Al Pacino's In A Horror Movie Based On A Real-Life Exorcism, And I'm Forever Haunted By What I Saw In The Trailer
Just when I thought it was complete make-believe and couldn't hurt me, I discovered that The Ritual is based on the true notes and findings of a real exorcist who performed multiple exorcisms on Emma Schmidt (who later changed her name to Anna Ecklund). HELP.
The Ritual stars Dan Stevens (Abigail, Cuckoo) and the legendary Al Pacino as two priests who team up to perform Emma's exorcism.
Al will portray Father Theophilus Riesinger.
XYZ Films / discover.theritualmovie.com
Dan will portray Father Joseph Steiger.
XYZ Films / discover.theritualmovie.com
Emma will be portrayed by Abigail Cowen (Chilling Adventures of Sabrina, Winx Club).
Monica Schipper / Getty Images, XYZ Films
The movie also features Ashley Greene (Twilight Saga) and Patricia Heaton (The Middle, Everybody Loves Raymond).
Jon Kopaloff / Getty Images, Michael Loccisano / WireImage
German-American exorcist Father Theophilus presumably performed multiple exorcisms on Emma (aka Anna Ecklund) in 1912 and 1928, and bless their hearts because it couldn't be me.
No matter how often I tell myself that I will stay far away from films like Insidious and The Conjuring, I suddenly find myself back in the irresistible clutches of creepy movies.
Filmdistrict / FilmDistrict / courtesy Everett Collection, Ben Rothstein / © Warner Bros. / Courtesy Everett Collection
Thanks to The Ritual, I'm back on my paranormal BS, and I'm utterly terrified... and excited.
Check out the trailer for The Ritual here, and let me know your thoughts.
Have you ever had a real-life scary experience that made you wonder if you should search Yellow Pages for an exorcist?
Share your responses in the comments!
The Ritual will be in theaters everywhere June 6th.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Artificial Authenticity And The Humblebrag Industrial Complex
Andy Warhol poses with his beloved dachshund Archie in November 1973. (Photo by Jack Mitchell/Getty ... More Images) Getty Images A now-viral screenshot (below) of a satirical LinkedIn post from four years ago has been shared thousands of times—mocking the platform's ecosystem of manufactured inspiration, where every mundane encounter becomes a profound lesson in leadership. Yet scroll through your feed today, and you'll find posts nearly indistinguishable from the parody. We've reached peak professional performance theater, where the line between genuine insight and algorithmic optimization has dissolved entirely. And what's notable is that more and more people are now using AI to draft their LinkedIn posts, outsourcing their inner monologue to machines that have never had an inner anything. Posts today are more than twice as long as they used to be, and a 2024 study by Originality found that over half of these long-form English language posts on the platform were AI generated. LinkedIn hasn't just digitized networking—it has industrialized authenticity, outsourcing even emotional labor to algorithms and turning professional identity into a content genre. This goes beyond LinkedIn's occasional awkwardness or self-indulgence. It's about how professional identity itself is evolving in an AI-saturated world, and the economic stakes are higher than we realize. Screenshot of LinkedIn post by Lumko Solwandle Nathan Pettijohn Before LinkedIn digitized professional networking in 2003, career advancement relied on physical proximity and institutional gatekeepers. Professional relationships were built through alumni networks, industry conferences, golf courses, and corner office introductions—spaces that inherently favored those with existing social and economic capital. LinkedIn democratized access to professional networks while simultaneously industrializing the performance itself, making visible what was once private and measurable what was once intuitive. Today, LinkedIn has over 1 billion global members, with only 1% posting content weekly, yet generating 9 billion impressions weekly. This platform has industrialized what sociologist Arlie Hochschild calls "emotional labor"—the management of feelings to create a publicly observable facial and bodily display. Except now, we're outsourcing even that labor to artificial intelligence. The platform's ecosystem of " broetry "—those distinctive LinkedIn posts formatted with short, dramatic line breaks for maximum impact—represents something deeper than mere narcissism. The typography itself performs sincerity, mimicking the cadence of spoken vulnerability. When someone writes: "I made a mistake. And it changed everything. Here's what I learned..." They're not just sharing a professional insight. They're using visual formatting to simulate the pauses and emphasis of authentic