Can the Josh Kraft campaign be saved?
I would have guessed he was down 20 points, not 30.
Advertisement
Before I get to the underwhelming Kraft campaign, let's give Wu her due. Her
She has since moved very effectively to consolidate her support within a broad swath of constituencies. If you heard a few months ago that
And her attacks on Kraft as a
Advertisement
I've never thought of Wu as enjoying Menino-level popularity or popular affection, but maybe that perception is outdated. She's never felt the love she's getting right now.
Her campaign could hardly be going any better.
Team Kraft responded to the bombshell poll with standard campaign bravado.
'Josh didn't get into the Mayor's race because of what polling says, and nothing has changed his focus on continuing to show up in Boston neighborhoods, talk to residents, and listen to the concerns of many people who are disappointed with this Mayor and the direction the city is going,' his campaign said in a statement. 'The entire campaign team is confident that as residents learn more about Josh, his background of service, and his ideas for the future of Boston, the numbers will move in his direction.'
Note that nowhere does this statement dispute the poll's findings.
What this poll lays bare is that nothing the Kraft campaign is doing is working.
From the outset, it has placed its faith in the belief that Wu is unlikable. And that there is enough disgust around issues like bike lanes and the
But they are clearly misreading the moment. Yes, Bostonians hate the city's terrible traffic. But they don't think Michelle Wu invented it, and they are clearly unmoved by Kraft's promise to freeze bike lanes.
Along the same lines, Team Kraft has also been unable to whip up hysteria over crime. Wu likes to say we live in the safest big city in the country; experts say the superlative 'safest' is disputable. But what matters in this debate is that voters don't view violent crime as an urgent problem in need of fixing.
Advertisement
Ultimately, fear of crime isn't statistical; it's something voters feel in their bones. Boston residents don't feel unsafe.
So Kraft hasn't found an effective line of attack. It's not that people think Wu is some perfect mayor - of course they don't. But they believe in where she's leading the city, and they don't see why Kraft would be an upgrade.
Finally, voters appear to be wary that Kraft is trying to use his wealth to buy his way into office. According to campaign finance records, Kraft has raised well over $3 million for this race, not counting the millions a Super PAC - 'Your City, Your Future' - has raised to blanket the airwaves with anti-Wu ads on Kraft's behalf. Wu has attacked him relentlessly for trying to buy City Hall, and that seems to be effective.
I firmly believe Kraft's camp erred by going so negative so early. Aggressively attacking Wu before voters had any sense of Kraft wasn't just ineffective - I think it rallied support for her. That partly explains why his numbers are so remarkably low. His campaign has been great - for Wu.
The worst number in this poll for Kraft: Seven. That's the percentage of remaining undecided voters. That is the number that might force him to rethink this entire venture. Because if you're down 30 points and most voters have made up their minds, where do you go for your votes?
Advertisement
I'm not saying I expect Kraft to drop out. But the questions facing this campaign today are truly existential. Robert Kraft is a man who despises losing and hates throwing away money. He can't relish the prospect of dumping millions of dollars into a blowout loss, and I'm sure he has trusted people on his payroll who know how to analyze a poll.
Josh Kraft is a dedicated, well-meaning civic figure. But what he isn't, to date, is much of a mayoral candidate. Yes, he has millions of dollars left to spend on this race.
But all his riches haven't bought him much so far. Maybe this would be a good time to ask himself why that's likely to change.
