Welcome end in sight to two-child cap that's affected almost a thousand West Lothian families
It was announced that it will be removed from March 2 next year
Close to 1000 families in West Lothian are set to benefit from the scrapping of the two-child cap.
Linlithgow MSP Fiona Hyslop welcomed the Scottish Government's announcement that the cap will be removed from March 2 next year.
The two-child cap was introduced by the Tories as part of their programme of austerity and has subsequently become Labour policy, despite Keir Starmer's previous promises to scrap it.
Around 950 families in West Lothian have been affected by the two-cap policy.
By ending it the Scottish Government is ensuring 20,000 fewer children in Scotland will live in relative poverty next year.
Fiona Hyslop said: 'I welcome the news that the Scottish Government is ending the two-child cap in Scotland.
'The UK Government's decision to continue the two-child cap has harmed 950 households in West Lothian but from next year this will end due to action taken by the Scottish Government.
'The Scottish Government has stepped in to mitigate the harm caused by the UK Government and this makes clear John Swinney's commitment to tackling child poverty in Scotland.
'This policy will provide much-needed support to families across West Lothian when the two-child cap ends next March.'
The MSP also welcomed a visit by Scotland's Health Secretary to West Lothian on Tuesday on Tuesday, June 17 during the launch of two health related framewoks.
She said: 'It was great to see Neil Gray MSP chose to visit Blackburn Partnership Centre to launch Scotland's Population Health Framework and the Health and Social Care Service Renewal Framework.
'These are major national policy frameworks are focused on prevention and joined-up community care to help people lead healthier lives and there is so much happening in Blackburn which already is delivering on this.
'The launch of both of these frameworks shows clear progress towards delivering the Scottish Government's vision for a healthier, fairer and more resilient Scotland.
'I was pleased to see the Cabinet Secretary visit Blackburn Partnership Centre, in my Constituency, as part of this launch.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
BBC issues statement on Kneecap performance after Bob Vylan decision
The BBC has issued a statement following the controversy caused by both Kneecap and Bob Vylan's performance at Glastonbury. Both acts have faced outrage from some viewers as well as politicians for their messages on stage. During Kneecap's performance on the West Holts Stage, they started chants of 'Free Palestine' and 'f*** Keir Starmer'. Duo Bob Vylan took to the stage just before the Irish rap group, and have come under fire for chanting 'Death to the IDF'. Bob Vylan's set was aired live on the BBC at the time, while the corporation decided not to air Kneecap's set as it happened. They have since decided to upload Kneecap's performance to iPlayer. In response a BBC spokesperson said: "We have made an on-demand version of Kneecap's performance available on iPlayer, as part of our online collection of more than 90 other sets. "We have edited it to ensure the content falls within the limits of artistic expression in line with our editorial guidelines and reflects the performance from Glastonbury's West Holts stage. As with all content which includes strong language, this is signposted with appropriate warnings. "As we have said before, acts are booked by the festival, and the BBC doesn't ban artists. We didn't stream Kneecap live." They continued: "Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive. "During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language. We have no plans to make the performance available on demand." Kneecap's set on the BBC still includes their chants while Bob Vylan's set is nowhere to be found. Glastonbury also issued a statement following criticism over the acts. Festival bosses said: "Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence." It comes after they were blasted by Health Secretary Wes Streeting and the Israeli embassy, with the Labour MP warning that both the BBC and Glastonbury had "questions to answer". He went on to brand it a "pretty shameless publicity stunt". 'I thought it's appalling, to be honest, and I think the BBC and Glastonbury have got questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens,' he told Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips. 'But I also think it's a pretty shameless publicity stunt, which I don't really want to give too much indulgence to for that reason.' Asked if the BBC should have cut the live feed, he said the broadcaster has questions to answer, but that he did not know what the editorial and operational 'challenges' are of taking such action. Meanwhile, the Israeli embassy said that it was "deeply disturbed" by the scenes on Saturday. Police are also investigating the incident after clips emerged online.
