Lil Durk Claims 'Government Presented False Evidence' In Murder-for-Hire Case
'The recent developments in Durk's legal case have brought a harsh truth to light: the government presented false evidence to a grand jury to indict him,' explained the video. 'This isn't justice. That's a violation of the very system that's supposed to protect all of us.'
The statement continued to detail, 'Durk has always used music to tell stories, to express pain to heal—and yet those same lyrics are now being used against him,' adding, 'We refuse to stay silent as Black artists continue to be criminalized for their creativity. Rap is art.'
In the end, the memo pleaded with the rapper's followers and asked, 'As a family, we are asking the public, the fans, and the culture to stand with us. Stand for truth. Stand for fairness. Stand for The Voice.'
Lil Durk, legal name Devontay Durk Banks, was arrested in October 2024 and the following month he was officially charged with 'one count of conspiracy, one count of use of interstate facilities to commit murder-for-hire resulting in death, and one count of using, carrying, and discharging firearms and a machine gun and possession of such firearms in furtherance of a crime of violence resulting in death.'
In December 2024, the Grammy winner was denied bond as he pleaded not guilty to the federal charges.
Earlier this year, the rapper's legal team claimed prosecutors provided the grand jury with 'false evidence,' and filed to have the indictment dismissed.
'The government told the grand jury that Mr. Banks, through specific lyrics in his music, celebrated and profited from a revenge murder that he had ordered,' explained lawyer Drew Findling in the filing. 'That claim is demonstrably false,' he continued, noting that the song 'Wonderful Wayne & Jackie Boy,' a collaboration with Detroit rapper Babyface Ray, was 'written 'seven months before the incident even happened.'
Earlier this week, the 'Backdoor' rapper called Akademiks from behind bars with an update for fans.
'I've been good, man. Mentally, spiritually, I been on top of my sh*t,' exclaimed the 32-year-old. 'I'll be back out there, you hear me?' adding 'Thank you—I need all the prayers. I appreciate you.'
He continued, 'Ain't nothing changed, bro. I've just been focused on life, my family. I'm trying to learn Arabic in here…A couple guys in here that know how to speak Arabic fluently, so I've been picking up words, just tightening up my Arabic. Just building knowledge.'
More from VIBE.com
Lil Durk Converts 13 Prison Inmates To Islam As He Awaits Murder-For-Hire Trial
Lil Durk Files To Have Murder-For-Hire Indictment Dismissed
Lil Durk Facing Wrongful Death Lawsuit Due To Alleged Role In Death Of Quando Rondo's Cousin
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge gives ex-officer nearly 3 years in Breonna Taylor raid, rebuffs DOJ call for no prison time
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — A federal judge on Monday sentenced a former Kentucky police officer to nearly three years in prison for using excessive force during the deadly 2020 Breonna Taylor raid, rebuffing a U.S. Department of Justice recommendation of no prison time for the defendant. Brett Hankison, who fired 10 shots during the raid but didn't hit anyone, was the only officer on the scene charged in the Black woman's death. He is the first person sentenced to prison in the case that rocked the city of Louisville and spawned weeks of street protests over police brutality that year. U.S. District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings, in sentencing Hankison, said no prison time 'is not appropriate' and would minimize the jury's verdict from November. Jennings said she was 'startled' there weren't more people injured in the raid from Hankison's blind shots. She sentenced Hankison, 49, to 33 months in prison for the conviction of use of excessive force with three years of supervised probation to follow the prison term. He will not report directly to prison. The U.S. Bureau of Prisons will determine where and when he starts his sentence, Jennings said. The judge, who presided over two of Hankison's trials, expressed disappointment with a sentencing recommendation by federal prosecutors last week, saying the Justice Department was treating Hankison's actions as 'an inconsequential crime' and said some of its arguments were 'incongruous and inappropriate.' Civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who helped Taylor's family secure a $12 million wrongful death settlement against the city of Louisville, had called the department's recommendation 'an insult to the life of Breonna Taylor and a blatant betrayal of the jury's decision.' Crump was at Monday's hearing and said he had hoped for a longer sentence but was 'grateful that (Hankison) is at least going to prison and has to think for those 3 years about Breonna Taylor and that her life mattered.' Afterward, before a crowd outside the courthouse, Crump sounded a familiar chant: 'Say Her name.' The crowd yelled back: 'Breonna Taylor!' And he and other members of Taylor family's legal team issued a subsequent statement criticizing the Justice Department. 