Adrian Walker is a Globe columnist. He can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trouble-packed NYC animal shelters land another $1M in taxpayer funds — GOP's Sliwa slams as ‘drop in the bucket'
The city is dumping another $1 million into its troubled jam-packed animal-shelter system to hire and train 14 new staffers, City Hall said Friday. The Animal Care Centers of New York City — a nonprofit with a $1.4 billion contract to run the Big Apple's animal-shelter system for 34 years — recently announced it was suspending its intake of dogs and cats because of 'critical' overcrowding. The move came days after a Post expose revealed ongoing sickening conditions at ACC's new $75 million city-funded shelter in Queens. Advertisement 5 Anna Garguilo, an adoptions counselor with Charmy, 4, an Akita mix. Stephen Yang 'ACC's work to ensure no animal is left behind is essential to protecting animals across New York City, and our administration is proud to invest $1 million in additional funding to support the work ACC does and boost their capacity to better care for animals,' Mayor Eric Adams said in a statement. 'I also urge New Yorkers looking for a pet addition to their families to adopt, so we can ensure that every animal can find a loving home.' Advertisement But GOP mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa slammed the funding announcement as a piecemeal solution to the larger problem of animal welfare in Gotham. 'The city has completely ignored animal welfare,' Sliwa wrote on X. 'Today's $1M for ACC is a drop in the bucket. ACC has a 34-year contract worth over $1B—and yet our shelters are overcrowded, surrenders are paused, and animals are suffering.' 5 New York City mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa holds a campaign event outside of an Animal Care Center on 110th street in East Harlem in Manhattan. Stephen Yang 5 'ACC has a 34-year contract worth over $1B—and yet our shelters are overcrowded, surrenders are paused, and animals are suffering,' Sliwa said. Stephen Yang Advertisement The red-beret-wearing Republican, who shares an apartment with six rescue cats, earlier this week called for the city to end its contract with ACC and replace it with a city-run overhaul that would include a 'quasi-private public partnership' to shift the cost away from taxpayers. A new animal welfare agency would be created in the 'basement' of City Hall and all shelters would be kill-free and offer free spay and neuter programs under a Sliwa administration. The ACC has three active sites across the five boroughs with more than 1,000 animals in its care. 5 New York City Mayor Eric Adams speaks at a press conference to announce that 200 rescues have been made through the NYPD's drone and enforcement operations targeting subway surfing on July 21, 2025 in New York City. Andrew Schwartz / Advertisement 5 A new animal welfare agency would be created in the 'basement' of City Hall and all shelters would be kill-free and offer free spay and neuter programs under a Sliwa administration. Stephen Yang While the ACC is mandated to have a location in each of the five boroughs, the Brooklyn location is currently closed till 2026 for renovations, and the Bronx resource center has been 'temporarily' closed since May. Another $92 million facility in The Bronx is still under construction even though it was slated to open in the spring. The ACC did not respond to a Post request for comment. Adams' campaign did not respond to a request for comment, either.
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
Columbia's $200M payout: Letters to the Editor — July 26, 2025
The Issue: Columbia University's $220 settlement agreement with the Trump administration. Columbia University's sudden remorse for its failure to protect Jewish students and faculty members on campus is akin to a known felon who feigns sorrow when caught committing a criminal act ('The Ivy League schooled,' July 24). Only when President Trump's administration threatened to withhold grant support and hold its leadership accountable did Columbia express regret. Remaining silent while antisemites were given free rein on campus speaks volumes. As Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel noted: 'Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.' S.P. Hersh Lawrence It was certainly encouraging to read about the agreement reached by the Trump administration and Columbia University. However, until the true source of this rot is removed, I fear it will be of limited success. There are many ideologically committed members of Columbia University's administration, teaching and admissions bureaucracy who will continue to spread their vile messages of hate. These people must be removed as well, tenured or not. John Mancuso Naples, Fla. While Columbia University announced that scores of students have been disciplined, and even expelled, we know of no professors who have been punished. It makes no sense to punish students while radical professors — the source of their antisemitism — remain employed at Columbia to indoctrinate future students. Seymour Cohen Manhattan Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Shai Davidai is spot on when he says that the $200 million crackdown on Columbia University is just a start ('Hate Abates?' July 24). The real villains here are Columbia University's radical professors, who manipulated and encouraged their clueless student-puppets into braying antisemitism and anti-American propaganda. Sadly, most of these faculty members will holler about the First Amendment, as they hide behind their tenure. Going forward, Columbia University needs a program to specifically address this hateful ideology when it occurs among its professors and instructors. Frank Olivieri North Ft. Myers, Fla. It appears that Columbia University has finally gotten the courage to discipline anti-Israel students who created chaos and harassed Jewish students mercilessly. Maybe Jewish students at Columbia can have some peace this coming semester, although that is highly doubtful if Zohran Mamdani becomes mayor. J.J. Levine Miami Beach, Fla. The Issue: The city Department of Education's failing 'restorative justice' discipline policies. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters New York City always thinks throwing more money at the problem is the answer (' 'Restorative' Nonsense,' Editorial, July 25). Kids put in timeout for serious school incidents take it as a joke, and the disruption caused by their selfish behavior only hurts the students who want an education. The Department of Education needs to impose stricter consequences for those students who disrupt classroom learning. Joseph Valente Staten Island Since the 1960s, we've seen discipline worsen in our public schools, due to the acceptance of liberal policies. It is long past time to begin a no-toleration policy for poor behavior. Right now, parents must consent before their child is placed in a special-education class. With proper documentation, this must change. Ed Greenspan Brooklyn Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Harvard ‘wants to settle' after Columbia's $200M fine over civil-rights probe, Trump says
