
The blue-blooded City fund giant battling to stay relevant
The historic money manager, which was founded during the Napoleonic Wars, invited the late Queen Elizabeth II to cut the ribbon for the 308,000 sq ft office, making a major coup for the eponymous Schroders family, who have controlled the business for two centuries.
Flanked by Bruno Schroder, the 85-year-old family patriarch, and chairman Michael Dobson, the Queen's visit marked a new dawn for the FTSE 100 giant, which was attempting to reinvent itself as a modern-day asset manager.
Yet seven years on from the prestigious opening – the British financial titan is at a crossroads. Buffeted by an industry-wide downturn, Schroders is trying to plot a new course in a rapidly changing environment.
Schroders' problem had been a rapid sea change in investment markets, away from its bread-and-butter active stock picking model towards cheaper 'passive' funds – like ETFs – and private capital.
It has tried to keep pace by buying numerous businesses that oversee private capital, but questions remain over the success of this strategy.
As a result, investors are growing weary. Shares in Schroders hit their lowest level in a decade last year, and despite a recent upswing, remain 45pc below their recent peak in 2021.
For the 15 or so members who form the 14th generation of the Schroder family, and still own 44pc of the group, the financial repercussions have been severe.
Their combined wealth has dropped from an estimated £4.6bn when shares peaked to about £2.4bn today– a loss of £2.2bn in under four years.
Bruno Schroder, who died in 2019, has since been replaced on the board by his daughter, the billionaire heiress Leonie Schroder.
Along with her cousin, Claire Fitzalan Howard, they represent the interests of the secretive Schroder family, who are no doubt keen to see the firm prosper once more.
'The family wants to see a share price which is going in the right direction rather than the wrong direction – and it had been going in the wrong direction for seven years,' says Rae Maile from Panmure Liberum.
To arrest the slide, Richard Oldfield, the new chief executive who took the reins in November, has laid out a radical £150m cost-cutting plan and ambitious new financial targets.
Hundreds of jobs could go as part of the overhaul, with the City abuzz with questions over whether Oldfield and Meagen Burnett, his finance chief, can turn the Schroders ship around – or whether a more dramatic break-up is needed.
'Schroders has been trying to be all things to all people, but they have missed out on the scale game,' says one industry observer.
'Their clients are buying cheaper passive funds at one end, and private markets funds at the other – and Schroders is getting squeezed in the middle.'
Schroders had been Britain's leading stock picker since the 1960s when it rode the occupational pension scheme boom by managing money for the likes of the Post Office and the Marylebone Cricket Club.
Such was its prestige that Michael Verey, the former chairman, once modestly declared that Schroders was 'rather good at investments, having done it for a long time, and is not a bit ashamed of it'.
Struggled to maintain dominance
Yet despite its storied reputation, Schroders has struggled to maintain its dominance in the 21st century – as Wall Street machines like BlackRock and KKR have put the squeeze on the industry with their cut-throat American drive.
Peter Harrison, who left in November after a decade as chief executive, sought to expand more into more esoteric investments such as private credit and real estate – areas he dubbed 'areas of fast-flowing waters' – to keep Schroders in the race.
As part of the strategy, he acquired numerous companies in a scattergun M&A offensive, spending significant sums on 'alternative' fund managers like Benchmark Capital, Adveq, Blue Orchard, SPW, River and Greencoat Capital.
But up against a better-resourced American private credit managers such as Carlyle and Blackstone, Schroders never appeared particularly comfortable operating away from its main strengths of stockpicking and wealth management.
Some say Harrison had the right idea, but the execution let him down because he didn't put his foot on the gas.
'Harrison spent a lot of shareholder funds over a long period of time buying shiny new toys which then didn't actually deliver,' says Maile.
'The areas where it has been doing well were being sidelined by Harrison, who was chasing the view of the world that said it's all about private markets. If you did work in public markets at Schroders, you were the poor cousin.'
Schroders' current predicament is ironic because it has rarely struggled for relevance in financial markets.
Blue-blooded, old school and part of the financial establishment, the history of the group is entwined with the history of Britain.
Founded in London by Johann Heinrich Schröder, a member of a prosperous Hamburg family, Schroders was for centuries a major British merchant bank, ranking alongside the Rothschilds, Kleinworts and Warburgs in terms of prestige.
It originally financed cotton imports from the US before the Civil War, and later the construction of the London Underground and the Channel Tunnel.
But in 2000, the Schroder family, then led by George Mallinckrodt and Bruno Schroder, severed that link.
They sold the historic banking business to Citigroup, leaving it as a standalone fund manager. Despite the risks, their bold gamble paid handsome dividends.
Assets under management at Schroders swelled from £132bn in 2000 to over £300bn just before Harrison took over in 2015.
Since then, assets under management have jumped again to an astonishing £780bn.
Yet this increase has masked hidden issues threatening the business.
