Farm groups voice concerns over UK agriculture budget
The call comes ahead of UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' statement at lunchtime today (Wednesday, June 11), which will outline all departmental finances from 2027-2030, including the agriculture budget.
On the eve of the spending review, a CLA poll of nearly 500 farmers found that the majority would abandon nature-friendly practices and revert to intensive methods if government funding is cut.
The main findings of the poll of 460 members included:
88% say they will have to revert to intensive farming if funding is pulled for Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) and Countryside Stewardship (CS) schemes;
95% say they will reduce the amount of land managed for the environment;
98% say that Labour does not understand or respect rural communities;
99% don't trust Labour to make decisions that benefit their business;
76% say they are not in a position to fully fund the land management actions in their SFI/CS agreements by themselves.
The CLA and groups including the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), National Trust, Soil Association, and the Nature Friendly Farming Network have also sent a joint letter to farming minister Daniel Zeichner outlining the impact a reduced budget will have on nature.
The letter outlines how the organisations are 'deeply concerned about the rumoured cuts to the agricultural budget in the upcoming spending review'.
It warns that any reduction in the budget will be 'catastrophic' to the government's aims.
'Many of the environmental features present in the countryside and enjoyed by the public will be under threat and will disappear. This would be a poor legacy for this government,' the letter states.
Agriculture budget
CLA president Victoria Vyvyan said that 'if funding for sustainable farming schemes is cut, government won't just abandon nature – it will abandon its word'.
'The Sustainable Farming Incentive is working – for farmers, for nature, for the public, and for the Treasury.
'It's bringing back wildlife, cleaning up rivers, and restoring the health of our soil.
'Take that funding away, and farmers will be pushed back to intensive methods – forced to undo years of progress. Nature will suffer as well as farmers, and on the environment, it will go against everything government claims to agree with,' she added.
James Cameron, a farmer based in East Kennett, Wiltshire, explained that since entering these schemes, his farm has become 'a haven for nature'.
'What was once arable land, is now species-rich grassland. Red-listed birds, butterflies and bees have all returned in full force. What we've been able to build is magical.
'But now, all of that could vanish. Our entire financial model depends on this scheme. If funding is cut, it will be disastrous.
'We can't afford to fund all this work ourselves, and the private sector simply isn't there yet. We may have no choice but to re-adopt intensive farming practices just to stay afloat.
'Farming is already an uncertain enough business. We need a government that brings stability, not one that plays policy roulette and makes it impossible to operate at every turn,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Hundreds more MoD data breaches revealed as security questions raised in wake of Afghan breach
The latest MoD data shows there were 569 incidents in 2023-24 – up from 550 the previous year – which included electronic devices being lost and protected documents not being disposed of properly. In one incident last year, the details of 272,000 staff – including names and bank details – were breached when one of its systems, run by an external contractor, was hacked by a 'malign actor'. In another case, the MoD was fined £350,000 (€404,000) by the Information Commissioner for a breach related to the handling of emails linked to the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) – the scheme to bring Afghans with links to British forces to safety in UK. Kevan Jones, the chairman of the powerful Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), has demanded that the MoD give an explanation as to why high-security information is being held on low-security systems. It follows the revelation this week of a catastrophic data breach, which exposed 100,000 Afghans to potential reprisals from the Taliban, costing the UK taxpayer billions and prompting a three-year cover-up through the use of an unprecedented super-injunction. Further concerns emerged on Thursday after it was revealed that UK spies and special forces soldiers were also potentially exposed by the incident. Already, members of the ISC, which has a statutory duty to hold government agencies to account, are furious that the MoD ignored a request by a judge to share the details of the original Afghan data breach with the committee. But now the Labour peer who chairs the committee has raised questions over whether the MoD's systems to handle sensitive data are good enough. Mr Jones said: 'There seems to have been a number of breaches. It raises questions not just about the systems but how they are used. "The big unanswered question on the Afghanistan data leak is why such secret information was being held on a low-side system and not a secure encrypted system.' ADVERTISEMENT The ISC has demanded documents relating to the Afghan breach and could launch its own inquiry into the scandal. But the issue is also set to be raised in the inquiry that the Commons defence select committee will hold after the summer recess. Tan Dhesi, the Labour defence select committee chair, said: 'This is going to end up being one of the most costly email blunders in history. . 'Rigorous safeguards must be in place to ensure that this cannot happen again. " It's shameful that courageous Afghans who served alongside British soldiers have had their safety jeopardised by this leak. 'The revelation that this breach has also put our brave British service personnel at risk makes the situation even more shocking.
