Pogacar plays down yellow jersey after Evenepoel wins Tour time trial
Pogacar, who started the day in second place on the same time as leader Mathieu van der Poel, produced one of his best time trials on the 33km route around Caen to finish just 16 seconds behind the world and Olympic champion to leave Van der Poel and fellow challenger Jonas Vingegaard struggling in his wake.
The Slovenian, who now holds a 42sec lead over Evenepoel with Vingegaard over a minute behind, is the first rider since Eddie Merckx in the 1970s to hold all three of the main jerseys -- the general classification, points and king of the mountains.
"I'm super happy with how I rode today, to be 16 seconds behind the world champion, the Olympic champion, the best time triallist in the world right now," Pogacar said after the stage.
"It's a very good day and I'm happy, but I'm just happy this day is over and we can keep the ball rolling in this Tour de France.
"The most important (jersey) is yellow, and the most important time to have it is on the Champs-Elysees at the finish line.
"Now, it's not that important. It feels good, but the important thing is to have it in Paris."
Evenepoel completed the course in 36min 42sec at a blistering average speed of 54 km/h. Italian Edoardo Affini finished third, 33sec behind.
It was Evenepoel's second stage win on the Tour de France, having triumphed in the time trial in Gevrey-Chambertin last year on his debut in the Grande Boucle.
"I knew I had a good chance but, of course, the legs still have to be there and everything has to go to plan," said Evenepoel whose Soudal Quick-Step team-mate Tim Merlier won stage three two days ago.
"In the end I think it was pretty good. I didn't really feel like I could go any faster, so I think in general I'm happy with the result.
"It's a second stage win for our team, it's super nice.
"As for me, I've taken a step towards the podium but there's still a long way to go."
- 'Incredible' -
Two-time winner Vingegaard, who began the day just 8sec behind Van der Poel, had a poor day as the Dane could only finish 13th in the stage -- 1min 21sec behind Evenepoel -- to slip to 1min 13sec behind Pogacar in the new standings.
He drops to fourth overall with local rider Kevin Vauquelin moving up to third after a hugely-impressive ride that saw him finish fifth on the day.
"I'm over the moon, really," said an emotional Vauquelin.
"I think I can only experience this once in my life. To see everyone looking at me, cheering me on, it's incredible.
"For a 24-year-old just starting out in the professional world, it's just incredible."
Dutchman Van der Poel also struggled to maintain the pace, coming in 18th, 1min 44sec behind the winner, dropping him down to sixth overall.
Evenepoel was the nailed-on favourite to win the stage given his astonishing record in time trials.
AFP | Anne-Christine POUJOULAT
The Flemish rider, who has been wearing a golden helmet since his Olympic double, is virtually invincible in this exercise.
He has won the last six time trial stages in which he has taken part, and nine out of 12 since the start of 2024. This was his 64th career victory, of which 21 have come in time trials.
Evenepoel was also impressed by the performance of Pogacar who was a distant third to the Belgian and Vingegaard in the time trial in the recent Criterium du Dauphine.
"Compared to the Dauphine, he took a big step forward. He showed that he's in great form and that he's the man to beat in this Tour."
Thursday serves up the second longest stage of this year's Tour with 3,500 metres of elevation over a 201.5km route through Normandy which starts in Vauquelin's home town of Bayeux and ends with a short, steep climb to the finish in Vire Normandie.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Semenya's right to a fair hearing violated, rules European Court of Human Rights
Caster Semenya's long fight for athletes with differences in sexual development is not over after the latest court ruling The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Caster Semenya's rights to a fair hearing were violated. This is the latest outcome in a long legal battle against athletics authorities and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The Grand Chamber of the European Court on Thursday, 10 July 2025 upheld a 2023 ruling that the two-time 800m Olympic champion's appeal to a Swiss Federal Supreme Court against regulations that barred her from competing had not been properly heard. Semenya, an athlete with differences in sexual development (DSD), has been involved in a legal battle over regulations that prohibit her from running unless she medically lowers her natural testosterone levels. She first took her fight to the CAS, sport's highest court, in 2018, and later to the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. Semenya lost both cases, although when the CAS ruled against her four years ago it accepted that it meant she was being discriminated against. However, its judges ruled 2-1 that 'such discrimination is a necessary, reasonable and proportionate means of achieving World Athletics' aim of preserving the integrity of female athletics in the Restricted Events'. On Thursday, the European Court of Human Rights delivered its Grand Chamber judgment in the case and found in favour of Semenya on Article 6 (right to a fair hearing), but ruled against her on three technical areas — Article 8 (right to respect for private life), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination) — due to jurisdiction. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Semenya challenged regulations that required her to lower her natural testosterone levels to compete in the female category internationally. She also challenged the rejection of her legal actions against these regulations by the CAS in Switzerland and subsequently the Swiss Federal Supreme Court. At 34, she has no intention of competing again, but the case has become about fighting for other DSD athletes' rights. Violation The European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the right to a fair hearing (Article 6 of the Convention) on the grounds that the Swiss Federal Supreme Court's review of Semenya's case did not meet the required 'particularly rigorous examination'. The European Court of Human Rights decided that the CAS's mandatory and exclusive jurisdiction was imposed on Semenya by a sport governing body, not by law. This situation creates a structural imbalance in the relationship between sportspersons and governing bodies. Specifically, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court's review was limited to assessing if the CAS's conclusion was 'unjustified' based on its findings, even though the court had left open the issue of athletes maintaining testosterone levels, which was central to Semenya's argument. The dispute concerned one or more of her 'civil' rights. These 'civil' rights corresponded to fundamental rights in domestic law. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The European Court of Human Rights found that despite the CAS expressing serious concerns about the difficulty athletes face in maintaining testosterone levels under the regulations, and this issue being central and decisive to Semenya's case, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court conducted only a limited review of the CAS's decision. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The Federal Supreme Court did not sufficiently act on doubts expressed by the CAS regarding other questions, such as the alleged arbitrary inclusion of the 1,500m and one mile events, and the potential for the regulations to make public the status of female athletes with differences of sex development. The Federal Supreme Court also rejected, without thorough examination, Semenya's argument comparing her situation to a previous case in which a CAS award was deemed incompatible with public policy. Consequently, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that the Federal Supreme Court's review, due to its restrictive interpretation of 'public policy', did not satisfy the required rigour, leading to a violation of Article 6 of the Convention. Although Semenya did not submit a claim for damages, the Court ordered that 'Switzerland' pay €80,000 in 'respect of costs and expenses'. Dismissed Despite the success with Article 6, Semenya's complaints under Article 8 (right to respect for private life), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination) were rejected by the European Court of Human Rights. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads Semenya submitted that the DSD Regulations had affected her psychological integrity and identity, her right to self‐determination and her right to exercise her professional activity, and that they had led to discriminatory treatment. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads The court examined whether the applicant fell within Switzerland's jurisdiction to allow the complaints to be heard. Generally, a state's jurisdiction is territorial, meaning the facts of the complaint must occur within that state's territory. In this case, as Semenya is a South African national living in South Africa, she has no personal link with Switzerland, and Switzerland played no role in drafting or applying the DSD Regulations. They are drafted by World Athletics, which is registered in Monaco. Therefore, Semenya did not fall within Switzerland's territorial jurisdiction for most complaints and the Grand Chamber, by a vote of 13 to 4, declared Semenya's complaints inadmissible under Articles 8, 13 and 14 of the Convention. The case could now return to the Swiss courts, or to CAS. DM
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Europe court says Caster Semenya's trial wasn't fair in gender testing case
The European Court of Human Rights ruled that Caster Semenya's trial over testosterone levels was unfair, ordering Switzerland to pay her 80,000 euros, but did not overturn the World Athletics ruling or allow her to compete without medication. Picture: Frederick Florin/AFP A top European court Thursday said a Swiss court did not give South African runner Caster Semenya a fair trial over whether she should lower her testosterone levels to compete as a woman. The double Olympic champion, who is classed as having "differences in sexual development", has been unable to compete in her favoured 800m category since 2018, after she refused to take drugs to reduce her testosterone levels following World Athletics introducing new rules on women competitors. She had hoped for European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to also rule that she had been victim of discrimination, but its Grand Chamber said those complaints were inadmissible as they did not fall under Switzerland's jurisdiction. Semenya has already tried other tribunals to try to change the rules.
eNCA
3 hours ago
- eNCA
Europe court finds Switzerland breached Semenya's right to a fair trial
STRASBOURG, France - The European Court of Human Rights has ruled in favour of Olympic champion Caster Semenya. The court upheld the 2023 ruling that the South African middle-distance runner Semenya's rights had been violated. This ruling thus allows Semenya her legal challenge against World Athletics to continue. The ruling comes nearly two years after deliberations began. Semenya's decade-long legal battle has cost an estimated R30-million. She won Olympic gold in the 800 metres in London 2012 and Rio 2016. Semenya has been a world champion three times in 2009, 2011 and 2017.
