Harvard Kennedy's backup plan for foreign students: Study online, or in Canada
'We are announcing these contingency plans now to alleviate the uncertainty many students feel, but we will not officially launch these programs unless there is sufficient demand from students who are unable to come to the United States due to visa or entry restrictions,' Weinstein said.
'To our students: we hope to see you on campus in the fall, but if that is not possible, we will bring HKS to you,' he said.
Read more: 'Devastating': 10 Harvard researchers detail 'essential' work set to be cut by Trump
Fifty-two percent of Harvard Kennedy School's student population is international. They are from more than 100 countries, according to the institution.
The announcement comes after a federal judge ruled in the university's favor on two separate preliminary injunctions — allowing Harvard to host international students and rejecting the Trump administration's attempt to ban Harvard foreign students from entering the country to study.
Trump boasted on Friday of a 'mindbogglingly HISTORIC' deal with Harvard University.
The reported deal is on the back of months of battling between the two parties, where the Trump administration has claimed the university failed to protect Jewish students, particularly in the wake of the war in Gaza.
The pair of injunctions effectively replaces two temporary restraining orders on those issues that were granted in May and June.
Burroughs still needs to rule on the legality of the case, but the injunctions provide a pause until that happens.
The online program would be for new and returning students through the school's HKS Global program. It offers students 'best-in-class online instruction' and the ability to participate in up to three intensive 'in-person convenings in cities around the world' where students can take credit-bearing sessions taught by Harvard faculty and engage in co-curricular activities, according to Weinstein.
The option to study at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Toronto is only available for returning students. The students are offered classes taught by Harvard faculty, both online and in person and instructors at the Canadian school.
'These are exceptional times,' said Janice Stein, founding director of the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy. 'If Harvard Kennedy School international students are not able to complete their studies in Cambridge. Mass., the Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy looks forward to providing shared academic and co-curricular experiences for students from both our schools.'
The battle over international students started when the Department of Homeland Security said it was revoking a key certification that allows Harvard University's international students to study there.
The institution was offered an ultimatum by the Trump administration to lose the certification or give up information about its foreign student population.
Quickly after, Judge Burroughs granted a temporary restraining order.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio later stated that the U.S. would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students and increase vetting of social media accounts of student visa applicants.
Following the revocation attempt, President Donald Trump issued a proclamation that barred Harvard's international students from entering the country to study. He also directed Rubio to consider stopping the processing of Harvard student visas.
A temporary restraining order from Burroughs blocked that, and the State Department ordered embassies around the world to resume processing Harvard University student visas.
Read more: Judge rules Trump can't invoke national security powers to ban foreign Harvard students
Harvard international students have been wrongly detained at Boston Logan Airport and denied visas, according to Maureen Martin, Harvard's Director of Immigration Services, who wrote in a court filing.
At the same time, the State Department told consulates last week that they should prioritize the student visas of those aiming to attend colleges with less than 15% international students, according to the Associated Press.
There are 200 institutions with total student populations of more than 15% international, including all the Ivy League schools and 26 public universities, the outlet said.
About 27% of Harvard's undergraduate and graduate students are international, according to 2024 to 2025 data.
Harvard has a separate lawsuit in reaction to the federal government freezing or cutting nearly $3 billion in federal funding, citing antisemitism at Harvard.
'In the Trump Administration, discrimination will not be tolerated on campus. Federal funds must support institutions that protect all students,' the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services wrote in May as it cut $60 million in grants to Harvard.
Why a database of bug genes could be one of Trump's most devastating cuts at Harvard
Data breach affecting over 75,000 people at UMass leads to lawsuit
Judge rules Trump can't invoke national security powers to ban foreign Harvard students
Harvard's Jewish faculty have their own wish list for a deal with Trump
These 16 states are supporting the Trump admin in lawsuit with Harvard
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Raskin on Trump ‘ugly' remark: Not everyone can live up to his ‘exquisite' level of ‘handsomeness'
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a vocal critic of President Trump, shot back with sarcasm after the president seemingly called him 'ugly' in a post online. 'I suppose I don't like being called ugly by Donald Trump, but not everybody can live up to his exquisite levels of handsomeness and personal physical grace,' Raskin told MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell on 'The Last Word.' 'And so that — I would consider myself probably in the large majority of American men who simply can't live up to the exquisite standards that he's set, and his extraordinary popularity with American women,' he quipped. His remarks came after Trump, in a post on Truth Social, called the Maryland lawmaker a 'third rate Democrat politician' and said Raskin 'has no idea what is in our fantastic Tax Cut Bill, nor would he understand it if he did.' 'This DOPE has been consistently losing to me for YEARS, and I love watching his ugly face as he is forced to consistently concede DEFEAT TO TRUMP — And tonight should be another of those nights,' the president added. 'Raskin is a bad politician, and a TOTAL LOSER!' The lawmaker is no stranger to attacks after serving as impeachment manager during Trump's second impeachment trial following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. He also sat on the select committee investigating the riots. The back-and-forth came as the House GOP was considering the Senate-passed version of the 'big, beautiful bill.' The lower chamber advanced the spending package early Thursday after overcoming a dramatic procedural vote overnight. Democrats have been vehemently opposed to the reconciliation package, with Raskin posting on social platform X Wednesday that 'House Democrats have been 100% united in standing up for all Americans and saying no to the GOP's job-killing, health care-destroying, debt-exploding tax bill.' On Thursday, he went a step further, calling the bill a 'tax scheme.' 'The GOP's tax scheme strips health care coverage from millions of Americans, including at least 245,000 Marylanders,' he wrote on X. 'I'm voting 'hell no.'' The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.
