&w=3840&q=100)
Israel confirms killing Hamas co-founder Muhammad Issa Al-Issa in Gaza City strike
The IDF confirmed the killing of Hamas's co-founder, Hakham Muhammad Issa Al-Issa, in an Israeli strike over the Gaza City on Friday. Al-Issa was touted as one of the masterminds of the Oct 7 attacks. read more
The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) and Israel Securities Authority (ISA) confirmed on Friday that Hamas 's co-founder, Hakham Muhammad Issa Al-Issa, was killed in an Israeli strike in Gaza City. In a statement on the matter, the IDF said that Al-Issa was hit in the area of Sabra within the city.
'Hakham Muhammad Issa Al-Issa was a key source of knowledge and one of the last remaining senior Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip who held high-ranking positions before October 7th, 2023,' the IDF said. In its statement, the Israeli military described Al-Issa as a senior figure in the militant group's military wing.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
He was considered the founder of both Hamas itself and Hamas' military wing. IDF noted that at the time of his death, Issa was serving as the head of its combat support. Apart from this, he was also a member of Hamas' General Security Council. IDF noted that in the past, Al-Issa 'played a significant role in the planning and execution of the brutal October 7th massacre ,' but neglected to share what role he played.
Hopes for a ceasefire look bleak
Israel has essentially managed to eliminate the top brass of Hamas in its months-long war in Gaza. The war started days after Hamas conducted a surprise attack on October 7 in southern Israel, killing 1,200 people. Apart from this, the Palestinian militant group also took over 200 people as hostages , some of whom are still under its captivity.
In retaliation, Israel declared war on Hamas and has killed more than 56,000 people and has left thousands more wounded in Gaza as of now. The coastal enclave is also facing a shortage of crucial resources like food, water and medical supplies.
While both sides agreed to a brief ceasefire in two instances, hopes for the end of the war started fading. In light of this, on Friday, US President Donald Trump indicated that a ceasefire might come into play within the next week . However, it was not clear whether it would be a temporary or permanent ceasefire, or if any prisoner exchanges would be involved, like in past temporary ceasefire agreements.
The IDF noted that during the war between Israel and Hamas, Al-Issa worked to rebuild Hamas' organisational systems that were damaged in Israeli strikes. The IDF also mentioned that Al-Issa had advanced attacks against Israeli citizens and IDF troops in Gaza. The Israeli military went on to vow to 'locate and eliminate all terrorists from the different terrorist organisations who took part in the brutal October 7th massacre.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
39 minutes ago
- First Post
Iran's nuclear programme wasn't 'obliterated' or 'set back decades', as Trump said
Contrary to Donald Trump's assertions, Iran's nuclear infrastructure was damaged and not destroyed and experts and leaked intelligence assessments indicate the programme could be revived within months read more A satellite image shows airstrike craters over the underground centrifuge halls of the Natanz Enrichment Facility, following US airstrikes amid the Iran-Israel conflict, in Natanz County, Iran. Maxar Technologies/Reuters Despite US President Donald Trump's repeated assertions that Iran's nuclear programme has been 'obliterated' and 'set back decades,' early intelligence assessments suggest otherwise. A preliminary analysis from the US Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), reported in American media, indicated that American and Israeli airstrikes on June 21 only delayed Iran's nuclear activities by a matter of months, not decades, and certainly not eliminated them. The DIA's report, though classified, was cited by multiple sources familiar with internal assessments. These officials suggested that the damage, while significant, did not dismantle the core industrial and technological infrastructure that underpins Iran's nuclear ambitions. The White House has pushed back hard against this narrative, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt calling the idea that 'unnamed Iranian officials' could know the extent of the damage 'nonsense,' asserting instead that 'their nuclear weapons program is over.