emotional revelation, turning genuine human moments into content optimized for algorithmic consumption. LinkedIn's algorithm can identify robotic responses but remains surprisingly vulnerable to AI-generated thought leadership. When machines can successfully impersonate human professional insight, what does that say about the original insight? We've reached a point where artificial authenticity reflects back on itself so thoroughly that it's difficult to recall what unmediated professional wisdom even sounded like. The Humblebrag Industrial Complex LinkedIn has transformed what was once a social faux pas into a legitimate digital marketing strategy. The platform rewards what sociologists might recognize as ritualized vulnerability—a scripted performance of authenticity that has crystallized into genre: "I'm humbled to announce..." (success disguised as modesty, the linguistic equivalent of covering a Ferrari with a tarp) "A stranger did something kind and restored my faith in humanity..." (virtue signaling through anecdote, usually involving coffee shops or airport encounters) "I was rejected from my dream job, and it was the best thing that ever happened to me..." (destiny disguised as disappointment, the professional equivalent of "everything happens for a reason") These posts function as modern parables, teaching us how to navigate professional success while maintaining the illusion of humility. But the economic implications are worth noting. Research by Edelman found that thought leadership influences decision-makers' purchasing behaviors, with their B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study showing that strong thought leadership content not only strengthens a company's reputation but also positively impacts RFP invitations and pricing. LinkedIn's audience has twice the buying power of the average online user, and four out of five people on the platform drive business decisions. This creates what amounts to the Instagramification of the cubicle, where every career move becomes content, every professional insight becomes engagement bait, every human moment becomes a potential case study in leadership. The performance actually matters—posts with 50 comments from engaged users prove far more impactful than those with 1,000 likes and no conversations, suggesting that authentic dialogue (however performed) still carries economic weight. Unlike other social media platforms where influence might translate to brand deals or Patreon subscriptions, LinkedIn performance has direct B2B economic consequences. Consider the case of Justin Welsh, who reports building "$10.3M+ in business revenue at ~86% profit margins" largely through LinkedIn content. His posts about entrepreneurship routinely generate hundreds of thousands of impressions and directly drive sales for his courses and consulting services. Welsh's success illustrates how LinkedIn has flattened traditional professional hierarchies—you don't need a corner office or MBA to influence industry conversations. The Shadow Audience Effect Erving Goffman once described everyday life as a kind of stage, where individuals perform identity for an audience. LinkedIn crystallizes this theory in digital form. What makes LinkedIn's artificial authenticity particularly powerful is what we might call the "shadow audience effect." For every person who reads and engages with your post, there are dozens more who scroll past, absorbing your message without leaving any digital trace. You're influencing people you'll never know you influenced, creating ripple effects of professional persona that extend far beyond the platform's ability to track. This invisible influence explains why LinkedIn content often feels like performance art masquerading as professional insight. The poster knows they're being watched by potential clients, employers, and industry peers, even if those watchers never engage. The result is calculated transparency—being selectively vulnerable through frosted glass. For younger professionals or those without traditional credentials, this can create a pressure to perform vulnerability as a career strategy, not as a path to connection. What LinkedIn has accomplished is the digitization of what Pierre Bourdieu called ' cultural capital '—the knowledge, skills, and tastes that signal social status. Professional networking was always about displaying and accumulating this capital, but LinkedIn made the process explicit, quantified, and globally accessible. Your post engagement isn't just social validation; it's the real-time measurement of your professional cultural capital in the marketplace. This is why so many users report career opportunities or new clients from posts that received little visible engagement—because the real influence lies in who's