Failures in compensation scheme for infected blood laid bare in report
Sir Brian Langstaff, chairman of the probe, said that the number of people who have been compensated to date is 'profoundly unsatisfactory' as he called for 'faster and fairer' compensation for victims.
The latest report of the inquiry concludes:
– There was a 'missed opportunity' to consult with people affected by the scandal.
– There has been a 'repetition of mistakes in the past' in the way both the Conservative and Labour governments have responded.
– Trust in the Infected Blood Compensation Authority (IBCA) has been 'lost' by many members of the infected blood community.
– People impacted by the scandal have expressed a 'grave concern' over the delay in compensation and a 'lack' of clear timescales as to when it will be delivered.
– The report raises concerns about how the regulations underpinning the compensation authority have created a 'liability window' which mean people infected with HIV with contaminated blood or blood products before 1982 will not be compensated which is 'illogical and profoundly unjust'.
– The impacts of a hepatitis infection are not being 'fully recognised' in the compensation scheme, including the impact of early treatment for the virus which has been linked to severe side-effects.
The main report of the Infected Blood Inquiry was published in May 2024 (PA)
Campaign group Tainted Blood has estimated that at least 100 people have died while waiting for compensation since the main report was published last year.
Writing in the 210-page report, Sir Brian said: 'Trust has not yet been regained but instead has been further damaged and that people have been harmed yet further by the way in which they have been treated.'
Speaking to people impacted by the scandal at an event in central London, Sir Brian said that 'delay creates an injustice all of its own'.
He described how one man spent his dying days applying for compensation but died before he received it.
'One man spent his last days applying for compensation but died before the process was complete.
'His family do not know when they will receive the recognition that should have been his.
'A mother in her 80s, whose two sons and husband were infected at the same hospital, died before she was even allowed to start the process.
'Many, many fear they will not live to see the recognition which compensation brings.'
The report details how another victim described how 'it feels as if we are waiting to die, in limbo, unable to make any progress in our lives'.
The Inquiry's Additional Report on Compensation is now published on the Inquiry website.
Access the Report here: https://t.co/CbQTGm28Ev
— Infected Blood Inquiry (@bloodinquiry) July 9, 2025
He described how victims of the scandal told him how the compensation scheme had left them feeling 'desperate and powerless'.
Sir Brian highlighted how his first report on compensation was published in 2023 yet some affected people have been told that they may not receive compensation until 2029.
He said that it was 'inexplicable' and 'unthinkable' for the compensation scheme to be devised without input from the infected blood community.
Sir Brian said that 'time is not on anyone's side' as he made a series of recommendations to improve the compensation scheme.
'Once again decisions have been made behind closed doors leading to obvious injustices,' he said.
'The UK Government has known for years that compensation for thousands of people was inevitable and had identified many of those who should have it – but only 460 have received compensation so far and many, many more have not even been allowed to begin the process.
'We are calling for compensation to be faster, and more than that, fairer.'
More than 30,000 people in the UK were infected with HIV and hepatitis C after they were given contaminated blood and blood products between the 1970s and early 1990s.
And more than 3,000 people have died as a result, and survivors are living with life-long health implications.
The Infected Blood Inquiry published its main report on the scandal in May last year, and a compensation scheme was announced a day later.
But in the same week a general election was called and officials from the IBCA have described how in the early days of the organisation it consisted of two men, a laptop and a phone.
We've published our latest compensation figures today – these are accurate as of 1 July 2025.
We will continue to publish updated figures every two weeks.
Click the link to see the latest figures: https://t.co/CISQSHwRQ0 pic.twitter.com/KRWbpXunBg
— Infected Blood Compensation Authority (@IBCA_UK) July 3, 2025
Some £11.8 billion has been allocated to compensate victims, administered by the IBCA.
As of July 1, some 2,043 people have been asked to make a claim, and 460 people have had their compensation paid totalling more than £326 million, according to IBCA figures.
On Sunday, the Cabinet Office said that it will 'reduce the administration and process delays' victims are facing, meaning the IBCA will 'be able to deliver services quickly, and require different supporting information from claimants'.
A Government spokesperson said: 'This additional report reflects the unprecedented nature of the Infected Blood Scandal and the thoroughness of the Inquiry's investigation.
'We are grateful to the Inquiry for its ongoing work. We will now consider all of its recommendations.
