
Why £2 million 'race against time' to save St Andrews Harbour's historic pier from disaster continues
The 72-year-old St Andrews University graduate can claim a quirky but globally recognisable success: he led the team that developed the world's first squeezy tomato ketchup bottle, securing Heinz's inaugural order for 18 million of them in 1985.
It's fitting, then, that the restoration of the storm-ravaged medieval pier at St Andrews Harbour – which reopened on April 30 – has demanded similarly inventive thinking and sheer determination.
Douglas, alongside fellow trustee Ken Sweeney and a small band of committed volunteers, has been at the heart of monumental efforts to repair the historic pier and chart a sustainable future for the centuries-old harbour.
The pier was triumphantly reopened with the return of one of the university town's most iconic traditions: the Gaudie.
An estimated 2000 red-gowned St Andrews students processed along the newly repaired pier with flaming torches.
They honoured John Honey, a student who, in 1800, saved sailors from a shipwreck near the harbour's entrance.
But despite the celebrations and the photogenic symbolism, the work is far from done.
While £1 million of repairs have been carried out so far, major engineering repairs to restore the pier's connection to the cliffs remain unfunded, requiring a further £2 million.
With major grant applications underway, it is thought that a funding gap of around £500,000 will remain – and the clock is ticking.
The urgency stems from the unprecedented damage wrought by back-to-back 'risk to life' storms in late 2023 – Storm Babet in late October and Storm Ciarán just over a week later.
Together, they battered the harbour infrastructure, scoured the seabed, destroyed sluice gates and undermined the very integrity of the pier structure.
Ken Sweeney, 69, a retired PE teacher and former St Andrews coastguard with deep family ties to the harbour, recalls the impact vividly.
'Basically, the harbour got weakened by the first storm then hit by the second,' he explains.
'The lock gates got driven from their resting position by a spate effectively and then bounced around by the swell in harbour. That was Storm Babet.
'That meant we had no control of the water in the harbour. We couldn't un-silt it without the gates. We did manage to re-open after a week thanks to a local farmer digging out the sand.
'But then the second storm, from the same north-easterly angle, bombarded the base of the pier along its full length – particularly at the pier landfall.
'It was like a washing machine scouring it out. The road was on its way if no remedial actions were taken, and the cliff and path down was at risk too. It still is!'
The storms exposed the fragility of a pier structure whose original foundations date to the 14th century, built and rebuilt over generations.
Capping stones from 1900 were lifted off like pebbles.
Waves penetrated the twin rows of stonework, blasting out rubble infill with hydraulic force.
Emergency intervention from Fife Council bought some time, with £100,000 of rock armour installed to prevent further cliff erosion and road collapse at the pier landfall.
The Scottish Government's Marine Scotland Emergency Fund contributed £360,000 to urgent harbour gate repairs.
But the trust – working closely with Historic Environment Scotland, Fife Council and Lochgelly-based Realm Construction, part of the Purvis Group – also has the pier's A-Listed status to consider.
'We used oak double-fired wedges, carefully hammered into the stone joints,' explains Douglas.
'It's a traditional method with modern precision – the wedges swell with moisture to hold stones tight.
'We also repointed the pier nose, tidied the west wall, repaired the picnic area and even restored the smaller pier.'
Tidal work schedules meant stonemasons worked unseen, often on the seaward side of the pier. Hard work meant the pier re-opened earlier than planned.
Still, danger remains. The repairs completed so far have stabilised the pier, but the structure's landward connection – known as the landfall – remains highly vulnerable. Without the final phase of work, future storms could undo everything.
'Rock armour is in place, but it's temporary,' warns Douglas. 'Another winter like 2023, and we could lose the whole end section again. That would be catastrophic.'
Permission has recently been given to use concrete on the seaward side of the landfall to give better protection.
However, this brings different engineering challenges.
The final phase – the rebuilding of the landfall, the reinstatement of the historic slipway, and long-term reinforcement of the surrounding cliff – carries an estimated cost of £2 million.
The hope lies with two major funding bids: £1 million from the Heritage Lottery Fund and £500,000 from Historic Environment Scotland.
If successful, these grants would leave a remaining gap of £500,000 – a sum the trust believes it can raise through community efforts and local donors. But time is short.
'We'd need to start work in spring 2026 to be finished by that winter,' says Douglas.
'Any later, and we risk being caught out by another storm season.'
The University of St Andrews, whose students have helped fundraise and whose imagery often features the pier, has contributed £2,000 from its Community Fund and helped connect the trust to alumni networks.
The student-run Kate Kennedy Club, which organises the Gaudie Walk, has pledged funds from its upcoming centenary campaign. In total, nearly £20,000 has been raised by the student community.
