaign and allow humanitarian aid to flow. I am proud that our government was one of the few nations that did not cut aid in its last Budget, and I call on the opposition to make aid a bipartisan commitment.
