He was ready to pay $750,000 for his new house. Then the appraisal came in.
Patrick Haley never thought he would be arguing to pay more for a house than it was supposedly worth.
Haley, who works in home-construction technology, was in the process of relocating from Texas to North Carolina a few weeks ago when he found his dream home in Charlotte. The $750,000, four-bedroom home spanned 2,700 square feet and backed into a state park.
My second wife says her 2 kids should inherit our estate, but I also have 2 kids. Is that fair?
'I am scared to death that I'll run out of money': My wife and I are in our 50s and have $4.4 million. Can we retire early?
Markets are resilient — but this bank says it could fall apart quickly. 'Fundamentals remain dire.'
My father is giving me $250K to buy a home, but told me not to tell my two siblings. Am I morally obligated to tell them?
Suze Orman says retirees should have a 5-year 'just-in-case' fund. Is this true?
Haley wanted to be close to family, so he didn't mind the steep price tag, part of which would be covered with proceeds from the sale of a previous home he had sold in San Antonio.
What he did mind was the appraisal gap. The property appraiser, sent by the lender he was working with, had determined the market value of the home he wanted to buy was just $698,000 — $52,000 less than what he had agreed to pay the seller.
That wouldn't work for Haley. Lenders need to know the value of a home as a safeguard to ensure that they don't overextend loans for more than they are worth.
And with the appraised value being lower than the asking price, that left Haley with a gap. He could only take out a mortgage for $698,000, and as the asking price was $52,000 more, he would need to pay the remainder out of his own pocket.
'I also disagreed with that appraisal,' Haley told MarketWatch. The property's proximity to a state park made it unique. Not many properties like that came up for sale often, he said, so there were no comparable sales on which to base the home's value.
Haley's experience shows how tricky the home-appraisal process can be at a time when home sales have stalled, partially due to a lack of homes on the market.
At the same time, since the market has become less competitive, more buyers are finding they have more time to spend on the appraisal process to make sure they are getting a fair price. In March, the National Association of Realtors saw a fall in the share of buyers skipping an appraisal contingency to 19% from 24% the previous month.
An appraisal contingency is a clause that allows the buyer to back out of a deal if the property is appraised at less than the price they agreed to pay the seller. In other words, it's a way for buyers to avoid overpaying for a house.
During the pandemic, it was more common for buyers to skip the appraisal contingency to expedite the process of buying a home. But in general, waiving the appraisal contingency is not a good idea, real-estate experts told MarketWatch.
'For cash buyers, it is the buyer's decision,' Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the NAR, told MarketWatch. Nevertheless, an appraisal contingency is 'generally advisable unless the property is clearly considered underpriced or multiple offers are expected.'
In most cases, such as Haley's, the lenders require an appraisal before they can originate a loan. 'Most appraisals are at the lender's request to ensure the loan amount given is not too much,' Yun said. They will require the buyer to pay the cost of the appraisal, which can be between $300 and $500, according to an analysis by LendingTree TREE, a comparison-shopping site.
An appraiser looks at various aspects of a home to gauge its value. These can include the condition the home is in, the square footage and recent home sales in the neighborhood.
Appraisals can be a sensitive process for sellers to navigate. Homeowners who are selling have particularly strong feelings about appraisals that come in lower than they expect. 'Homeowners are very often very emotional, and what they think moves the needle doesn't move the needle at all,' Megan Judd, an Orlando, Fla.-based home appraiser and owner of Metropolis Appraisal Services, told MarketWatch.
Judd, who's been appraising homes for over 30 years, says the length of time an appraisal takes depends on the property. If she's evaluating a home that is newly constructed and fairly straightforward, such as a tract home, she would take an hour to do research before she gets to the house, 45 minutes to look through it, 45 minutes to drive around the neighborhood and take photos of comparable properties, and then three to four hours to type the appraisal report out.
'And that's a very simple one,' Judd said. 'I tend to spend a workday and a half, maybe 10 to 12 hours on a complex property — such as if it's a lakefront property … or anything out of the ordinary.'
The appraisal gap is slightly more common among small homes. Roughly 9% of homes in the closing process were appraised below the contract-sales price, according to a report by Cotality that looked at home sales in June 2024, the latest month for which data were available. Nearly a tenth of starter homes were appraised below the contract-sale price, the report said, versus 7.1% of more expensive homes.
The fact that the appraisal gap is higher among starter homes could reflect 'a higher risk of overpayment by inexperienced first-time home buyers,' the company said.
Back in North Carolina, the homeowners who were selling their home to Haley were also facing the possibility of their home being undervalued.
Haley, who was a repeat buyer, was not pleased with the number the appraiser came up with, and didn't think they had done a very thorough job. The person from the appraisal company 'never set foot in the home,' Haley said, and didn't stray farther than 20 feet from where their car was parked outside.
He theoretically had two choices at this point: Either walk away from the home and start looking for another, or get another lender and hope for the home to be appraised at a higher price.
But giving up wasn't in the cards. Haley needed the appraisal to get the mortgage. He wasn't in a rush, since the home was being sold off-market by the owners, whom he knew through a family member. He was told to try a different lender, so he went to a local one.
After Haley switched from a national mortgage lender to a local lender that did its own appraisal, the difference was day and night. 'Everyone wants my business, so they probably told me what I wanted to hear,' he said, 'but at the same time, they were really helpful' in terms of explaining what they said was their different approach to valuing homes like the one he sought to buy.
One way in which this new appraisal differed: The appraiser sent by the local lender looked at homes sold in the neighborhood over a longer period of time since there were few comparable transactions in recent years, rather than looking at homes sold recently in the surrounding areas, some of which were pretty far away. 'I don't think a home in that neighborhood has sold for the last five years,' Haley said, 'so there was no direct comparison.'
The lender ended up appraising Haley's dream home for $785,000 — $100,000 more than what the national lender had estimated — which meant he could get a conventional mortgage to cover the price of the home. Haley is currently under contract for the property.
'We were able to come up with what I thought was a more just appraisal,' Haley said.
What personal-finance issues would you like to see covered in MarketWatch? We would like to hear from readers about their financial decisions and money-related questions. You can fill out or write to us at . A reporter may be in touch to learn more. MarketWatch will not attribute your answers to you by name without your permission.
My eldest son refused to share his father's $500K inheritance with his siblings. Should I cut him off?
I'm 65 and a widow with 5 children. Should I split my $1.1 million nest egg between them while I'm still alive?
Legendary investor Bill Miller on why the worst is over for stocks, Amazon's a buy and Tesla isn't
How investors should think about Berkshire's stock price without Buffett
The U.S. economy might be able to handle any disruption from Trump's tariffs more easily than Wall Street expects
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Musk Rages as Trump Tax Bill Slashes Electric Vehicle Credits
Elon Musk slammed the US Senate's latest version of President Donald Trump's multi-trillion dollar tax bill Saturday, raging online that the cuts to electric vehicle and other clean energy credits would be 'incredibly destructive' to the country. Musk, the chief executive officer of Tesla Inc. and SpaceX, posted on his social media platform X about the bill, which the Senate was planning to put to an initial vote on Saturday. Musk recently left Trump's side after working for several months as the head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two Workers for SEC's EDGAR System Charged With Insider Trading
(Bloomberg) -- Two men who worked for the Securities and Exchange Commission's EDGAR public filing system were charged with insider trading after allegedly pocketing $1 million by stealing non-public information obtained through their jobs. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Justin Chen and Jun Zhen, both of Brooklyn, New York, were charged in a federal complaint with obtaining material, non-public information about companies like Purple Innovation Inc., Ondas Holdings Inc., SigmaTron International Inc., and Signing Day Sports Inc. through their work at EDGAR, according to Brooklyn US Attorney Joseph Nocella. Prosecutors say that between March and June 2025 the pair engaged in a scheme to obtain information about these companies, which announced they had entered into merger agreements or partnerships 'that resulted in significant increases in the share price of each company's stock.' Chen, 31, and Zhen, 29, purchased shares in the companies before the announcements, 'and sold those shares at a significant profit immediately after the announcement,' according to a complaint filed in federal court in Brooklyn. 