Immigration advisor loses license, ordered to repay victims $58,500
Photo:
RNZ / Yiting Lin
An immigration advisor has lost their license after charging Chinese migrant workers tens of thousands of dollars in visa fees for jobs that didn't exist.
Tzu Tong (Jane) Ma has had her license cancelled by the Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal, over breaches relating to arranging work visa applications for two migrants at a building company ZR Homes.
The company ZR Homes was owned by Ma's husband, which she hadn't disclosed as a conflict of interest, and there were no jobs.
She has been ordered to repay the victims $58,500 in compensation and has also been fined $10,000.
There have been widespread reports of fraudulent employers and agents
selling jobs under the Accredited Employer Work Visa scheme since early 2023
.
The latest decision by the Tribunal comes more than a year after the Tribunal upheld 51 breaches by Ma, involving advice given to five other clients.
The breaches included six counts of dishonesty involving giving false information and documents to Immigration New Zealand, as well as other breaches of the licensed immigration advisers Code of Conduct.
Ma was ordered to compensate $19,061 to one victim, and fined $17,000 across three different complainants.
Ma's license was suspended in April 2024, shortly after the first Tribunal decision against her, but was not revoked then.
In this latest case, the two migrants arrived in New Zealand only to find there was no available work with ZR Homes.
They filed complaints to the Immigration Advisers Authority against Ma, and stated that they had no work or any income for several weeks after arriving in New Zealand, which caused them significant mental distress.
Immigration Advisers Authority registrar Duncan Connor said the numerous breaches and deliberate attempt to conceal a conflict of interest was unacceptable.
"The seriousness of the complaints and pattern of behaviour prompted the Authority to seek suspension of Ms Ma's licence which was granted by the Tribunal pending the outcome of the final Tribunal decision which we were pleased the tribunal agreed with," Connor said.
Tribunal chairperson DJ Plunkett said in his decision that the misconduct is aggravated by the lack of any acknowledgement of serious wrongdoing by Ma.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 minutes ago
- Scoop
ComCom Saves Businesses $90 Million A Year In Payment Costs
The Commerce Commission has today issued its final decision to reduce interchange fees paid by Kiwi businesses to accept Visa and Mastercard payments. It costs New Zealand businesses around $1 billion a year to accept Visa and Mastercard payments, which is often passed onto their customers through surcharges and higher product costs. The Commission has determined this cost is too high and has acted to reduce this cost for businesses by around $90 million a year. 'This is an important step in our continued work to cut costs for businesses and consumers. Our latest decision builds on the initial fee caps set in 2022, which led to $140 million in annual savings to New Zealand businesses,' Commerce Commission Chair Dr John Small says. 'This decision cuts the cost for businesses accepting payments made through credit cards and foreign-issued cards, which are often the most expensive for businesses to accept. 'We expect our latest decision to see the average small business save around $500 each year in lower fees. Individual businesses could save more or less, depending on the mix of transactions they accept. 'In making this decision we were careful to balance lower costs for merchants today with keeping incentives for new fintechs to innovate and challenge the big established incumbents. That meant leaving enough money in the system to keep it competitive and safe from fraud and scams over the long term,' Dr Small says. Consumers can expect these cost savings to flow through to fewer and lower surcharges, but regulation may still be needed to curb excessive surcharging. 'We'll be exploring what regulation may be needed to address excessive surcharging, which we consider to be anything more than the cost businesses face to accept Visa and Mastercard payments,' Dr Small says. The Commission expects payments providers to support businesses to understand their costs to accept these payment types, so where businesses choose to surcharge it accurately reflects their cost. 'We have decided not to regulate the fees for commercial credit card or prepaid debit card payments at this time based on feedback we received during consultation. We're looking to understand more before deciding if these payment types should be regulated,' Dr Small says. Background The Commission prioritised addressing the costs businesses face to accept different payment types to ensure regulation of surcharging didn't have unintended consequences of moving costs for consumers from one area to another. Without action to lower the fees, limitations on surcharges could see businesses forced to absorb these fees and recoup the money elsewhere, like in higher product costs. Alternatively, it could lead to some businesses not offering certain payment methods, like contactless or credit, as they are too expensive. When someone uses a Mastercard or Visa credit card or makes a contactless payment, such as Paywave, the business receiving the payment is charged a 'merchant service fee'. It will most likely seek to recover this fee in the form of surcharges or higher product prices. This latest decision relates to interchange fees, which make up about 60% of merchant service fees. Mastercard and Visa card issuers (usually banks) receive an interchange fee every time a card holder uses their card at a business to make a payment. The remaining portion of the merchant service fees include fees that are paid to Mastercard and Visa, and to providers of payment services to businesses.
