Ohio's Geauga County continues its fight to keep ICE contract secret
As masked federal officers raise fears by raiding workplaces and courthouses and detaining elected officials who object, Ohio's Geauga County is fighting to keep secret its contract to jail immigrants those officers arrest.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio last month sued Geauga County when the county failed to provide a copy of its contract to jail people detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
The ACLU is asking the Ohio Supreme Court to issue a writ mandating that Geauga County, which is just east of Cleveland, turn over the contract.
The ACLU contends that such a contract between two public entities is a public document. For its part, the county is arguing that only ICE can release it.
In a court filing Tuesday, Geauga County lawyers said 'they have not denied that they possess these records at the time of this filing, and that they have asserted that the requested records are prohibited by disclosure under federal law, and therefore exempted from disclosure under the Ohio Public Records Act, specifically, RC 149.43(A)(1)(v).'
The provision cited under the Ohio public records law says that state officials can't release 'records the release of which is prohibited by state or federal law.'
However, Geauga County didn't cite any part of state or federal law saying that ICE detention contracts are exempt from release.
As a general matter, government documents can usually only be withheld or redacted if they contain sensitive personal information, business secrets, would compromise a law-enforcement investigation or if their disclosure would endanger public safety or national security.
None of the nine exemptions the Department of Homeland Security says it has from federal open records law appears to apply to the ICE contracts.
Geauga County can't simply hide behind federal immigration officials to avoid its obligations under Ohio open-records law, said Amy Gilbert, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU.
'Tellingly, Geauga doesn't dispute that it is withholding public records from disclosure,' she said in an email. 'The county's supposed reliance on ICE to tell it what to do does not relieve the county of this statutory duty. As a clear legal matter, their duty is governed by Ohio law.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Meanwhile, the lawfulness of ICE's conduct has been called into question elsewhere in Ohio — and across the country.
ICE officers — some of them masked — on Tuesday handcuffed New York City Comptroller and mayoral candidate Brad Lander when he asked to see the warrant they had to arrest a migrant who had appeared for a hearing at immigration court.
The tactic in those and other courthouses has deprived migrants of a traditional safe space to engage with the legal system, critics say.
Federal agents last week took U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla to the ground and handcuffed him as he tried to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a press conference. Noem, who has struggled to explain fundamental legal protections for individuals, oversees ICE.
In Butler County in Southwestern Ohio, supporters of Emerson Colindres had been demonstrating outside the jail against his ICE detention. Born in Honduras, Colindres, 19, had been living on Cincinnati's West Side since he was eight.
On June 4, the recent high school graduate and soccer standout was arrested during a routine ICE check-in. CityBeat on Tuesday reported that ICE had moved Colindres to a private jail in Louisiana — even though his attorneys a day earlier had filed a motion to stop the deportation.
In a written statement, Ohio Immigrant Alliance founder Lynn Tramonte said that if the goal of President Donald Trump's mass-deportation program was to make people feel safer, it's not working.
'No one benefits when masked ICE agents arrest immigrants at their immigration court hearings, while they are following the process,' she said. 'When ICE tricks a high school soccer star into showing up for an appointment, and arrests him on the spot. That doesn't help anyone at all.'
