
"Indus Water Pact Suspension Must Be Utilised": Punjab Amid Water Row With Haryana
The recent decision by the Centre to suspend the Indus Water Treaty opens up the possibility of greater utilisation of water from the western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) within Indian territory, Mr Mann said, referring to the suspension of the pact with Pakistan in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack.
Punjab, which is currently facing groundwater depletion, must be prioritised in any future strategies for the usage, diversion, or allocation of river waters, he added.
The Chief Minister mooted the idea of Yamuna-Satluj Link (YSL) canal instead of Satluj-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal project. "Haryana and Punjab are brothers. Now this fight should end. There has always been politics over the matter. Both the states have been fighting for 2 MF water, but if the canal comes from Kashmir, we will get 23 MF water," he said.
The controversial 1981 water-sharing agreement came into being after Haryana was carved out of Punjab in 1966.
For effective allocation of water, SYL canal link was conceptualised. A stretch of 214 km SYL was set to be built, of which 122 km were to be in Punjab and 92 km in Haryana.
In 2004, the then Congress government of the state came out with the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act with an intention to terminate the 1981 agreement and all other pacts relating to sharing of waters of rivers Ravi and Beas.
The Supreme Court had first decreed the suit of Haryana in 2002 asking Punjab to honour its commitments with regard to water sharing in the case.
Punjab challenged the verdict by filing a suit which was rejected in 2004 by the Supreme Court.
During the meeting that was convened by Union Jal Shakti Minister C R Patil, Mr Mann reiterated that Punjab has no spare water to share with any other state and there was no question of sharing even a single drop of water with anyone. Most of the state's blocks are overexploited, and the groundwater situation in the state is dire, he said.
The Chief Minister said the SYL canal is an 'emotive issue' and that Punjab will face serious law and order problems, which will escalate into a national issue, with Haryana and Rajasthan also being affected.
He and Mr Saini, however, express confidence that the dispute will be resolved soon. The next meeting is scheduled to be held on August 5.
Mr Saini said a meaningful discussion took place in a cordial atmosphere in the meeting. He said Mr Mann acknowledged that this issue should be resolved, as it has remained pending for far too long.
Mr Saini also said that Punjab and Haryana are like brothers, and even today, they share a common space with mutual respect and harmony. Discussions in the next meeting are expected to lead to a better solution and yield positive results, he said.
The meeting was also attended by Union Secretary Debashree Mukherjee, Haryana Chief Secretary Anurag Rastogi, Additional Chief Secretary of Irrigation and Water Resources Department Anurag Aggarwal, along with several senior officials from the Irrigation Department.
Meanwhile, former Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda said the Bharatiya Janata Party-led Centre should now move ahead from such meetings. "The (top) court had handed over the responsibility of getting Haryana's share of water to the central government. The BJP is in power both in Haryana and at the Centre. In such a situation, Haryana should have got its share of water by now. But due to BJP's anti-Haryana attitude, this could not happen. Now, if the government is talking about it, then it should directly file a contempt of court case," he said.
Indian National Lok Dal MLA Rania Arjun Chautala accused Mr Mann of doing politics over the issue. "Water is a natural resource over which the entire country has rights, not just of a state. SYL is the lifeline of Haryana. Haryana's right. Haryana should get water. The central government should resolve the water sharing issue," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
125 immigrant billionaires now hold $1.3 trillion of America's wealth
Immigrants aren't just cheap labour — they help make America wealthier. The 2025 Forbes list of foreign-born billionaires living in the US, along with Meta's newly announced Superintelligence Lab run entirely by immigrant researchers, reflects how central immigrants have become to the country's growth — economically and technologically. A record 125 foreign-born American citizens now appear on Forbes' annual list of billionaires residing in the US, up from 92 in 2022. Together, they account for 14 per cent of America's nearly 900 billionaires and hold $1.3 trillion in combined wealth — around 18 per cent of the country's total billionaire fortune. Among the top 10 richest Americans, three are immigrants. The world's wealthiest person, Elon Musk, was born in South Africa and moved to the US via Canada as a student. He is now worth $393.1 billion. Google cofounder Sergey Brin, who came to the US from Russia as a child, follows with a net worth of $139.7 billion. Nvidia's Jensen Huang, born in Taiwan and sent to the US as a child during political unrest in Thailand, is worth $137.9 billion. These 125 billionaire immigrants hail from 43 countries, but most were born in just a handful of places. • Indian-origin immigrants leads with 12 billionaires, up from 7 in 2022 • Taiwan and Israel follow closely with 11 each • Canada (9), China (8), and Germany and Iran (6 each) also feature prominently Among the new entrants are AMD CEO Lisa Su, cousin of Nvidia's Huang, and Iranian-born biotech leader Maky Zanganeh, now co-CEO of Summit Therapeutics. 'Being an immigrant is about seeking the best opportunities and learning to adapt to new environments,' Forbes quoted Zanganeh, whose firm's lung cancer drug candidate helped push her into the billionaire bracket. Indians added five new immigrant billionaires this year — more than any other country. Sundar Pichai, Satya Nadella, and Nikesh Arora are now part of this cohort, joining other US-based billionaires like Jay Chaudhry, Vinod Khosla, and Romesh Wadhwani. Most are self-made, and many came for education While over a quarter of US billionaires inherited their wealth, 93 per cent of immigrant billionaires built it themselves. Nearly two-thirds made their fortune in tech (53 people) or finance (28 people). Many came to the US for higher education and stayed on. According to Forbes, Musk arrived to study at the University of Pennsylvania. Jay Chaudhry, now worth $17.9 billion, flew from India to the University of Cincinnati in 1980 having never been on a plane. Shahid Khan, owner of the Jacksonville Jaguars, arrived at 16 to study in Illinois and washed dishes for $1.20 an hour his first day. Immigrants leading Meta's AI lab Beyond billionaires, immigrants are also behind some of the most cutting-edge innovation in the US today. Meta's newly launched Superintelligence Lab, tasked with building next-generation AI systems, is staffed entirely by immigrant researchers. The 11-member team includes talent from India, China, the UK, South Africa, and Australia — all with advanced US university degrees and work histories at top AI firms like OpenAI, Google and DeepMind. 'Meta's Superintelligence Lab, led entirely by immigrant researchers, is the practical reality we needed to see,' Praneet Singh, AVP of University Partnership at upGrad's study abroad division told Business Standard. 'AI innovation is truly going borderless and India continues to serve as a strong hub of ready talent.' He added, 'It's quite paradoxical, though — while our talent is ready, mobility remains constrained. Despite policy shifts like STEM OPT extensions and improved green card processing, visa constraints and bureaucratic uncertainties continue to slow down global movement.' This rise in immigrant wealth and innovation comes against the backdrop of tighter immigration scrutiny under the Trump administration, with longer visa processing times and expanded enforcement.


India Today
16 minutes ago
- India Today
Rs 1,066 crore central aid cleared for six flood, landslide-hit states
The central government has approved over Rs 1,066 crore in aid for six states affected by floods and landslides during this year's monsoon. The money has been released as part of the Centre's share under the State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF).Uttarakhand will receive the highest share at Rs 455.60 crore, followed by Rs 375.60 crore for Assam and Rs 153.20 crore for Kerala. Manipur, Meghalaya, and Mizoram will receive Rs 29.20 crore, Rs 30.40 crore, and Rs 22.80 crore Home Ministry said the Centre is fully committed to helping states during natural disasters. "Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and guidance of Union Home Minister Amit Shah, the government stands firmly with all states in times of crisis," it said. So far this year, the Centre has released Rs 6,166 crore from SDRF to 14 states and Rs 1,988.91 crore from the National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) to 12 states. Additional funds have also been given from disaster mitigation from financial support, the government has also provided help on the ground, sending NDRF teams, Army units, and Air Force support for rescue and relief work. Over 100 NDRF teams are currently deployed across 21 states and union Indian Army has also stepped in to assist people in the Northeast under Operation Jal Rahat-2. So far, 40 relief teams have been deployed in Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland, and nearly 3,820 people have been Assam's upper districts, relief operations were activated after the Dhansiri river breached danger levels in Golaghat. In Nagaland, the deputy commissioner of Dimapur requisitioned Army assistance to provide flood relief in Singrijan Colony, one of the worst-affected areas. An Engineer Task Force (ETF) was swiftly too remains on alert, with the Nambol river surpassing danger levels in Imphal West and Bishnupur water, and medical help are being provided, and the Army remains on standby in several areas as floodwaters slowly begin to recede.- Ends


The Print
22 minutes ago
- The Print
After 35 yrs, Congress to revive campus elections in Karnataka to reclaim youth base, counter ABVP & Left
'The high command has instructed (the state government) to hold student elections,' B.K. Hariprasad, Karnataka MLC and former AICC general secretary, told ThePrint. It is a significant step for the state Congress, which has relied on student-based support to fill in leadership positions in the past. Bengaluru: The Congress has instructed its Karnataka unit to restart student elections on campuses, resuming a practice that was last held in the 1989-90 academic year. A ban on the same was imposed by the Veerendra Patil-led Congress government in 1989. The Congress high command has written to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah about the same as well, at least three party leaders said. The purpose behind restarting student elections is to counter the tightening grip over the fraternity by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)-backed Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and Left-leaning outfits, shrinking space for Congress-backed student unions. Congress' student wing National Students' Union of India (NSUI) has seen its influence wane in Karnataka since student elections were seen as dominated by violence, caste-based politics, interference by rowdy elements and politicians, vitiating the atmosphere in colleges. The Karnataka High Court too has held the view that campus elections were responsible for the widespread violence. 'Elections will be first conducted in government colleges. We (government) cannot direct private colleges or universities to hold elections,' Saleem Ahmed, MLC and former working president of the state Congress, told ThePrint. Ahmed was the last national president of the NSUI from Karnataka. The NSUI claims that it has over 40 lakh members across 15,000 colleges in India. But there is little information on its actual ground presence in Karnataka's academic institutions. Seasoned politicians cutting across party lines, such as Arun Jaitley, Sitaram Yechury, Lalu Prasad Yadav, Ananth Kumar, Ajay Maken and Ashok Gehlot, among others, all came up through student movements. But over the years, the space for student leaders has been given to children and relatives of existing leaders or those with money, multiple politicians ThePrint spoke to said. Also Read: DU Students Union election campaigns make grand promises, but no mention of LGBTQ+ or environment 'Breeding ground for future leaders' In the late 1980s, student body elections, especially in Bengaluru's Government RC College and Government Arts & Science College were just as high-profile as any assembly polls. In Karnataka, leaders like Hariprasad dominated student politics in the 1970s, giving Congress grassroots-level support and a constant source of fresh blood for leadership roles. Incumbent deputy CM D. K. Shivakumar too was active in student politics. Other leaders like former Karnataka Speaker Vishweshwar Hegde Kageri, BJP leader N. Ravi Kumar, former minister Roshan Baig and incumbent transport minister Ramalinga Reddy, among others, too came from student movements. But there was violence in colleges and unruly elements roamed campuses, who were often associated with other anti-social elements from outside. Even Shivakumar has openly admitted to having had the backing of Kotwal Ramachandra, a notorious gangster, when he was contesting student elections. Speaking to ThePrint, Ahmed said that in RC College, some members of the students' union had picked up a fight with the principal in the late 1980s. The principal, who was seen to be close to then education minister K.H. Ranganath, asked for a ban on student elections. 'There was at least one murder on account of student elections and Ranganath was given a picture that student elections breed violence,' Ahmed said. It led to the ban on student elections which has remained in effect till this day. Ahmed said that the NSUI gained immense significance after former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi lowered the voting age to 18. 'I had requested Rajiv Gandhi to restart student elections in Karnataka, who in turn referred me to Oscar Fernandes who was KPCC (Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee) president. Fernandes asked Ranganath but he did not budge,' Ahmed said. The Congress, like its counterparts, relied on student movements to shape young leaders. 'It was a breeding ground for future leaders,' he added. But multiple leaders who spoke to ThePrint said the practice of honing student leaders has now been replaced with that of children of established politicians being paradropped into key positions. Leaders like Hariprasad also lamented the decline of the infrastructure that gave the party its strength. In the 2022 hijab-related protests, the Congress literally had no position nor presence on campuses. The Campus Front of India, student arm of the now banned Popular Front of India, stood with the students who demanded the right to wear a hijab in classrooms while several pro-Hindu organisations stood with those opposing this. Student-led movements also played a crucial role in the Emergency-era protests against Indira Gandhi. With ABVP and Left-leaning parties dominating student elections in other states, the Congress hopes that its strong presence in Karnataka will attract young students to its ideology and help increase its base among state youth. (Edited by Nida Fatima Siddiqui) Also Read: Hyderabad university land row: NSUI members oppose own Congress govt, condemn CM Revanth's remarks