
Province takes metro to court over land invasion, dumping near Hennops
The area has suffered significant environmental damage due to pollution and unregulated human settlements.
Metro spokesperson Lindela Mashigo confirmed that the metro had been served with court papers relating to the matter.
He emphasised that the city is fully aware of the situation and its implications for the environment, particularly the Hennops River.
Mashigo noted that the Tshwane metro's environmental management inspectors (Green Scorpions) had already taken steps by issuing a directive under Section 28 of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) to the Gauteng Department of Infrastructure Development (GDID).
GDID owns the land in question.
'NEMA Section 28 requires that every person who causes, has caused or may cause significant pollution or degradation of the environment must take reasonable measures to prevent such pollution or degradation from occurring, continuing or recurring,' he said.
He added that if the harm to the environment is authorised by law or cannot be reasonably avoided, the act still obliges those responsible to minimise and rectify such pollution or degradation.
Mashigo explained that this responsibility extends to any landowner, occupier or person with control or legal rights to the land or premises.
'In light of non-compliance with the directive, the matter has been handed over to the Gauteng Department of Environment for possible criminal prosecution.
The Tshwane Metro Police Department (TMPD) also continues to enforce municipal waste management by-laws in the area.'
To prevent similar environmental degradation in the future, Mashigo said the metro is engaging with the Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni metros to manage transboundary pollution.
'The city is in the process of identifying suitable properties to establish multipurpose waste sorting facilities to ensure that waste sorting activities are conducted in an environmentally compliant manner,' he added.
This legal action from the provincial government follows a sustained campaign by the DA, which has allegedly been pushing for government intervention since 2021.
In May, DA provincial spokesperson for Environmental Affairs, Leanne de Jager, announced that the party's long-standing advocacy had led to the Gauteng government initiating legal proceedings against the Tshwane metro.
'The illegal invaders are residing on the banks of the Hennops River, which has a severe environmental impact on the water system and air quality.
'They also dump refuse inside the river, exacerbating the problem,' she said.
De Jager emphasised that ensuring the Hennops River system remains free from illegal dumping is crucial for water quality, local air quality, and preventing soil contamination on provincial land.
She explained that the party had used multiple channels to address the issue over the past four years, including tabling questions in the Gauteng Provincial Legislature, submitting petitions, and engaging provincial departments to take action.
According to De Jager, the case will be heard in court on August 13.
'This case sets an important precedent, showing that community action backed by political leadership can result in meaningful environmental accountability,' she stated.
She added that a DA-led Gauteng government would prioritise the protection of provincial land and ensure that the Green Scorpions deliver on their mandate to monitor rivers and ensure they are free from pollution.
While the legal process plays out, broader efforts to address the pollution of the Hennops River system are already underway at a local level.
Last month, Tshwane Mayor Dr Nasiphi Moya announced that the metro had officially partnered with the Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni metros to tackle one of the Hennops River's most critical upstream pollution sources, the Kaalspruit River.
The Kaalspruit River originates in Ekurhuleni and flows through Johannesburg before merging with the Hennops River.
It has been identified as a key contributor to the pollution crisis affecting the entire river system.
Moya said the collaboration among the three metros was formalised during a joint meeting on May 26, which she described as a defining moment for her administration.
'For too long, we have been plagued by the declining state of the Hennops River and overwhelmed by a sense of helplessness because of our inability to address the upstream causes of pollution,' said Moya.
She explained that urbanisation, informal settlements near riverbanks, and the dumping of raw sewage and municipal waste have all contributed to the environmental collapse of the Kaalspruit and, by extension, Hennops.
'This river system is deteriorating fast. Illegal sand mining and sewer mining have also compounded the situation, leading to excessive erosion and the silting up of the entire system, all the way past the Hennops River and down to Hartbeespoort Dam,' she said.
'It is by overcoming the blame game that the three metros can accept that we are in this together and committed to doing whatever it takes to fix it.'
Moya said the agreement between the municipalities includes the establishment of an inter-metro multidisciplinary Kaalspruit Task Team, made up of senior officials from the respective metros.
This team will regularly report to the three mayors and align existing plans into a combined proposal with technical interventions and funding requirements.
Do you have more information about the story?
Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114.
For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East
For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
7 hours ago
- eNCA
Minister Creecy tables budget before parliament
CAPE TOWN - It was a day for budget votes. Some were more controversial than others after the DA said it would boycott the budgets of at least two departments presided over by compromised minister. It's the final leg of the national budget process because the Appropriation Bill can only be passed if all departmental votes have been agreed to. One of the less controversial budget vote was for transport – although opposition parties criticised none the less.

