
Schools in literacy crisis, advocacy group warns
Schools have told advocacy group Lifting Literacy Aotearoa they are struggling with record numbers of students with poor literacy.
They say teens are wagging classes and schools are blowing their budgets on extra lessons because they are unable to cope with tough new NCEA reading and writing tests.
A snapshot of school experiences gathered by Lifting Literacy showed some students were so far behind in their learning their teachers did not know what to do with them.
Lifting Literacy said the situation was a crisis and the government needed to develop a five-year plan to help schools help teens learn to read and write.
Principals and teachers from 29 secondary schools responded to an informal Lifting Literacy survey.
Their comments revealed the introduction of high-stakes NCEA literacy and numeracy tests called "corequisites" had coincided with the worst-prepared cohort of teenagers some schools had ever seen - thanks to Covid.
"It's an enormous issue. We have an increasing number of students who are very limited in both reading and writing," wrote one respondent.
"Each year students who come to us at Year 9 are showing increasingly low literacy levels and increasingly high learning needs. The impact is huge," said another.
The respondents said teachers were struggling to teach classes that ranged from the barely literate to high-achievers and schools were "scrounging" for funding.
"Most high school teachers do not have qualifications to address this," said one respondent.
"Pressure has fallen on high schools with little or no support," said another.
"We are now operating in planned deficit budgets to fund the high level of need and high stakes for students due to NCEA changes," said one principal.
Several respondents said their schools bankrolled literacy catch-up classes and training from the Kahui Ako scheme that gave some teachers release time for specialist work with other teachers in their school or across groups of schools.
An English teacher from a large, low-decile school who RNZ agreed not to name, said that arrangement allowed her to work with four classes of Year 9 students who could not read.
She said the school would have to cover the cost itself next year because the government axed the scheme in its May Budget.
Despite the relatively high numbers of struggling Year 9s, the teacher said her school's current Year 11s had entered the school with the lowest level of education of any Year 9 cohort before or since.
"They're the ones that are really struggling with the corequisites because they're expected to pass but as they're failing their identity of their ability is dwindling," she said.
The teacher said teaching teenagers to read was often "quite a quick fix", with most requiring only three or four "structured literacy" lessons to learn how to decode words by learning which sounds went with each letter.
"Teaching kids how to read and read longer words, which seems to be the biggest problem, that's quite a quick fix," she said.
"Teaching younger kids takes a longer time, teaching these older kids, even kids who really struggle and some of them who are dyslexic, once they're shown a certain way some of them are off within three or four lessons, they're gone," she said.
"Some might take a lot longer, but the majority of them in high school there's nothing wrong with them other than they haven't been taught that A-U is an "or" sound or O-U-G-H can have 6-7 different sounds, or how to split up longer words," she said.
She said the government could achieve great results if it funded similar programmes across the country.
Another teacher who worked with others across a major city said secondary schools had been left in the lurch.
She said teachers were having to figure out themselves how to help their students.
"We have a cluster of people who are all working in the literacy space and we're working together and sharing our ideas and sharing with each other because we've got no support from the ministry and no guidance," she said.
Janice Langford provided structured literacy training for primary schools, but recently started working with secondary teachers because of the need.
She said English teachers were being asked to do the work of specialist literacy teachers and they were not trained for it.
Lifting Literacy Aoteroa chair Jennie Watts said in five or 10 years, improvements the government was making in primary schools would flow through to secondary.
But in the meantime, students were not getting a fair deal.
"There's an urgent gap. We can't let those kids, the kids who are struggling right now and the ones who are about to hit secondary school, we can't just let them fall through the cracks.
She said secondary schools needed a five-year strategy including training and funding to improve teens' literacy.
It should introduce a new optional literacy subject separate to English, and remove the co-requisite numeracy and literacy requirement for NCEA.