Last year, clients pulled more money than they put in, with many ditching their stock market investments for private capital.
That has raised questions over what Schroders wants to be and whether it has the right strategy.
'They're not trying to be KKR, they're trying to be like a version of Partners Group or Hamilton Lane in the US', says one fund industry expert, referring to groups that sell private assets to deep-pocketed pension funds and charities.
Oldfield has pledged to get a grip on Schroders' private capital units, known as Schroders Capital, training up the 40 or so specialist salesmen who explain the fiendishly complex products to investors to increase investment flows.
While assets under management have increased from £46bn in 2020 to £70bn today, inflows have slowed over the past two years.
He has also dialled down expectations, pointing to the likelihood of lower inflows into the private markets business over the next three years.
Fund management 'runs through Schroders like a stick of rock'
But what if Oldfield's plan to ride both horses in public and private markets fails?
As another option, David McCann, a Numis analyst, says Schroders could ditch its in-house fund manager completely and become a standalone wealth manager.
Schroders added to its blue-blooded credentials a decade ago when it bought Cazenove Capital, a one-time broker to the Queen and formerly chaired by David Mayhew, a former Etonian once dubbed one of Britain's most respected bankers.
Today, Cazenove caters for the super-rich, with customers requiring a minimum of £3m just to get through the door.
Splitting off the fund managers and focusing on blue-ribbon Cazenove would leave Schroders as a 'simpler, but market-leading wealth management business', McCann says – with the cash generated from the sale handed out to shareholders.
Such a move would mirror Mallinckrodt and Bruno Schroder's turn-of-the-century decision to ditch its banking business – a bold gamble that paid off handsomely.
Yet some are not convinced. 'Fund management runs through Schroders like a stick of rock. It's not as easy to do as it sounds,' says another City source.
Oldfield has also played down the idea, pointing out that Cazenove relies heavily on Schroders' fund management division.
Yet Schroders needs to keep running to stay in the race. In 1901, banking scion Herman Kleinwort said of the group: 'They are fond of big deals and do a lot of speculation.'
The Schroder family, its 6,200 staff and the City of London itself will all be hoping that Oldfield pulls off his ambitious overhaul to help the historic fund manager rediscover some of that former magic.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal
July 31 (Reuters) - Meta's Facebook must face a consumer protection lawsuit brought by the District of Columbia's attorney general accusing the social media giant of misleading consumers about its data-privacy practices, an appeals court ruled on Thursday. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals revived the District's lawsuit for now in a unanimous three-judge ruling, opens new tab, finding that a lower court judge applied the wrong legal standard in dismissing the case in 2022. The District's lawsuit was part of a wave of court and regulatory actions stemming from revelations in 2018 that Facebook had allowed the now-defunct British political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to access data from as many as 87 million users. The consultancy's clients included President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign. Facebook has denied any wrongdoing, and said that it made clear and appropriate disclosures to users about its privacy policies. It still can seek dismissal of the lawsuit. In a statement, Facebook said it was weighing its options and remained confident it will prevail. The District attorney general's office had no immediate comment on Thursday's ruling. The District's lawsuit accused Facebook of duping users into thinking the company had strong enforcement measures to audit third-party applications. The lawsuit said Facebook allowed third parties like Cambridge Analytica to harvest user data without consent on a widespread basis. In the lower court ruling, Judge Maurice Ross of the Superior Court for the District of Columbia concluded that "Facebook did not materially mislead consumers as to their response to Cambridge Analytica." The appeals court said the attorney general should have a lower burden of proof in making renewed arguments that Facebook made unintentionally misleading claims to the platform's users about their control over their information shared on the site. Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and current and former directors and officers of the company this month agreed to settle claims seeking $8 billion for alleged damage caused by allowing repeated violations of Facebook users' privacy. The accord, filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, did not disclose a settlement amount. Facebook in 2022 said it would pay $725 million to resolve a class action in federal court in California over the Cambridge Analytica scandal. In 2019, Facebook agreed to pay a record-breaking $5 billion fine to resolve a U.S. Federal Trade Commission probe into its privacy practices. The case is District of Columbia v. Facebook, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 23-CV-0550. For plaintiff: Jeremy Girton of D.C. attorney general's office For defendant: Joshua Lipshutz of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher


South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Alexander Isak training at former club Real Sociedad amid transfer speculation
