Crown Estate profits remain at record high but windfarm boost set to fall back
This has helped bring returns to the Treasury to £5 billion over the past decade.
The Crown Estate is run as an independent business, but its profits are paid directly to the Treasury, which then hands on a small portion of the money to the monarchy, known as the Sovereign Grant, which supports the official duties of the royal family.
Earnings have spiked to record levels in the past two years thanks to option fees – payments made by companies to reserve a patch of the seabed to eventually build their wind turbines on.
But The Crown Estate said the so-called option fee uplift is expected to drop back significantly in the current financial year – down from £1.07 billion in 2024/25 to around £25 million a year from January 2026 as projects move into the construction phase.
This will see the net revenue profit 'normalise', according to The Crown Estate.
But it said underlying profits, stripping out the option fee boost, stood at £366 million in the year to the end of March and would continue to grow.
The Crown Estate owns the vast majority of Britain's seabed, stretching up to 12 nautical miles from the mainland, and leases part of it to wind farm operators.
It also has a 180,000-acre property holding across the UK, including much of London's Regent Street and St James's, and large swathes of arable land and forestry.
Dan Labbad, chief executive at The Crown Estate, said it had been a 'landmark year' for collection, but flagged a difficult backdrop in the wider economy.
He said: 'This year's results are set against significant global economic disturbance.
'This affects the UK and Crown Estate just as it affects countries and businesses.
'This has made for a more challenging period.'
The results showed the value of The Crown Estate's land and assets was £15 billion in 2024/25, down from £15.5 billion the previous year.
The drop came after gains in its urban and rural businesses were offset by a £1 billion fall in the valuation of its marine assets.
It said the valuation of the marine portfolio had jumped higher in anticipation of option fees, but that it reduced as this income was recognised, falling back to £3.4 billion from £4.4 billion in 2023/24.
The figures come after the new Crown Estate Bill was passed earlier this year, handing it more powers to invest and borrow.
The Treasury has said the changes will allow The Crown Estate to invest more in green energy and help the UK achieve net zero.
Recent investments by The Crown Estate include a joint venture announced in May with Lendlease for housing and science and innovation space across six projects.
It said this has the potential to deliver 100,000 jobs, 26,000 homes and have an overall value of up to £24 billion.
Mr Labbad said: 'Thanks to new legislation, we now have greater flexibility to invest across our portfolio, increasing our resilience and potential, and enabling us to create lasting benefits for the country and its finances.'
Under previous rules, The Crown Estate could not use its cash reserves to invest because it had to hold them against the prospect of future financial losses.
But greater ability to borrow will see it invest more in offshore wind.
The Government has also committed to doubling its onshore wind capacity by 2030 and Mr Labbad said The Crown Estate was reviewing its land portfolio to see if more onshore wind projects could be 'viable and relevant'.
It will report back later in 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour ditches plan to charge inheritance tax on payments made to bereaved military children
Labour has ditched plans to hit the grieving children of military personnel with a tax on their bereavement payments. In October Rachel Reeves announced plans to make relatives in receipt of off-duty death-in-service payments, other than spouses or civil partners, pay inheritance tax from April 2027. This means children and unmarried partners of soldiers who died from illness while off-duty, would have been subject to a tax on their payments. But the Chancellor was forced to back down from her Budget announcement after mounting pressure from members of the Armed Forces, who called it a 'corrosive' plan. The Government confirmed to The Daily Telegraph that after a consultation with Armed Forces organisations it had decided to withdraw the proposals. A spokesman said: 'From April 6, 2027 all death in service benefits payable from registered pension schemes will be out of scope of Inheritance Tax, regardless of whether the scheme is discretionary or non-discretionary.' The latest climbdown comes after Ms Reeves was forced to scale down plans to scrap the universal winter fuel payment and reforms to the welfare system. Mark Francois, the Tory Armed Forces spokesman, said he welcomes the reversal decision 'though it represents another U-turn by this Labour Government'. He added: 'I am pleased that common sense has now finally prevailed.' An HM Treasury spokesman said: 'It's right that we are excluding all death in service benefits from inheritance tax while still achieving the Government's objective of removing inconsistencies between pension schemes.'
