'We wish we'd never asked for help': Family's hurt as thousands with learning disabilities locked up
Everyday for an hour he's allowed to leave the hospital in Hull, where he's locked away, and ride around the nearby park with his dad, who struggles to keep up.
It's the highlight of each day for him.
Josh is 21 and has severe learning disabilities and autism.
For the past four years he's been locked away in secure units. Josh's needs became more complex when he was 17.
Desperate for help, his parents, Garry and Sara, turned to social services.
He was admitted to an inpatient unit and his parents were told it would just be for three months while he was assessed. But he never came home.
"It's the biggest regret of our lives," Garry and Sara said.
"We wish we'd never asked for help.
"He was taken from us and locked up." Josh was detained under the Mental Health Act and moved to a different hospital 100 miles from their home.
According to his parents, he suffered physical and mental abuse at the hospital which was eventually closed down. "He's gone through absolute hell," Sara said.
"I don't think anybody will ever realise unless they've actually seen it.
"For one person to go through that much trauma in his life; it's so sad."
When ITV News first met Josh nearly two years ago, he was at a hospital closer to home.
Staff declared he was ready to be discharged but there was no adequate community care in place and Josh became trapped in the system.
His parents told ITV News that Josh had deteriorated significantly since.
He had been repeatedly physically restrained and injected with drugs to sedate him."Sometimes I'd go in and he was laid in his own urine because he just couldn't be bothered to get up," his mother Sara told ITV News.
"I've had to hold him while changing his sheets because he couldn't stand up.
"He was slurring his words, it was absolutely heartbreaking.
"No mother wants to walk out, leaving her child like that but you have no choice."
His father, Garry, said doctors at the facility had told him that Josh was "over medicated" most of the time."In the first meeting that we had, we were told that it was well over the limits of roughly around 80 per cent over drugged, over medicated," he said. Josh has continued to be in long term segregation and spent almost two months isolated in a room with nothing but a toilet in the corner.
Any communication was through a small hatch in the door.
That's where he spent his 21st birthday, with his parents forced to pass presents through that hatch.
Last year, Josh's parents were told he would be moved to a forensic unit which houses people involved with the criminal justice system. "I was just ready to give up," Sara said.
"I was so close to just having a breakdown and saying, 'I don't feel like I can be a mum right now' because I was just in such a bad place but then who would fight for Josh?" Garry and Sara were told it was the only option.
But it wasn't. Melissa, an occupational therapist and specialist practitioner from HOPES, arrived.
HOPES is a NHS programme which has been running for three years to support people like Josh come out of long term segregation.
Staff are trained to work intensely with the patient and family.
The model focuses on compassion and dignity and avoids using any kind of restraint, except as a last resort for a short amount of time. Exclusive analysis by Mencap for ITV News has revealed people with learning disabilities and autism locked up in mental health units are disproportionally restrained.
They make up about 16 per cent of patients in mental health units, but receive more than a third of the total restraints used. Melissa worked intensively with Josh helping him to come off his medication. "I remember when Josh first came to the hospital and, obviously, he was on so many drugs they had to wean him off slowly and he did have some ups and downs while coming off them and it resulted in Josh needed to go in seclusion," Sara said.
"Melissa sat on the floor with him at the other side of the hatch and she was holding his hand and Josh said to her, 'why can't I come out?'" About 70 per cent of people who have been supported by HOPES have come out of long term segregation.
But funding for the HOPES programme was only ever allocated for three years.
Now, it's up to local trusts to decide if they can afford the programme and the services of practioners like Melissa . Funding for Melissa to continue working with Josh stopped a few weeks ago. Josh's parents say he's struggling without her help. "It's cruel," Sara said.
"For Josh, she was here and then gone.
"She was amazing and helped him so much; we're terrified he'll regress and never come out."
Former Care Minister Norman Lamb, who chaired the HOPES project, told ITV News priority needed to be given to people like Josh. "It is an enduring scandal to continue with the practice of long term segregation," he said.
"It's a truly inhuman treatment and it's usually because of a lack of understanding.
"The NHS has a moral obligation to maintain this programme; it's clearly working." Josh's case is not rare.
Hundreds of others like him are trapped in hospital, detained under the Mental Health Act and unable to leave because there is nowhere for them to go.
ITV News has been investigating the continuing scandal of people with learning difficulties being locked away in segregated hospital units. Currently, more than 200,000 people with learning disabilities and autism are detained in inpatient units in England.