Tramonte added, 'Emerson Colindres has a U visa waiting for him. One branch of the federal government is processing it, while another branch of the same government is trying to deport him.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Curses as White House Faith Office Lunch Takes Bizarre Turn
Things got a bit awkward during the White House Faith Office luncheon on Monday. Not only did President Donald Trump curse in front of faith leaders—calling Biden-era indictments against him 'bulls--t'—he raged that he he had been investigated more than the gangster Al Capone, bragged he has 'always made money,' and incorrectly claimed gas prices are the lowest they have been in 50 years. Those topics did not appear to be part of Trump's prepared remarks. As he addressed assembled religious business leaders from the podium, he looked down occasionally at his speech but went off on tangents as he worked his way through the text. 'I've ended the radical left war on faith, and we're once again protecting religious freedom instead of destroying it, and God is once again welcomed back into our public square,' Trump said, clearly part of his prepared remarks. Trump, 79, compared himself to Capone moments later. He characterized the notorious gangster, believed to have murdered over 200 people, as 'great.' 'I was under investigation more than the late, great, Alphonse Capone,' Trump said. 'Think of it. Al Capone would kill people for dinner. If he left the room and he didn't like him, he'd have him shot, killed, buried under a building someplace, as part of the foundation of a building. They're all over the place, and I said I had more time under investigation than the legendary Alphonse Capone, or probably anybody else.' Trump then misremembered that he had been indicted four times in 2023, not five. 'The one thing I did that was very helpful, I was indicted five times. Indicted, that wasn't a word that was in—my father's looking down, my mother's looking down, that my son's not supposed to be indicted,' he said. 'I think I got indicted five times, impeached two times. All bulls--t, right? Terrible stuff.' The luncheon crowd, comprising 60 CEOs and business leaders who donate to faith-aligned charities, did not appear to mind the president's meandering, as they clapped and cheered throughout his speech as he rambled. 'Gas prices have reached the lowest level in five decades,' Trump remarked at one point. 'Actually, it's going to be, we're going to see some really good numbers where, you know, drill, baby drill, drill, baby drill. I've got to make sure that people can afford to produce the gas. ... 'But the gas has gotten to the lowest level in decades, and you're seeing $1.99 $1.98. I saw $1.95 at certain states, not California, because every time it goes down, they add taxes onto it,' Trump rambled. 'All they do is they keep adding taxes. Terrible governor, doesn't know what he's doing. He may be, he may be a candidate, but if you, if you go by success, you can't have him be a candidate.' Fox News reported that the White House luncheon is the 'first event of its kind.' The White House Faith Office was created by executive order in February. Trump grew up in a Reformed Church but rarely attends services as an adult. He has made a habit of name-dropping God since entering politics a decade ago, and he won the presidency in 2016 off the backs of Evangelical voters who later became his MAGA base.
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Is Patriarchy Corporate America's Costliest Blind Spot? This Expert Weighs In
Close-up photo of Dr. Tubbs holding book 'Erased.' Research suggests that companies with diverse leadership teams produce over 19% higher innovation revenue compared to non-diverse teams, yet global and U.S. averages for women in senior leadership roles float between 28% and 34% in recent years. After approximately $8 billion spent annually on diversity training, the numbers haven't budged, and Dr. Anna Malaika Tubbs believes that this is not a coincidence. The Cambridge-educated anthropologist and bestselling author of The Three Mothers argues in her latest work, Erased, that patriarchy isn't a relic of the past or a women's issue but a business crisis disguised as progress. 'The things that we have lost as a result of a desire to protect American patriarchy have not been by mistake but have been intentional. The erasure of mothers in my first book was not an accident but rather a deliberate omission,' Tubbs said. 'Many historians and scholars felt it necessary to exclude women from their accounts of men's lives. When we understand it that way, rather than as something that just happens naturally over time, we're more aware of what we're up against in terms of the desire to maintain a social order and to erase anything that proves we can choose other options.' This same pattern of deliberate exclusion didn't end with history books but seeped into corporate culture, eventually making its way into boardrooms and performance reviews and strategic planning sessions. Tubbs also rejects the idea that patriarchy is outdated and, instead, presents it as a part of a larger, more insidious system. Think about the last board meeting where a woman's concerns about market risk got dismissed as 'overthinking,' or when relationship-building skills got labeled 'soft' while aggressive negotiation tactics were called 'strategic.' These aren't isolated but collectively form symptoms of what Tubbs calls 'American patriarchy,' a term she uses to distinguish the specific system that emerged from the founding fathers' post-Revolutionary War anxiety about maintaining control. According to Tubbs, modern patriarchy is not a personal failing but a structural problem. 