RNZ News
6 minutes ago
- RNZ News
UK fraudster Jack Hennessy stays jailed in NZ after parole denied; ‘truly sorry' for victims
By Tracy Neal, Open Justice reporter of A composite image of Jack Hennessy and his attempted escape from a taxi in central Auckland. Photo: NZME composite A convicted British criminal who duped more than 20 Kiwis into giving him $337,700 after posing as a police courier says he is now disgusted and embarrassed by his actions. Jack Dylan Hennessy, who is in prison for scamming 21 mostly elderly victims in 2024, told a panel of Parole Board members how truly sorry he was on Wednesday. "I'm disgusted by my actions. I'm disgusted, embarrassed and feel stupid," he said. In a letter he read at the hearing, he said he wanted to become the best man he could, rather than be remembered for what he had done if he were to die tomorrow. But the panel was not convinced of his sincerity, because he refused to co-operate with police and tell them who was behind the scam ring he was part of. NZME reported last year Hennessy claimed he was blackmailed into his actions after losing a luxury $200,000 Swiss watch loaned to him by dangerous British criminals. Hennessy told the panel he had wanted to wear the watch to look "cool" in front of others. The panel declined his release, saying the board needed to be satisfied he had completed rehabilitation programmes that ensured communities he was released back into, in New Zealand and in Britain, were safe from any further offending. The 26-year-old, who was facing deportation upon his release, was jailed in the Auckland District Court last November for three years and three months for the offending, described by Judge Kevin Glubb as "reprehensible", premeditated and "carried out with almost military precision". After landing in Auckland on 9 June, 2024, Hennessy rented an apartment on Hobson St, then proceeded to steal $337,700 over the next 14 days from 21 people aged from 59 to 92. His victims thought they were assisting an elaborate law enforcement investigation. They were called by scammers posing as police officers. They were then convinced to withdraw large sums of money from their bank accounts in the belief they were assisting undercover detectives in a sting operation targeting counterfeit banknotes. Hennessy used taxis to visit the victims' homes to collect the cash, posing as a plain-clothed police courier. He used prearranged code words including "aroha", "totara", "treetop" and "Timbuktu" to convince his victims he was a genuine state operative. They believed that after handing the money to Hennessy, it would be whisked to investigators, checked for fake notes, then redeposited into their accounts. In reality, the money was either pocketed by Hennessy or sent to his bosses overseas. Hennessy told Parole Board panel convenor Neville Trendle that he was told to contact a person in Auckland, who took a cut from the money he handed over, and who then transferred the rest as cryptocurrency. Several victims spoke of their intense shame after realising they'd been duped, the devastating financial effects on their retirement plans, and feelings of fear and violation that the scammers knew their addresses and had personally visited their homes. Hennessy was caught on 24 June on his way to pick up $20,000 from an 83-year-old victim who had already handed over $16,000. After being spotted in a taxi in central Auckland, he led police on a brief foot chase before being arrested. He later admitted 27 charges, including obtaining by deception and one of escaping custody. The hearing panel said that banks had so far covered a lot of the losses incurred, but $28,000 remained outstanding, which Hennessy said he intended to repay. How he might do that was challenged by panel member Sharon Gemmell, who stressed that the people targeted by Hennessy belonged to the most vulnerable sector of the community. Hennessy said he planned to get a job once back in Britain and arrange to have deductions made, possibly through the Ministry of Justice, but he was unsure who to approach and how to go about it. However, Gemmell was not convinced he had tried hard enough to find a way by which he might make good on his promise. She said he was a "clever young person" who had come to the country and straight away began scamming people, yet he was not able to figure out how to pay the money back. "I'm very reluctant to see you sail off to the UK and not make any arrangement to pay that back." Hennessy has previously served time in a British prison for his role in a smash-and-grab gang targeting mobile phone stores. He claimed he only agreed to board the flight to New Zealand and pick up packages stuffed with cash after a British crime syndicate threatened to harm his mother and brother. Hennessy told panel member Olivia Brittain, who asked why he had not co-operated with the police in helping to identify others involved, that giving up names would put the rest of his life in jeopardy. "They're not people to be messed with," he said. Brittain said that he was denying his elderly victims. Hennessy said that at the time he was only thinking of himself, but the consequences of what he had done crept up "day by day". Trendle said it remained a mystery how Hennessy had become involved. Trendle said that hearing the Briton talk about the restorative justice process he had taken part in, and how sorry he was, did not sit well with the convenor when the prisoner refused to co-operate with the police. "It means that remorse and indications of repayment are meaningless," Trendle said. Hennessy would now have to complete rehabilitation programmes and devise a safety plan before being considered again for parole in January. This story first appeared in the New Zealand Herald .