NHS figures show 40 per cent of those people do not need to be there.
Since 2011 successive governments have pledged to reduce the numbers of people with learning disabilities and autism in hospital by 50 per cent.
That target has never been met.
Exclusive analysis by Mencap for ITV News revealed it would take eight years to achieve.
In April, the government introduced a new, much lower target – a 10 per cent in year reduction by March 2026. Garry and Sara have a very clear message for the Health Secretary Wes Streeting.
"I would ask him why they're locking away people who have got learning disabilities?"
"Would they lock a five year old child away? Because that's what Josh is mentally.
"If it was his family, if it was their child, would they be happy with him being locked up?" ITV News put that question to the Health Secretary.
Wes Streeting MP admitted the treatment for people like Josh was unwarranted and cruel.
"In our ten year plan, the emphasis shifts from hospital to community," he said.
"So those adults who are hospitalised for no reason, care could be provided within the safety and dignity of their homes.
"I want that for everyone, particularly this group in society who have poor health outcomes.
"I take the challenge from the family on the chin. If this was my mum, dad, brother would I tolerate it? No.
"I'm here as Health Secretary to be a voice and a champion for patients and care users, so when parents put those challenges to me I'll able to take those challenges on."
Mr Streeting insisted the Mental Health Act Bill would stop people with learning disabilities and autism being inappropriately detained.
But Dan Scorer, Mencap's Head of Policy, said it was not so simple. "The Government has said clearly that this change in the law will only get 'switched on' when there is sufficient community support in place," Mr Scorer said.
"However, there is no plan for making sure sufficient community support will be in place any time soon.
"This is a serious flaw. There is a serious risk that the key law change for people with a learning disability and or autistic people will never be activated." Garry and Sara said Josh was excited about a future outside of hospital."He wants a job, he wants to work with bikes, he wants to go to college to learn to read and write," Sara said.
"He wants a life that's not locked away in a hospital.
"Surely he deserves that?"
Josh asks his parents daily when he can come out but they can't give him an answer.
Until there is proper community support in place Josh continues to be locked up."It's easy to lock people like Josh away and just forget about them rather than get them out there," Sara said.
"It's an easy life to lock them away, drug them, keep that one quiet.
"It's only when they've got someone who will actually speak up for them and say, no, this isn't right.
"Obviously, we are there for Josh all the time, so we know what's going on.
"But not every patient in them hospitals has someone to look out for them. So then people that are just stuck there and being drugged and nobody's seen it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
NHS Fife says staff have faced violent threats as it defends tribunal actions
NHS Fife has said police had to be called after staff faced threats of 'physical harm and sexual violence', as the health board sought to defend its actions around an employment tribunal. The update from NHS Fife also revealed that legal costs have increased by £38,000 in just one month. The health board released a statement midway through the employment tribunal involving nurse Sandie Peggie, who was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton at Victoria Hospital on Christmas Eve 2023. NHS Fife said it was 'having to defend' itself and wanted to answer questions posed by the press and politicians, addressing 'misinformation' online. It urged for respect for 'the privacy of all those giving evidence', following 'significant and very polarised debate' on social media. The statement said: 'In some cases, however, what began as debate has evolved into much more worrying behaviour, including a threat of physical harm and sexual violence, which has required the involvement of Police Scotland.' It added that staff should be able to work 'without being subjected to unacceptable personal attacks and trolling on social media', and criticised Sex Matters, the charity which is funding Ms Peggie's legal team, for allegedly 'steering public opinion'. It said: 'The claimant's case is being supported by Sex Matters, whose chief executive officer and co-founder was called as a witness by the claimant in the earlier hearing. 'The claimant's barrister is also chair of Sex Matters. 'Other members of the organisation's 'advisory group' have provided commentary to the media on a number of occasions where no reference is made to their direct involvement.' The health board insisted that its actions in investigating Ms Peggie 'were not punitive', and reiterated that an investigation was launched due to allegations concerning patient care, which were not upheld following a disciplinary hearing on June 25. The health board said: 'While the claimant raised concerns about a trans woman's use of a locker room, this was not the reason that NHS Fife's internal investigation was initiated. 