The True Story Behind the High School Spying Scandal in 'Spy High'
It begged the question: How did the high school get a picture of a student in their bedroom?
The case caused a national scandal in 2010, and it's now been given the docuseries treatment in Prime Video's four-part Spy High, out April 8. Here's what to know about the spying scandal that rocked America; one that wouldn't look out of place in an episode of another show releasing a new season the same week, Black Mirror.
Read more: Schools Let AI Spy on Kids Who May Be Considering Suicide. But at What Cost?
At the beginning of the 2009-2010 academic year, the Lower Merion School District gave their entire student population of 2,306 students (including both Merriton HS and Lower Merion HS) brand new Macbooks to streamline schoolwork. Unsurprisingly, students were thrilled at getting a top-of-the-line laptop for free. They would use AIM chat to keep in touch with their friends at school and home, video chat, play games…everything a laptop could provide was now at their fingertips.
What seemed like a dream come true became a nightmare when Blake Robbins was called into the office, with school officials using photos taken on his laptop to accuse him of a crime. Robbins never took those photos, and the school refused to tell him how they got them. Robbins' parents were terrified that the school was using the laptop to spy on their son and other students (including their daughter Paige). The Robbins family promptly filed a lawsuit against the school board.
The lawsuit soon became a national news story, widely referred to as WebcamGate. The revelation that a school could be spying on their students in and out of the classroom was a cause for alarm across America. The school board argued that the webcams were only activated to find stolen or missing laptops, but Robbins' computer was never reported as such. The Robbins family lawyer, Mark Haltzman, filed an order for the school board to release the photos they had of Blake, which led to the release of over 400 photos of the 15-year-old taken on his laptop without his knowledge. This included photos of him sleeping in bed.
An FBI investigation was launched, with the school board under considerable fire for allegedly spying on their students. As the case dragged on, public opinion started to shift against the Robbins family, with many alleging that they were suing because they needed the money and wanted to soak up their 15 minutes of fame. Both Blake and Paige Robbins were bullied relentlessly at school, and the school board launched a defense, hiring a top Philadelphia law firm and attorney Henry Hockeimer to conduct their own investigation on WebcamGate.
Read more: How Docu-Mania Took Streaming by Storm
The FBI investigation uncovered that the school board had taken over 56,000 images using a remote technology called Theft Track, designed to take random photos on a laptop webcam considered lost or stolen. That number far exceeded the 400 originally released of Blake. Of the 2,306 issued laptops, 36 of them captured images of students at home without their knowledge. When it came to Robbins, the school board argued they turned on the tracking on his laptop because he hadn't paid for insurance after breaking the first laptop, leading them to consider the laptop stolen, and were therefore trying to find the computer. However, in the parental consent forms required to get the laptop in the first place, there was no mention whatsoever of any sort of remote tracking. Spy High uncovers several e-mails from the school board's IT department that show they not only knew the location of Robbins' laptop thanks to the tracking (and therefore knew that it was not missing), but purposefully continued to track and take photographs without his consent.
Suspicious of Robbins because of his disciplinary issues at school (which largely stemmed from being late to class), the monitoring led to an image of Robbins holding what looked like drugs, which led to the Nov. 11 meeting and breakthrough on the case. Through the process of discovery, an internal school district email was uncovered which urged that parents should be made aware of the tracking, concerned that 'a huge uproar' could occur if they were left unaware. Virginia DiMedio, Director of Technology and Information Services at LMSD, replied saying, 'There is no way that I would approve or advocate for the monitoring of students at home,' and 'I suggest you take a breath and relax.' Parents remained unaware of Theft Track, the feature that allowed for remote photography.
More students came forward with lawsuits of their own upon realizing they were being spied on. Jalil Hasan, 17, filed suit, as did a student who preferred to remain anonymous, called 'Student Doe.' In Spy High, that student's identity is revealed as Keron Williams. Most of the 36 kids who were targeted came from minority backgrounds, and Keron's mother had originally opted to conceal his identity because she feared that public exposure could have severe consequences for her son. In both Hasan and Williams' cases, their laptops were never reported to be lost or stolen, nor were there any issues with paying for the insurance. The series details how betrayed the students felt to be spied on by an institution they were supposed to trust, and the impact on their mental health and development.
The FBI's investigation ended with the decision to not pursue charges against LMSD. They claimed to have not found enough evidence to prove criminal intent behind the spying, despite not having interviewed any of the students. Robbins, Williams, and Hasan were all pressed by their attorneys to settle their lawsuits and avoid the difficulties of battling their cases in court. Eventually, they all agreed. As the main public face of the WebcamGate lawsuits, Blake Robbins' settlement was for $600,000—a lot of money for any teenager. However, only $175,000 was awarded to Robbins himself, with $425,000 going to legal fees. Hasan, who had the same lawyer as Robbins, was awarded $10,000. Williams was told to sign an NDA to receive $10,000, but he refused, eventually getting a settlement of $13,500.
