
Pupils with special needs ‘have to travel further to school for suitable place'
Budgets for home to school transport are under 'considerable pressure' as many special schools are full, which is forcing pupils to travel further, according to a Local Government Association (LGA) report.
Spending by councils on transporting children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) to schools is predicted to reach around £1.97 billion in 2025/26, up from around £1.73 billion in 2023/24 and approximately £645 million in 2015/16.
Children under eight are entitled to free home to school transport if the nearest suitable school is more than two miles away, or more than three miles for older children.
The average one-way trip to school for pupils with Send is nine miles, according to the research carried out by the Isos Partnership, but one county council reported an average distance of 22.8 miles.
Councils reported that a 'growing minority' of children and young people with Send are travelling very long distances to school – often due to a lack of suitable special school places closer to their home.
The report warned that continuing to fulfil the current statutory responsibilities for home to school transport is becoming 'increasingly financially unsustainable' for local authorities.
The findings have been published during the LGA's three-day annual conference in Liverpool this week.
Schools minister Catherine McKinnell is due to address council leaders on the Send system at the LGA's conference on Wednesday morning.
Department for Education (DfE) data last week showed that the number of education, health and care plans (EHCPs) – which set out the support a young person requires for their Send needs – has increased.
In total, there were 638,745 EHCPs in place in January, up 10.8% on the same point last year.
The LGA report said the rise in the number of children and young people who require education in a special setting has 'placed considerable pressure on home to school transport budgets as most special schools are full, forcing children to travel further distances to access a place that meets their needs'.
Councils have reported a 40% rise over the last five years in children and young people with Send (aged under 16) needing home to school transport, the research suggested.
Arooj Shah, who chairs the LGA's children and young people board, said: 'The rapidly rising need for home to school transport from children and young people in Send is yet another reminder of the huge pressures on the Send system.
'It is also wrong that children are increasingly having to travel long distances to get to school because of a lack of provision near to their home.
'This has to change.
'We urge the Government in its White Paper to deliver the comprehensive reforms the Send system needs, so that it is more inclusive and improves educational attainment for children.
'This should also include putting councils on a stable financial footing by writing off councils' high needs deficits, which are projected to reach £5 billion next year.'
A DfE spokeswoman said: 'This Government inherited a Send system left on its knees – which is why we are looking at changes to enable more children to thrive in mainstream settings and stop parents having to fight for help, while bringing about financial sustainability for councils.
'Through our plan for change, we're already making progress by investing £740 million to create more places for children with Send in mainstream schools, as well as increasing early access to speech, language and neurodiversity support to prevent needs from escalating.
'This will pave the way for significant, long-term reform – improving children's and parents' experiences and addressing the pressures councils are facing, including around home to school transport.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Hancock: Discharging patients into care homes was ‘least-worst' Covid decision
Matt Hancock has insisted that discharging patients from hospitals to care homes in the early stages of the pandemic was 'the least-worst decision' at the time. The former health secretary admitted that forming a protective ring around care homes was 'impossible' as he doubled down on the policy, which was among the most controversial decisions of the pandemic. The Covid Inquiry previously heard there were more than 43,000 deaths involving the virus in care homes across the UK between March 2020 and July 2022. Alasdair Donaldson, a senior civil servant, was quoted earlier this week describing the toll as a ' generational slaughter within care homes '. On Wednesday, Mr Hancock acknowledged the discharge policy was an ' incredibly contentious issue ' but told the inquiry that 'nobody has yet provided me with an alternative that was available at the time that would have saved more lives'. When the pandemic hit in early 2020, hospital patients were rapidly discharged into care homes in a bid to free up beds and prevent the NHS from becoming overwhelmed. However, there was no policy in place requiring patients to be tested beforehand, or for asymptomatic patients to isolate, until mid-April. This was despite growing awareness of the risks of people without Covid symptoms being able to spread the virus. NHS 'insisted' on policy Mr Hancock, who resigned from the government in 2021 after admitting to breaking social distancing guidance while having an affair with a colleague, has now appeared at the inquiry seven times. Returning for a full-day session to face questions specifically about the care sector, Mr Hancock said the hospital discharge policy had been 'driven' by the then NHS chief executive Sir Simon Stevens, now Lord Stevens. Mr Hancock said: 'It was formally a government decision. It was signed off by the prime minister. It was really driven by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of the NHS, but it was widely discussed.'


