Former leading Tory Sir Jake Berry joins Nigel Farage's Reform UK
Speaking to the Sun newspaper, the new Reform member added: 'Old Westminster politics has failed.
'Millions of people, just like me, want a country they can be proud of again. The only way we get that is with Reform in government.'
Britain needs Reform!https://t.co/kNq74pTAeb
— Sir Jake Berry (@JakeBerry) July 9, 2025
Sir Jake is the second former Cabinet minister in a week to join Reform, after ex-Welsh secretary David Jones announced he enrolled as a member.
Other ex-Tories who have joined Reform include Marco Longhi, Anne Marie Morris, Ross Thomson, Aiden Burley and Dame Andrea Jenkyns, now the mayor of Greater Lincolnshire.
The former MP for Rossendale and Darwen lost his seat in the 2024 general election to Labour's Andy MacNae, who had a majority of 6,000 over Sir Jake.
Mr MacNae won with 18,246 votes to Sir Jake's 12,619.
Reform's candidate Daniel Matchett followed in a close third with 9,695 votes.
Since his loss, Sir Jake has worked in broadcasting, hosting a show on Talk TV.
Before serving in Ms Truss's government, he was a minister during both Boris Johnson and Theresa May's premierships, with responsibilities focused on the Northern Powerhouse and levelling up.
In a video published alongside the Sun's reporting, Sir Jake spoke of his time in government.
After claiming that 'Britain is broken', he added: 'I know who broke it because I was there.
'For 30 years I supported the Conservative Party, for 14 years I was one of their MPs, sitting at that Cabinet table twice.
'I want to tell you today my friends that I have come to a decision. The old parties do not have what it takes to transform our country, to build a Britain we can believe in again, and that's why I've decided to join the Reform Party.'
Sir Jake, who opposed Brexit ahead of the 2016 referendum, commended his new party leader Mr Farage for having 'always stuck by his principles, even when it was unpopular'.
Mr Farage 'doesn't change his views, when the political weather changes', Sir Jake said, adding: 'Because you know you can trust him, I can trust him too and that's why I'm going to spend every day campaigning to ensure that Nigel Farage and Reform form the next government of this great United Kingdom.'
A Labour Party spokesperson, said: 'Not content with taking advice from Liz Truss, Nigel Farage has now tempted her Tory party chairman into his ranks.
'It's clear Farage wants Liz Truss's reckless economics, which crashed our economy and sent mortgages spiralling, to be Reform's blueprint for Britain. It's a recipe for disaster and working people would be left paying the price.
'Only our Labour Government is putting more money in people's pockets, boosting British jobs, and delivering the renewal our country needs through our Plan for Change.'
A Conservative Party spokesman said: 'Reform support increasing the benefits bill by removing the two-child cap, and nationalising British industry.
'By contrast the Conservatives, under new leadership, will keep making the case for sound money, lower taxes and bringing the welfare bill under control. We wish Jake well in his new high-spend, high-tax party.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why becoming a republic would be financially stupid
Leave aside what you think of the social merits of the Royal Family and look at the economics. £130 million is a lot of money, about half a CalMac ferry in fact. That money would be better spent on the health service etc etc say the detractors. Read More: The reality is that if we didn't have a Royal Family then in purely financial terms we should invent one. Looked as a business the Royal Family is a market leading and highly profitable British product, with large export earnings and no effective competition. The Royal Family doesn't cost us a penny; it is hugely profitable for Britain and contributes to our national income many times more than it costs. Take non-doms as another example. People from elsewhere who live in this country but pay less tax than British people do. Seems unfair so let's nail them for more tax. Exactly what Rachel Reeves has done but now it is dawning on her that driving these people away by taxing more of their earnings and assets means we collect less tax rather than more. Why would an Indian Citizen who bases themselves in Britain and pays full tax on their British income and assets stay here if we want to charge Inheritance Tax on their global assets when India and lots of other places don't have Inheritance Tax? The answer is that they would be crazy to stay and, in many cases reluctantly, they are leaving. So less tax revenue for us here. Well done Rachel. (Image: PA) What Governments have got to focus on is increasing the amount of tax we actually get not pandering to people's prejudices by turning the screw on people they are envious of. Becoming a republic would be tragic in many ways but it would also be financially stupid. The non-dom tax regime needs to be looked at again. We want people from other countries who can contribute very positively to our economy to base themselves here, we want more of them not fewer. Governments need to realise that people who have very significant wealth tend to have interests in many countries. Basing themselves in Britain is a choice they make rather than something they can be compelled to do. Rachel Reeves needs to realise this and act sensibly. So what about Scotland? What can we do here other than continue to demand more money and more powers which we then misuse? Scotland has control over its own income tax rates and so far, other than virtue