The Journal
2 days ago
- The Journal
'An attempt to rinse hard-pressed families': TDs slam new 'exit through gift shop' rule at zoo
TWO DUBLIN TDS have added their voices to criticism of Dublin Zoo over the change to the attraction's exit route which means customers are now advised to leave via the gift shop. Parents contacted The Journal earlier this week to express their anger over the rule, arguing that the change has led to unnecessary pressure to purchase items from the shop. One parent we spoke to said it was the 'last thing' families need after hours of walking around the zoo. The change leaves parents of small kids having to deal with potential demands and tantrums, the zoo customer said – 'whereas previously we could have simply left via the main gates and walked back to the car park without passing the shop at all'. In the wake of the publication of our original article , customer services staff at the zoo confirmed to parents who complained that some changes were being brought in and that from now on any visitor who asked to leave via the old route (through turnstyles at the main gate) would be permitted to do so. However, visitors need to ask a staff member to be told that that's an option. Photos taken at the zoo yesterday afternoon showed signage placed around the turnstyles with 'NO ENTRY' displayed in large lettering and a direction to 'please exit Dublin Zoo via our Gift Shop'. A spokesperson for the zoo did not respond to a question on whether management would consider bringing in clear signage to make customers aware of the alternative to the gift shop exit. Dublin South Central TD for the Social Democrats Jen Cummins said going to the zoo is already expensive enough without additional pressure to spend money being placed on parents and guardians. The gate price for entry for two adults and two children is currently €72.50 – with discounts available for advance booking. Cummins, who has four children, said: 'From a parent's perspective, trying to corral a child to get out of the zoo is a feat in itself. But now having to go through the gift shop, it's a real Americanisation – I think we can move away from that here, we don't need to do that.' 'I thought it was working very well before. I mean, lots of people are going to the shop anyway, it's not like everyone was avoiding it. Parental choice is really important in these situations, and perhaps people would be thinking about not going to the zoo if there is going to be an added cost on top of the entry fee.' As for the zoo's position that parents should request an alternative exit, Cummins said: Advertisement 'The idea of what they are saying of 'if you give us a nod, we will let you out the other way' [...] are you really going to be the one parent who says 'I'll go out that way' while your child is hysterical?' Social Democrats education spokesperson Jen Cummins TD Fingal East TD for Labour Duncan Smith called on the zoo to go back to the old system, arguing that the new exit route feels like an attempt to 'rinse' people before they leave. 'I am urging Dublin Zoo to revert to the previous system of entrance and exit from the zoo. As a regular visitor to the zoo with my family, I am fully aware of the costs associated with a visit to what is a great Dublin amenity. 'Many families have to make a budgetary decision in order to visit in the first place. There is a safe and senisble exit adjacent to the gift shop and it should be left to visitors' discretion as to whether they visit the gift shop. 'This feels like an attempt to rinse hard-pressed families before they leave.' Labour TD Duncan Smith. Leah Farrell / Leah Farrell / / Other parents who contacted The Journal this week said they would not be going to the zoo while the new arrangement remained in place. Some also raised concerns about the burden being placed on parents of children with additional needs in particular. The Zoological Society of Ireland, which runs Dublin Zoo and Fota Wildlife Park in Cork, had an income of €25.1 million in 2023 and its annual report for that year noted a surplus of €131,000. Figures for 2024 are not yet publicly available. The zoo is a not-for-profit organisation. In its initial statement earlier this week the zoo confirmed the change to the exit route had been brought in, adding: 'Dublin Zoo remains committed to providing a positive experience for all guests and we value all feedback as part of our ongoing efforts to enhance the visitor experience.' In response to follow-up queries, including one about how visitors would be told about the alternative exit option (via the turnstyles), a spokesperson said yesterday: 'If a parent or guardian deems the exit unsuitable or inaccessible for themselves, their family, or guests, Dublin Zoo can make arrangements to facilitate departure through an alternative gate.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Keir Starmer holds ‘constructive' call with Taoiseach on Troubles legacy plans
Keir Starmer stressed the importance of 'consensus' in handling the legacy of the Troubles as he spoke to his Irish counterpart on Friday. In a phone call with Taoiseach Micheál Martin, the British prime minister had what Downing Street described as a 'constructive discussion' on dealing with the legacy of the 30-year conflict in Northern Ireland. A Number 10 spokesperson said the two men had 'underscored the importance of a way forward that built consensus', before turning to economic issues and the UK-EU relationship. Mr Martin himself echoed Downing Street's comments, tweeting that he had had a 'constructive discussion with British PM Keir Starmer today on a framework for dealing with legacy'. The call came as Mr Starmer faces pressure from some of his own backbenchers over plans to repeal and replace legislation passed by the previous government that halted investigations into all but the most serious allegations involving Troubles-related cases. Downing Street and the Taoiseach described the conversation as 'constructive' (Peter Byrne/PA) The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act has been criticised by human rights campaigners for granting conditional immunity to suspects. That provision was ruled incompatible with human rights laws by the Northern Irish courts, prompting Labour to commit to replacing legislation it described as 'flawed and failed'. But that proposal has brought condemnation from former British soldiers who fear it will open the way to vexatious prosecutions and civil claims. Opponents are also reported to include some Labour MPs, including veterans minister Al Carns. A former Royal Marine and special forces officer, Mr Carns was reported by The Times to be considering resigning over plans to repeal the Legacy Act. But earlier in the week, Downing Street said the Government was 'working in lockstep' on the issue. A Ministry of Defence source also played down the prospect of Mr Carns quitting, but told the PA news agency it was a 'tricky issue' and 'when you are making policy there is always going to be debate internally'.