Fourteen months after Robbins' settlement, his sister Paige, 19, was fearful that the images captured of her could be inappropriate and could damage her own ambitions of one day being district attorney. She brought forward her own lawsuit against the school district. A spokesperson for LMSD referred to the suit as 'an attempted money-grab,' and Paige received a torrent of abuse online, including disturbing antisemitic messages. Robbins withdrew the lawsuit.
Spy High also explores the rise in monitoring software in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a massive increase in students acquiring laptops for school, and the docuseries reports that 88% of schools use some type of monitoring software. The consequences reach further than potential crime. Software can flag words like 'gay,' leading to students being forcibly outed, like Leo Holcomb in Minneapolis (he and his friend, Charlie Schmidt, helped get monitoring software banned in the state of Minnesota). But a huge number of students are still being monitored across America. The Center for Democracy & Technology estimates that 23 million students are attending public schools that actively monitor their online activity.
LMSD refused to take part in the documentary, saying in a statement, 'In 2010, the independent investigation into LMSD's use of the LANrev TheftTrack system found no evidence that the feature was used to 'spy' on students.' At 18, Blake Robbins left Lower Merion for Los Angeles and has never returned. His parents, tired of the abuse stemming from their lawsuit, moved to Florida.
And that photo that 'proved' Robbins was selling drugs, launching the WebcamGate scandal? It was taken from a video he sent to his friend on Facebook of him holding a misformed Mike and Ike candy.
Contact us at letters@time.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Black America Web
a day ago
- Black America Web
Hold Up! Was Beyoncé's Music Stolen During Her Atlanta Cowboy Carter Tour Stop?
Source: Parkwood Entertainment / Live Nation Beyoncé fans, we've got a situation. According to recent news reports, some serious Cowboy Carter content may have been jacked in Atlanta. So, it's no surprise that the Bey Hive is buzzing. While many of us were out here rehearsing our line dances, putting together lewks, and shining our boots, her team was dealing with something nobody saw coming: a break-in that could've compromised unreleased music and major tour visuals. Police say the incident happened just two days before Bey's Atlanta run kicked off. Christopher Grant, one of Beyoncé's choreographers, and Diandre Blue, a tour dancer, told police their rental Jeep Wagoneer was broken into. Thieves allegedly swiped two suitcases – and not just any suitcases. We're talking luggage with jump drives with watermarked tracks, past and future setlists, tour footage, and personal items related to the Cowboy Carter production. Pause for reaction. Reports indicate that the culprits took luxury clothing, two MacBooks, Apple headphones, and other items. Thankfully, Atlanta police have issued an arrest warrant for a suspect. No name has been confirmed yet, or that the person is in custody, but fingers crossed justice is served. Because if there's one thing we don't play about, it's Beyoncé – or her music. Despite the drama, Queen Bey has owned Atlanta's Mercedes-Benz stadium as if nothing happened. Further, Atlanta also showed up and showed out for her. Celebs like Usher, Kandi Burruss, and Kenya Moore have been spotted in the crowd. Record-breaking numbers of fans also continue to pour into downtown Atlanta as Queen Bey holds her final night. The Cowboy Carter tour continues to give everything it needs to give. But, this behind-the-scenes drama proves how real the stakes are when you're running the music game. SEE ALSO Hold Up! Was Beyoncé's Music Stolen During Her Atlanta Cowboy Carter Tour Stop? was originally published on


CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
AI-generated porn scandal rocks University of Hong Kong after law student allegedly created deepfakes of 20 women
Hong Kong's privacy watchdog said Tuesday it has launched a criminal investigation into an AI-generated porn scandal at the city's oldest university, after a student was accused of creating lewd images of his female classmates and teachers. Three people alleged over the weekend that a University of Hong Kong (HKU) law student fabricated pornographic deepfakes of at least 20 women using artificial intelligence, in what is the first high-profile case of its kind in the Chinese financial hub. The university sparked outrage over a perceived lenient punishment after it said Saturday it had only sent a warning letter to the student and demanded he apologize. But Hong Kong's Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data said Tuesday that disclosing someone else's personal data without consent, and with an intent to cause harm, could be an offense. The watchdog "has begun a criminal investigation into the incident and has no further comment at this stage," it said, without mentioning the student. The accusers said in a statement Saturday that Hong Kong law only criminalises the distribution of "intimate images," including those created with AI, but not the generation of them. There is no allegation so far that the student spread the deepfake images, and so "victims are unable to seek punishment... through Hong Kong's criminal justice system", they wrote. The accusers said a friend discovered the images on the student's laptop. Experts warn the alleged use of AI in the scandal may be the tip of a "very large iceberg" surrounding non-consensual imagery. "The HKU case shows clearly that anyone could be a perpetrator, no space is 100 percent safe," Annie Chan, a former associate professor at Hong Kong's Lingnan University, told AFP. Women's rights advocates said Hong Kong was "lagging behind" in terms of legal protections. "Some people who seek our help feel wronged, because they never took those photos," said Doris Chong, executive director at the Association Concerning Sexual Violence Against Women, referring to cases at the group's crisis center. "The AI generations are so life-like that their circulation would be very upsetting." Asked about the case at a Tuesday press briefing, Hong Kong leader John Lee said most of the city's laws "are applicable to activities on the internet." HKU said on Saturday it will review the case and take further action if appropriate. AI-generated pornography has also made headlines in the U.S. A study found 6% of American teens have been targets of nude deepfake images that look like them. Last month, Meta removed a number of ads promoting "nudify" apps — AI tools used to create sexually explicit deepfakes using images of real people — after a CBS News investigation found hundreds of such advertisements on its platforms. In May, one of the largest websites dedicated to deepfake pornography announced that it shut down after a critical service provider withdrew its support, effectively halting the site's operations.