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD IAEA director: Damage 'severe but not total' Echoing the cautious tone of US intelligence, Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS News that while the strikes had caused severe damage, the destruction was not total. He emphasised that Iran still retained the ability to resume uranium enrichment within a matter of months, noting that the necessary capacities remained in place. He explained that Iran could operate a few cascades of centrifuges to produce enriched uranium, or even less than that. Grossi also warned against assuming that Iran's nuclear program had been eliminated. He said that, frankly, one could not claim that everything had disappeared and that nothing remained. He stressed that Iran's knowledge base and industrial capabilities were still intact, making it possible for enrichment activities to resume once operational challenges were overcome. Intercepted Iranian communications suggest limited damage The Washington Post reported that intercepted communications between senior Iranian officials seemed to show a consensus that the attacks were less devastating than initially feared. The newspaper cited four individuals with knowledge of the intercepted messages, suggesting that Iranian leadership had assessed the damage to their facilities as relatively contained. However, the credibility of these communications remains a subject of debate within intelligence circles. Another source, quoted by Reuters, confirmed their existence but labelled them 'unreliable indicators' of the real state of Iran's nuclear programme. A disputed narrative from the Trump administration Trump has remained unwavering in his version of events. In an interview with Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, he described the operation as a 'spectacular military success,' claiming the nuclear programme was 'obliterated like nobody's ever seen before'. His defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, echoed this, insisting the strikes marked the 'end to their nuclear ambitions'. Yet, during a Pentagon press briefing, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine struck a more measured tone. Caine admitted that the full battle damage assessment was still ongoing and said it was 'too early' to determine exactly what capabilities Iran retained. He did, however, note that initial assessments showed 'extremely severe damage and destruction' at the targeted sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Enrichment capacity could rebound quickly Despite the high-impact nature of the strikes, experts, including Grossi believed that Iran could resume uranium enrichment relatively quickly. He said if Iran wished to do so, it would be able to start the process again. He said that Iran was a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology, and that its ability to restart centrifuge operations was based on years of accumulated knowledge that could not simply be undone. Grossi also highlighted the absence of IAEA inspectors on the ground as a critical blind spot. Since the strikes, Iran has denied inspectors access to the targeted facilities, citing security and political concerns. Tehran's UN ambassador, Amir Saeid Iravani, insisted inspectors were 'in Iran' but said they could not access specific sites. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khamenei and mixed Iranian messaging The response from Iran's leadership has been uneven. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei reportedly dismissed the airstrikes as ineffective, saying they achieved 'nothing significant'. Yet Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi acknowledged that the damage was 'excessive and serious'. This inconsistency has fuelled speculation that Iran may be deliberately downplaying the impact while preserving the appearance of resilience. Iran's military leadership, meanwhile, has expressed scepticism over Israel's commitment to the recently declared ceasefire. Armed forces chief Abdolrahim Mousavi said Tehran was prepared to respond 'with all our power' if provoked again. Diplomatic options still on the table Despite the heightened tensions, Grossi reiterated the importance of a diplomatic resolution. He said that the situation, following the military strikes, would ultimately require a long-lasting solution, which could only be a diplomatic one. He also noted that although Iran had consistently asserted its nuclear program was intended for peaceful purposes, the IAEA had been unable to verify those claims because Iran had refused to answer very important questions. Military action, limited impact While the Trump administration has celebrated the June 21 strikes as a decisive blow against Iran's nuclear programme, a growing body of evidence from intelligence assessments and international experts suggests a far more modest result. The damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure was 'severe' but by no means 'total,' and the core capabilities — technological, industrial, and intellectual — remain intact. Iran could, according to the IAEA, begin spinning centrifuges again within months. As Grossi warned, military strikes alone are unlikely to end Iran's nuclear ambitions. With inspectors still barred and the region on edge, the enduring solution appears to lie not in airpower but in diplomacy.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘I love you Trump': Palestinians cheer as US-backed aid reaches Gaza