'If we think about it as a system rather than a person's fault, we realize how all of us have been hurt by it,' she said. This framing avoids the defensive posturing that typically derails diversity conversations in corporate settings, and instead of finger-pointing, it redirects attention toward structural barriers, those that constrain organizational potential. Applying Tubbs' framework to corporate settings reveals how patriarchy becomes self-sabotaging at the institutional level. When companies fail to recognize and address patterns of exclusion, they perpetuate cycles that limit their potential for growth, scaling, and adaptation. The cost of this can be far-reaching and is only reinforced because other unlikely groups contribute to it. 'Patriarchs are not only men,' Tubbs emphasizes. 'There are many women, people of color and immigrants who are protecting this social order.' Patriarchy is not a new topic of conversation, especially not in corporate conversations, but Tubbs pushes for something that goes beyond simple recognition. She's asking executives to look at their last five major product failures and ask themselves if a more diverse leadership team would have seen the blind spots coming. 'We cannot build a nation where women have power over men because that's not what I'm advocating for, but instead a nation where we each have power vested in us,' Tubbs said. For business, this vision translates into cultures where different voices and perspectives aren't just tolerated but actively pursued as competitive and valuable, as opposed to being yet another diversity metric. 'We have to be completely aware at all times that we cannot be neutral, because our American systems are not neutral,' Tubbs said. The observation cuts through corporate rhetoric and exposes how being neutral itself can become a form of complicity. The companies that get this right will tap into market opportunities that their competitors miss. For some companies, the biggest threat to innovation isn't in Silicon Valley but the unchecked bias around their boardroom table.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says any 'credible' Epstein files should be released
President Donald Trump said Tuesday the US Justice Department should release all "credible" information from its probe into notorious sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein as he sought to douse a firestorm of criticism from his supporters over his handling of the case. Trump is facing the most serious split of his political career from his famously loyal right-wing base over suspicions that his administration is covering up lurid details of Epstein's crimes to protect rich and powerful figures they say are implicated. "The attorney general has handled that very well," the Republican leader said of Pam Bondi, who leads the Justice Department, when he was asked about the case at the White House. Trump repeated his claim that the Epstein files were "made up" by his Democratic predecessors in the White House -- even though he said multiple times during the election campaign that he would "probably" release them. "She's handled it very well, and it's going to be up to her," Trump said. "Whatever she thinks is credible, she should release." Trump's latest comments mark a softening of his stance -- he had voiced frustration in the Oval Office and online about his supporters' fixation on Epstein and pleaded with them to move on. "I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody," Trump told reporters Tuesday night, adding: "It's pretty boring stuff." The president's "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement has long held as an article of faith that "Deep State" elites are protecting Epstein's most powerful associates in the Democratic Party and Hollywood. Trump has faced growing outrage since his administration effectively shut down Epstein-related conspiracy theories, which have become MAGA obsessions. The Justice Department and FBI said in a memo made public earlier this month there is no evidence that the disgraced financier kept a "client list" or was blackmailing powerful figures. They also dismissed the claim that Epstein was murdered in jail, confirming his death by suicide, and said they would not be releasing any more information on the probe. - 'Let the people decide' - It marked the first time Trump's officials had publicly refuted the stories -- pushed for years by numerous right-wing figures, notably including the FBI's top two officials, before Trump hired them. Beyond angering supporters, the issue has opened a schism within his administration, sparking a fiery blow-up between Bondi and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino, who is said to be considering resigning. Trump's attempts to take the sting out of the controversy have largely failed, with far right influencers continuing to criticize him online. Even his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, a Fox News host, has called for "more transparency" from the administration. Trump's most powerful ally in the US Congress, House Speaker Mike Johnson, pushed Tuesday for the administration to release more information about the case, and his stance has been echoed by multiple Republicans. "We should put everything out there and let the people decide," he told MAGA influencer Benny Johnson's internet show, calling on Bondi to "come forward and explain" apparent discrepancies in her statements about the case. Bondi told Fox News in February a list of Epstein clients was on her desk for review, before backtracking and saying that no such list existed. Epstein died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019 after being charged with sex trafficking. Trump -- who has denied visiting the US Virgin Islands home where prosecutors say Epstein sex trafficked underage girls -- said ahead of his election he would have "no problem" releasing files related to the case. Asked whether Bondi had told him if his name appeared in a file related to Epstein, Trump said "no," adding that Bondi has "given us just a very quick briefing." ft/jgc/dw