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Amazon's Idaho College Murders Documentary Is Better Than Peacock's — Except in the Ways It Isn't
Two can be a crowd when it comes to documentaries, and that proves true when analyzing the horrific 2022 University of Idaho killings. On Thursday, July 3, Peacock released its feature-length documentary The Idaho Student Murders. Eight days later, on Friday, Amazon's Prime Video released all four episodes of its documentary series One Night in Idaho: The College Murders. The two projects cover the same awful incident — in which Washington State University Ph.D in criminology candidate Bryan Kohberger brutally murdered Idaho students Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin with a knife — but in pretty different ways. Notice I didn't say in 'disparate' ways, because I am definitely about to compare and contrast these docs. More from The Hollywood Reporter Kenny and Kaylor Hope 'Love Island USA' Fans "Can Relate to Us More" in 'Beyond the Villa' 'Poker Face' Boss Rian Johnson Delighted in That Finale Cliffhanger Tease: "Peacock Was a Little Nervous" Where to Watch 'One Night in Idaho: The College Murders' and Pre-Order the Book Behind the Series For starters, one is a 90-minute, continuous documentary film and the other is 172 minutes cut four ways — no one on either side of the competing projects can take issue with that observation. But in noticeable ways, the Prime Video docuseries directed by Liz Garbus and Matthew Galkin is superior to Peacock's doc, which was directed by Catharine Park. It is more entertaining (entertainment value feels like an awful way to judge true crime — but crime or not, it's true) and has much deeper access to the victims' friends and family members, who say much more interesting things about their deceased loved ones. Whereas the main storytellers in Amazon's docuseries are those closest to the victims, in the Peacock doc, author Howard Blum (When the Night Comes Falling: A Requiem for the Idaho Student Murders), a retired FBI special agent who worked on the case, and some unaffiliated attorneys carry the narrative. The Idaho Student Murders feels closer to the looming court case — it better tackles crime scene detail, Kohberger's personal history, his alibi and even the procurement of the murder weapon. Whereas One Night in Idaho is closer to the people. In a crowded media ecosystem, it is the personal stories that break through — especially when the court case never happens. At first blush, it would appear that Peacock's first-mover advantage here is, well, an advantage. But I don't think that's true. The Peacock doc actually wasn't even yet dated for release when Kohberger changed his plea to guilty; the streamer rushed the film out to meet the moment, a person with knowledge said. It was probably the right choice, but there was no avoiding the fact that the doc's open-ended legalese was now obsolete. The nature of The Idaho Student Murders allows more for the outside shot that Kohberger may be innocent of the heinous crimes — a plea of 'Not Guilty' had originally been submitted on Kohberger's behalf — but by the time of the Peacock release, we (very freshly) knew he definitively was not not guilty. Kohberger struck a surprise plea deal to avoid the death penalty, which just a few months ago was reverted back to the firing-squad technique by order of the Idaho governor. None of that is the filmmaker's fault, of course: Kohberger's trial had been set to start one month after her doc was released, and Peacock, owned by NBCUniversal, which itself is owned by Comcast, is not in the business of getting sued over libelous content. But once Kohberger confessed — the evidence against him is overwhelming — it made Park's attempts at impartiality obsolete. It also meant that Park had to scramble to get the latest update (and quotes from a few of the families) into a new end-title card. Garbus and Galkin had an extra week or so to tidy theirs up. There are other numerous ways in which One Night in Idaho: The College Murders outshines The Idaho Student Murders. Like, for example, the lighting. Peacock's documentary was produced in connection with a podcast, and while I don't exactly know how to say this, that's exactly what it looks like. Even the format of One Night in Idaho (Amazon) makes for a more engrossing viewership experience, and a cliffhanger looming over the end of each episode encourages binge-viewing. The Idaho Student Murders (Peacock) does not lack for climactic moments — the story (and the need to edit into and out of ad breaks) guarantees that — but they just don't hit the same. To be fair, both the platforms and studios involved reflect the differing level of production. The lead production companies on One Night in Idaho: The College Murders are Amazon MGM Studios and Skydance Television. How big are they? Well, Amazon is a top-four (worldwide) company by market cap, and Skydance is about to effectively buy Paramount Global. The Idaho Student Murders was produced by KT Studios and iHeartMedia — both primarily deal in the audio format. For what it's worth, I bet it made for a hell of a podcast. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series 22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise