Changing opinions on the assisted dying bill
Had you asked my opinion of assisted dying eight, five or three years ago, I might have responded very differently. My views then would have been shaped by pain, the mental toll of illness, the isolation it brings and the deep sense of guilt over the burden I felt I placed on those close to me, and over the NHS resources I consume.
Medical opinions often differ, and I've witnessed how care can shift depending on how a patient presents – mood, appearance and speech all have an effect on our treatment. In an unequal society, how can we ensure that a decision as final as assisted dying is truly free from undue influence or even prejudice?
The risk is that the bill could unintentionally set us on a path where choosing to die becomes seen as a selfless or responsible act, disproportionately affecting the poorest and most vulnerable in our society, and safeguards will be eroded as society becomes 'trained' to see assisted dying as just another life option. Current societal norms of compassion for the weakest and the poorest in society will become eroded as assisted dying replaces improved funding for compassionate and comprehensive palliative care.David GibbonCardiff
The Royal College of Psychiatrists' position risks underestimating both the safeguards in the assisted dying bill and the capacity of terminally ill people to make autonomous, informed decisions about their lives (Royal College of Psychiatrists says it cannot yet support assisted dying bill, 14 May). Kim Leadbeater's bill applies only to mentally competent adults with a terminal diagnosis and a prognosis of six months or less. It includes clear protections to ensure that choices are freely made and not influenced by untreated mental illness. Suggesting that psychiatrists are unable to assess this not only undermines our expertise but risks denying dying individuals the right to make decisions about their own bodies in their final days.
Autonomy in healthcare is a fundamental principle. Every day, patients make complex, life-altering choices about surgery, treatment refusal, even palliative sedation. That the same liberty should be withheld at the end of life is not only inconsistent but deeply unjust.
With more than 25 years' experience of supporting families in their most challenging and vulnerable moments, I know that compassion and clinical rigour can and must coexist. Other countries have shown that it is possible to create safe, ethical systems of care for terminally ill patients who may be considering assisted dying. In this country, only those with the means to travel to Dignitas can exercise this choice. We have, in effect, a two-tier system: access to assisted dying is available, but only to the wealthy. That is not a safeguard, it is an elitist injustice.Dr Sabina DosaniChild and adolescent psychiatrist; visiting researcher and ambassador for medical and health humanities, University of East Anglia
We should not be surprised that MPs are changing their minds on the assisted dying bill (At least five more MPs decide to vote against England and Wales assisted dying bill, 14 May). In the House of Commons, assisted dying may present as a 'for or against' voting issue, but the reality of decision-making is far less straightforward. Besides aye and nay, other valid positions can easily be overlooked – for example, 'yes if', 'no unless', 'not yet', 'don't know'.
Dividing lines run through the cabinet, parliament, the medical profession, the charitable sector, communities and families. They also run through individuals, not least those who are or may become terminally ill. The lines move as circumstances change; people change their minds – often.
The legislative process has catalysed debate around assisted dying. Regrettably, the debate has been unduly affected by the process, especially since a private member's bill is being considered. More time for wider deliberation and discussion, without the pressure of parliamentary timetables, would have been welcome. Given the subject, any legislation would always be controversial – some would say rightly so – but legislation should follow a broader, more deliberate national discussion. Here, the horse appears to have found itself behind the cart.
Full disclosure: I am living with an incurable illness. Before and since diagnosis, I have been firmly against assisted dying, in principle and in practice. If media coverage is anything to go by, stark realities surrounding end-of-life issues seem to be overshadowed by exchanges of sincerely held but stridently expressed views. It feels as if people are in danger of losing out to process; we must do better.Name and address supplied
Thank you for Lucy Webster's measured piece on assisted dying (The assisted dying lobby isn't being honest with you – disabled people are at risk from this bill, 14 May). As a person with complex health problems, including multiple sclerosis and brain haemorrhage, I believe that the passing of this bill will be the very thin edge of a terrifying wedge.
With disabled people's rights under attack by successive governments, who is to say that in 10 or 20 years' time, the supposedly 'economically inactive' will not be encouraged to cease being a burden on their families and society. I am not economically inactive – I receive personal independence payment, and I spend it; I enjoy my life immensely, despite its limitations. I never, ever thought that a Labour government would decide to consign people unable to work to the scrapheap or, potentially, open the door to an even worse outcome.Harriet ConnidesEast Finchley, London
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Scientists create temporary tattoo that detects if your drink has been spiked
Scientists have created a temporary tattoo that can detect if a drink has been spiked with just a couple drops. The sticker, which is applied to the skin, can detect the presence of the drug Y-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) even in low concentrations within one second. Commonly used to spike drinks, the central nervous system depressant drug Rohypnol, known as roofies or GHB, has been liked with sexual assault. It causes drowsiness, slows down your breathing and reduces heart rate. These drugs are colourless, tasteless and induce a stupor in victims that is similar to severe alcohol intoxication – leaving people vulnerable to sexual assault. The prevalence of spiking is high with 11 per cent of UK adults report being spiked at any point in their lives, according to Drinkaware. It added that 9 per cent of men and 13 per cent of women have reported their drink being spiked. There are ways people can protect themselves from drink spiking, with specialised strips and cards that change colour when exposed to these drugs. But many of these drug testing kits are conspicuous or take minutes to report a result. In the study published in the journal ACS Sensors, researchers in South Korea set out to develop a rapid-acting test for GHB that's worn on the skin using a tattoo-like sticker. Gyeong-Ji Kim, Jai Eun An, Kyong-Cheol Ko, Oh Seok Kwon and colleagues created the stickers by placing a mould over the top of a thin plastic film decorated with tattoo-like designs. They poured a gel mixture into the mould which contained a chemical receptor that turns red when it detects GHB. The back of the sticker was then coated with a diluted glue solution, so it could stick to skin. Researchers tested the sticker's ability to detect small amounts of GHB in a variety of beverages: whiskey, vodka, beer, soju (a Korean alcoholic beverage) and coffee. The drug was detected within one second of coming into contact with the contaminated drinks. It even changed colour when it detected levels of the drug lower than what would induce serious physiological symptoms – 0.01 micrograms of GHB in 1 millilitre of beverage. The sticker is designed to be able to discreetly dip a finger into a drink, touch the drop to the sticker and see the result almost immediately. A positive result displays for up to 30 days after detection, which could be important if it's needed as a form of evidence of tampering. The researchers say that their sticker technology is inexpensive and easy to manufacture, and it could be commercially available soon.
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Jesy Nelson warns of key symptoms of rare pregnancy complications in first interview after twins' birth
Jesy Nelson has detailed the symptoms of the rare pregnancy complications she experienced before giving birth to her twins. The former Little Mix star and her partner Zion Foster welcomed Ocean Jade Nelson-Foster and Story Monroe Nelson-Foster in May at 31 weeks and five days. She underwent a procedure for pre-twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, or TTTS, a condition that results in an unbalanced blood flow from one twin to another. The rare condition is thought to impact between 10 and 15 per cent of identical twins who share a placenta, and can be fatal without intervention.
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Grandmother dies from sepsis after pet dog licked wound on her leg, inquest hears
A pensioner died from an infection caused when her granddaughter's affectionate dog licked a wound on her leg, an inquest has heard. June Baxter, 83, had used a personal alarm to summon help after a fall at her home last month. Her granddaughter, Caitlan Allin, rushed over with her pet, arriving shortly before paramedics turned up and dressed the wound. Mrs Baxter, a retired legal secretary, began to feel unwell the following day and was taken to hospital the following morning, where she died from septic shock a week later. Blood cultures showed she had pasteurella multocida in her system, an organism found in the mouth of dogs. Norfolk coroner Johanna Thompson recorded a conclusion of accidental death after Miss Allin said in a statement that she 'did not see her dog lick Mrs Baxter's injury' but accepted it was a 'possibility' as she enjoyed the pet's attention. The medical cause of death was given as 'septic shock due to left leg cellulitis due to a domestic dog lick'. A family member, who didn't want to be named, told the Mail the dog had belonged to Mrs Baxter for seven years before she became too frail to look after it and gave it to Miss Allin. They said: 'She was in palliative care for the last year of her life. She had about ten medical issues. 'She injured her leg. The dog didn't cause the injury or bite her or anything. 'We don't know if the dog had licked her leg a few days before [the fall] or anything.' However, research has shown that pasteurella multocida – which is the most common cause of infection in humans following bites or scratches from dogs and cats – cannot survive more than 24 hours in the open air at room temperature, suggesting the infection occurred on the day of the fall. The inquest, in Norwich, heard how Mrs Baxter, whose husband Ken died about five years ago after a long illness, fell while using a commode at her small detached bungalow on the outskirts of Attleborough on June 29. She pressed her community call bell, which alerted Miss Allin, who lives in the same market town and was her main carer. Miss Allin arrived with the dog at around 8.30am - just before paramedics entered and used tweezers to reposition the torn skin and dress the wound. Mrs Baxter started to feel sick on June 30 and was taken to Norfolk and Norwich Hospital the following day, where her condition deteriorated and she passed away on July 7. Secondary causes of death were given as kidney, liver and heart conditions. The widow's daughter, Clare Wootten, said in a statement to the inquest yesterday that her 'independent and determined' mother had survived sepsis previously. Clinicians at the hospital had explained to her that the 'infection was from the mouth of a dog' and she 'agreed with the cause of the death'. Mrs Baxter's family were not at the inquest but the coroner confirmed they had seen the evidence and were content for the hearing to take place in their absence. Neighbours in Mrs Baxter's quiet cul-de-sac told the Mail she had three dogs which were given to family members when she became too ill to look after them. One said: 'Her granddaughter came down with the dog most of the time. 'If it was the dog that licked her, it wasn't her granddaughter's fault. She had a fall and her granddaughter got called. Either way, it was an accident.' Ms Thompson concluded the inquest saying: 'Mrs Baxter was in frail health. On June 29, she was found to have injured her leg at home. 'On the following day, she reported feeling unwell. She was taken to Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital where she was diagnosed with an infection which was subsequently identified to be arising from a domestic dog lick.' Pasteurella multocida was found in cholera-infected birds in 1878 but was only isolated two years later by Louis Pasteur – the French microbiologist renowned for his work in pasteurisation and vaccination – and subsequently named after him.