watching, not who's commenting. When Machines Learn Professional Authenticity The integration of AI into LinkedIn content creation represents an evolution in professional identity performance. AI writing tools now offer LinkedIn-specific templates—some trained on large datasets of high-performing posts—designed to replicate the cadence of professional inspiration. The AI learns the cadence of professional inspiration, the rhythm of humble bragging, the precise vulnerability-to-insight ratio that drives engagement. MIT sociologist Sherry Turkle observes : "Technology doesn't just do things for us. It does things to us, changing not just what we do but who we are." This shift is particularly evident in professional contexts, where AI-assisted content creation is reshaping how we construct and perform our professional identities. This shift in how we perform professional identity online doesn't exist in a vacuum. It's emerging in parallel with broader workplace transformations—remote work, pandemic-era burnout, the so-called ' Great Resignation ,' and the rise of solo entrepreneurship. As traditional career ladders collapse or morph into lattices, platforms like LinkedIn have become a kind of stage where we rehearse relevance. In a world where your job title might be in flux and your office is your kitchen table, broadcasting a coherent professional persona isn't just branding—it's survival. The implications extend beyond LinkedIn. As AI becomes more sophisticated at mimicking human professional communication, the premium on genuinely human insights—the kind that can't be replicated by algorithms—may actually increase. We might be witnessing the last gasps of performed authenticity before authenticity becomes the only viable differentiator. The Algorithm Made Me Do It Andy Warhol famously predicted everyone would be famous for fifteen minutes. LinkedIn offers something more unsettling: the chance to remain professionally relevant indefinitely—as long as we never stop performing. The platform has created a new form of professional purgatory where authenticity becomes a competitive advantage precisely because it's so rare. In a feed flooded with AI-generated inspiration and algorithmic optimization, the genuinely human voice doesn't just stand out—it becomes economically valuable. We've reached the point where being authentically yourself is the ultimate professional hack. But here's the deeper paradox: LinkedIn didn't create performed professionalism—it simply made it visible, measurable, and unavoidable. The platform exposed what was always true about professional identity: it has always been performative, from the firm handshake to the power lunch to the carefully curated resume. LinkedIn merely provided the stage and sold tickets to the show. The real question isn't whether artificial authenticity is corrupting professional discourse—it's whether we'll develop the literacy to distinguish between human insight and algorithmic mimicry. As AI becomes more sophisticated at replicating professional wisdom, the ability to offer genuinely original thinking may become the ultimate career differentiator. The humblebrag industrial complex will endure, but so will our fundamentally human need for genuine connection and meaningful work. The challenge is learning to sound like ourselves—even while writing on a platform (and perhaps with tools) designed to make us all sound the same. Just perhaps, the most human thing we can do is think thoughts worth writing ourselves.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bruce Willis' Wife Issues Statement Regarding Speculation Surrounding Her Husband's Health
Emma Heming Willis has sent a clear message to fans — and to the media. "To Whom It May Concern: If you ever come across a story that begins with "sources close to the family say...," do yourself a favor and stop reading," Heming Willis wrote on her Instagram Stories on July 26. "And to any outlet that runs with those kinds of stories, do better. Giving a platform to anonymous speculation is not only careless, it's harmful. Onward," she added. Heming Willis' statement comes on the heels of reports that her husband, actor Bruce Willis, is no longer able to speak or walk. A number of unconfirmed reports surfaced this week suggesting that the Die Hard star's health has declined. Willis was diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia in 2023. The condition affects the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain and can affect a person's personality, behavior and language, according to the Mayo Clinic. Willis has a strong support system, which consists of his wife, whom he married in 2009, his ex-wife, Demi Moore, and his five daughters. Over the past couple of years, the whole family has done their best to keep Willis' spirits high. There have been a number of times that his family, especially his older daughters, have shared updates on their father, but they tend to keep it simple, affording their dad the ability to live his life privately. The family has not shared any significant updates on Willis' condition since revealing his Willis' Wife Issues Statement Regarding Speculation Surrounding Her Husband's Health first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 26, 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Jessie Murph sparks outrage over controversial music video depicting domestic violence, pornography