RNZ News
6 minutes ago
- RNZ News
As house prices drop, will the retirement nest egg still be such a safe bet?
By Claire Dale* of Photo: RNZ Changes to KiwiSaver , global economic uncertainty and predictions house prices could drop by as much as 20 percent by 2030 all mean retirement is looking very different to how it once did. A retirement strategy based on the equity held in a house is no longer as reliable as it has been in the past. Home ownership in Aotearoa New Zealand fell from 75 percent in 1991 to 60 percent in 2023 and is projected to fall to 48 percent in 2048. The average age of a first-home buyer has also risen to 36, meaning an increasing number of New Zealanders (13 percent) are paying off their mortgages after they reach retirement age. The number of retirees renting is also on the rise. By 2048, 40 percent of them will rent, placing pressure on New Zealand's housing stock. KiwiSaver is unlikely to replace the traditional housing nest egg. New Zealanders have, on average, $37,079 in their KiwiSaver accounts , with thousands of people reaching close to retirement age with less than $10,000 saved. The prospect of retirement looks bleakest for those currently aged between 35 and 49 years old. A recent report from credit agency Centrix found this group was struggling the most financially. A big part of the problem is that house prices skyrocketed just as they became first-time home buyers. The average asking price for residential property rose by 60.3 percent over the past decade, from $556,931 at the beginning of 2015 to $892,579 at the end of 2024. While incomes have also increased, they have not matched housing prices. In 2000, houses cost about five times the median household income. But by 2025, the median price had risen to 7.5 times the median household income. Those who bought their first home around the peak in 2021 are likely to be hit hardest by the forecast drop in house values. According to data insight firm Cotality (formerly Corelogic), nominal prices are expected to pass their 2021 peak by mid-2029. But when adjusted for inflation, prices in mid-2030 would be a fifth below the peak. Older New Zealanders are also facing significant housing pressures. According to a 2022 report from Treasury , over half of superannuitants still paying off mortgages spent more than 80 percent of their superannuation income on housing costs. Those who are mortgage-free are spending less than 20 percent of their super on housing. Between 2019 and 2024, the percentage of overdue mortgages for the 50+ age groups ranged between 2 percent and 2.5 percent, compared to a range of 1 percent to 1.5 percent for all mortgages. People between the age of 55 and 64 are likely to have purchased their homes in the late 1990s and early 2000s, so are less likely to be hurt by the 2021 peak and subsequent trough. Despite this apparent advantage, only 38 percent of people between 55 and 64 are mortgage free . The possibility of using accumulated KiwiSaver funds to clear a mortgage is also diminishing. As a result of the 2025 Budget changes to KiwiSaver, employee and employer contributions will rise from April 2026 to 3.5 percent and from April 2028 to 4 percent, offsetting the reduced annual government contribution. The end of employer contributions matters particularly to the 24 percent of those aged over 65 years who are still in the workforce. A rule change in 2021 means employers are not required to make contributions or to deduct employee contributions, unless the employee continues to make KiwiSaver contributions. But current global crises are affecting KiwiSaver returns. Uncertain and volatile markets, especially for actively managed funds, mean fund managers reallocate money to try to minimise losses. Not all their bets pay off. By 2030, Stats NZ projects that approximately 265,000 people aged 65 and over will be in the workforce. The Office for Seniors notes that although older workers have challenges finding and staying in paid work, a third of the workforce is aged over 50 and 50 percent of people aged 60 to 69 are employed. Importantly, as the Retirement Commission research found, a third of people over 65 were not working by choice. An increasing number , who neither own their home nor have significant retirement savings, have to continue working past 65 because they need the money to eat and pay the bills. As New Zealand's population ages, and more seniors have to work to pay for the essentials, it's clear retirement is going to look different. Betting on the value of a house to fund life after 65 is less certain than it used to be. More than ever, New Zealanders need to consider how they will live well in their later years. * Claire Dale is a research fellow at the Pensions and Intergenerational Equity (PIE) research hub, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau * This story was first published on The Conversation .