TimesLIVE
7 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
DA rejects Simelane, Nkabane departmental budgets
The DA has followed through on its threat to vote against departmental budget votes of ministers who are facing allegations of wrongdoing. This after the party this week voted against budgets of the departments of human settlements and higher education led by Thembi Simelane-Nkadimeng and Nobuhle Nkabane respectively. This decision was taken as a direct response to President Cyril Ramaphosa axing trade and industry deputy minister Andrew Whitfield, of the DA, last week for defying his order that none of the members of his executive were allowed to go to the US at the height of the diplomatic tensions between the two countries. The DA in response argued that Ramaphosa had been harsh on Whitfield and that it was not acceptable that he fired him for such a minor transgression while he still kept Simelane and Nkabane in his cabinet. Unlike Whitfield, the DA argued, Simelane was accused of corruption and Nkabane stood accused of lying to parliament. Instead of dealing with the two ministers who were facing serious allegations, Ramaphosa decided to axe Whitfield for going on a trip without getting permission, the DA argued. DA MP Luyolo Mphithi on Wednesday said his party was voting against Simelane's budget vote because of the corruption allegations she was facing. Mphithi said the DA was concerned that instead of firing Simelane, Ramaphosa had moved her from the department of justice to human settlements. 'You'd think that the response to this that the president would have shown minister Simelane the door, he did not. He asked for the report that he stayed with for three months,' said Mphithi. 'And even though the DA sustained pressure asking the president to act, he lacked courage to act and instead decided to dump minister Simelane at human settlements, one of the most important departments for South Africans.' 'It seems that this president does not take an issue with the fact that a person accused of corruption sits in his cabinet and will have to look after a budget of R30bn that is set aside for South Africans,' he said. Ideally, Mphithi said, the DA would not have a problem with voting for the department of human settlements' budget as it relates to people's housing and security but they could not do it because of the allegations faced by Simelane. 'The DA will always support the granting of funds to house the vulnerable at the same time fast-tracking jobs and growth to give many more South Africans the dignity of being able to buy and own their own houses,' he said. 'And though this budget and the department have many challenges under normal circumstances it would be supported. However, we sit with a minister who faces corruption allegations who has not been accountable to the South African public. And it is because of this we struggle support this particular budget.' Mphithi and the MK Party's Thulani Gumede raised several issues with the human settlements budget presented by Simelane, saying it was not dealing with some of the key issues faced by South Africans in the sector. 'A critical examination reveals a fundamental flaw, an overall real decline in the department's budget. None of its five main programmes demonstrates above-inflation increases,' said Gumede. 'This systemic underfunding of human settlements initiatives will inevitably worsen existing backlogs and impair the progressive realisation of adequate housing.' He said his party could not vote for as it would mean they accepted the decrease in allocation. 'I asserted during the committee meeting last week and I reiterate now that this draft budget must be rejected. It's real term decline across key programmes particularly in integrated human settlements and informal settlements upgrading directly contradicts the constitutional obligation to provide adequate housing and the strategic goals of the national development plans,' he said. 'Accepting this budget will constitute a retreat from addressing deeply entrenched structural inequalities and the pressing needs of the vulnerable communities for basic services and dignified living conditions.'

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
EDITORIAL: It's game over for the DA in the GNU
DA leader John Steenhuisen's announcement that his party, including ministers serving in Ramaphosa's Cabinet, will not take part in the upcoming National Dialogue, is immaterial, argues the writer. Image: Armand Hough/ Independent Newspapers THE DA now has little to no ground to argue against the perception that the ANC has reduced it to a mere bystander in the so-called Government of National Unity (GNU). That is why President Cyril Ramaphosa can fire a DA deputy minister from his executive without being concerned about the political implications for his decision. From the start, the ANC has always been firmly in control of the direction the government takes despite failing to secure enough votes to govern the country as a single party in last year's elections. Ramaphosa knows all too well that the DA's desperation to remain in government runs so deep that it will not retaliate with severe action even when he acts against DA members in the executive. The DA was always going to find it difficult to impose itself in the GNU because it entered the coalition government for the wrong reasons. Its stated objective of keeping the EFF and Zuma's MK Party out of government plays into the ANC's hands. ANC secretary general Fikile Mbalula's utterances that the government won't collapse even if the DA leaves the GNU should be seen as a declaration that the DA's involvement in the GNU is immaterial. Just like DA leader John Steenhuisen's announcement that his party, including ministers serving in Ramaphosa's Cabinet, will not take part in the upcoming National Dialogue. The DA must leave the GNU with whatever little pride it still has. Its role in opposition benches was more effective than it is in this current government. The past 12 months have proved this. Almost all the policies and Bills it opposed remain firmly in place and some of them will be implemented on behalf of the ANC by their ministers. Leaving the GNU will allow it to make a head start in campaigning to win some of the key metros that remain hung. It's there that it should demonstrate its governing strength. It can find inspiration from renowned Pan-Africanist Professor Patrick Lumumba's words when he correctly points out that: 'No matter how good you are…if you stay for too long, you spoil it. A good dancer must know when to leave the stage.' CAPE TIMES