Times
44 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer's plan to win back ‘authoritarian-leaning' voters
Sir Keir Starmer wants to win back 'authoritarian-leaning' voters by ramping up Labour's messaging on tackling migration and crime. Downing Street strategists have drawn up plans to restore trust in politics among two groups of people identified as 'grafting realists' and 'striving moderates'. The former are largely disengaged with political news, but likely to live in social housing and receive benefits, meaning they have often have direct contact with the government. According to official documents seen by The Times, these voters have lower than average levels of trust in politicians. Internal polling commissioned by Downing Street said these 'grafting realists', who make up about 14 per cent of the population, exhibit 'authoritarian-leaning views, particularly around crime and immigration'. Guidance drawn up by the Cabinet Office's New Media Unit suggests that this group, mostly female and with an average age of 45, are more likely to get their news online or from social media, although a notable portion 'avoid the news due to anxiety'. It says: 'They are more disengaged with the news, politics and current affairs than average, see politicians and the media as more of a force for bad than for good, and feel the truth may be being hidden from them.' The strategy team, launched by No 10 last year, recommends advertising in supermarkets, on buses and through social media influencers to target this group. Topics such as 'controlling immigration' and 'tackling crime' should be prioritised, it adds. • Keir Starmer on the benefits U-turn and his toughest week yet The second group being targeted by Starmer are known in No 10 as 'striving moderates'. With an average age of 44 and likely to have children, they are 'slightly more' trusting of the government but despondent about their own prospects, and also make up 14 per cent of the population. According to the guidance: 'This segment are more pessimistic than optimistic about their own future and are the most likely of all segments to feel powerless to change their own lives. Despite this, they feel more positively towards politicians and pay higher levels of attention to the news, politics and current affairs than average. Overall, they hold moderate political views.' Migration is identified as an important issue for 'authoritarian-leaning' voters TIMES PHOTOGRAPHER JACK HILL Prioritising evidence of action on plans to build 1.5 million homes is advised. Martin Lewis's Money Saving Expert website and the advice forum Mumsnet are given as examples of 'how to reach' the second group of voters, as well as traditional newspapers, TV and radio news. • No 10 seeks influencers to spread Starmer's word on social media The strategy is a government one being implemented by civil servants, rather than overtly political. However, Labour insiders said it was crucial to their plans for the next election as they aim to restore trust in the government to deliver on its promises and see off the threat of Nigel Farage's Reform party, who they see as 'populist'. Last week Starmer admitted that his first year in office has been blighted by a struggle to sell his plans to voters. 'We haven't always told our story as well as we should,' he told Sky News during a trip to the G7 summit in Canada.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
As a visibly physically disabled MP, my view on the welfare bill is clear: we need a reset and fast
In March 2020, when the Conservative government looked like an outlier in appearing to pursue a Covid strategy centring on herd immunity, for the first time in my life I felt raw, hot fear. Thinking of my toddler and what might happen if I caught coronavirus and was treated under the then Nice guidelines 'frailty' score was too much. I sobbed deeply. After 10 years of austerity, I knew then that disabled people would pay an enormous price for the pandemic thanks to the government's handling of it. Disabled people did: almost 60% of Covid-related deaths involved disabled people in that first wave. I vowed then that I would do all I could to use my skills and experiences of 20 years working in disability law and policy to deliver a country that treats disabled people with dignity and respect. Five years later, I am one of the only visibly physically disabled members of parliament. I was proud to be elected last year as the first person to have grown up in my constituency to go on to represent it in parliament for more than a century. I am proud, too, that Labour's manifesto committed to championing the rights of disabled people, and to the principle of working with disabled people to ensure our views and voices are at the heart of all we do. Consequently, since April, I have been engaging relentlessly with government, at the very highest level, to change its proposals as set out in the universal credit and personal independence payment bill. I made it clear from the start I could not support the proposals on personal independence payments (Pip). Pip is an in-work benefit, designed to ensure disabled people can live independently. There are 4 million disabled people in poverty in the UK. As a matter of conscience, I could not support measures that would push 250,000 disabled people, including 50,000 children, into poverty. Nor could I accept proposals that used a points system, under current descriptors, that would exclude eligibility for those who cannot put on their underwear, prosthetic limbs or shoes without support. The concessions now announced are significant, including that all recipients of Pip who currently receive it will continue to do so. I know this will be an enormous relief for many of my nearly 6,000 constituents in receipt of Pip and for disabled people across the country. However, I will continue working, as I have done from the beginning, to look at these concessions carefully against the evidence on the impact upon disabled people, including my constituents, and disabled people's organisations. Fundamentally, I will be looking for further reassurances that the detail will fulfil Labour's manifesto commitments to disabled people. The social model of disability must be central to this – removing barriers to our inclusion in society. Proposals must take a mission-led approach across all five missions to break down barriers to opportunity for disabled people. I hope to see three things from government, embedded in the text of the amendments, if the bill reaches the report stage. First, the review being led by Stephen Timms, the minister for social security and disability, must not be performative. The government must not make the same mistake twice. I strongly recommend bringing in a disabled expert on equality and employment law, such as Prof Anna Lawson at the University of Leeds, to support this work. Second, the government must consult disabled people over the summer to understand the impact of the proposed changes from November 2026 on future claimants. These must mitigate risks of discrimination for those current recipients with similar disabilities and against pushing new disabled claimants into poverty after November 2026. In doing so, it must produce an impact assessment that also reflects the impact of unmet need for future recipients on health and social care services, and clarifies the application of new criteria on those receiving Pip if they get reassessed. Third, growth must mean inclusive growth. In implementing the £1bn employment, health and skills support programme, there needs to be a clear target for closing the disability employment gap. Importantly, there needs to be a commitment to a sector-by-sector strategy on closing this gap and a skills training strategy for the employment support workers enabling disabled people into work. These approaches outperform cuts or sanctions in getting disabled people into sustainable employment. This matters. The Conservatives left us with a pitiful 29% employment gap and 17% pay gap for disabled people. The Labour government has an opportunity to bring in a new era of policymaking for disabled people that takes a laser focus in closing this gap. The disability sector believes that this can be reduced by 14%; generating £17.2bn for the exchequer. We must seize this moment to do things differently and move beyond the damaging rhetoric and disagreements of recent weeks. In line with the prime minister's statement that reform should be implemented with Labour values of fairness, a reset requires a shift of emphasis to enabling disabled people to fulfil their potential. I will continue to engage with government and disabled people's organisations, to fight for a country that treats disabled people with dignity and respect. Marie Tidball is Labour MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge, chair of the all-party parliamentary group on autism and co-chair of the disability parliamentary Labour party Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