However, the harbour trust would quietly welcome more direct financial support from the university itself. This comes at a time when the higher education sector faces significant funding challenges of its own.
A spokesperson from the University of St Andrews said: 'The university has supported St Andrews Harbour Trust both financially, and in kind.
'We connected the trust to our alumni networks, and the University Community Fund donated £2,000 to the trust's pier appeal.
'To date the fund has supported 177 charities and organisations across Fife, including the harbour trust, with a total of £280,920. The university commits a core donation of £30,000 a year to the fund.
'Social responsibility is one of our core values…and we remain committed to supporting the harbour trust wherever possible.'
Historic Environment Scotland describes St Andrews Harbour as of 'outstanding importance' in Scotland, as recognised through its category A listing.
It has offered advice on sympathetic repairs in keeping with the historic character.
However, the situation also highlights the growing need to better understand and respond to the impact of climate change on historic coastal infrastructure.
St Andrews Harbour Trust's ambition goes beyond emergency work.
Plans include a new café with upper-floor harbour trust offices and exhibition space, housed in a cantilevered structure that accounts for the fragile quay wall.
Leisure pontoons have already revitalised the inner harbour.
Seven working fishing boats remain active, vital for income and Marine Scotland support.
The reopened pier is a triumph. But there's little doubt the harbour's long-term survival depends on securing the next wave of funding and completing the final phase of restoration before nature strikes again.
You can donate at St Andrews Harbour Trust.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
06-07-2025
- Daily Mail
Secrets about Prince William and Kate Middleton's St Andrews love story revealed as royal author says the future Princess of Wales was 'very shy'
As the two graduands sat in the grand Younger Hall, they heard a speech from the Vice Chancellor that would prove prophetic for the couple. Vice Chancellor Brian Lang told the audience in 2005 that St Andrews prides itself on being 'Britain's top matchmaking university' and that one in ten students would go on to marry.


Daily Mail
12-06-2025
- Daily Mail
JONATHAN BROCKLEBANK: In a world where height matters, I've made my peace with being the wee guy in the family - it's time Scotland did too
When my family arrived at the home of a great aunt in St Andrews who hadn't seen us in a while, she bade me the following frank greeting: 'Aye, I see you're still no catching up with your brother.' She was referring to my stature. She took one look at us and noted that the nine-year-old remained half a head shorter than the 10-year-old, just as he had done since we were three and four. My reply to this has been quoted back to me many times in family circles. I think they thought it showed a degree of acuity under fire. I told Auntie Cathie: 'I didn't know it was a competition.' Years passed and I grew taller. But so, damn it, did my brother. By 20, he had overtaken my 6ft 3in father. Me, I pulled up a cruel quarter of an inch short of the 6ft mark. It has been my lot in life to remain forever noticeably lower to the ground than my father and, indeed, his father before him. If that were not bad enough, I've had to watch my older brother match them inch for inch and, more recently, see his sons rocket skywards, flaunting the family gene that somehow passed me by. And I told Auntie Cathie it wasn't a competition. Of course it's a competition. And I'm in last place. That eats at a guy. A scientific study now underlines what I knew all along but wasn't prepared to admit to a plain-spoken aunt peering into my tender soul the moment I entered the room. Size matters. Shorter men really are jealous of taller ones. Deep down, they are dismayed by the differential and, naturally – as we imagine ourselves civilised and 'above' such things – in denial about it. This suppressed sense of inadequacy manifests itself in what we have long recognised as 'short man syndrome' – the observable truism that the quickest male tempers are most often the preserve of the diminutive. The Australian study, published in Evolutionary Behavioural Sciences, finds that smaller men are more likely to be encumbered with exactly the kinds of hang-ups we would expect – intrasexual envy, jealousy, competitiveness. At the extremes of the syndrome, I'd suggest they are way more confrontational too – and paranoid, and out to prove some point that their more altitudinous counterparts don't feel worth proving. Is it just my imagination or, when tensions simmer, is it ever the tall guy who winds the short fellow up more profoundly than anyone else present? Am I off beam, or does the threat of a violent episode double if a lady is watching? Something primordial awakens in some of us – a rage against the natural order of the living world which suggests the bigger beasts get the spoils. Yes, by dint of growing up in a family of giants, I can quite see how short man syndrome gnaws at a person's self-worth. I may have been in denial about the height race but was quite open wanting to take him down in every other area of fraternal competition you can name. Why? He was bigger than me. It wasn't fair. So I was coming for him. I look at the land where I live and I see a lot of me as a 13-year-old in it. Scotland doesn't think it is fair either. England is bigger than it. They grew up side by side and Scotland is the perennial little brother, never catching up or coming anywhere close. In the sport we care about most, we lose against England more often than we win because they are bigger than us. Just like I did with my older brother, we dedicate ourselves to putting one over on them. We run that extra yard, push that bit harder because it's them and