'As made clear during tribunal proceedings, the disciplinary process was initiated due to concerns raised about interactions with a colleague and patient care.' It said that the 18-month investigation was 'not of itself punitive' and said that the probe was believed to be 'fair and impartial'. The health board said that as of June 30, legal costs had increased to £258,831.31, an increase of almost £40,000 from May 31, when costs were£220,465.93, with the majority covered by Central Legal Office (CLO) and National Services Scotland (NSS) who administer the CNORIS Indemnity scheme. It said: 'NHS Fife is liable for the first £25,000 of costs associated with defending the case.' The statement said: 'The Health Board appreciates that there are deeply entrenched views on both sides of the debate around single-sex spaces and has never sought to stifle fair and reasoned debate on the topic, asking only that any media coverage is respectful, fair, balanced, accurate, and distinguishes fact from opinion.' It added: 'NHS Fife acknowledges the Supreme Court's ruling and other developments in this area. ' Work is under way across the entirety of the health board's estate (including toilets, changing and locker rooms) to identify areas where any adaptions may be required and schedule any work that may be necessary to improve facilities.' Maya Forstater, chief executive of Sex Matters, said: 'This is an extraordinary intervention from NHS Fife, even by the board's standards. 'NHS Fife has dug itself into a reputational black hole. 'If the only way forward the board can see is to lash out, including by criticising Sex Matters, which has at all times acted with propriety and in pursuit of its charitable objects, that suggests desperation.' When the statement was mentioned at the employment tribunal on Friday, Ms Peggie's junior counsel Charlotte Elves said it caused 'some concern'. Jane Russell KC, representing NHS Fife, said: 'Unfortunately because this hearing has taken place in public, Fife's witnesses have been exposed to a very unsafe environment and I'm afraid threats have been made to them as have threats been made to me.' Judge Alexander Kemp said: 'No participant whether witness, representative or participant should be intimidated and if that has happened its a matter for the criminal courts and Police Scotland. 'Obviously matters of defamation are not within our jurisdiction.' A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'We have received information and it is being assessed.'
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
From NHS to Send: the key areas Labour wants to improve before next election
Angela Rayner has called on Labour colleagues to 'step up and make that case' for the government's achievements, saying it was important to stress policies were not about short-term fixes but 'fundamental reforms'. Here are four areas where Labour is seeking to improve society – but faces a race against time before the next election to do so. This is in one sense an area where the government can claim quick-ish gains, with the boast that an additional 2m appointments have been created since the election, and promises to cut waiting times, a promise which hangs in the balance. But at the same time, more fundamental change is needed to cope with an ageing population more prone to chronic conditions. Hence the NHS 10-year plan, set out earlier this month and intended to move the health service to a different model, one based less on acute hospital care and more on community hubs. Then there is the parallel process to find a working model for older people's social care. As with health, this combines the very immediate and the hugely knotty and long term. In the foreground is the political wreckage of the government's attempt to shave £5bn off the annual welfare bill, primarily by tightening rules for personal independence payment, an idea dropped amid a massive Labour rebellion. The context to that, of course, is the significant increase in the numbers of people receiving benefits for long-term sickness and disability, an area where the experts are not even clear precisely what is causing it, let alone how to alleviate it. This is likely to be a challenge for several governments to come. A subject just as pressing and controversial as welfare, and also one where there are no easy solutions on offer. Ministers have pledged a thorough examination of the current system, which is both increasingly expensive and the cause of much complaint and anguish for parents and children seeking to navigate it. While ministers have guaranteed the continuation of some sort of statutory provision for Send pupils, this will not necessarily be via the current method of education, health and care plans, or EHCPs, despite the worries of campaigners. After the welfare debacle, expect much caution. As is a common political truism, the things run by councils – bin collections, libraries, social care – are often the ones that voters notice most immediately. And it's fair to say that in many cases, the impressions are not good. Labour has already embarked on a shake-up of local government, combining a series of smaller councils and creating more mayoralties. This may simplify some things, but a much deeper malaise is the lack of money for local government, not helped by the reliance on a council tax system based on valuations last done in 1993. This is probably too big an ask for now, but at some point a government will have to get to grips with it.