Jessie Murph has fans in an uproar. The 20-year-old singer, who has been compared to Amy Winehouse, sparked a social media firestorm over the music video to her risqué new song '1965.' The video, which came out July 18, has been accused of glorifying pornography and domestic violence due to its graphic nature. 11 Jessie Murph in her '1965' music video. Jessie Murph/YouTube 11 Jessie Murph puts a gun in a man's mouth in the '1965' music video. Jessie Murph/YouTube 11 Jessie Murph lounging on a bed in her '1965' music video. Jessie Murph/YouTube Fans are particularly upset over a shocking sex scene that takes place in the middle of the video. In addition, a woman who appears to be Murph is depicted tied up while face down on a couch in the video. 11 Jessie Murph's '1965' music video has sparked intense backlash with fans. Jessie Murph/YouTube 11 Jessie Murph has been accused of glorifying violence and porn. Jessie Murph/YouTube Fans flooded the comments section of the song's YouTube upload — which has over 7 million views — to express their displeasure. 'The way my jaw dropped the floor, there's still time to unrelease this,' one fan wrote. 'The fact it's been 5days or whatever since the video had been uploaded and youtube still hasn't blurred that out is crazy work,' a different comment read. 11 Jessie Murph released '1965' on July 18. Jessie Murph/YouTube A third person said, 'I didnt think it would be this bad. I am forever traumatized this is diabolical.' 'Since when is pornography allowed on youtube?' someone else asked. More fans slammed Murph for including a child in the video right before the sex scene. 'So so messed up,' a fan said. 11 Jessie Murph with a young child in her '1965' music video. Jessie Murph/YouTube 'Not only is this song ahh, putting a child before such a explicit scene is crazy,' a different fan noted. '1965,' which is from Murph's newly released second studio album 'Sex Hysteria,' is filled with raunchy lyrics. 'We'd go to church on a Sunday, wake up on Monday/You'd go to work and I'd stay home and sing and do fun things/I might get a little slap-slap, but you wouldn't hit me on Snapchat,' Murph sings. 11 Jessie Murph attends Spotify's 2025 Songs of Summer Celebration in Los Angeles on July 23. Getty Images for Spotify 'I think I'd give up a few rights/If you would just love me like it's 1965,' she also sings. An insider told the Daily Mail that Murph's song and music video sparked outrage in the country music scene, with some comparing her to Kanye West. 'If she continues this and goes completely off the rails like Kanye, then people should have more conversations about the person she is rather than the artist she is,' the insider told the outlet. 11 Jessie Murph performing during The ACM Country Kickoff at Tostitos Championship Plaza in Frisco, Texas. Getty Images The Post has reached out to Murph's reps for comment. In a recent interview with Teen Vogue, Murph spoke about the intense reactions her music evokes from fans. 'I'm glad that I make people have some sort of reaction. I'd rather them be like, 'I hate you,' or 'I love you,' rather than, 'I feel indifferently,' I guess,' the Alabama native stated. 11 Jessie Murph seen in New York City on July 21. GC Images 'But still, I just find it f—ing weird… I don't have any hate in my heart… That's been something that I've been trying to figure out how to navigate and not react and get mad because it totally makes me be like, 'F–k you, b-tch,'' she added. Days after releasing her new album, Murph's performance to '1965' on 'The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon' was similarly bashed by fans online. 'how dare anybody be comparing this to Amy… you should all be ashamed smh,' one fan wrote. 11 Jessie Murph performs during Spotify's 2025 Songs of Summer Celebration. Getty Images for Spotify 'everything about this feels like an SNL skit. how is this real,' another fan said. Murph was discovered by uploading vlogs and covers on TikTok and YouTube. She had her breakthrough with her 2021 single 'Always Been You,' three years before releasing her debut studio album, 'That Ain't No Man That's the Devil.'