'While today's sentence is not what we had hoped for –– nor does it fully reflect the severity of the harm caused –– it is more than what the Department of Justice sought. That, in itself, is a statement,' the statement said. Hankison's 10 shots the night of the March 2020 botched drug raid flew through the walls of Taylor's apartment into a neighboring apartment, narrowly missing a neighboring family. The 26-year-old's death, along with the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, sparked racial injustice and police brutality protests nationwide that year. But the Justice Department, under new leadership since President Donald Trump took office in January, sought no prison time for Hankison, in an abrupt about-face by federal prosecutors after the department spent years prosecuting the former detective. They suggested time already served, which amounted to one day, and three years of supervised probation. Taylor's mother, Tamika Palmer, said she was disappointed that the new federal prosecutors assigned to the case were not pushing for a tougher sentence. On many occasions inside the courtroom Monday, lead federal prosecutor Rob Keenan agreed with Hankison's defense attorneys on factors that would decrease Hankison's punishment. 'There was no prosecution in there for us,' Palmer said afterward. 'Brett had his own defense team, I didn't know he got a second one.' Taylor was shot in her hallway by two officers after her boyfriend fired from inside the apartment, striking an officer in the leg. Neither of the other officers was charged in state or federal court after prosecutors deemed they were justified in returning fire into the apartment. Louisville police used a drug warrant to enter Taylor's apartment, but found no drugs or cash inside. A separate jury deadlocked on federal charges against Hankison in 2023, and he was acquitted on state charges of wanton endangerment in 2022. In their recent sentencing memo, federal prosecutors wrote that though Hankison's 'response in these fraught circumstances was unreasonable given the benefit of hindsight, that unreasonable response did not kill or wound Breonna Taylor, her boyfriend, her neighbors, defendant's fellow officers, or anyone else.' Jennings acknowledged Monday that officers were provoked by Taylor's boyfriend's gunshot but said 'that does not allow officers to then do what they want and then be excused.' While the hearing was going on, Louisville police arrested four people in front of the courthouse who it said were 'creating confrontation, kicking vehicles, or otherwise creating an unsafe environment.' Authorities didn't list charges against them. Federal prosecutors had argued that multiple factors — including that Hankison's two other trials ended with no convictions — should greatly reduce the potential punishment. They also argued he would be susceptible to abuse in prison and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder. The sentencing memorandum was submitted by Harmeet Dhillon, chief of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division and a Trump political appointee who in May moved to cancel settlements with Louisville and Minneapolis that had called for overhauling their police departments. In the Taylor case, three other ex-Louisville police officers have been charged with crafting a falsified warrant, but have not gone to trial. None were at the scene when Taylor was shot. The warrant used to enter her apartment was one of five issued that night in search of evidence on an alleged drug dealer that Taylor once had an association with. Lovan writes for the Associated Press.
Black America Web
5 hours ago
- Black America Web
Video Shows Florida Cops Beat Black Man After He Questioned Why He Was Stopped Over Headlights During Daytime
Source: Harry M. Daniels LLC / Wukela Communications Another day, another group of police officers exposed after committing egregious acts of police brutality against a Black man who was simply asking why he was pulled over and why he was being ordered to exit his vehicle. A video has recently gone viral, showing 22-year-old William McNeil Jr. being stopped by a Jacksonville, Florida, police officer on Feb. 19. The officer told McNeil he stopped him because his headlights weren't on, despite it appearing to be daytime. So, an understandably confused Black man points out that the cop's reason for the stop doesn't make sense. Then he's asked, for no discernible reason, to get out of his car, and when he doesn't immediately follow that demand, well, you can see in the video below what happens next. From ABC News: In the video, officers with the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office say they pulled McNeil over because the vehicle's headlights were not on. McNeil questioned the traffic stop because it wasn't raining and it was still light outside. An officer, who cannot be seen in the video, is heard saying, 'It doesn't matter, you're still required to have headlights on.' An officer asks McNeil to step out of the car, and when McNeil asks for the officer's supervisor, another officer punches the driver's window until it shatters. The officer then punches McNeil in the head before unlocking the vehicle door, unbuckling his seatbelt and forcibly removing him from the driver's seat. Once out of the vehicle, multiple officers then gather around McNeil. One officer is seen grabbing McNeil's head and punching him in the chin before forcing him to the ground. Florida law states clearly that motorists must use their headlights 'from sunset to sunrise, including twilight hours,' or 'during any rain, smoke, or fog.' So, the officer didn't have a real reason to pull McNeil over in the first place, and there's plenty of reason to wonder what the officer was really fishing for that prompted him to weasel his way around probable cause. While we're all wondering about that, we might as well wonder why McNeil's completely reasonable inquiry as to why he was pulled over was responded to by a demand that he exit his car. For what? To search him and his vehicle? Why? Did McNeil's failure to operate his headlights in broad daylight provide reasonable suspicion that he needed to be further detained and searched? It appears that even before breaking his car window, dragging him out and beating on him, these cops already had every intention of violating McNeil's civil rights, and their fragile blue egos sent them over the top once they saw McNeil wouldn't let said violations go unchallenged. On Sunday, civil attorneys Ben Crump and Harry Daniels announced McNeil retained them to represent him. 