San Francisco Chronicle
38 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How Ukraine can cope with the US pause on crucial battlefield weapons
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — The decision by the United States to pause some weapons shipments to Ukraine has come at a tough time for Kyiv: Russia's bigger army is making a concerted push on parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line and is intensifying long-range drone and missile attacks that increasingly hammer civilians in Ukrainian cities. Washington has been Ukraine's biggest military backer since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor on Feb. 24, 2022. But the Trump administration has been disengaging from the war, and no end to the fighting is in sight, despite recent direct peace talks. Specific weapons needed from U.S. Amid recurring concerns in Kyiv about how much military support its allies can supply and how quickly, Ukraine has raced to build up its domestic defense industry. The country's output has gradually grown, especially in the production of more and increasingly sophisticated drones, but Ukraine needs to speedily scale up production. Crucially, some high-tech U.S. weapons are irreplaceable. They include Patriot air defense missiles, which are needed to fend off Russia's frequent ballistic missile attacks, but which cost $4 million each. That vital system is included in the pause, and many cities in Ukraine, including Kyiv, could become increasingly vulnerable. A senior Ukrainian official said Thursday that Patriot systems are 'critically necessary' for Ukraine, but U.S.-made HIMARS precision-guided missiles, also paused, are in less urgent need as other countries produce similar assets. 'Other countries that have these (Patriot) systems can only transfer them with U.S. approval. The real question now is how far the United States is willing to go in its reluctance to support Ukraine,' he told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of sensitivity of the subject. The official said that Patriot missiles exist in sufficient numbers globally, and he said that accessing them requires political resolve. 'There are enough missiles out there,' he said, without providing evidence. He also stated that Ukraine has already scaled up its domestic production of 155 mm artillery shells, which were once critically short, and is now capable of producing more than is currently contracted. 'Supplies from abroad have also become more available than before,' he said. Backup plan Amid at times fraught relations with U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been enlisting greater European help for his country's arms manufacturing plans. European countries don't have the production levels, military stockpiles or the technology to pick up all the slack left by the U.S. pause, but Zelenskyy is recruiting their help for ambitious joint investment projects. Draft legislation to help Ukrainian defense manufacturers scale up and modernize production, including building new facilities at home and abroad, will be put to a vote in the Ukrainian parliament later this month, Defense Minister Rustem Umerov announced this week. Zelenskyy said last month that major investments will go to the production of drones and artillery shells. 'The volume of support this year is the largest since the start of the full-scale war,' he said about commitments from foreign countries. Under Trump, there have been no new announcements of U.S. military or weapons aid to Ukraine. Between March and April, the United States allocated no new help at all, according to Germany's Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. For the first time since June 2022, four months after Russia's full-scale invasion, European countries have surpassed the U.S. in total military aid, totaling 72 billion euros ($85 billion) compared with 65 billion euros ($77 billion) from the U.S., the institute said last month. Big battlefield problem Without Patriot missiles, as well as the AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missile and shorter-range Stinger missiles that are also included in the pause, Ukrainian cities likely will take a bashing as more Russian missiles pierce air defenses. On the front line, Ukrainian troops haven't recently voiced complaints about ammunition shortages, as they have in the past. They have always said that during the war, they have never had as much ammunition to as their disposal as Russian forces. The army faces a different problem: It's desperately short-handed. It's turning to drones to compensate for its manpower shortage, and analysts say the front isn't about to collapse. 'This is war — and in war, steady deliveries are always crucial,' he said. ___ Barry Hatton reported from Lisbon, Portugal. ___
San Francisco Chronicle
38 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Supreme Court will take up a new case about which school sports teams transgender students can join
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Thursday to hear a case over state restrictions on which school sports teams transgender students can join. Just two weeks after upholding a ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth, the justices said they will review lower court rulings in favor of transgender athletes in Idaho and West Virginia. The nationwide battle over the participation of transgender girls on girls sports teams has played out at both the state and federal levels as Republicans have leveraged the issue as a fight for athletic fairness for women and girls. More than two dozen states have enacted laws barring transgender women and girls from participating in certain sports competitions. Some policies have been blocked in court. At the federal level, the Trump administration has filed lawsuits and launched investigations over state and school policies that have allowed transgender athletes to compete freely. This week, the University of Pennsylvania modified a trio of school records set by transgender swimmer Lia Thomas and said it would apologize to female athletes 'disadvantaged' by her participation on the women's swimming team, part of a resolution of a federal civil rights case. Republican President Donald Trump also has acted aggressively in other areas involving transgender people, including removing transgender troops from military service. In May, the Supreme Court allowed the ouster of transgender service members to proceed, reversing lower courts that had blocked it. The new case will be argued in the fall. West Virginia is appealing a lower-court ruling that found the ban violates the rights of Becky Pepper-Jackson, who has been taking puberty-blocking medication and has publicly identified as a girl since she was in the third grade. Pepper-Jackson sued the state when she in was middle school because she wanted to compete on the cross country and track teams. This past school year, Pepper-Jackson qualified for the West Virginia girls high school state track meet, finishing third in the discus throw and eighth in the shot put in the Class AAA division. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for Pepper-Jackson in two areas, under the Constitution's equal protection clause and the landmark federal law known as Title IX that forbids sex discrimination in education. Idaho in 2020 became the first state in the nation to ban transgender women and girls from playing on women's sports teams sponsored by public schools, colleges and universities.