Watts said the government should also provide funding for literacy lead teachers, targeted intervention for the students who needed them, and resources aimed at teenagers.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
14 hours ago
- Scoop
Parents Cautiously Optimistic About Waving Goodbye To NCEA
A Dunedin mum is hopeful the changes to NCEA will benefit her Year 7 son, but another says she's a "bit scared". The government has pulled the pin on New Zealand's official secondary-school qualification after more than 20 years. The National Certificate of Educational Achievement will be gone by 2030, replaced by a basic literacy and numeracy award at Year 11, and the Certificate of Education and Advanced Certificate of Education at Years 12 and 13. 'Achieved', 'not achieved', 'merit' and 'excellence' will be replaced by marks out of 100 and letter grades A, B, C, D and E. The new certificates would be standards-based, like the NCEA is, meaning every student passes if they demonstrate the required knowledge or skills, but they would have to study at least five complete subjects and pass four of them to get their certificate. A Dunedin mum, who RNZ has agreed not to name to protect the identity of her child, was optimistic about the move. "It will be an advantage to him because it gives that nice, stringent 'I know what I need to head for, I need to study really hard for this'." She called NCEA a "step backwards", saying the change was a return of a more structured way of learning and a focus on core subjects. "As an employer of people coming out of university, I can tell you it kind of sets them up a little bit for failure in real life," she said. "I find that the English levels, the maths levels and science levels coming out for students just isn't quite as good as some of the historical stuff that I've seen coming out of the older styles." Another mum, who has a son just starting university and a daughter in Year 9, said the NCEA system was confusing. "Even I couldn't understand this credit system and achieved system. I always thought 'what is this? Credits? Credits?'. "But one thing I've noticed, if he knows he has got enough credits, then he decides he's not going to work any harder." The new grading system could push them to study harder or discourage them from learning, she said. "As a parent, I am a bit scared, to be honest." She was uncertain how students would respond to the changes, saying it would depend on how they were implemented. A grandmother who lived with her Year 8 grandson said she was on board with the changes if they helped students. "That's what I would be hoping for. Something that makes it easier for the kids to show that they've really, really tried and that they do want to be at school and they want to learn and that they want to get a job when they get away from school, and that they want a better life." But she was worried some students might choose to drop out if they had to pass four of their five subjects to get one of the new certificates. "That does sound a bit tough because if a child or a young adult can't handle exams - to pass four subjects may just be beyond their capability," she said.


NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
NCEA scrapped: Will new NZ Certificate of Education fix ‘tarnished' system?
Auckland Grammar headmaster Tim O'Connor was among supporters of the revamp, saying change was desperately needed. Many students had coasted under NCEA rather than striving for excellence, he said. That led to NCEA becoming 'tarnished' as the 'flexible anything qualification', with students looking for easy ways to gain credits and more than 250,000 instances of skipped exams last year. It was critical to rebrand NCEA to restore parent faith, O'Connor said. He urged everyone to give feedback on the proposed changes because – like NCEA before it – the radical shake-up could affect students for decades to come. The proposed changes The scheme proposes axing NCEA 1, giving students respite from high-pressure exams in Year 11. However, they would now be expected to focus on literacy and numeracy in a 'Foundational Skills Award' that aimed to provide the base skills to tackle their senior studies. Year 12 students would then seek to attain the NZCE and Year 13 students the NZ Advanced Certificate of Education. Students could still potentially take two essay-based assessments and one exam per course as with NCEA, but the Government argued that even essays would be graded in a more standardised way under its new plan. Common-sense grading, such as awarding As and marks out of 100, would not only make more sense to parents but also employers and universities at home and abroad, it said. The changes would kick in at Year 11 level in 2028, with the same set of students then moving into the NZCE and NZACE in 2029 and 2030 respectively. The Government's proposed implementation timeline for its education plans. Supplied / Ministry of Education 'When do you use calculus after school?' Mount Albert Grammar principal Patrick Drumm was another school leader hailing the changes as a 'huge step in the right direction'. Excessive flexibility in NCEA had meant even science subjects could be taught differently at different schools, he said. 'Doing chemistry at Mount Albert Grammar is not the same as doing chemistry in other parts of Auckland or New Zealand.' Working together to build more consistent lessons across all schools would help raise the bar across the country, Drumm said. For too long, students had on average been achieving far different results in different socio-economic areas, he believed. Improving simple things, such as grading, could be a step forward, he said. Under NCEA, an A stands for achieved, which is a lesser mark than the E for excellence. Drumm said overseas universities had called his school up because they were confused by the school reports students had submitted in their uni applications. They would ask: 'What are all these Es?' Drumm also praised the dropping of NCEA Level 1 as a 'no-brainer'. His school had already dropped out of NCEA Level 1 and created its own curriculum for its Year 11 students this year. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford have revealed NCEA's fate. Photo / Alex Cairns Papakura High School principal Simon Craggs earlier told the Herald that NCEA Level 1 had been poorly designed, and tested students on technical skills, like grammar syntax, that they would never need to remember or use later in life. Still, he had heard from some principals upset the NCEA Level 1 qualification was being dropped altogether. That's because it was the only qualification early school leavers had to show future employers, he said. Without it, these school leavers had no official school document to add to their resumes. Balancing university entrance with trade careers Craggs also had 'mixed feelings' about the wider changes. One of his biggest concerns was the seeming tilt towards favouring students wanting to enter university. Practical skills rather than advanced maths were typically more relevant to students pursuing vocational training and a career in jobs like the trades, he said. 