Unemployment rate rises to 5.6% in May, female joblessness higher at 5.8%
Earlier last month, the Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation released the first monthly Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) as part of efforts to monitor the proportion of unemployed people among those eligible for jobs in the country in real-time.
The latest data collected in the current weekly status (CWS) showed that the unemployment rate (UR) for persons of all ages during May 2025 rose to 5.6% from 5.1% in April 2025.
The pace of joblessness among females was higher at 5.8% compared to 5.6% in males at the country level in May 2025.
Joblessness among those in the age group of 15-29 increased to 15% in May from 13.8% in April 2025 across the country.
The rate of unemployment in urban areas rose to 17.9% in May from 17.2% in April, while it was 13.7% in the month under review up from 12.3% in the previous month in rural areas.
CWS refers to the activity status determined on the basis of a reference period of the last 7 days preceding the date of the survey.
In rural areas, employment shifted away from the primary sector (agriculture) (from 45.9% in April to 43.5% in May 2025) to the secondary and services sectors, it noted.
Reduction in agricultural activities with the end of Rabi harvest season for both males and females in the rural areas may have brought about the downward shift in number of workers, it stated.
In urban areas, changes were more marginal with slight declines in own account workers and casual labourers, affecting workforce numbers, it stated.
The study further showed that the unemployment rate (UR) among women in the age group of 15-29 also increased to 16.3% in May from 14.4% in April across the country (rural+urban).
The joblessness rate also increased to 24.7% in May from 23.7 in cities in April and to 13% in the month from 10.7% in villages in April.
Joblessness among men aged 15-29 years was recorded at 14.5% in May from 13.6% in the country.
It also increased to 15.8% in May from 15% in cities in April and rose to 14% from 13% in villages.
The data also showed that Labour Force Participation Rate (LFPR) among people aged 15 years and above dipped to 54.8% in May 55.6% during April 2025.
The participation rate in rural areas also came down to 56.9% in May from 58% in April and also declined to 50.4% in the month from 50.7% in urban areas.
LFPR among males aged 15 years and above also came down to 78.3% in May from 79% in April.
A decline in female LFPR, especially in rural areas (more than 1 percentage point) was due to fewer women working as casual labourers and unpaid helpers, it stated.
The decline in LFPR and WPR and the rise in UR were driven largely by seasonal agricultural patterns, higher summer temperature experienced in May in some parts of the country due to which physical outdoor work gets limited and movement of some unpaid helpers to domestic chores, especially in the higher income (top 3 decile) rural households, it explained.
Similarly in urban areas, it also dipped to 75.1% in May from 75.3% in April 2025.
Among females aged 15 years and above, the rate of labour force participation also declined to 36.9% in May from 38.2% for rural areas during April 2025.
The LFPR for women aged 15 years and above in urban areas declined to 25.3% in May from 25.7% in April this year.
LFPR refers to the percentage of persons in labour force (i.e. working or seeking or available for work) in the population.
Worker Population Ratio (WPR) defines the proportion of those who are employed among total population.
WPR in rural areas among those aged 15 years and above also dipped to 54.1% in May from 55.4% in April 2025, the data showed.
The ratio in urban areas was also lower at 46.9% in May from 47.4% in April.
The overall WPR at the national level was recorded at 51.7% in May lower than 52.8% in April 2025.
WPR among females aged 15 years and above in rural also declined to 35.2% in May from 36.8% in April this year and to 23% in the month from 23.5%.
The overall female WPR of the same age group at the country level also came down to 31.3% in May from 32.5% in April 2025.
Considering the need for high-frequency labour force indicators with enhanced coverage, the sampling methodology of PLFS has been revamped from January 2025.
Across the country, a total of 7,511 first-stage sampling units were surveyed during May 2025.
The number of households surveyed was 89,372 (49,267 in rural areas and 40,105 in urban areas) and a number of persons surveyed was 3,79,600 (2,16,542 in rural areas and 1,63,058 in urban areas).
The labour force survey has been released quarterly as well as annual basis so far.
The statistics ministry explained that changes are expected in the monthly PLFS ratios due to increased frequency and seasonal changes but do not necessarily reflect secular trends.
There would be attributable to a combination of seasonal, academic and labour market-related factors, it stated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
3 days ago
- NDTV
Only 8.25% Indian Graduates In Jobs Matching Their Qualifications: Report
A new report by the Institute for Competitiveness has revealed a stark disconnect between higher education and employment outcomes in India, showing that just 8.25% of Indian graduates are employed in roles that match their educational qualifications. Based on data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) and aligned with the National Classification of Occupations (NCO) framework, the report outlines how over half of Indian graduates are engaged in lower-skill roles-such as clerical work, machine operation, and sales-classified as Skill Level 2 occupations. Overqualification Widely Prevalent The findings show that even among workers with qualifications suitable for Skill Level 4 jobs (the highest classification), nearly 28.12% are stuck in lower-tier roles, suggesting widespread overqualification and underemployment. This trend of mismatch is further visible in Skill Level 3 occupations, where only 8.25% of appropriately qualified individuals are in roles that match their educational level. Underqualification Also A Challenge The report also flags underqualification as a problem. Roughly 8.56% of workers in Skill Level 2 jobs lack the necessary educational background, possibly due to informal training or on-the-job learning. This highlights the need to strengthen vocational and technical education (TVET), which currently lacks widespread accessibility and robust infrastructure. Regional Disparities Worsen the Problem States with dense youth populations such as Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, and West Bengal are especially vulnerable to the growing skills mismatch. These regions face risks of chronic underemployment, increased migration to urban centers, and a weakening local economy due to skill redundancy. In 2023-24, states like Bihar and Meghalaya still had over 60% of their workforce with only Skill Level 1 education-the lowest category-while states like Goa and Kerala reported significantly lower shares in this bracket. Education Access Still Uneven India has achieved near-universal enrolment at the primary level, but the transition to higher education remains inconsistent across states. For instance, while West Bengal and Kerala have shown impressive gains in female enrolment in higher education, Lakshadweep witnessed a dramatic decline of nearly 90% over the past decade. Alarmingly, only 2.17% of India's population has qualifications suitable for Skill Level 4 jobs. Even at the state level, disparities are stark: Chandigarh leads with 11.21%, whereas states like Bihar (0.45%) and Jharkhand (0.70%) lag significantly. Upskilling Holds Economic Promise According to the report, moving workers from intermediate to advanced skill levels could increase wages by up to 149%, offering a major boost to household incomes and national GDP. But this transformation demands greater investment in higher education-currently, India allocates only 3.06% of its budget to the sector. The estimated funding gap stands at Rs 88,000 crore.