'In total, Chen and Zhen have made a profit of more than $1 million from their trading.' Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested Chen and Zhen Friday night at John F. Kennedy International Airport as they were planning to board a flight to Hong Kong, said John Marzulli, a spokesman for Nocella. Chen worked as an EDGAR operator and assistant manager while Zhen worked as an EDGAR operator and typeset manager, prosecutors said. The two had access to the company announcements before they were filed. Both men are charged with securities fraud, which carries a prison term of as long as 25 years, prosecutors said. Chen and Zhen made their initial court appearances in federal court in Brooklyn on Saturday before US Magistrate Judge Vera Scanlon, who ordered them held without bail. Chris Wright, a lawyer for Zhen, and Charles Millioen, a lawyer for Chen, didn't immediately return email messages seeking comment about their clients. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Dividend Stock: Kinder Morgan vs. Enterprise Products Partners
Kinder Morgan is one of the largest midstream operators in North America. Enterprise Products Partners is one of the largest midstream operators in North America. One of these two midstream giants has a better track record of reliably paying investors for sticking around. 10 stocks we like better than Kinder Morgan › If you are looking at Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) and its 4.1% dividend yield, you should also consider Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) and its 6.8% distribution yield. But the reason for preferring Enterprise over Kinder Morgan is only partly to do with the yield, particularly if you are a dividend-focused investor. Here's what you need to know to decide between these two midstream giants. From a big-picture perspective, both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise Products Partners operate in the energy sector. This sector is known for being volatile, thanks to the huge impact that oil and natural gas prices have on the financial results of most energy companies. But not all energy companies, since Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are largely toll takers, charging fees for moving oil and natural gas around the world. Essentially, these midstream players sit between the upstream (energy production) and the downstream (chemicals and refining). The pipelines, storage, and transportation assets they own generate reliable fees, with the price of the commodities moving through their systems far less important than demand for the services they provide. And demand for energy tends to be fairly high even when energy prices are low. So both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise have attractive and reliable business models in what is an otherwise volatile industry. From this perspective, Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are very similar. They are also very similar when it comes to the size of their asset portfolios, which are among the largest in North America. In fact, both businesses have market caps in the $60 billion to $70 billion range. But they aren't interchangeable. Midstream investments are generally considered for the reliable income stream they provide to investors. The lofty dividend yields of both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are part of that story. However, there's a back history that investors shouldn't ignore. In 2016, the energy sector was going through a difficult period. Enterprise increased its distribution. Kinder Morgan cut its distribution by 75%. To be fair, it was the right move for the company, but it was a terrible outcome for income investors. The real problem, however, is that just a couple of months prior to the cut, management was guiding for a dividend increase of as much as 10%. The cash freed up from the dividend cut was used to strengthen Kinder Morgan's balance sheet and to invest in growth opportunities. So the cut made the business stronger, with management eventually getting dividend growth back on track. But even here there was a problem. It set out an aggressive dividend growth schedule and then fell short of that plan during the difficult energy market in 2020, during the coronavirus pandemic. In other words, Kinder Morgan has let dividend investors down during each of the most recent energy industry downturns. Enterprise increased its distribution modestly in 2020, but that is basically what it has done for years. In fact, at this point, Enterprise has reliably increased its distribution year in and year out for 26 consecutive years. Kinder Morgan looks like it is in much better financial and business shape today than it was in 2016. And the 2020 dividend miss was reasonable, too, given the uncertainty at the time. But if being able to trust how the management teams of the investments you own address what's important to you, Enterprise will be the better investment option. And you'll collect a higher yield while you're at it. Before you buy stock in Kinder Morgan, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Kinder Morgan wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Dividend Stock: Kinder Morgan vs. Enterprise Products Partners was originally published by The Motley Fool