Social media incentivised spread of Southport misinformation, MPs say
The Commons science and technology select committee called for new multimillion-pound fines for platforms that do not set out how they will tackle the spread of harmful content through their recommendation systems.
The MPs warned that rapid advances in generative artificial intelligence, which allows for the creation of convincing fake videos, could make the next misinformation crisis 'even more dangerous' than last August's violent protests after three children were killed by a man wrongly identified online as an asylum seeker who had arrived by small boat.
They also called for AI-generated content to be visibly labelled and said divisive and deceptive content amplified on social media after the attacks may have been part of a foreign disinformation operation.
'It's clear that the Online Safety Act [OSA] just isn't up to scratch,' said Chi Onwurah, the committee chair, after a seven-month inquiry. 'The government needs to go further to tackle the pervasive spread of misinformation that causes harm but doesn't cross the line into illegality. Social media companies are not just neutral platforms but actively curate what you see online, and they must be held accountable.'
Neither misinformation nor disinformation are harms that firms need to address under the OSA, which only received royal assent less than two years ago. State-sponsored disinformation can amount to an offence of foreign interference.
The report examines the role of platforms including X, Facebook and TikTok, and comes after this week's opening of a public inquiry into missed opportunities to prevent the killing of Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, on 29 July last year.
Just over two hours after the first call to the emergency services, a post on X claimed the suspect was a 'Muslim immigrant', and within five hours a false name, 'Ali al-Shakati', was circulating on the same platform, the MPs found. Within a day, these two posts had received more than 5m views. In fact, the attacker was Axel Rudakubana, a British citizen born in Cardiff.
Another X post that evening calling for violence towards asylum hostels received more than 300,000 views, and the next day the false name was on X's 'Trending in the UK' list.
TikTok suggested to users under its 'others searched for' function the words 'Ali al-Shakti arrested in Southport', and by the end of the day after the attack social media posts with the false name had accrued 27m impressions and violence had broken out outside Southport mosque. On 3 and 4 August a Facebook post called for violence against the Britannia hotel in Leeds, where many occupants were asylum seekers.
The committee called for fines of at least £18m if platforms do not set out how they will tackle significant harms that derive from content promoted by their recommendation systems even if it is not illegal.
It concluded: 'The act fails to keep UK citizens safe from a core and pervasive online harm.'
It called on the government to make social media platforms 'identify and algorithmically deprioritise factchecked misleading content, or content that cites unreliable sources, where it has the potential to cause significant harm.' But it stressed: 'It is vital that these measures do not censor legal free expression.'
The MPs called on ministers to extend regulatory powers to tackle social media advertising systems that allow 'the monetisation of harmful and misleading content', with penalties rising depending on severity and the proceeds used to support victims of online harms.
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology has been approached for comment.
Ofcom said it held platforms to account over illegal content but stressed that the scope of laws requiring platforms to tackle legal but harmful content was a matter for the government and parliament.
A spokesperson said: 'Technology and online harms are constantly evolving, so we're always looking for ways to make life online safer. We're proposing stronger protections including asking platforms to do more on recommender systems and to have clear protocols for responding to surges in illegal content during crises.'
TikTok said its community guidelines prohibited inaccurate, misleading or false content that may cause significant harm and it worked with factcheckers and made any content that could not be verified as accurate ineligible for its 'for you' feed.
X and Meta were approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
I'm feeling the pressure, Eluned Morgan says after year as first minister
First Minister Eluned Morgan says she is feeling the pressure as she gears up her party for the next Senedd election following her first year in the the past few months polls have suggested Labour may lose its lead in a Welsh parliamentary election for the first time since the a year in charge, the Welsh Labour leader said she had a "historic responsibility" and knew when she took the job her party would be in for a "tough time".Meanwhile she said the UK government was "probably" not listening to her at the time she made a landmark speech criticising Sir Keir Starmer's government. Opposition parties accused Morgan of "drift," "dithering" and "failure" in her first year on the job, claiming the "same old problems remain". Morgan took over her party after a tumultuous period, following the ousting of Vaughan Gething by senior figures in the Welsh short stint as first minister was dominated by a donation of £200,000 from a man previous convicted of illegally dumping waste to his preceding leadership was installed without a contest after other potential candidates ruled themselves then the first minister has sought to focus on a small list of priorities - particularly on reducing long NHS to the BBC Wales podcast Walescast on Wednesday, Morgan said the "longest waits are definitely heading in the right direction".When it was pointed out to her that two-year waits had risen recently, she said there was a "particular problem" in the north Wales health board, Betsi said: "I am pulling my hair out."But, look, we're all over them."Morgan said the health board were getting some treatments "out into the independent sector, because you know what you're getting there", as well as opening a new orthopaedic released in July said those waiting more than two years went up by 6.5% on the previous month, to just under 10,300. 