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kate Middleton reveals ‘life-changing' cancer journey has been a ‘rollercoaster'
The Princess of Wales openly discussed her 'life changing' cancer journey and 'rollercoaster' recovery on a visit to an Essex hospital. Speaking at Colchester Hospital, Kate Middleton revealed the toll cancer takes on family and friends. 'It is a life-changing experience both for the individual patient but also for the families as well and actually it sometimes goes unrecognised, you don't necessarily, particularly when it's the first time, you don't appreciate how much impact it is going to have,' the princess told a group of users, volunteers and staff at the Cancer Wellbeing Centre. The princess was diagnosed with an unknown form of cancer in March last year, in the same year as the King was also diagnosed with cancer. On her visit to the hospital, she praised the centre's 'holistic' approach to the support it offers patients, relatives and carers, which includes counselling and dietary advice. 'There is this whole phase when you finish your treatment that you, yourself, everybody expects you, right you've finished your time, go, you're better, and that's not the case at all,' she added. 'You have to find your new normal and that takes time.' After visiting the centre, the princess planted several coral-pink Catherine's Rose plants in the hospital's Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) wellbeing garden, which offers a restorative space for staff, patients and visitors.


The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The first 10 minutes: why breaking your morning routine can ruin your day
Name: The first 10 minutes. Duration: 10 minutes. Appearance: The surest sign that you're about to have a terrible day. Ten minutes doesn't seem very long. Apparently that's all it takes. A new study has concluded that 37% of us can work out whether we're going to have a good day or a bad day, based on what happens during the first 10 minutes after we wake up. Really? But isn't everyone too busy journalling, meditating and sipping room temperature lemon water? God, you're annoying sometimes. Still, you can't determine anything in 10 minutes. I disagree. This morning I slept through my alarm, realised too late that I'd run out of toilet roll and then pulled the handle off my kitchen drawer. On purpose? No, of course not, but it does explain why I'm having such a terrible day. How so? It takes us about 25 minutes to properly wake up, which is why we usually have a set sequence of events we like to follow. The disruption of that sequence – maybe forgetting to brush your teeth or make coffee or exercise – can have a knock-on effect that reverberates throughout the rest of the day. Wait, everyone has a routine? Almost everyone, yes. Yours might be pretty simple – go to the toilet, make a drink, do some stretching – but other people have slightly more elaborate ones. Such as? Well, Anna Wintour famously likes to have played an hour of tennis before her 6am blow-dry. Mark Wahlberg wakes up at 3.30am and then spends time praying. More recently, the influencer Ashton Hall shared that he wakes up at 3.52am and immediately starts plunging his face into various ice baths. Yes, me too. Oh really? Either way, these people use their routines to set the foundation of their day. I'm sure that if you sneaked into Ashton Hall's house and stole his ice baths, he'd have a terrible day. I'm not getting up that early. Fine then, do what Cindy Crawford does instead. Which is what? She likes to watch the sunrise from the hot tub of her Malibu mansion every morning. Relatable. Even so, an easily repeatable morning routine is the best way to ensure a good day. It helps to streamline it, too. If your first 10 minutes involve making a cup of coffee, you'll have a better day if you make sure that all your mugs are clean before you go to bed. If they involve going to the toilet, make sure you've got plenty of toilet paper, so you won't end up stuck there until someone kindly brings you some. Was that one just for you? No, let's pretend it happens to everyone. Do say: 'For a better life, start your day with a routine.' Don't say: 'Can that routine involve waking up, panicking for half an hour, then doomscrolling until you're running late for work?'