
I want the Greens to be a populist party – here's how we can do it
Since I joined eight years ago, the change has been huge – and built entirely on the hard work of our members. It's been an impressive decade, but the next decade needs to be explosive. That's why I'm running for the party leadership, on a platform of 'eco-populism'. I want to take the eco message beyond the grassroots and to the masses.
You don't have to be a political scientist to see why this moment requires a bold Green Party. The climate crisis is affecting all our lives and biting into our livelihoods, but we have a government that has been disappointingly quick to break its promises on climate action, even when green investment is the clearest route to raising living standards and improving quality of life for millions of people up and down the country.
First came the binning of the £28bn green investment – then support for major airport expansion, followed by backpedalling on clean car standards. Prime minister Keir Starmer has gone from shouting about a Green New Deal to jettisoning climate justice.
The sad truth is that Labour is obsessed with the electoral threat from Nigel Farage's Reform UK, and its supposed green credentials are the first thing to go to the wall. This week, the prime minister made time to give a speech about how Farage, if he were ever put in charge, would crash the economy like Liz Truss. I don't doubt it – but politics shouldn't bend to the will of the hard right.
More voters than ever are keen to vote Green. But I believe we need to communicate our clear policy platform in a way that better speaks to people's everyday needs.
Under my leadership, we will stand with those at the sharpest end of the country's economic failures – and we will show them how a climate-proofed economy will mean warmer homes, cheaper bills, decent jobs and greater security for all of us.
The current administration is missing basic opportunities to do green things. They're part-nationalising the railways… but have forgotten the most important part: improving the trains.
Meanwhile, Robert Jenrick this week filmed himself stopping fare-dodgers on the London Underground – which is all well and good if that was his job. But, as a former minister, he had both the time and the power to create systemic change – and failed to enact change.
Even now, in his role as shadow secretary of state, instead of pushing the government to reduce the burden on some people living in poverty, which is a much more effective preventive measure against crime, he is acting as some sort of vigilante for the sake of social media.
It's not radical to say that corporations shouldn't profit from the water coming out of taps, or that extreme wealth ought to be taxed fairly – it's just that no one is willing to say it.
Some might say such things are far cry from what the Green Party has been most known for. But there's no environmental justice without racial, social and economic justice, too. And the same corporations that are discharging sewage into our rivers are destroying our communities and, ultimately, will do the same for our democracy, too.
In the coming weeks, I'm going to make it my mission to tell one simple story – one which says it doesn't have to be like this. We can do things differently. The UK can have clean air, lower bills, job security and public services that we all can rely on.
This is what I mean by 'eco-populism'. At the very heart of our environmental mission are bread and butter issues that affect all of us. And making climate action relevant to people's material, every day concerns. Under my leadership, we will have a Green Party that can demonstrate that a better country and a better world is within our grasp – one that can build the mass movement needed to demand it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on talking in class: the writers speaking up for oracy education are right
Two years ago, Sir Keir Starmer enthused about teaching speaking skills. So schools campaigners were understandably dismayed when oracy – otherwise known as speaking and listening – did not appear in the interim report of the curriculum review for England headed by Prof Becky Francis. Peter Hyman, the former New Labour adviser who became a headteacher, has been a key figure behind the revival, over the past decade, of an idea developed in the 1960s. Steps to embed the importance of verbal communication in education have already been taken, with more than 1,000 schools working with the charity Voice 21, and a parallel project in Scotland. The hope expressed by children's authors and others last week is that its absence from the draft report was an oversight which will soon be rectified. The task before Prof Francis's commission is a daunting one, with reformers of all kinds looking to it for solutions. An evidence call attracted 7,000 responses, with the future of special educational needs provision, and a wish to reduce exams, among key issues raised. But it should be clear to the panel, and to ministers, that oral learning also matters. One reason is the rising number of children arriving in primary school with speech and language skills below the expected level. While some pupils catch up later, others need specialist help. Communication difficulties are one reason for the increase in the number of education, health and care plans (EHCPs), which set out what such support entails. The reasons for such complex changes are not yet fully understood, although the pandemic has had an impact. The challenge of artificial intelligence, in relation to university studies as well as schools, is another factor behind a renewed emphasis on talking. Given the easy availability of technological tools to aid writing, it is arguably more important than ever that people are equipped to share ideas and knowledge through speech as well. In many European countries oral examinations are far more common, in schools as well as universities, whereas in the UK 'vivas' are mostly reserved for postgraduate studies. In foreign language learning, the importance of speaking is taken for granted. But while oracy already features in the maths and science curriculum, as well as in English, it is often marginalised. The tricky task of reformers is to alter teaching practice so that more weight is placed on verbal communication, without making this yet another assessment hurdle to be cleared. For its champions, the core of oracy education is the ability to make connections. They want young people to be able to express themselves, and point out that this is a vital life skill – for example, in job interviews and the kinds of public‑facing work that seem least likely to be taken over by machines – for which school should prepare them. Big gaps in confidence about public speaking have long been recognised among the most glaring social inequalities. This doesn't mean that everyone should aspire to be a debating champion. Different accents, personalities and ways of relating should be valued, not ironed out. But if our schools are to keep pace with our frenetically changing world, it is surely right that they should maximise the facility for language, which is part of what makes us human.


Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says US is close to reaching a trade deal with China
TURNBERRY, Scotland, July 27 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday his administration was close to reaching a trade deal with China, but gave no other details. "We're very close to a deal with China. We really sort of made a deal with China, but we'll see how that goes," Trump told reporters at the start of a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland.


Telegraph
3 minutes ago
- Telegraph
UK could save £5bn if Bailey changes course on debt sales
Taxpayers would save up to £5bn next year if Andrew Bailey overhauls the Bank of England's controversial programme of bond sales, analysts have calculated. Deutsche Bank has said Rachel Reeves would be spared from transferring billions of pounds to Threadneedle Street if it stopped selling long-term debt amid a dramatic drop in bond prices. The Bank is currently unwinding the stockpile of gilts it amassed during the financial crisis and lockdown, when it created almost £900bn to boost the economy. When interest rates were at record lows of 0.1pc during the pandemic, the Bank earned far more on its returns from government bonds than it had to pay in interest to commercial banks. However, this reversed dramatically once interest rates started to rise. The Bank is now also actively selling gilts back to the market as part of so-called quantitative tightening (QT), crystallising billions of pounds of losses for the taxpayer.