The joy of receiving much-needed aid from the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was immediately visible as it reached Gaza, with Palestinians in the region chanting, 'I love you Trump' and 'I love you Donald.' UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres had however last week slammed the US-backed GHF and termed its operation in Gaza as "inherently unsafe". (X/@Osint613) White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt re-shared a video posted by the X handle of Open Source Intelligence, showing scenes of chanting and cheering in Gaza. The arrival of the US-backed aid followed months of delay, during which the United Nations repeatedly warned of a looming risk of famine in the Palestinian region. VIDEO: Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump urged Israel to make a deal with Hamas in Gaza. In a post on Truth Social on Sunday, he said, 'MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that the ceasefire in Iran has opened "many opportunities", including the possibility of bringing back the remaining hostages from Gaza. While he said that the issue in Gaza needs to be resolved, Netanyahu affirmed his priority of rescuing the hostages. During a visit to a security facility in Israel's Shin Bet domestic intelligence service on Sunday, Netanyahu said, "I want to inform you that as you probably know, many opportunities have opened up now following this victory, many opportunities." "First of all, to rescue the hostages. Of course we will also have to solve the Gaza issue, to defeat Hamas, but I estimate that we will achieve both tasks," he added. ALSO READ | After Israel-Iran ceasefire, mediators try to grab 'opportunity' for a Gaza truce Around 50 Israeli hostages, who were abducted by Hamas during the October 7, 2023, offensive, continue to remain in Gaza. An official said, "The families of the hostages welcome the fact that after 20 months, the return of the hostages has finally been designated as the top priority by the prime minister." Trump on Saturday had said that Netanyahu was "right now" negotiating a deal with Hamas, though neither leader provided any details about it. UN slams US-backed GHF Last week, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres slammed the US-backed GHF and termed its operation in Gaza as "inherently unsafe", saying that "it is killing people". While Israel and the US want the United Nations to work through the controversial foundation, the UN has refused to do so and questioned the neutrality of the aid organisation. The UN has also accused GHF's distribution model of militarising aid and forcing displacement. "Any operation that channels desperate civilians into militarised zones is inherently unsafe. It is killing people," Guterres told reporters. He further said that the UN-led humanitarian efforts are being "strangled", adding that the aid workers themselves are starving. "People are being killed simply trying to feed themselves and their families. The search for food must never be a death sentence,' Guterres added. "It is time to find the political courage for a ceasefire in Gaza," he said.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
"Don't Think We Should Have Billionaires": Zohran Mamdani
Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani said Sunday that billionaires shouldn't exist, stepping up his rhetoric in a network television interview against the wealthiest and most powerful New Yorkers. "I don't think that we should have billionaires," Mamdani said on NBC's Meet the Press. "Because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality, and ultimately what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country." Mamdani, who's increasingly drawing national attention after a crushing victory in last week's New York primary, stood by his critique of income inequality in the global financial capital. He defended his denunciations of Israeli policy, a traditional campaign topic in the city, including the war in Gaza. He declined to condemn the phrase "globalise the intifada," which is offensive to many Jewish people. President Donald Trump on Sunday raised the possibility of withholding federal funding for the city if New Yorkers elect Mamdani in November. "He's going to have to do the right thing, or they're not getting any money," Trump said on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures. He called the 33-year-old state assemblyman a "communist." House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, a New York Democrat who represents part of Brooklyn, said he doesn't know Mamdani well but that "globalizing the intifada" is "not an acceptable phrase." "I think our nominee is going to have to convince folks that he is prepared to aggressively address the rise in antisemitism in the city of New York, which has been an unacceptable development," Jeffries said on ABC's This Week. Many of Mamdani's positions - which include free buses, rent freezes and higher taxes for the rich and corporations - have unsettled business leaders and mainstream Democrats. He stood his ground on NBC, saying he wants to "work with everyone, including billionaires" to build a fairer city and pledging to "make clear that there's no room for antisemitism in this city." He said business leaders have told him that the city's high cost of living is preventing them from attracting and retaining talent, while politicians "have pretended to simply be bystanders to a cost of living crisis." Mamdani took on Trump, rejecting the communist label - "I call myself a democratic socialist" - and described the president's name-calling an attempt to distract. "I have already had to start to get used to the fact that the president will talk about how I look, how I sound, where I'm from, who I am, ultimately," he said.