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Angela Rayner's bill ‘will make it easier for doctors to strike'
Labour's workers' rights overhaul will make it harder for hospitals to find cover for walkouts because unions will no longer need to tell managers in which departments the strikers work. NHS bosses have raised safety fears about the measures, which could put Wes Streeting, the health secretary, on a collision course with Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, who is leading the reforms. The Employment Rights Bill, which is making its way through the Lords, will make it easier for the British Medical Association (BMA) to call strikes, with some doctors saying jokingly: 'All hail Queen Angela'. Unions will no longer have to meet a legal threshold of a 50 per cent turnout in a ballot to hold a strike. The reforms will also increase the length of a strike ballot mandate from six months to 12. This is expected to only apply to new ballots once the legislation has passed but NHS bosses have said it raised the prospect of 'ongoing, lengthy periods of industrial action'. The BMA had only a 55 per cent turnout in its recent ballot of resident or junior doctors, and on current trends turnout would dip below 50 per cent if the union reballots doctors next year. However, Rayner's reforms mean the BMA would be able to strike anyway. Resident doctors have said the bill is a 'game changer' in their long fight to get 'full pay restoration' to 2008 levels — the equivalent of a 29 per cent pay rise. By law, individual employees do not need to tell employers if they intend to strike but unions must tell bosses how many workers in each category will walk out, as part of their notice of a strike. The Employment Rights Bill will remove that requirement and while unions will still need to list the category of workers, they will not need to provide the numbers of workers in each category. This week, Streeting said it was 'shockingly irresponsible' for unions to tell striking doctors not to inform their bosses. He said: 'What I cannot fathom is how any doctor in good conscience would make it harder for managers to make sure we have safe staffing levels, would make it harder for other staff who are going to be turning up to work that day, not least the staff who have not had a higher percentage pay rise, many of whom are paid less than resident doctors.' Richard Sloggett, of Future Health Research, said the Employment Rights Bill was 'very problematic for Streeting' and he was being 'boxed in by Angela Rayner'. Rory Deighton, acute network director at the NHS Confederation, said: 'Not knowing whether individual members of staff will go out on strike can create much uncertainty for NHS leaders who will be working to minimise the impact on the provision of care and services to patients, ensuring that services can continue to be delivered safely — including considerations on the welfare of all of their staff working normally and not taking strike action.' • Key Labour workers' rights reforms delayed after business backlash He said employers and unions needed to 'work constructively and professionally at all times' and added: 'Nobody in the NHS, least of all patients, want to see ongoing, lengthy periods of industrial action, however, these reforms do mean this is a risk we could face.' Chris Coombes, senior associate at the employment law firm Littler, said: 'Certainly, for employers who need to arrange cover during periods of industrial action, it will be more difficult to do so with less information about what sort of employees will be taking part in the strike.' The BMA's six-month mandate to call strike action will run out in January, when the union will have to reballot its members. Its leaders have made it clear they are prepared to keep balloting in the long haul and have said they will not back down until they are awarded a 29 per cent rise. • Doctors could have student loans written off to avert strikes Sloggett, an adviser to Matt Hancock when he was health secretary, said: 'This current strike mandate will run until January. If both sides are still dug in, then the BMA will just reballot. When Rayner's reforms kick in next year, there will be nothing to stop the BMA going on strike again — even if they don't get above 50 per cent turnout. 'If you are in Wes Streeting's shoes you need as many tools and levers as possible against the BMA. Angela Rayner is taking away one of his levers — that if turnout goes below 50 per cent they can't strike again. 'Streeting is being boxed in by Angela Rayner. Rayner's reforms will rebalance power towards the unions. We could have wave after wave of industrial action. The government has got itself into a really messy situation. 'It raises the prospect of indefinite NHS strikes rumbling on and on for years. Unions will no longer have to go through the process of reballoting every six months.' • Five deaths linked to disruption from last junior doctors' strikes He said the reforms would also give more power to other members of NHS staff threatening to strike, including nurses and hospital consultants. 'For Streeting the Employment Rights Bill is a real bind, as he can't be seen to be anti-union if he wants to secure a future labour leadership crown. But strikes will severely hamper any progress on NHS waiting lists.' A government spokesman said: 'The old strike laws clearly didn't work, with the UK losing more days to industrial action in 2022 and 2023 than in any year since the 1980s. 'Strikes have a serious cost for patients, which is why we are appealing to the BMA to call them off and work to improve working conditions and continue rebuilding the NHS. Under our plans unions will still need to provide categories of worker, workplaces affected and number of workers involved. 'We have also been clear that the intention to change the ballot turnout threshold will be aligned closely with the introduction of e-balloting to ensure that industrial action mandates have broad support.'