'Over £300 million has been paid to victims since the compensation scheme opened last October and we are taking action to enable a quicker compensation process.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
16 hours ago
- ITV News
Antisemitism an ‘urgent issue' for all of British society, Penny Mordaunt warns
Dame Penny Mordaunt has said she was 'stunned into silence' as she undertook a government-backed review into antisemitism in British society. The former Conservative minister joined Lord John Mann, the government's antisemitism adviser, in chairing an independent commission on antisemitism on behalf of the Board of Deputies, Britain's largest Jewish community organisation. Writing in the Telegraph newspaper, the pair described themselves as 'hard-nosed politicians' who are 'used to dealing with the extremes of human emotions and catastrophe'. Despite "decades of these experiences", however, they said they were "still stunned into silence" by the evidence they had received as independent chairs of the Board of Deputies Commission on Antisemitism, "particularly from young people in the Jewish community". 'This is an urgent issue not just for the Jewish community but for the United Kingdom as a whole,' the pair added. 'We are all harmed if we tolerate the abuse of some of our fellow citizens by those who hold warped or extreme views.' Their warnings of growing antisemitic prejudices across British society, from the NHS to arts organisations and the police, comes as the report they authored is set to be published on Tuesday. Among its recommendations are that the NHS should hold a summit to tackle the 'specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism' within the health service. Lord Mann and former defence secretary Dame Penny set out 10 recommendations calling for educators, public services and trade unions to do more to tackle antisemitism, including "basic training on contemporary antisemitism" for every NHS trust. "From evidence that we heard, we can identify that there is a specific unaddressed issue of antisemitism within the NHS," they said. "We recommend that a summit should be held with NHS leaders across the UK to begin to address this." They noted an 'identifiable lack of consistency and capacity in antisemitism training' and recommended the creation of a specific antisemitism training qualification, adding that such training should be included within equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in organisations and institutions. Government doesn't know how many migrants could be returned under France deal Baseline US tariffs on most UK goods 'here to stay', Lord Mandelson says Efforts to teach primary school teachers how to avoid passing on antisemitism and anti-Jewish tropes in their lessons should be rolled out in faith schools across the UK, the commission said. It added that professional organisations and trade unions should ensure that all Jewish members are treated equally and with respect, while there must be a consistent approach taken by police when dealing with antisemitic crimes. The commission said it had seen evidence of 'hidden barriers being put in front of Jewish involvement within the arts' and said there must always be a 'robust response for those who choose to discriminate and government at every level should ensure this'. Lord Mann said: 'It is unacceptable that the Jewish community has faced an onslaught of antisemitism since October 7th. 'Whilst this is not new, the commission heard shocking experiences that we will not ignore. Antisemitism is racism and it must be treated as such. We hope these recommendations will provide additional guidance and action for civil society.' Dame Penny said: 'No person should face abuse or discrimination whilst going about their business, whether it is pursuing the career of their choice or accessing public services. 'We wanted to suggest some very practical things that can be dealt with swiftly and will dramatically improve people's experiences.' Board of Deputies president Phil Rosenberg said: 'Overall, the challenge in civil society can be summarised as one of a failure to apply the protections rightly afforded to different vulnerable groups equally to Jewish people in the same positions. 'Many sectors promote strong Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) processes, which are very important, but too often, these protections seem to exclude Jews.' He said the board will insist that 'Jews must count' and will use the recommendations of the commission's report 'to ensure that they do'. An NHS spokesperson said: 'It is completely unacceptable for anyone to experience racism, discrimination or prejudice in the health service, whether staff or patient, and the NHS takes any instance of antisemitism or discrimination extremely seriously. 'The NHS provides care and treatment for everyone regardless of race, faith, or background and all NHS healthcare providers should have policies in place to address issues like this in the workplace.'
Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
WHO recommends Gilead's twice-yearly injection for HIV prevention
July 14 (Reuters) - The World Health Organization on Monday recommended Gilead's (GILD.O), opens new tab lenacapavir, a twice-yearly injection, as a tool to prevent HIV infection. The recommendation, issued at the International AIDS Conference in Kigali, Rwanda, comes nearly a month after the U.S. health regulator approved the drug, giving patients new hope of interrupting virus transmission. The twice-yearly injectable offers a long-acting alternative to daily oral pills and other shorter-acting options, reshaping the response to the disease especially among those who face challenges with daily adherence, stigma, or access to health care "While an HIV vaccine remains elusive, lenacapavir is the next best thing," said Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. The WHO's recommendations come at a critical moment as HIV prevention efforts stagnate with 1.3 million new HIV infections occurring in 2024 as funding challenges, stigma around the disease persist. These infections disproportionately impact populations such as sex workers, men who have sex with men, transgender people, people who inject drugs, people in prisons, and children and adolescents. WHO has also recommended a public health approach to HIV testing using HIV rapid tests that would remove a major access barrier by eliminating complex and costly procedures. Lenacapavir, part of a class of drugs known as capsid inhibitors, proved nearly 100% effective at preventing HIV in large trials last year.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
'Doctors must think before downing stethoscopes - strike would be self harm'
Sympathising with striking workers is in my DNA, so I hope that England's hospital doctors think again before downing their stethoscopes. This is because Wes Streeting has already won the battle for the public's hearts and minds. With recent average pay rises totalling 28.9 per cent – the Health Secretary authorising 22.3 per cent over two years to settle a dispute inherited from the Tories, then this year's inflation-beating 5.4 per cent – have transformed the mood. We could all agree these hard-working, skilled and stressed life-savers are worth even more. But with the NHS finally getting back on its feet, waiting lists falling from Conservative record highs, patients wouldn't be voicing solidarity on picket lines should five days of walkouts start on July 25. Public support for the doctors has collapsed ahead of talks between Streeting and their British Medical Association trade union. New polling finding previously strong approval for industrial action by what are now called resident doctors halving from 52 per cent a year ago to just 26 per cent . As surveyor Ipsos's senior director Gideon Skinner opined, these would be the first doctors' strikes for some years without broad-based support from the public, with Labour voters among them. Pats on the back don't pay bills and muscle is key in disputes, but while participating medics voted overwhelmingly to strike in 2025 (90 per cent) as they did in 2023 (98 per cent), ballot turnout dropping to 55 per cent from 77 per cent signalled some queasiness on the wards. Perhaps their BMA resident doctors' committee co-chair Dr Ross Nieuwoudt was carried away when he suggested 'people are excited to go again', later clarifying docs were 'energised' to strike. How much their living standards are down since 2008 is disputed, the BMA claiming a painful 29 per cent while the Nuffield Trust puts it at a smaller 5 per cent. Still, whichever financial calculation is accepted, doctors have a case as do millions of other workers punished by what the TUC – which the BMA is not affiliated to – billed as the Tory worst wages squeeze since the Napoleonic era. The health and political calculations the BMA must also consider are whether squandering bedside trust and the respect are prices these doctors are prepared to pay in a dispute they could lose industrially as well as publicly. Streeting's up for the fight. Are they? The best outcome for patients would be no strikes followed by an agreed independent review to improve earnings long-term. Wages, jobs and lives are in the balance.