WASHINGTON — Harvard University 'wants to settle' after seeing Columbia get all of its grant funding back in exchange for a $200 million fine to resolve civil-rights violations, President Trump said Friday. 'Harvard wants to settle, but I think Columbia handled it better,' Trump told reporters on the White House's South Lawn before departing for a trip to Turnberry, Scotland. 'They have a very good, Obama-appointed judge,' he said of the jurist overseeing Harvard's case. 'And so they'll get a little kick out of that. But ultimately, we win that case. And the bottom line is we're not going to give any more money to Harvard.' Trump stripped the Cambridge, Mass., school of $2.6 billion in federal funding earlier this year because he said it discriminated against Jewish faculty and students by not protecting them enough from hate, and also because the Ivy League promoted DEI. 6 President Trump claims Friday that Harvard University 'wants to settle' its court case involving his administration stripping funding over discrimination issues. Anna Wilding/ Harvard has shown no signs of relenting in its lawsuit against the administration, but the president and Education Secretary Linda McMahon have both expressed confidence in a future settlement. 'We're hoping that Harvard will come to the table,' McMahon told NewsNation's 'Morning in America' on Thursday. 'We're already seeing other universities that are taking these measures before investigation or before our coming in to talk to them.' Former Harvard President Larry Summers had posted on X that the terms of Columbia's recent agreement, which allowed for the return of $400 million in grants and other federal funding, were 'an excellent template' for his alma mater. In particular, Summers noted the deal's commitments to academic freedom and reforms to address the explosion of antisemitism on campus after Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, massacre in Israel — not to mention the return of grants that have stalled scientific and medical research. As part of its agreement, Columbia University will also appoint an independent monitor, place disciplinary issues under the purview of the provost's office, submit 'semi-annual' reports on its compliance with Title VI, VII and IX anti-discrimination rules to the feds and ensure it is implementing merit-based hiring and admissions requirements. 6 An anti-Israel mob illegally occupies Butler Library at Columbia University in spring 2024. Obtained by NY Post It will also pay out more than $20 million to Jewish employees who were discriminated against. Not all Jewish alumni were convinced that the terms were enough, pointing to several provisions floated during negotiations in April — such as placing departments under an academic receivership or abolishing the University Judicial Board for not punishing anti-Israel demonstrators — that weren't agreed to. 6 'We're hoping that Harvard will come to the table,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon told NewsNation's 'Morning in America' on Thursday. AFP via Getty Images 'Whatever money it is, Columbia is treating it as a drop in the bucket,' said Shai Davidai, who announced he was leaving the school earlier this month after a year-plus investigation into him cleared the business school professor of wrongdoing. 'We have to remember the billions in endowments,' he said of the Ivy League school's outside haul. Still, 'I hope they're feeling a little bit of pain — and rethink their actions in the future,' Davidai said, As for the more than $20 million promised to Jewish workers who were discriminated against, the professor said he doesn't know whether he'll see 'a penny' of it. 'I'm cautiously optimistic — because nobody knows. We don't have any assurances,' he said. Sam Nahins, a Columbia grad student trapped inside the school's main Butler Library during the student siege on campus last year, added that the deal's promised safety enforcement may prove difficult based on the vague language of the pact. 'It's a great step in the right direction, but the biggest concern is faculty members not facing accountability for their incitement and involvement,' Nahins said. 6 'The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track,' said Columbia acting President Claire Shipman in a statement. REUTERS 'I think with the [faculty] senate losing disciplinary power, the school adopting the [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance] definition of antisemitism and students leaving Columbia in masses due to expulsions, suspensions, and graduation, we might see and feel a difference on campus,' Nahins said. But the rot at the fabled Ivy runs deep, the grad student said. 'That can all be for nothing if professors keep indoctrinating students.' Columbia acting President Claire Shipman in a statement, 'The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track. 'Importantly, it safeguards our independence, a critical condition for academic excellence and scholarly exploration, work that is vital to the public interest.' 6 Harvard, in its case against the Trump administration, has argued that the revoking of grants violates the university's First Amendment rights. Getty Images An email from the Columbia provost's office Wednesday night noted the significance of having none of its academic departments 'placed under outside supervision or receivership,' according to a copy obtained by The Post. 'This landmark agreement, including a record-breaking $21 million EEOC settlement—the largest ever for victims of religious or racial discrimination—is a direct result of President Trump's unwavering commitment to combating antisemitism and ensuring justice for Jewish students and faculty,' said White House principal Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields in a statement. 'This historic settlement with Columbia is a monumental victory for the Jewish community and the entire country, and everyone should applaud a return to common sense and upholding the civil rights of all Americans.' 6 Former Harvard President Larry Summers said the terms of Columbia's agreement, which allowed for the return of $400 million in grants and other federal funding, were 'an excellent template' for his alma mater after losing $2.6 billion in funding. AFP via Getty Images Harvard, in its case against the Trump administration, has argued that the revoking of its federal grants violates the university's First Amendment rights, a line of argument that Boston US District Judge Allison Burroughs seemed inclined to agree with during a Monday hearing. Burroughs questioned whether the government had the ability to make 'ad hoc' decisions about yanking research dollars without being able to prove Harvard officials have actually done enough to curtail Jew-hatred on campus. Reps for Harvard University did not immediately respond to a Post request for comment.