The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
Are gig workers a part of India's labour data?
The 2025 Union Budget took several measures to formally 'recognise' gig and platform workers, and extended various social protection schemes to this growing workforce. Despite this recognition, the revised Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), 2025 does not include substantive changes to account for the diverse forms of gig and platform work. Gaps in labour classification Gig workers were first incorporated into the legal framework through the Code on Social Security, 2020. Under Chapter I, Section 2(35), a gig worker is defined as 'a person who participates in a work arrangement and earns from such activities outside of a traditional employer-employee relationship.' Platform work, as defined in the Code, is 'a work arrangement outside of a traditional employer-employee relationship in which organisations or individuals use an online platform to access other organisations or individuals to solve specific problems or to provide specific services or any such other activities which may be notified by the Central Government, in exchange for payment.' While this definition separates gig workers from both formal and informal categories, it doesn't clearly define who a gig worker is or the nature of gig work. According to NITI Aayog's 2022 report 'India's Booming Gig and Platform Economy,' the gig workforce is expected to reach 23.5 million by 2029-30. Despite such projections and efforts to define gig work, India's primary labour statistics source, the PLFS, continues to subsume gig work under vague categories such as 'self-employed', 'own-account workers', or 'casual labour'. This statistical invisibility has direct consequences. Clause 141 of the Code on Social Security, 2020, 'seeks to provide that the Central Government shall establish a Social Security Fund for social security and welfare of the unorganised workers, gig workers and platform workers.' Similarly, the National Social Security Board, constituted under Section 6 of the Code on Social Security, 2020, is tasked with framing and overseeing welfare schemes for gig and platform workers. Such welfare boards and policymakers rely on the PLFS for 'evidence-based policy,' but the absence of a distinct category for gig and platform workers undermines its very intent. When classification itself is unclear in primary datasets, access to schemes becomes uneven and exclusionary. How the PLFS falls short In response to a Rajya Sabha query on whether the government had updated PLFS methodology to capture the rise of gig work, the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation stated, 'No updation in the PLFS Schedule has been undertaken with the objective of specifically identifying persons engaged in the gig economy. However, all market activities i.e. activities performed for pay or profit which result in production of goods and services for exchange are included under the domain of economic activity considered in PLFS. The activity situation of a person who is found to be working or being engaged in economic activity during a specified reference period is associated with employment in PLFS. Hence, even the persons engaged in 'gig economy' for pay & profit are covered in PLFS.' Though gig work is technically included under economic activity, without a specific category or classification, the survey fails to offer visibility into the unique nature of digital labour, characterised by multiple job roles, dependence on algorithms, lack of formal contract and absence of safety metrics. In the survey, while the question on the type of job contract provides an option for 'no written job contract', it doesn't capture the hybrid nature of work. Unlike traditional self-employment, gig work is shaped by platform algorithms, performed across multiple apps and are mostly task-based rather than time-bound. Workers have no stable contracts, and often rely on digital reach. Many lack access to benefits or protections available to formal workers, and don't fully own their work processes, making the 'self-employed' label misleading. Employment uncertainties, income volatility and algorithm governance remain invisible within PLFS classification. A food delivery person working across platforms like Swiggy, Zomato, for instance, will be flattened into a category that does not reflect entirely on their employment conditions or social security needs. Recognition without representation Recent policy efforts like the e-Shram registration, the issuance of digital ID cards, and health coverage under the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana indicate the state's recognition of the gig and platform workforce. But unless statistical systems like the PLFS evolve, the data meant to support and monitor these interventions cannot be considered inclusive. The 2025 PLFS revision introduced some important updates: a larger sample size, monthly estimates, and better rural representation. However, it still does not address the issues of how gig work is defined and understood. For inclusive policy making, India must update PLFS classification codes or introduce survey modules that distinctly capture gig work. Durga Narayan is a policy researcher affiliated with the Indian Institute for Human Settlements (IIHS) and the Observer Research Foundation (ORF), Mumbai.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
Employment push: New job scheme must be supported by structural reforms
The widespread skill mismatch and the low penetration of technical and vocational education have further compounded the problem Business Standard Editorial Comment Mumbai Listen to This Article The Union Cabinet on Tuesday approved the employment-linked incentive (ELI) scheme, first announced in the 2024-25 Union Budget. The scheme reflects an acknowledgement that India's economic growth must translate into gainful job opportunities. According to the latest monthly bulletin of the Periodic Labour Force Survey, the female labour force participation rate was 33.2 per cent, far below the global average, while the youth unemployment rate (aged 15-29) was 15 per cent, compared with the overall unemployment rate of 5.6 per cent. Besides, most people are engaged in the informal sector, which is low-paying. The ELI scheme, aimed at improving formal