'I don't know about you, but when do you use calculus after school? Why do you need to learn that if that's not the pathway you're interested in pursuing?' Craggs also believed vocational training needed flexibility. He gave an example of a school located near a unique local industry. Some students might want to get jobs with that local employer and so would be interested in gaining credits for 'learning about health and safety' more than maths, he said. Drumm and O'Connor agreed striking a balance in an education system that aimed to help all students – from those seeking entrance into Ivy League US universities to those wanting to be plumbers – was a tough and complex task. The proposed new record of achievement. Supplied / Ministry of Education Drumm suggested vocational training could be carved out into a different but equally valued education pathway. He said you only had to look at the utes and work cars parked in front of Coromandel holiday homes to realise how financially successful trade careers could be. Vaughan Couillault, principal of Papatoetoe High School and a member of the principals' advisory group working with the Government on the reforms, said there might be less flexibility under the new vocational training system. However, he said it aimed to provide more rigorous and standardised lessons by bringing in industry bodies to create the curriculum and ensure it included skills employers wanted. The changes aimed to have 'calculus' and 'tradie' skills equally valued and marked within the school system, he said. Education Minister Erica Stanford received multiple briefings on the current set-up. Photo / Alyse Wright Is the consultation period just a tick box exercise? Looming over the debate are concerns about the process itself, with Craggs questioning the shortness of the six-week consultation period. He hoped the consultation was genuine 'and not just a tick box exercise' with decisions already made. He didn't want change to be made merely as a statement for political gain. 'Education has become a real political football. 'It is really wearying on the profession, to be honest, to be constantly going backwards and forwards.' Education researcher Michael Johnston, from the NZ Initiative, who advised the Government, praised the reforms. He claimed they equally aimed to raise academic standards and use 'industry-designed vocational pathways' to give equal weight to trade and other career paths. Papatoetoe High School's Couillault urged everyone to work together as ultimately there may be bigger challenges waiting outside the curriculum itself. He claimed a digital divide was already threatening to create different classes of students as emerging tech and artificial intelligence gave some students better resources than others. Using the upcoming consultation period wisely to give feedback was crucial, he said. 'I want to live in a New Zealand where our qualification is... respected nationally and overseas, and gets our kids where they want to go.'

RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
NCEA changes: Some aspects like 'a step backwards in time'
The National Certificate of Educational Achievement will be gone by 2030. File photo. Photo: 123rf The government's plans to replace the NCEA system are on a tight timeline and will require a lot of support, say teachers. After more than 20 years as New Zealand's official secondary-school qualification, the government has pulled the pin on the NCEA . The National Certificate of Educational Achievement will be gone by 2030, replaced by a basic literacy and numeracy award at Year 11, and the Certificate of Education and Advanced Certificate of Education at Years 11 and 12. 'Achieved', 'not achieved', 'merit' and 'excellence' will be replaced by marks out of 100 and letter grades A, B, C, D and E. The new certificates would be standards-based, like the NCEA is, meaning every student passes if they demonstrate the required knowledge or skills, but they would have to study at least five complete subjects and pass four of them to get their certificate. This year's Year 8s would be the first cohort through the new system, starting with the foundation award in 2028, which might look a lot like the current NCEA literacy and numeracy tests. Teachers in a secondary school staffroom told RNZ they were still getting to grips with the announcement - and while some could see potential in the proposed changes, others were more cautious. "My big concern is around the kids that currently school doesn't really work for them," said one teacher who feared NCEA's flexibility would be lost. "The students are the ones that get harmed when people are just choosing to try things out," said another. Several teachers worried the new system would rely to heavily on end-of-year exams. "I don't think it's an improvement. High-stakes assessment is incredibly stressful for a number of people. The well-being of students has to be considered," said one teacher. Every teacher RNZ spoke to warned the timeline for introducing a new curriculum next year followed by the new qualification from 2028 through to 2030 was incredibly tight and would require a lot of support. Several said their curriculums had still not been written and the ministry was asking teachers to work on the new documents for free. Another pointed out that the government was asking teachers to do a lot of extra work at the same time as it was making low offers in pay talks. "Teachers got a one percent pay offer from this government and then there's four to five years of new and extra work, incredible amount of work, and those two don't marry up," she said. Papakura High School principal Simon Craggs said some aspects of the proposed changes 'such as marks out of 100 and stopping students from choosing standards from many different subjects - looked like "a step backwards in time". Craggs said he was pleased to see the government was looking at a new foundation qualification at Year 11 because the current system of online tests in reading, writing and maths was not working for many students from poor communities. He said it was critical the government listened to schools that served Māori and Pacific communities, because by 2050 they would account for half the population. "If we design a qualification that excludes them from success in our society, then we're going to have a real problem on our hands," he said. "NCEA for all its flaws, it has created a lot more opportunities for people from poorer communities to access qualifications they wouldn't have had access to before." Wellington Girls College principal Julia Davidson said NCEA needed an overhaul and the proposed changes had potential. However, she said whatever came next had to be flexible and provide choices for teenagers, especially those who struggled with exams. "That's the bit that worries me. What happens to your kids who are neuro-diverse, what happens to your kids who have got anxiety issues, what happens to kids who fall apart on the day. There has to be more flexibility," she said. "I have some concerns about the marking-by-number thing. What's the difference between 54 and 58, what does it really tell you?" Davidson said the workload for teachers of introducing a new curriculum and a new qualification system would be significant. "I've had my first teacher tell me that probably they'll leave.. wondering whether this is what they want to do," she said. Consultation on the proposed qualification changes closes on 1 September. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.