The Sweden international, who is reported to have asked Newcastle executives to explore a move away from St James' Park, has been heavily linked with Liverpool. His former club Sociedad confirmed on Thursday he was 'working with his trainers' at the club's Zubieta facility. Newcastle have been approached for comment. The player did not travel with the rest of the Newcastle squad earlier this month for their pre-season tour of Asia amid speculation over his future, with the club saying at the time he was absent due to a minor thigh injury. The decision to train at his old club rather than his current one will heighten speculation that Isak sees his future away from Newcastle. No offer has been submitted by Liverpool as yet to Newcastle, who would almost certainly be looking for a British record transfer fee for the player. Should Newcastle price Isak out of a move or simply refuse to listen to offers, one option Isak and his representatives might consider would be to unilaterally terminate his contract with three years remaining. A European Court of Justice ruling in favour of former Chelsea midfielder Lassana Diarra last year means players can now terminate their deals 'without unnecessary fears', according to the lawyer who led Diarra's case. The ruling appears to have given players greater leeway to terminate a contract without just cause. The court found some of FIFA's transfer rules were contrary to European law because they restricted freedom of movement and were anti-competitive. Jean-Louis Dupont, who led Diarra's challenge and who was also at the centre of the landmark Bosman case which granted players free agency at the end of their contracts, believes last year's ruling lifts the threat of significant sanctions for players who choose to terminate their deals. Dupont, speaking in general rather than specifically about Isak's case, told the PA news agency: 'In its Diarra judgement, the court ruled that players have a right to termination without just cause and that it is for the ex-employer to establish the existence and the quantum of damages, knowing that losing the opportunity to transfer the player is NOT a damage. 'According to the court, such termination cannot entail disciplinary sanctions (when effected in between seasons). 'FIFA has, imperfectly, amended its rules to abide by the court ruling. But the bottom line is that players have the right to terminate without unnecessary fears.' Asked whether he thought players would now be free from the threat of sporting sanctions such as a ban for terminating their deals, Dupont added: 'Yes. If not, the right to terminate, as granted by the court, would just be theoretical. But, apparently, FIFA is still resisting on this point.' Following the ECJ ruling, FIFA opened a global dialogue on its transfer rules and issued amended, interim rules just before Christmas last year. The world players' union FIFPRO immediately pushed back on the amendments, saying they did not 'provide legal certainty' to players. FIFPRO issued guidance to players in May stating that following the ruling, a player's transfer fee or transfer value could no longer be used in the calculation of any compensation due to the club where the player had been contracted, and advised that the compensation paid should be 'limited to the residual value of the contract, with a possible further reduction or increase on the basis of the national law'. A presumption that a player's new club had induced the termination of contract was removed in the amended rules issued by FIFA last December. Now, a player's old club must prove the new club induced the player to break contract.


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
UK stocks mixed; FTSE 100 marks best month in six
July 31 (Reuters) - British equities closed mixed on Thursday, as investors assessed a spate of corporate earnings and looked for potential trade deals before the August 1 tariff deadline expires. The blue-chip FTSE 100 (.FTSE), opens new tab fell 0.05%. However the index posted its best month in six. The domestically focused midcap FTSE 250 index (.FTMC), opens new tab rose 0.9% and logged its fourth consecutive monthly gain. Over the past month, investors have digested a flurry of trade headlines from Washington and are still assessing the impact of U.S. tariffs on corporate earnings, although attention is now turning to hopes of a Bank of England rate cut next week. In the market, aerospace and defence stocks (.FTNMX502010), opens new tab gained the most among sectors, up 5.1%, after Rolls-Royce (RR.L), opens new tab raised its full-year operating profit and free cash flow outlook. Shares of the British aero-engineer hit a record high with 8.5% rise. Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab gained 1.2%. The oil major's second-quarter net profit tumbled by almost a third, but exceeded analysts' forecasts. On trade, Trump released fresh levies ranging from updates on copper tariffs, goods from Brazil, South Korea and India, as well as ending exemptions for small-value overseas shipments, ahead of his August 1 tariff deadline. Industrial miners (.FTNMX551020), opens new tab slipped 2.6% tracking lower copper prices. Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab, Anglo American (AAL.L), opens new tab and Antofagasta (ANTO.L), opens new tab fell between 2.2% to 5.9%. Among other corporate updates, St James's Place (SJP.L), opens new tab was the top gainer in the FTSE 100, up 11.9%, after the wealth manager's half-yearly net inflows doubled and it launched a new share buyback. Rentokil (RTO.L), opens new tab soared 9.5% after the pest control company kept its full-year outlook unchanged and posted half-yearly revenue growth of 3.1%. British American Tobacco (BATS.L), opens new tab rose 1.3% after the company exceeded its first-half profit estimates. Conversely, Mondi (MNDI.L), opens new tab fell the most in the FTSE 100, down 12.1%, after the packaging firm posted a near 17% fall in first-half pretax profit. A slowdown in the London Stock Exchange Group's (LSEG.L), opens new tab recurring revenue growth sent the company's shares down nearly 8%. Just Group (JUSTJ.L), opens new tab surged 67.5% to top the FTSE 250 midcap index, after Canada's Brookfield Wealth Solutions (BNT.N), opens new tab agreed to acquire the insurer for 2.4 billion pounds ($3.18 billion). On the radar next week, the Bank of England is expected to cut borrowing costs for the fifth time since last August.