The Liberals are down and opportunity is knocking
FEDERAL POLITICS
The headline reads ' Voters desert Coalition as Labor builds on win ' (The Age, 21/7). While I see this as good news, I would implore the government to develop some courage and take advantage of this situation where it can get something done. Cases in point: banning TV gambling ads, providing a more socially equitable tax system, and taking global warming seriously. There are many other issues. Now is the time for the Labor government to grasp their collective courage and act on some of those issues.
Louis Roller, Carlton
Who are the Liberals?
On the international stage our prime minister appears a bit daggy. But at least he's our dag. And somehow he's been able to pull together a team who can effectively communicate that they have the best interests of ordinary Australians at heart. Meanwhile, the Liberal Party is no longer the liberal party. Who are they? The Conservatives? Reform? One Nation? As Shane Wright points out, opposing everything all the time is not going to work. Can they demonstrate some constructiveness during the upcoming parliamentary session and productivity summit? A big test awaits.
Allan Dowsett, Preston
Voters look to female leadership
We always knew Susan Ley would have a difficult time as federal opposition leader due to the vast loss of Liberal seats. We need to ask why support for the PM has not increased much and the Coalition's has dropped.
Voters were looking for decisive action and a leader with a vision for the country. Ley has gone some way in this, speaking of consensus, remaining calm in difficult times thereby increasing her likeability. Most female independent MPs kept their seats at the last election or lost narrowly. Clearly we need more women in parliament and in leadership with their tendency to moderate, to bring together differing opinions and usually not to play power games. Yet the Liberals are still in the dark ages by opposing quotas.
Jan Marshall, Brighton
The problem with the Nationals
With the 48th parliament about to commence, it would be a welcome event if the Nationals do finally break away from their Coalition partner after decades of holding the whole country back on environmental progress. Based on very narrow and generally undeclared interests, their drive to do away with a net zero policy of any kind is anathema for the 21st century and an insult to the youth of this country and the world generally. Having the Nationals fully exposed and undiluted by partnership with the Liberal Party will allow the broader voting public to see the self-interest and lack of public interest that their policy entails.
Thinking outside of the square is fundamental to solving a problem but of course it is first necessary to acknowledge that there is a problem.
Robert Brown, Camberwell
A new path
Does Barnaby Joyce (' Joyce urges Coalition to ditch net zero ', 21/7) not understand what happened at the federal election just those few months ago? He wants the Coalition to dump net zero when the majority of Australians who voted for Labor, teals, Greens (and for almost anyone other than the Coalition) obviously want net zero pursued as a policy objective. Further he wants the Coalition to find points of division ignoring another clear learning from the election. The majority of Australians want politicians of all persuasions to work collegiately seeking outcomes that improve the lot of ordinary Australians. Partisan politics of the ilk we're witnessing in the US isn't what Australians want and won't improve the Coalition's chances of recovering the political capital they have squandered over the past decade.
David Brophy, Beaumaris
THE FORUM
No more regrets
Your correspondent's regret about their solar panel installation and declining feed-in tariffs ('Solar panel regret', Letters, 20/7) is a valid concern. As someone who has studied electricity, its industry and associated engineering and economics for 57 years, I can assure them that even though it feels like theft, it is true that solar energy during daytime in much of Australia is at best worthless and sometimes costly to export due to the shortage of energy storage in the power system.
The feed-in tariff will only be restored when sufficient battery capacity has been installed in homes and the grid to fully absorb the surplus daytime energy. That's why governments are subsidising battery storage.
Your insulting 1.5¢ feed-in tariff is better than most offers. You could get more value from your solar by installing a battery, moving what consumption you can to daylight hours and by changing retailer to access wholesale electricity pricing.
Ross Gawler, Malvern

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘The opposite happened': Economic roundtable could dissuade Australians from investing
LNP Senator James McGrath discusses Labor's economic reform roundtable, urging that it will dissuade Australians from investing in the 'productive part of the economy'. 'What the Labor Party doesn't realise is that if people start to cotton on to the fact that Labor is going to come after the money they've worked so hard for, people will no longer invest in the productive part of the economy,' Mr McGrath told Sky News host Steve Price. 'You only have to look at what's happening in the UK at the moment, with the Labour Party there, taxing what's called 'non-doms'. 'They thought they were going to bring billions of pounds of revenue … the opposite happened.'

Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Australians should be worried': Labor's economic reform roundtable is ‘bonkers'
LNP Senator James McGrath discusses how Australians should be worried about Labor's economic reform roundtable, saying it is 'bonkers' and will only produce 'hair-brained ideas'. 'Australians should be worried,' Mr McGrath told Sky News host Steve Price. 'Those who own their own homes, are of pensionable age, should be worried about organisations, so-called think-tanks, like the Grattan Institute coming up with quite frankly hair-brained ideas like this. 'This is bonkers.'

The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
Enough is enough. End the starvation in Gaza
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number. No attachments, please include your letter in the body of the email. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. Enough is enough Those photos, those stories in TheAge in the last week and the Wilcox cartoon of Gaza, of children starving to death, people dying in the attempt to get food – enough. It is unforgivable that we continue to stand by and do virtually nothing. I don't care whether you call it genocide, I don't care whether you call me antisemitic – I am not, but the killing must stop now. Benjamin Netanyahu must be stopped. If the only real tool of influence we have at our disposal is sanctions, then use them Anthony Albanese. Not only are innocents dying daily, but generational hatred is being cultivated. The Palestinians who manage to live will never forget. Hate will continue to grow exponentially, babies and children will continue to die meaningless slow and horrible deaths, and our world is in deadly peril. Please, our wise and cautious leaders, do something substantive. Karen Morris, Newport This is hatred High school students verbally attacking primary school children with hateful comments in a public area: if that is not antisemitism, racism and pure ignorant hatred, then I don't know what is. Marie Nash, Balwyn Israel the problem . . . Your correspondent (Letters, 26/7) claims the crisis in Gaza is of Hamas's making. Apparently, the real problem is that Hamas won't surrender, not the siege imposed by Israel. Not the bombed hospitals. Not the people who die while collecting food. Not the blockade on baby formula. Just Hamas. But let's be clear: This is not a war between equals. Israel is one of the most advanced militaries on Earth unleashing its power on a captive population. It is Israel that controls Gaza's borders, and blocks humanitarian aid. It is Israel that has killed tens of thousands, levelled cities, and made famine a weapon of war. Pointing the finger at Hamas while babies die of hunger under siege is not just misdirection – it is moral cowardice. Pressure should go where the power lies. And in this case, that's not Hamas. Nadia Green, Sunshine North . . . And the solution Your correspondent (Letters, 26/7) completely misses the point. There is starvation in Gaza and it is Israel causing the starvation through its blockade, and only Israel can end the blockade. Whether there is a ceasefire or not, or whether Hamas goes to Qatar is irrelevant; food, medicine, water and fuel can be let into Gaza today to feed the starving people, but Israel is stopping it. Anastasios Moralis, Ormond Follow France example Israel will continue its deadly actions in Gaza and the West Bank until it is prevented from doing so. Australia should stand with France and the other countries who recognise the state of Palestine. Yes, it's a symbolic gesture, but it also offers a pathway to peace.