it's not fair. Ask not whether short man syndrome is a thing because it indubitably is. Ask instead whether Scotland is suffering from a severe case of small country syndrome. The evidence, I fear, is all around us – in our politics, in our cringe, in our chippiness and in our tantrums. You will hear some rational arguments for Scottish nationalism which are worth a theoretical whirl. It's about addressing the democratic deficit, getting the government we vote for, tailoring economic policy to our specific needs, re-engaging with the EU. You will hear appeals to patriotism – indignation that we proud people with our own flag and history and identity allow ourselves to be governed by next door when, of course, we do no such thing. Some Scots will invoke a sense of moral superiority over our neighbours. Others will argue – still more fancifully – that the last 18 years of SNP rule at Holyrood have proved we're up to the job of independence. They have proved only that while some of us might be, the SNP certainly isn't. But through all the prattle it is the primordial rage that I hear most loudly – the small country's wrathful protest against its own lack of stature. Some of us with the syndrome, I suspect, would not only enjoy putting on the platform heels that independence would bring, but also revel in the schadenfreude of seeing the remainder of the UK lessened – even, perhaps, torn apart. It's not just about winning when you're a small chap. The big guy must lose too. Our cringe makes us miss the wood for the trees. Our contribution to the world stacks up against any small nation in it. We invented the telly, for goodness sake. It took a while but in time I made my peace with the fact I was the wee guy in my family. There are more ways to grow up than vertically and I think I must have found one of them. Wouldn't Scotland benefit from a little maturity on the matter too? Must grievance and resentment forever be our default setting? The plain fact of the matter is while there is almost certainly scientific grounding in the notion of short man syndrome there is no reason why susceptibility to feelings of inadequacy should translate to small countries. Indeed, many around the world seem much more comfortable in their skin than the big ones. Is the idea that we would be one of them just as soon as we separated from England – that a national personality shift towards sunnier dispositions would ensue on the declaration of independence? I am not sure personalities work like that. I think we have grown so accustomed to blaming others – particularly big bruv across the Border – for all our woes that we would find ourselves in crisis the moment we realised our troubles are home grown and, largely, always were. Independence is not what I want and I hope never to see it. I cannot shake off my affinity with the whole UK any more than I can warm to those in my corner of it who blame everything on everyone but themselves. But, if it ever happens, the road to it would be a deal smoother and the transition less traumatic if we lost the small country syndrome right now and started acting like the grown-ups we would surely have to be.


BBC News
06-06-2025
- BBC News
Downpatrick flood prevention scheme could cost £20m
A study commissioned by the Department for Infrastructure has recommended building a £20m flood prevention scheme in town was hit by serious flooding in November 2023 when Storm Ciarán brought exceptionally heavy rain to Northern engineers' report suggests a scheme involving culverts, embankments and infrastructure minister said further work would be undertaken to determine whether the scheme would be economically viable. Liz Kimmins added: "Flooding in Downpatrick - and how to reduce that flood risk - is an extremely complex issue with many variables."That is why it was important that a comprehensive study was carried out to inform the most viable and effective way ahead."The study, produced by engineering consultancy Amey, considered 14 possible were reduced to a shortlist of two, which were considered technically preferred option would offer flood protection to 78 businesses and 28 total estimated cost of £22.5m includes maintenance costs of around £2m.A cost-benefit analysis suggests the scheme would prevent flood damage, which would cost around £26m to study cautions that what is proposed is a "complex scheme" and that given the risks and unknowns at this stage, it may become economically unviable as work on the design concludes: "Further investigations are recommended prior to detailed design to mitigate some of these key risks and confirm economic viability through a business case." Analysis: Floods expected to get more frequent and severe by Barra Best, BBC News NI weather presenterHomes and businesses in Downpatrick were left underwater when Storm Ciarán hit in November town centre and surrounding areas suffered severe flooding following weeks of heavy rainfall, with Market Street and low-lying parts of the town particularly hard hit. Floodwater was made worse by high spring tides that prevented the River Quoile from discharging into Strangford Lough, which would have helped lower flood has suffered similar flooding incidents in the past. The commissioned study highlighted the need to protect sensitive habitats around Stangford Lough, as well as archaeological and historic sites in climate change expected to increase the frequency and severity of flooding, the Downpatrick Flood Alleviation Scheme, if it proceeds, could prove a critical step towards safeguarding the town's homes, businesses, and comes after Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins said on Thursday that updated legislation for water and flood management would be a "major step forward".The NI Executive has approved bringing the Water, Sustainable Drainage and Flood Management Bill to the assembly which, Kimmins said, would help "meet the needs of our growing population and adapt to changing weather patterns".