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
Anthony Albanese dodges huge tax question every Aussie wants answered after Treasury accidentally released secret advice telling the PM to raise it
Anthony Albanese has refused to say whether or not he will raise taxes after Treasury advised a hike to fix the federal Budget deficit. Insiders host David Speers grilled the prime minister on the topic on Sunday following revelations Treasury had made the suggestion. In an extraordinary blunder, bureaucrats mistakenly released parts of a secret briefing document given to the incoming Labor government in response to an ABC Freedom of Information request. In the briefing notes, officials told Treasurer Jim Chalmers that 'tax should be raised as part of broader tax reform' to make the federal Budget 'sustainable' as Treasury forecasts years of Budget deficits. The officials suggested the government 'build on' its superannuation tax and raise 'indirect taxes', such as those on alcohol and tobacco, with personal income taxes now making up more than half of Commonwealth revenue. 'Is Treasury right? Do we need to increase the tax take?' Speers asked Albanese. 'Well, what we need to do is to make sure that our tax system is fair, and we will always do that,' the prime minister replied. Speers repeated his question, before Albanese avoided answering for a second time. 'Well, what we need to do is get fiscal policy right,' he said. Speers asked what that meant for voters, and if it directly translated to increasing the total amount of taxation. 'What it means is what we've done, which is we produced two budget surpluses and we've reduced the budget deficit going forward, compared with what it was anticipated to be before we were elected,' Albanese said. The prime minister reasoned Treasury advice was not government policy, and said he encouraged departments to put forward their advice. He said his Labor government would keep a close eye on the budget and 'be responsible'. 'But surely you have an idea, as to when you look at the budget, whether you agree that tax needs to go up and spending needs to go down to fix it?' Speers asked a third time 'What I agree to is what we do in the Expenditure Review Committee, that's already begun meeting... [and] examine each policy to make sure that there's value for money,' Albanese said. He also said other policies like his superannuation tax changes would 'come in time'. The Treasury advice was accidentally provided to the ABC along with other documents in response to a Freedom of Information request. While the document featured the typical redactions, a Treasury official forgot to black out sensitive headings and subheadings, disclosing secret and politically damaging information. The advice forecast years of budget deficits. Officials suggested the government 'build on' its superannuation tax and raise 'indirect taxes', such as those on alcohol and tobacco, with personal income taxes now making up more than half of Commonwealth revenue. The document also shows officials bluntly told Labor that the party's pledge to build 1.2million homes over five years in response to the housing crisis 'will not be met'. Labor is already seeking to increase taxes on super balances above $3million. Chalmers at the time declined to rule out any new tax hikes ahead of the August economic roundtable.
Times
a day ago
- Times
The secret savings tax grab — and how to escape it
Savers and investors get a range of tax breaks and incentives that are designed to encourage them to make smarter decisions for their wealth. Tax relief on pension contributions and the £20,000 Isa allowance have escaped government tinkering, despite costing the Treasury billions of pounds. Tax breaks on pensions cost £70 billion a year, the latest figures show. But underneath all that, the government is sneakily taking an increasing share of the spoils made by those who risk their own money on the stock market. And you may not realise it. A flurry of recent rate increases and cuts to tax-free allowances helped raise as much as £50 billion from savings and investments in the last tax year — just as the chancellor plans to nudge savers to invest more in a bid to boost economic growth. Interest and returns made on savings and investments held in Isas are free of capital gains tax (CGT) and income tax. However, the £20,000 annual allowance has been frozen since 2017 and won't go up until at least 2030 — saving the government an estimated £605 million a year by that point. Anyone who has used the full allowance and holds shares and other investments outside an Isa can end up being taxed as many as five times: income tax on your wages; stamp duty when you buy shares; tax on dividends; capital gains tax (CGT) if you sell; then inheritance tax when you die. The amount of capital gains you can make before you have to pay tax was cut by the previous government from £12,300 in 2021 to £3,000 while the dividend allowance went from £2,000 to £500. In April the Labour government created a single 18 per cent rate of CGT for basic-rate taxpayers and a 24 per cent rate for most higher and additional-rate taxpayers. The rate of dividend tax is 8.75 per cent for basic-rate taxpayers and 33.75 per cent for higher and additional-rate taxpayers. • How much one year of Labour has cost you Anyone buying UK shares has to pay 0.5 per cent stamp duty reserve tax, which netted the Treasury £4.3 billion in the last tax year. The Sunday Times has called for stamp duty to be scrapped as part of its Revive the City campaign to boost the UK's stock market. The government