'I am absolutely disgusted by the actions of these officers but, unfortunately, I'm not surprised,' Daniels said in a statement. 'The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office has a long history of this kind of needless violence and brutality.' In his own statement, Crump noted correctly that 'it should be obvious to anyone watching this video that William McNeil wasn't a threat to anyone.' 'He was calmly exercising his constitutional rights, and they beat him for it,' he added. A statement sent to NewsOne from Crump's office reads: 'This is only the latest in a long line of excessive force incidents involving the JSO. In September 2023, the department was the focus of a national outcry after a video of JSO officers violently beating 24-year-old Le'Keian Woods while he was unarmed went viral. In 2019, JSO officers faced a federal lawsuit for killing 22-year-old Jamee Johnson after pulling him over for an alleged seat belt violation.' Meanwhile, Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters issued a statement Sunday, saying, 'We are aware of a video circulating on social media showing a traffic stop represented to be from February 19, 2025.' 'We have launched an internal investigation into it and the circumstances surrounding this incident,' Waters continued. 'We hold our officers to the highest standards and are committed to thoroughly determining exactly what occurred.' It's worth noting that Waters announced this internal investigation a full five months after the incident took place, begging the question: Would there be any investigation at all if the video hadn't recently gone viral? These cops conducted what should be considered an illegal stop, broke McNeil's window, forcibly pulled him out of the car, and beat him like it was just another day. That's how ingrained police violence against Black people is in the very culture of policing. Hopefully, William McNeil Jr. receives all of the justice he is owed. SEE ALSO: Virginia Funeral Home Faces Lawsuit After Black Man Was Allegedly Found Covered In Maggots During Viewing NC Troopers Fired After Cover-Up In Black Man's Death, Attorneys Say It's 'Only One Step Towards Justice' SEE ALSO Video Shows Florida Cops Beat Black Man After He Questioned Why He Was Stopped Over Headlights During Daytime was originally published on
Black America Web
5 hours ago
- Black America Web
WNBA Players Make Bold Fashion Statement At All-Star Game
Source: Steph Chambers / Getty Aliyah Boston was one WNBA star who took to the court during the All-Star game this weekend, donning warm-up shirts emblazoned with the words: 'Pay us what you owe us.' More than just a slogan on a stylish t-shirt, these words echo decades of frustration over the financial disparities that women, especially minority women, face in professional sports. The statement was a bold and necessary reminder that talent, effort, and visibility deserve proper compensation. From the chic tunnel styles to the dynamic talent on the court, the WNBA is delivering what it is supposed to, garnering plenty of star power. However, what it has lacked is the financial recognition that the franchise has earned. Despite the league's steady growth, increased viewership, and a social media boom fueled by culturally savvy players and high-level play, WNBA athletes are still paid just a fraction of what their male counterparts in the NBA make. The call for equal pay isn't just about salaries, it's about equity, visibility, and value. This subtle protest arrives at a critical time. The 2024 season saw record-breaking attendance and viewership, thanks in part to rookies such as Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese, as well as the continued dominance of players like A'ja Wilson and Breanna Stewart. Brands are lining up, social media is buzzing, and merch is flying off the shelves. The WNBA is no longer fighting to be seen. Therefore, when WNBA players say, 'pay us what you owe us,' they're not only speaking to the league; they're also addressing a system that has historically undervalued Black women in every field, including athletics. GloRilla Elevates the WNBA Movement After the subtle protest during the warm-up came the first half of the game, followed by the halftime turn-up. Memphis-bred rapper GloRilla lit up the stadium with her energetic performance, which had the players bouncing and even the popular mascot Big Ellie in her dancing bag. The powerful statement tees coupled with the electrifying GloRilla performance were more than a moment for the WNBA. It's a movement for women. And it's time for the checks to match the cheers. Run The Coins: WNBA Players Make Bold Fashion Statement For Equal Pay was originally published on