signalling tweaking at the bottom end to give lower paid workers a few extra pence a month, it has chosen to increase income tax rates so that somebody earning from about £45,000 upwards pays markedly more tax than they would elsewhere in the UK. Nigel Farage has come up with an idea for the UK to charge non-doms a one-off £250,000 fee and then distribute this money directly to lower earners. Gimmicky it is but entirely daft it isn't. Scotland could learn from it. Only about 30,000 taxpayers in Scotland pay the top rate of tax which starts at income of roughly £125,000. The exact number is not available but the number of Scots earning over £500,000 will be vanishingly small, perhaps only 1,000 people, certainly less than 5,000. What if we could attract a net additional 10,000 very high earners by putting a cap of £250,000 on the amount of Scottish income tax anybody resident in Scotland has to pay? To pay that amount of tax you would have to earn just over £500,000. If we could do this we would raise the tax collected in Scotland by £2.5 billion pounds every year. Nobody already here would pay more, nobody loses out, it's pure good news. Read More: This boost is before the positive knock-on effect of those extra taxpayers spending money on goods and services in Scotland which in turn creates more jobs and tax revenue to pay for public services. The rest of the UK cannot follow us down this road because it has too much to lose because there are so many more very high earners already there. You could argue that the £250,000 cap on tax payment is too high. A taxpayer paying £100,000 in tax is contributing more than 20 times as much as an average earner. "But it's not progressive" the socialists will wail. Indeed it is not. It's just smart. Our public services in Scotland are crumbling and our tax rates are stifling enterprise and driving people away. If we could attract very high earners to make their homes in Scotland - 10,000 seems a relatively modest target - we could transform our ability to fund public services as well as attract people who will help our nation's economy grow. Why not give it a try? Guy Stenhouse is a notable figure in the Scottish financial sector. He has held various positions, including being the Managing Director of Noble Grossart, an independent merchant bank based in Edinburgh, until 2017
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 'relieved' over French state visit despite King's 'snub'
King Charles delivered a powerful message to his son Prince William at the state banquet on Tuesday, marking the end of the final day of the French state visit to the UK. King Charles delivered a poignant message to his son Prince William during the state banquet on Tuesday, which marked the conclusion of the French state visit to the UK. The lavish banquet, graced by the presence of French President Emmanuel Macron, his wife Brigitte, the Prince and Princess of Wales, along with hundreds of other distinguished guests, took place at Windsor Castle. Here, the King gave an emotive speech reflecting on the Royal family's ties with France. In his heartfelt address, King Charles expressed his affection for his eldest son, Prince William, commending his choice to set up his family residence in Windsor, highlighting the significance of the location due to its Norman roots. "The castle in which we meet this evening was begun by my ancestor - and your sometime countryman - William, Duke of Normandy, in the year 1070," Charles remarked. "It remains the oldest and largest occupied castle in the world. "So it is perhaps rather appropriate that my son, the Prince of Wales, who shares that earlier William's name, has made Windsor his home with his family, like so many of our predecessors," the King continued, reports the Mirror. Observers were quick to note that the King's speech did not reference his younger son, Prince Harry, who stepped back from Royal duties in 2020 alongside his wife Meghan Markle and moved permanently to California. While some interpreted the omission of Prince Harry from King Charles's speech as a pointed 'snub', Royal commentator Jennie Bond has offered a different perspective. The ex-BBC Royal correspondent believes the King's address was nothing out of the ordinary. Speaking to The Mirror, Jennie Bond remarked: "I don't think it is significant at all that there was no mention of Harry. It would have been very odd indeed for the King to have mentioned him during a State occasion which was all about Anglo French relations." Bond further explained: "His reference to William was simply because of his name, the castle and its association with the Duke of Normandy. In no way was this any kind of snub." On whether the Sussexes might feel slighted by their exclusion from the King's speech and the French state visit, Jennie commented: "I don't imagine Harry or Meghan will have paid much attention to the Macron visit." She added: "If they did, they would probably feel relieved that they don't have to get dressed up and perform what is a very delicate and probably quite stressful diplomatic duty." The relationship between Prince Harry and King Charles has been notably tense over recent years, which could explain why the monarch chose not to mention the Duke of Sussex in his formal remarks. Prince Harry has expressed to the BBC his desire for "love a reconciliation" with his father, although he has suggested that King Charles is unwilling to engage in conversation with him. "There's no point continuing to fight anymore, life is precious," Harry remarked, further noting that he has "forgiven" them for their numerous "disagreements."