collected £25.5 billion in CGT, inheritance tax and stamp duty on shares in 2024-25, according to official figures. The Office for Budget Responsibility expects the total to be £44.9 billion for 2029-30. The amount cash savers can earn before being taxed on their interest is restricted to £1,000 a year for basic rate taxpayers and £500 for higher rate taxpayers and the allowances have not changed since they were introduced in 2016. Additional rate payers get no allowance. Tax on dividends and savings interest raised £24.2 billion in 2024-25 (7.8 per cent of income tax receipts). If that percentage stayed the same, taxes on those two assets would raise £31 billion by 2029-30. In all, taxes of wealth could total as much as £76 billion a year by the end of the decade. In a speech to City bosses at Mansion House in London, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, unveiled a series of policies; from asking pension funds to invest more of savers' money into private UK companies, to an advertising campaign to promote the benefits of investing. She said: 'For too long we have presented investment in too negative a light, quick to warn people of the risks, without giving proper weight to the benefits.' Maximilian Bierbaum from New Financial, a think tank, said: 'The government rightly wants to widen retail participation in capital markets. But it is sending mixed signals: it cancelled the proposed retail sale of shares in NatWest in July last year which would have given retail investors a big opportunity to invest in a household name, and it has raised capital gains tax.' Another review into the state pension age was announced on Monday, while the chancellor's plan to charge inheritance tax on pension pots was also confirmed. This all comes at a time when more pensioners than ever can expect to pay tax on their retirement savings, thanks to the freeze on income tax thresholds that began in 2021 and is set to last until at least 2028. Some 9.28 million pensioners are expected to pay income tax this year, including 979,000 higher-rate taxpayers, up from 7.1 million in 2021-22, according to HM Revenue & Customs. And from April 2027 pensions will form part of your estate for inheritance tax purposes, so if you leave your savings pot to anyone but your spouse or civil partner (who are exempt from inheritance tax), they could lose 40 per cent of it. If you die after the age of 75, they will have to pay income tax on withdrawals too. You can pass on £325,000 of assets from your estate inheritance tax-free — £500,000 if you leave your main home to a direct descendant and your estate is worth less than £2 million. Any assets above those thresholds can be taxed at 40 per cent. David Gibb from the wealth manager Quilter Cheviot said the recent stream of tax changes have left savers and investors 'grappling with a rising tide of complexity'. • Families face red tape nightmare with inheritance tax on pensions The first thing investors should do is to look to hold any stocks and shares in an Isa. Adults get a £20,000 annual allowance that can be split across cash and investment options. The chancellor was said to be considered restricting how much of your allowance you can save in cash, to nudge more savers towards investing, but the plans led to a fierce backlash from the industry and have been put on hold until the budget in the autumn. Inside an Isa you do not need to worry about CGT on investment growth, or taxes on dividends and savings interest, but they will still be part of your estate for inheritance tax purposes. If your Isa allowance is already used up, you could make tax savings by maximising your pension saving. Pensions are also CGT-exempt and you get income tax relief on contributions. Savers can pay in up to £60,000 a year, and you can take a 25 per cent tax-free lump sum from your pot after the age of 55. Daniel Herring from the Centre for Policy Studies, a right-leaning think tank, said: 'Wealth taxes are more damaging than taxes on income and consumption. They stop people making decisions that will lead to higher economic growth. 'CGT acts as a deterrent to investment, while extending inheritance tax to non-doms has led very wealthy people to move overseas to avoid it, taking their investments and capital with them.' Alex Kontoghiorghes, a researcher at the Bank of England, looked at what happened after the Isa rules changed in 2013 to allow investment in companies listed on the Alternative Investment Market (Aim). He found that companies were able to raise money more easily, because investors could buy into them more cheaply, which reduced their capital costs and permanently increased their share prices and dividends. Aim firms also invested more in their businesses and increased workers' pay. 'Changing the level of investment taxes incentivises capital flows into certain assets,' he said. Research by Interactive Investor suggests that 72 per cent of investors would invest more in UK stocks if stamp duty was abolished but just 2 per cent would invest more if the cash Isa allowance was cut. Last year the Centre for Policy Studies and the consultancy Oxera suggested that abolishing stamp duty on UK shares could boost the economy by up to 0.7 per cent and share prices by 4 per cent. It said it could actually raise £600 million more for the government than it would cost. Bierbaum said: 'It's quite frankly ridiculous that an investor in the UK pays stamp duty when they buy a share in AstraZeneca or BP but not when they buy a share in Nvidia or Apple. We penalise investors when they want to invest in the British economy.'