'We have to remind people of what's at stake' Morgan said Labour had to take the challenge facing the party seriously."I think we've got to remind people of what's at stake, things that they see every day in their lives, free prescriptions, free bus passes, free school meals."Every time you win an election, it gets more difficult for the time after and of course, there's a historic responsibility, and there's a responsibility as the first woman leader as well. "So yeah, of course, I'm feeling the pressure." A significant moment in her term in office came in May, when Morgan delivered a speech in Cardiff Bay's Norwegian Church that was scathing of UK government by Morgan as the Red Welsh Way, the first minister promised to "call out" Labour in Westminster if ministers got "it wrong for Wales".The first minister said the Welsh government had received more cash for coal tips and rail from the UK government."So is it enough? No, I want more. I'll always want more, and I'm not going to apologise for that."Morgan said she thought the UK government had "started sitting up and paying a bit more attention to us since I made the Red Welsh Way speech".Asked if she made the speech because she was not being listened to at the time, Morgan said: "I think that that was probably the case at that time, but that is no longer the case. Since then the engagement has been transformed."Morgan said she speaks to Sir Keir "at least once a month... probably more than any other first ministers had in the past". The Welsh Labour leader also defended her party's selection procedures, amid a row over how long the process is said it was slow because of the party was "trying to make sure we do due diligence well". 'Internal political nonsense' The first minister took over after months of bickering within her to BBC Radio Cymru podcast Gwleidydda with Vaughan Roderick, she said: "I think it's important that we concentrate on what's important to the people of Wales."Morgan said she felt "hesitant" when she took the reins but things had "calmed down a lot" since then."I was confident I could fix that and quite quickly that's what happened," she said Labour must concentrate on voters' priorities rather than "internal political nonsense".Responding to the suggestion people within Welsh Labour were briefing against one another, she said she "hated" that kind of politics."I think we should rise above that, and I don't think there's a political split in the party," she added. What have other parties said? Leader of the Welsh Conservatives in the Senedd, Darren Millar, said: "One year on and nothing has changed. "Whether it's 20mph speed limits slowing Wales down, or Labour's plans to waste £120m on more politicians in the Senedd, the same old problems remain."Plaid Cymru Senedd member Heledd Fychan, said: "Eluned Morgan's first year as first minister is encapsulated by a record of failure: from missing her own target to eliminate two-year NHS treatment waits, to faltering educational outcomes and rising levels of poverty in our communities."Reform, which is hoping to win its first Senedd seats next May, said: "From day one, she promised leadership and delivery. What we got was drift, dithering, and distraction. "Public services are buckling, the economy is stagnant, and the people of Wales are being let down by a first minister more interested in headline-chasing than hard graft."Welsh Liberal Democrat leader Jane Dodds said it was "fantastic" Wales had a female first minister and leading a party "was harder when you're a woman"."But the thing I've been thinking about a lot is that she doesn't stand up to Keir Starmer," she said. "She promised to do that. She promised to make sure Wales' voice was strong and I don't see that."
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How to work out if YOU can claim £950 from the car finance scandal - and what to do if you can't find the paperwork
It's the scandal dubbed 'PPI on Wheels', but last week five judges at the Supreme Court dealt a blow to millions of drivers hoping for a payout on their car finance deals. There will be no compensation for customers who were simply unaware commission was being paid when they took out car finance, with the judges declaring this was not enough to count as mis-selling.
Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
Six months on from my accident, I've not got on a Lime Bike again
Six months ago I was hit by a car while riding a Lime bike. I was cycling home after a late netball match in a quiet residential area of south London. It was dark but dry and it was a journey I'd made hundreds of times before. I wasn't wearing a helmet — I never did when I got Lime bikes. I had nearly crossed a mini roundabout when a driver coming from my left failed to stop, hitting the back of my bike and sending me catapulting me over the handlebars. I broke my wrist, my jaw and chipped my front teeth. I'm going to require dental work for the rest of my life. I was signed off work for six weeks. It was at least two months before I felt slightly more like myself again. I still get a little pang of nervousness crossing a road when I see a Lime bike coming. And I still haven't got back on a bike. That's why the decision by Hounslow Council to stop Lime ebikes operating in the borough appeals to me. Although less about rider behaviour on the roads and more about parking issues (alternative contracts have been offered to the rental firms Forest and Voi, with 'stricter enforcement for designated bay use' cited as a reason), it feels like sanity is starting to prevail. • The man behind Lime e-bikes on why they're 'no nuisance' The driver who hit me claims she didn't see me, that I 'came out of nowhere''. I guess if I'd been on my normal bike (which had a puncture, hence the Lime), I would have been travelling at a slower pace and therefore more visible to others, or I'd have been able to swerve before she crossed. I don't hate Lime bikes but I fear them now. While in many ways they've positively transformed our mobility across the city, they're big and heavy and fast. Anyone can get on one, and it feels like they leave them anywhere. As an able-bodied person I can walk around the scattered ebikes left on my road but I often think of how this affects wheelchair users, parents with prams, the elderly and people with disabilities. Since my accident, multiple friends have also had incidents, as riders and pedestrians. With summer weather making buses and trains far less desirable, more people are going to choose a Lime bike — thus more potential for accidents. • I know why Lime bike riders are so reckless Am I convinced things will be that different with Forest and Voi bikes? I don't know. It's good to see moves toward stricter parking systems but will that really stop people from riding recklessly? Banning one brand doesn't fix the problem, it just passes it on. For me, it's not so much the product that's inherently dangerous but how people use it. I often see riders on their phones, listening to music, even rolling a cigarette, completely absorbed in their bubble. Red lights and zebra crossings seem optional. And for pedestrians, these heavier, faster bikes leave a fraction of the reaction time compared to non-electric bikes. Riders need to understand that while we feel free and protected, the power is illusory. We're not in a car, it's still a bike, and our bodies are vulnerable. While the ban might ease frustration in the short term, it doesn't solve the bigger issue of integrating technological advances into city travel. Cities need to adapt, not just restrict. If councils don't tackle the root behaviours and infrastructure gaps, we'll be here again in six months with a different logo. As long as we treat these bikes as a quick fix — for cities, for commuters, for climate goals — without properly integrating them into how we move and live, we're asking for more accidents, more frustration and more bans. We need to fix the system before the fear outweighs the convenience and people like me never get back on.