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Tories enjoy Ascot Ladies Day freebies on eve of historic assisted dying vote
Kemi Badenoch's shadow ministers Stuart Andrew, Greg Smith and Louie French were off to the races last month – on the same day Parliament sat miles away in Westminster Kemi Badenoch's Tory shadow ministers were off to the races enjoying Royal Ascot freebies – on the eve of an historic assisted dying vote. Stuart Andrew bagged two tickets with hospitality worth £550 to attend Ladies Day last month. Fellow shadow ministers Greg Smith and Louie French also went despite the daytime event falling when Parliament was sitting. Voters might have expected them to be hard at work in Westminster where debates took place on June 19 — and with MPs backing assisted dying the next day. But smartly-dressed Andrew was pictured glass in hand, enjoying the Ascot jolly. The Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport's partner who posted the image on social media even boasted about it being "the hottest day of the year". It comes after PM Keir Starmer and Labour ministers found themselves under fire last year over taking freebies. Dozens of miles away from Ascot, the Commons had a busy schedule on June 19, meeting at 9.30am and not adjourning until 5.17pm. The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Steve Reed, the Solicitor-General, Lucy Rigby, and the Leader of the House, Lucy Powell, faced statements on UK infrastructure and warm home discount expansion also took place. Later, there was a motion to approve licensing hours for the Women's Euros, as well as debates on incontinence and water safety education. It is not known whether the Tory shadow ministers attended Parliament at all that day but with Ascot's gates opening at 10.30am and races starting at 2.30pm it would have given them little time at their desks. The trio voted against the assisted dying bill the following day. Andrew's tickets with hospitality came courtesy of Ascot Racecourse Ltd, the MPs' register of financial interests shows. His partner, Robin Rogers, deputy chairman for politics at Daventry Conservative Association, posted pictures of the couple on Instagram. He wrote: 'What do you do on the hottest day of the year? [sun emojis] It's obvious isn't it? Get trussed up like a turkey and head for Ascot!!!' With a series of horse and drinks emojis, he added: 'Not complaining today it's the Royal enclosure all the way!!' Shadow Sports Minister Louie French got two tickets 'and lunch with representatives of Ascot and British Horseracing' worth £590 on June 19, thanks to Ascot Racecourse. Tory Shadow Business Minister Greg Smith joined the fun, accepting two tickets worth £590 from Ascot Racecourse Ltd so he and a family member could go on the same day. In an earlier comment piece about assisted dying, Smith argued "we can all agree that the process for introducing such a consequential piece of legislation needs to be rigorous and thorough". And Tory MP and ex-minister Sir John Whittingdale – who also voted against the assisted dying bill – bagged hospitality and two tickets worth £3,600 to attend Ascot on June 19 too, courtesy of the Betting & Gaming Council. Andrew, French, Smith and Sir John were contacted for comment. A Conservative Party Spokesperson said: 'Racing is a valued part of the British economy, supporting 85,000 jobs and generating £4 billion a year. The industry is now under threat from Labour Government red tape and taxes."
